Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Aero vs Lightweight Again

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Aero vs Lightweight Again

Old 03-04-19, 09:13 AM
  #1  
Nassa
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Aero vs Lightweight Again

Hello,

First time back in a couple of years. I am getting back to cycling after a couple of years off the bike. I am struggling with the various trends and data out there with aero vs lightweight. I have two bikes that I am looking at and was wondering if I could have some feedback on them by some fellow riders.

2019 TCR Advanced
2018 Cervelo S3 Disc Ultegra

The Giant seems to win in terms of price and total package, but here are a list of what I would like feedback on:

1- Comfort => Is the aero that much more uncomfortable?
2- Speed => Does the aero give me that much more advantage over lightweight with deep wheels 42mm?
3- Quality of wheels => aluminum vs carbon
4- Overall ride

My riding:
1- Flat to undulating roads
2- Punchy short climbs
3- Ride distance 30-50km week-end 75-125km week-ends

Thanks for any advice and feedback
Nassa
Nassa is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 11:01 AM
  #2  
maartendc
Senior Member
 
maartendc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 901

Bikes: BMC SLC01, Trek Checkpoint ALR5

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 542 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Nassa
The Giant seems to win in terms of price and total package, but here are a list of what I would like feedback on:
1- Comfort => Is the aero that much more uncomfortable?:
The Cervelo is probably a good deal stiffer in the seatpost area, due to the seatpost being a lot wider. I think you will notice the difference over longer distances if you ride rough / bumpy roads. If roads are smooth, not a big difference probably.

2- Speed => Does the aero give me that much more advantage over lightweight with deep wheels 42mm?:
Probably not. Fit on the bike makes the biggest difference, then wheels, then helmet / frame. But if you do ride a lot of flat terrain at speeds OVER 35 kph, the difference could add up. If it is really rolling terrain and lots of short climbs, or if you ride slower on average, I'd rather have a lighter bike personally.

3- Quality of wheels => aluminum vs carbon:
Those Mavic wheels on the Cervelo are very heavy, at 1850g. I'd wager the Giant's wheels are only 1580g and much more "valuable" (more expensive if you'd buy separately). Overall, the Giant out of the box should be about 500g lighter, which is not insignificant, but unless you do a lot of sustained climbing won't be that noticeable.

I did some research, the Giant TCR with Ultegra mechanical should be around 7.6 kg, which is just OK for a "climbing bike". Some lightweight climbing wheels (1350g), lighter saddle, handlebars and tires can probably get this bike closer to 7kg.
The Cervelo S3 with Ultegra mechanical should be about 8.1kg, which is also just OK for an aero bike. Not bad, but not extraordinary. Getting lighter wheels can get this bike to 7.7 kg or so, but it will be a costly upgrade if you want lightweight, deep section wheels.
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/review...ervelo-s3-disc (lists weight with Red Etap, I deduced from there, Ultegra should be about 350g heavier)
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/group-...t-bikes-346737 (lists weight with Ultegra Di2, Ultegra mechanical should be about 100g lighter)

4- Overall ride:
Depends on the fit / what you prefer. I personally would prefer a lighter, nimble bike for rolling terrain and short steep climbs, but everyone has their preferences. All-in-all, for the type of riding you do, there is not a clear winner in my opinion. Both are solid bikes.

Last edited by maartendc; 03-04-19 at 11:06 AM.
maartendc is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 11:06 AM
  #3  
Rides4Beer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437

Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times in 414 Posts
I can't speak to either of these bikes, but I have an aero bike that is 16.5lbs and have no problems with climbing or long rides. If the geometry works for you and the fit is good, you should be fine.

I say go with the one that you think looks the best, performance differences for the average rider are most likely going to be negligible. If you like the way it looks, you'll want to ride it more.
Rides4Beer is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 11:10 AM
  #4  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,810

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
I'd go for less weight over more aero. But if the differences between two bikes that otherwise suit you in comfort and any other respect are just a pound or a little more, then go for the aero.

When you get to the small differences of performance when there is less than a pound between the two to compare, then IMO, you have to already be in pretty excellent riding shape to realize the differences and see them in your performance.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 11:41 AM
  #5  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Aero trumps weight for going fast, except when you're riding up a reasonably steep hill. But the difference is small.

Personally I love the rest Cervelos ride.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 12:02 PM
  #6  
Psimet2001 
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
Giant TCR's are widely considered among our all time favorite bikes among all the riders I have been riding with over the years.

Bikes and geometries are personal. Bikes either seem to work for you or not. The aero of one over the other is pretty insignificant IMHO. If you're not comfortable on it or enjoy riding it then all the aero in the world won't help. Besides Giant has a wind-tunnel for testing and I am sure they can list as much biased data as Cervelo can.

