Pros using relatively low cadence?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sunny South Florida
Posts: 19
Bikes: 2009 CAAD9-5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pros using relatively low cadence?
I was watching the live stream of Geraint Thomas who's doing a 3-consecutive-day 12 hours/day Zwift fundraiser for the NHS (rode with him yesterday for a couple of hours, along with thousands of others) and I noticed that his RPM was pretty much exactly 66 RPM most of the time. I've been out of road cycling for about 6 years and now getting back into it, back "in those days" the general thought was that high cadence (~90 RPM) is desirable for the reasonably fit, and from what I've gathered even recently the "new thing" is that maybe high cadence is not great for amateurs (because it gets HR up more than it needs to) but still a thing for pros (where the legs moving faster is not a concern to HR).
Is this just a personal thing? I actually tend to prefer ~90 RPM because I also run and want to keep stress off the knees. I was just surprised to see G run at 66 RPM. I'm wondering if it's because of the length of time, 12 hours is way more than even a TdF day. Would like to hear your thoughts.You can watch today's first 8 hours here(link is on Fb so it won't post -- search for him on Fb and it'll be one of the top posts for today, a "was live" entry).
Is this just a personal thing? I actually tend to prefer ~90 RPM because I also run and want to keep stress off the knees. I was just surprised to see G run at 66 RPM. I'm wondering if it's because of the length of time, 12 hours is way more than even a TdF day. Would like to hear your thoughts.
Last edited by mastre; 04-16-20 at 10:03 AM.
Likes For colnago62:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,955
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3957 Post(s)
Liked 7,310 Times
in
2,950 Posts
Likes For hrdknox1:
#5
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,641
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4739 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,004 Posts
exactly.. for us mere mortals, try going on a trainer and eg. output 70 watts with a 95 cadence. for whatever reason, it's really uncomfortable. But when at 200 watts, the 95 cadence is much better feeling than a lower cadence (sub 85).
Likes For Sy Reene:
#6
Globo Gym lifetime member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 5,204
Bikes: Fast ones
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times
in
306 Posts
200W is recovery wattage. Props to that guy, because 12 hours of recovery wattage on the trainer would absolutely destroy my gooch. Something about riding slow indoors is just awful. Maybe the slower cadence helps?
__________________
Likes For Cypress:
#8
Senior Member
I think a low cadence is more energy efficient with moderate loads, Certainly for light loads. Think of a cars engine, To get the best mileage we try to keep the engine in the low rpm range. But like the car engine, We don't generate our best power at low rpm's. Best long term power on a bike for athletic riders might be in the 80 - 90 rpm range. While best touring efficiency if time is not a factor might come at much lower rpms. Many variables at play here.
As a 63 year old recreation cyclist (2 - 4 hrs/ week) I seem to get best power short term at about 80 rpm. But I typically cruise at 60 - 70.
As a 63 year old recreation cyclist (2 - 4 hrs/ week) I seem to get best power short term at about 80 rpm. But I typically cruise at 60 - 70.
Likes For xroadcharlie:
Likes For bbbean:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Cadence is personal. It doesn't matter what anybody else's is, no matter their job title.
#11
Senior Member
The point of using lower gears or higher cadences is to reduce the amount of force you need to push with. If you're Geraint Thomas, 200W is soft-pedaling, so you're not needing to drive the cadence up very high to keep the required pedaling force at a comfortable level.
#12
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,997
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4957 Post(s)
Liked 8,099 Times
in
3,833 Posts
Using a 12-hour indoor trainer session to judge anything about a pro cyclist's optimum pedaling cadence is misguided.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sunny South Florida
Posts: 19
Bikes: 2009 CAAD9-5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the replies guys. My hunch was that, unless he's known as a particularly low cadence guy, it's probably because of the 12 hour shift (the car engine analogy was great btw). The parts I was looking at he was actually pedaling at 125-150W, and I skimmed quite a bit thru the ~8 hr clip and both cadence and power seemed steady -- cadence in particular was almost "stuck" at 66 RPM, to the point that I was appreciating his ability to keep it so steady -- even standing on the pedals he would only vary it by 2-3 RPM. The clip was from today, day 2, and before today's ride he said he was pretty tired from yesterday. So I think he's trying to manage it, 12 hours/day for 3 days in a row is still no joke even for the likes of G.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
And not that I'm massively strong, but this is one of the more challenging things about long rides with friends that are new and/or not very strong - my ass hurts considerably more when I'm just lightly spinning. I just might try a lower cadence next time.
Likes For WhyFi:
#15
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
I used to be all about spinning at higher power, but this year it's been flipping and I get better power (and sustained power) at lower cadence. "Lower" here meaning as low as low 70s. Of course, I'm not thumping out sprinter power, but much above 200w for efforts.
