Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Comparing bike geometry - a new thing we made

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Comparing bike geometry - a new thing we made

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-17, 02:52 PM
  #1  
bobonabike
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Omnium, Yeti SB130, Santa Cruz Chameleon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Comparing bike geometry - a new thing we made

Hello

A friend and I have been working on a website that lets you add geometry tables for any bike you like, then easily compare that geometry side-by-side with another.

It's here: geometrygeeks.bike

It started because I got fed up building excel tables to compare different bikes before buying. Too many different layouts, formats, terms for the same dimension... just frustrating.

We started in December 2016 and we've grown to over 1600 bikes. It works wiki-style, so you can add and edit the bikes on there. We've got data direct from some manufacturers (Cannondale, Boardman, Sensa, Ghost... and others) and we and users have added many others. In time we hope it can be the world's biggest database of bike geometry.

I'm posting on here to let you know about it, and also to seek feedback.

What works? What doesn't? What would make it more useful?

Cheers!

Bob
bobonabike is offline  
Likes For bobonabike:
Old 05-11-17, 03:05 PM
  #2  
rgconner
Senior Member
 
rgconner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,156

Bikes: Curtis Inglis Road, 80's Sekai touring fixie

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 9 Posts
Motorcylists have a cool site that lets you get an idea of how you fit on a bike. There might be too many options to make a similar site for a bicycle, but here it is so you can see for yourself:

Motorcycle Ergonomics
rgconner is offline  
Old 05-11-17, 03:08 PM
  #3  
bobonabike
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Omnium, Yeti SB130, Santa Cruz Chameleon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
That is neat. Never seen that before!
bobonabike is offline  
Old 05-11-17, 03:16 PM
  #4  
Masque
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Willamette Valley
Posts: 335

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, 2011 and 2017

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was wishing this existed just today.

The use case I have, though, is to compare one bike to multiple sizes of another. Essentially, to answer the question, "Which size of the Bike-o-Tron Descender is closest in geometry to my Velomaster Spokewizard?"

Edited to add: Oh yes, apparently you can do this, though the UI doesn't quite communicate that and I'm not certain exactly how I've done it. Neat tool.
Masque is offline  
Old 05-11-17, 03:27 PM
  #5  
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
I think it's pretty awesome, although I struck out on all three of my bikes
wphamilton is offline  
Old 05-11-17, 03:39 PM
  #6  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times in 1,834 Posts
Awesome. I have doznes of pages of useless geometry comparisons. if this works well ... thanks. If not .... well, just go to sleep. You'll be safe.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 05-11-17, 04:39 PM
  #7  
JBerman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Inverness, FL
Posts: 373

Bikes: Guru Evolo-R

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think this is a great idea and as long as it gets populated with content, it will be useful. I myself indexed information about my historical bikes for the purpose of ensuring bikes I purchased again would be comparable in fit (especially good for online shopping, like used on ebay).
JBerman is offline  
Old 05-11-17, 06:41 PM
  #8  
raisinberry777
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hobart, Australia
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
I like it.

A useful feature is for those who know their preferred stack and reach, it'd be nice if I could put that in and it could show me a bunch of bikes that fit within that (say, plus or minus 3mm).
raisinberry777 is offline  
Old 05-12-17, 12:01 PM
  #9  
bobonabike
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Omnium, Yeti SB130, Santa Cruz Chameleon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
@raisinberry777: Cheers. Yeah we're thinking about that kind of search. Technically challenging but certainly on our radar.

@wphamilton: Glad you like it. Which three bikes?

@Everyone else: Thanks for the support
bobonabike is offline  
Old 05-12-17, 01:25 PM
  #10  
Fett2oo5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Tomball, Texas
Posts: 174

Bikes: '91 Klein Quantum

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Would you consider adding a diagram with labels of the dimensions on the "Compare" pages?
At the very least it would be helpful if you had such a diagram on the "Understanding Bike Geometry Measurements" page. Because as you said, "..... Too many different layouts, formats, terms for the same dimension..... "
A diagram of a bike frame with the dimensions labeled would help to visually define the terms for the users.

p.s. This is a great tool, I've put it in my favorites for later. Thank you for compiling the data. It's a great idea.