The only time I would ever favor aero in a bike selection is when discussing a new TT bike and only if I was racing on it (which I mean why would you own a TT bike unless you were racing on it).
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 01:03 PM
  #7  
Nassa
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank you fo all your comments.
My lbs is only getting the Giant in April and the Cervelo is last one in my size.
Still undecided.
Nassa is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 01:13 PM
  #8  
maartendc
Senior Member
 
maartendc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 901

Bikes: BMC SLC01, Trek Checkpoint ALR5

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 542 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Nassa
Thank you fo all your comments.
My lbs is only getting the Giant in April and the Cervelo is last one in my size.
Still undecided.
For this amount of money, I would not let myself be pressured into getting the "last one in my size". There are MANY good bikes in the $4000+ range. Test ride a couple of them, see which you like, see which one fits you. Which one do you like the look of, etc.

If I was spending THAT kind of money on a bike, I would have to absolutely be in LOVE with it!!
maartendc is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 01:21 PM
  #9  
Nassa
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by maartendc
For this amount of money, I would not let myself be pressured into getting the "last one in my size". There are MANY good bikes in the $4000+ range. Test ride a couple of them, see which you like, see which one fits you. Which one do you like the look of, etc.

If I was spending THAT kind of money on a bike, I would have to absolutely be in LOVE with it!!

I agree, but at the same time, most lbs don't allow you to test ride unless it is on a trainer for a couple of minutes.

Which other bikes would you suggest?
Nassa is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 01:39 PM
  #10  
Racing Dan
Senior Member
 
Racing Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,224
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 316 Times in 214 Posts
Im not too familiar with US pricing, but no DI2 at this price`point? How about a scott foil 10 at five grand?
Racing Dan is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 01:42 PM
  #11  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
The place I bought my first Cervelo from was happy to send people out on long test rides. They'd let you do a century on any bike on their floor if you could arrange to do it on a weekday (because other people want to do test rides on weekends). They're very expensive bikes and the shop knows people won't buy them unless they're certain.

They'll have more in your size; if that one sells and you want an S3 they'll be able to get you one. I agree, don't let that pressure you.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 01:53 PM
  #12  
maartendc
Senior Member
 
maartendc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 901

Bikes: BMC SLC01, Trek Checkpoint ALR5

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 542 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Nassa
I agree, but at the same time, most lbs don't allow you to test ride unless it is on a trainer for a couple of minutes.

Which other bikes would you suggest?
Hmm, I have not bought many bikes new from a store (I mostly buy used bikes), but from what I've heard, most shops let you test ride extensively from bikes that are in stock.

Especially expensive bikes, people tend to test ride. I would insist on it, or take my money elsewhere honestly.
maartendc is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 01:55 PM
  #13  
rivers
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 96 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times in 79 Posts
See if you can test ride them both, especially for the kind of money you're talking about. Weight or speed won't matter if you don't find the bike a comfortable fit and ride. My nice bike is an aero bike, and weighs about 7.5kg. I find it a very comfortable ride and have done many century+ rides on it, with the longest to date being 150 miles. I'll be doing a double century on it in June as long as the weather isn't too foul (if its going to be heavy rain, I'll want the bike with hydraulic discs for at least one of the descents).
rivers is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 02:26 PM
  #14  
Noctilux.95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern California
Posts: 595

Bikes: Bianchi Oltre XR4 Celeste, De Rosa SK Pininfarina, Giant TCR SL, Giant Revolt Advanced Revolt 0 Gravel Bike, Trek Madone SLR, Cervelo R5 Disk

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 376 Post(s)
Liked 124 Times in 65 Posts
This is more about which is the better bike, not aero vs lightweight. The TCR in my mind is clearly better of the two.
Noctilux.95 is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 02:29 PM
  #15  
cruiserhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,953
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
For similar money you can get a Cannondale SuperSix Evo disc Di2 or a DuraAce/Spidering equipped rim brake.
I think it's a better bike than most, and a brilliant performer.

Although they are all nice choices, of the two you are looking at, the TCR is a better overall bike imo.

But, for the money, I would take the Cdale in a heartbeat over them both. You get way more, and a better overall bike for similar money.
cruiserhead is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 02:38 PM
  #16  
cruiserhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,953
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
The place I bought my first Cervelo from was happy to send people out on long test rides. They'd let you do a century on any bike on their floor if you could arrange to do it on a weekday (because other people want to do test rides on weekends). They're very expensive bikes and the shop knows people won't buy them unless they're certain.

They'll have more in your size; if that one sells and you want an S3 they'll be able to get you one. I agree, don't let that pressure you.
That sounds insane.
Who would ride a century, then just return the bike and say "naw, didn't like it".
And would would buy a "new" bike with a century on it?
Who would sell a bike as new with at least one century on it?
cruiserhead is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 03:57 PM
  #17  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,453

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,453 Times in 1,823 Posts
I am pretty sure if I were spending $4K and the shop said, "Take it around the parking lot," I would say "Goodbye." For m, for a bike, that is a lot of cash. if I cannot get customer service when i am ready to buy a $4K bike, what am I facing in the future?