#16
Senior Member
Modern road racers all ride at a highish cadence, 90-110 in the peloton when the pelo ton is going at a high speed. Back in the day, mashing was the rule. Look at Merckx in the 70's, even Ullrich in the 90's, they mashed,. Their average cadence was probably around 80. But a spinner is a winner.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#17
Senior Member
Merckx wasn't a masher. By necessity everyone trained for low-cadence efforts because racers were using absurdly narrow drivetrains even on mountain stages, but they didn't necessarily use low cadences all the time.
Eddy Merckx chose a 52-14 gear for his hour record. His average cadence was over 100rpm for that hour.
Eddy Merckx chose a 52-14 gear for his hour record. His average cadence was over 100rpm for that hour.
Likes For HTupolev:
#18
Senior Member
If this guy is doing 66rpm at 200W it's because 200W is an easy ride for him. I'd probably be in the 80s for 200W, and would quickly be in the 90s if I were cruising at much higher than that output.
Spinning vs. mashing only applies for me when there is "enough" resistance, and I'm sure that's probably the same for everyone who spins. Without sufficient resistance, I find it very difficult to even attempt to spin, and without sufficient resistance there'd be no point to spinning anyway. What's "enough" resistance is probably different for everyone, but for me an obvious sign that it isn't enough is if I'm trying to spin and am bouncing around in the saddle.
My understanding of the premise of spinning vs. mashing is that the closer one gets to the max force output one's muscles are capable of, the quicker one burns out those muscles. Spinning reduces the force required for each stroke, thus bringing one further from the max muscle exertion and extending one's endurance. On an easy ride one is by definition already far enough away from one's max capable exertion that trying to reduce it further through spinning is pointless.
Spinning vs. mashing only applies for me when there is "enough" resistance, and I'm sure that's probably the same for everyone who spins. Without sufficient resistance, I find it very difficult to even attempt to spin, and without sufficient resistance there'd be no point to spinning anyway. What's "enough" resistance is probably different for everyone, but for me an obvious sign that it isn't enough is if I'm trying to spin and am bouncing around in the saddle.
My understanding of the premise of spinning vs. mashing is that the closer one gets to the max force output one's muscles are capable of, the quicker one burns out those muscles. Spinning reduces the force required for each stroke, thus bringing one further from the max muscle exertion and extending one's endurance. On an easy ride one is by definition already far enough away from one's max capable exertion that trying to reduce it further through spinning is pointless.
#19
Senior Member
Merckx wasn't a masher. By necessity everyone trained for low-cadence efforts because racers were using absurdly narrow drivetrains even on mountain stages, but they didn't necessarily use low cadences all the time.
Eddy Merckx chose a 52-14 gear for his hour record. His average cadence was over 100rpm for that hour.
Eddy Merckx chose a 52-14 gear for his hour record. His average cadence was over 100rpm for that hour.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#20
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,641
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4739 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,004 Posts
You are right, for the hour record everyone spins. I'm talking about road racing and in his era, cadence was much lower. Take a look at minute 11. Their cadence is in the 70s-80s. And excuse the cheesy film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hnLjiTzejo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hnLjiTzejo
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
You are right, for the hour record everyone spins. I'm talking about road racing and in his era, cadence was much lower. Take a look at minute 11. Their cadence is in the 70s-80s. And excuse the cheesy film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hnLjiTzejo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hnLjiTzejo
The 90s were an <ahem> exceptional era, and riders found that they could climb in bigger gears than they ever had before. But make no mistake, they still pedalled at 90rpm on flat stages.
Ullrich was an exception even in his day. He would power up any climb, in the highest gear he could turn over, but then he was on the same team as Bjarne Riis, who would climb on the big ring pretty much all the time.
Even now, Nairo Quintana climbs at close to 60 rpm, while Froome climbs at 90ish. A lot of it is still down to personal preference.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,516
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Here you go. You can see how it was done back in the day. And for those who think barcons were/are only for touring, see how many you can spot.
60 Cycles by Jean-Claude Labrecque - NFB
60 Cycles by Jean-Claude Labrecque - NFB
Last edited by seypat; 04-17-20 at 05:10 PM.
Likes For seypat:
#23
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,002
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6198 Post(s)
Liked 4,814 Times
in
3,321 Posts
Probably just a comfortable pace for him all things considered which speed alone is none of them. Pro's and those that ride ungodly amounts of miles a year have blood vessels in their legs that will supply a good amount of oxygen to their leg muscles and carry away the crap that results from converting stores to energy. So tooling around at a low cadence might have been all he needed.
Recently, Thomas De Gendt was dropped from a zwift event when he pulled over 550 watts in way the algorithms thought was unnatural.
Recently, Thomas De Gendt was dropped from a zwift event when he pulled over 550 watts in way the algorithms thought was unnatural.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/de-...oing-too-fast/
#25
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Here you go you can see how it was done back in the day. And for those who think barcons were/are only for touring, see how many you can spot.
60 Cycles by Jean-Claude Labrecque - NFB
60 Cycles by Jean-Claude Labrecque - NFB
Cadence, schmadence. That's real racing. (Irony font.)
Last edited by canklecat; 04-17-20 at 04:38 PM.