Last edited by Fett2oo5; 05-12-17 at 01:28 PM.
Fett2oo5 is offline  
Old 05-12-17, 01:36 PM
  #11  
corrado33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cool idea, was hoping there would be a graphic of the frames side by side so you could visually tell which was longer/slacker etc.

Although I struck out on my frames as well, but I'm not surprised, being as weird as they are.

86 Bianchi Limited
1992(ish) Mondonico Diamond
1995(ish) Landshark Roadshark

Although I'm pretty sure both the Mondo and Landshark were custom built so there wouldn't be any specs out there for them.
corrado33 is offline  
Old 05-12-17, 01:54 PM
  #12  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by rgconner
Motorcylists have a cool site that lets you get an idea of how you fit on a bike. There might be too many options to make a similar site for a bicycle, but here it is so you can see for yourself:

Motorcycle Ergonomics
I primarily like the GT type bikes and age profile puts me there too.

But I find, after years of cycling, I just feel better leaning forward. So I want the sport position on a GT.

Oh well.
Doge is offline  
Old 05-13-17, 05:26 PM
  #13  
Fiery
Senior Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,361
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Alternatives, can provide some ideas fpr further development:
Stack and reach calculator
https://www.velogicfit.com/ (needs registration but otherwise free)

I use the first one a lot.

Last edited by Fiery; 05-13-17 at 05:29 PM.
Fiery is offline  
Old 05-14-17, 09:17 AM
  #14  
Johnny Rad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Zion
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by corrado33
Cool idea, was hoping there would be a graphic of the frames side by side so you could visually tell which was longer/slacker etc.
Agreed, like the online stem comparison tool... Stem Comparison Tool | yojimg.net

Thanks for putting in the effort on this project.
Johnny Rad is offline  
Old 05-15-17, 12:29 AM
  #15  
bobonabike
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Omnium, Yeti SB130, Santa Cruz Chameleon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks all for the suggestions and the encouragement.

Yes we've been thinking about a graphical comparison tool for a while, but it's really difficult to do well. It will need to make certain assumptions that turn out to be very significant, e.g. headset stack height, so getting those right it key. It's on the long list of things to do
bobonabike is offline  
Old 05-23-17, 04:36 PM
  #16  
VaBeachTennis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nice! Are you going to make a Facebook Page out of it too?
VaBeachTennis is offline  
Old 05-23-17, 05:14 PM
  #17  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,904

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times in 2,553 Posts
I am one who needs long stems and bikes with short chainstays and long front centers to get reach and weight balance to be good. Years ago, I wrote a Fortran program to calculate stem needed and weight balance for bikes based on the published specs. (I wanted to buy an off teh shelf ti bike, early 2000s.) Very educational but rather depressing. I found exactly zero bikes with "A" level fits. Spending $4000 then for a "B" level? Nah.

I then started using my AutoCAD skills to draw up my bikes, putting each bike on its own layer, making comparing bikes easy. It also cemented things I had been becoming aware of for my fit. Handlebars needed to be here. Seat needed to be there. And I could rotate any position forward to make it better for fix gears (lower and more aero - a huge plus going upwind of back - more comfy.

A few years later, my fortunes changed. I had a good working relationship with a frame builder. I had a bike that was very close to optimum already. So I took it to the builder and said "copy this but jack the BB to xx and pull the headtube forward 1 cm so I can run a stock stem". (And do this, this and this. It was a custom build after all!

5 years later I sent the builder an AutoCAD drawing of my next bike; based entirely on what I had learned from drawing up my frames. This bike was quite different form the first, in position, in handling, in feel. Both bikes were just what I wanted. Somewhere in the middle of all this, Ihad him build be a custom stem for my old Peter Mooney, also coming from the big drawing.