Also ... if the bike got really used hard or scuffed up or they couldn't put it back on the shelf as "New" i'd imagine they would discount it. i t would still sell for a lot of money. And people would sure remember that shop. Word-of-mouth advertising is both the cheapest and the best.

To the OP:
Originally Posted by Iride01
When you get to the small differences of performance when there is less than a pound between the two to compare, then IMO, you have to already be in pretty excellent riding shape to realize the differences and see them in your performance.
For someone who rides for pleasure, not competition, the differences in performance (time over distance) would be negligible, and unless you road Fast all the time the aero wouldn't be a big bonus ... but unless you absolutely assaulted every hill, the lower weight wouldn't be a big bonus.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 04:05 PM
  #18  
bbbean 
Senior Member
 
bbbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,689

Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 413 Times in 246 Posts
2 important questions you should ask:
Do you spend more time climbing or more time in the wind?
Which bike fits and suits you best when you test ride it?
__________________

Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton

bbbean is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 06:06 PM
  #19  
maartendc
Senior Member
 
maartendc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 901

Bikes: BMC SLC01, Trek Checkpoint ALR5

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 542 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by cruiserhead
That sounds insane.
Who would ride a century, then just return the bike and say "naw, didn't like it".
And would would buy a "new" bike with a century on it?
Who would sell a bike as new with at least one century on it?
A lot of shops have "demo bikes" of their most popular models in the most popular size. So it is not that hard to imagine. That is why you see some bikes being sold as demo bikes at a discount.
maartendc is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 07:08 PM
  #20  
Sojodave
Senior Member
 
Sojodave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Utah
Posts: 586

Bikes: The Blurple Specialized Roubaix Pro

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 220 Post(s)
Liked 143 Times in 75 Posts
I recently saw a GCN video about pro racers in Dubai. They were interviewing pro riders about their bikes and there was a team that chose Giant TCR's over aero bikes because they are fast and comfortable. You can take that with a grain of salt, but I have three friends who rave about how comfortable the TCR frameset is. You should also look at the Canyon bikes.
Sojodave is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 07:29 PM
  #21  
RShantz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 609
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times in 19 Posts
I'd say go for comfort first. However, if the two are very similar in comfort, go aero. I've got a Madone with the Isospeed & it's as comfortable to me as any bike I've ridden. I think it's faster at higher speeds (25mph or higher) for a given wattage than my other bikes. So if it's just as comfortable I think it's a win.
RShantz is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 11:40 AM
  #22  
maartendc
Senior Member
 
maartendc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 901

Bikes: BMC SLC01, Trek Checkpoint ALR5

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 542 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Sojodave
I recently saw a GCN video about pro racers in Dubai. They were interviewing pro riders about their bikes and there was a team that chose Giant TCR's over aero bikes because they are fast and comfortable. You can take that with a grain of salt, but I have three friends who rave about how comfortable the TCR frameset is. You should also look at the Canyon bikes.
I mean obviously the teams have only the choice of 1 bike brand, the sponsor. However, they theoretically should have availability of the Giant Propel, their aero frame. So maybe it is indicative that the TCR is a good all-round bike, or maybe that aero frames really don't make THAT much of a difference. I am sure they would be using deep section wheels on the TCR in Dubai.

I have heard nothing but good things about the TCR. But if you want the most comfortable frame, you should probably look at their endurance frame, the Defy.
maartendc is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 01:00 PM
  #23  
Psimet2001 
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by maartendc
I have heard nothing but good things about the TCR. But if you want the most comfortable frame, you should probably look at their endurance frame, the Defy.
All relative and personal. I have loved and been comfortable on a TCR since day one and I'm too fat and don't ride enough and would be steered to a defy if I walked in off the street into a shop. Good thing I know what I like and don't like.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 01:59 PM
  #24  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 900 Post(s)
Liked 1,122 Times in 482 Posts
Originally Posted by Nassa

2019 TCR Advanced
2018 Cervelo S3 Disc Ultegra

[...]

Thanks for any advice and feedback
Normally I try not to wade into threads like this but since you're open to any advice and feedback -- both are nice bikes but I ride with a bunch of pretty good riders on pretty nice bikes and I'm not mature enough to show up for a ride with the most expensive bike and the cheapest legs.
RChung is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 01:59 PM
  #25  
maartendc
Senior Member
 
maartendc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 901

Bikes: BMC SLC01, Trek Checkpoint ALR5

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 542 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
All relative and personal. I have loved and been comfortable on a TCR since day one and I'm too fat and don't ride enough and would be steered to a defy if I walked in off the street into a shop. Good thing I know what I like and don't like.
Sure, I am not saying the TCR is not / cannot be a comfortable bike (and I wouldn't know, never ridden one). I am merely pointing out that the TCR has a more race-oriented geometry than the Defy. Just depends on what you are looking for.

Test ride is key.
maartendc is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.