Now, when I go to buy a bike, I bring a tape measure and get enough data to draw it up. Go home and throw that new geometry onto a new layer, turn on the bikes that work and I can instantly see what I need for stem and seapost and issues that bike will have fit-wise.

This not a marketable product. Takes way too many man hours and I am using a program more expensive than my bikes. But it sure works for me. (My Fortran program could have been marketed if DOS had stuck around. Oh well.)

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney:
Old 05-23-17, 05:24 PM
  #18  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,904

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times in 2,553 Posts
Originally Posted by bobonabike
Thanks all for the suggestions and the encouragement.

Yes we've been thinking about a graphical comparison tool for a while, but it's really difficult to do well. It will need to make certain assumptions that turn out to be very significant, e.g. headset stack height, so getting those right it key. It's on the long list of things to do
If you could tie the geometry program to a graphical program, one plus could be that errors/incorrect input assumptions, etc would then be visible. For example, the head tube looks way too high. OK, so they are doing stack to the TT/HT centerline intersection. I thought it was the headtube centerline at the top of the headset. And the like.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 12:08 PM
  #19  
bobonabike
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Omnium, Yeti SB130, Santa Cruz Chameleon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Cheers guys. You're right that the graphical comparison tool is a solvable problem. I like the idea of making assumptions explicit and correctable.
@VaBeachTennis - no FB page yet. Do you think it would attract more users that way?
bobonabike is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 07:40 PM
  #20  
VaBeachTennis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bobonabike
Cheers guys. You're right that the graphical comparison tool is a solvable problem. I like the idea of making assumptions explicit and correctable.
@VaBeachTennis - no FB page yet. Do you think it would attract more users that way?

Heck yeah! Because I would share it with my friends (all 2 of them) and other folks here will share it with their friends and it can expose your product exponentially. Make a page and comment as that page on other cycling Facebook sites and that also help get your product out there. Good luck!
VaBeachTennis is offline  
Old 05-31-17, 05:29 PM
  #21  
awesomeame
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 162

Bikes: 2018 Trek Emonda SL w/Vision metron 40 wheelset, ultegra gruppa. 2010 Intense Tracer VP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It would be cool if you could select a bike, and then be able to see other bikes with similar specs, without having to compare each bike one by one. Or is there already a way to do this which I'm not seeing?

Matt
awesomeame is offline  
Old 11-17-19, 02:25 AM
  #22  
bobonabike
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Omnium, Yeti SB130, Santa Cruz Chameleon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
I just stumbled across this thread I started 2.5 years ago... so here's an update!

geometrygeeks.bike has kinda blown up and we now have over 6,300 bikes listed, and growing every day.
  • We've made it easier to add a new bike. The site tries to automatically extract the geometry table from any webpage you point it at.
  • We've added 'search by numbers', so you can search the database by e.g. stack and reach plus a tolerance. Spoiler alert - we charge a fiver for this, to help pay for the site.
  • We've added a huge list of bike fitters, all over the world, searchable by location. Fitters can list their businesses for free.
It's still a spare-time project, it's still good fun, and we're still seeking feedback from users on what you'd like to see... so please do get in touch!

(We're still working on visual comparison... maybe in 2020?!)

Best

Bob
bobonabike is offline  
Likes For bobonabike:
Old 11-17-19, 03:55 PM
  #23  
Kimmo
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 510 Posts
Awesome.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 11-25-19, 06:10 AM
  #24  
dvdslw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Apopka, Florida
Posts: 1,476

Bikes: Santa Cruz Stigmata

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 20 Posts
Great tool to help us find the perfect fit. Thank you!
dvdslw is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
torger
Fitting Your Bike
10
12-29-23 05:18 AM
gordieax
Road Cycling
2
04-24-18 10:36 PM
Peiper1
Road Cycling
12
04-09-12 08:26 PM
LemondFanForeve
General Cycling Discussion
5
02-28-11 07:57 AM
aecky01
Road Cycling
28
02-23-10 08:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.