1984/85 Specialized Sequoia beef up suggestions
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
1984/85 Specialized Sequoia beef up suggestions
Hi folks,
I picked up a Specialized that I believe to be an '84 or '85 Sequoia based on the serial number (M4FG0266, as far as I can read), the number of bottle mounts/ eyelets (seat tube, downtube on both sides), the front and rear eyelets for a rack, the headtube stud for a pump, and the chrome drive-side chainstay. (Though my Specialized is red. From what I have seen and read, all of the Sequoias from this era/year are blue. Repaint perhaps? I also don't know how to explain the chrome fork, since Sequoias seem to have the same color fork as the frame, but the fork is stamped as a Specialized).
I'm daydreaming of setting this baby up for some long-ish touring of big hilly terrain on the west coast. And when I'm not touring, I'd like to just have this as a fairly beefy commuter, with racks kept on for groceries etc. I generally value strength/comfort/load bearing capacity over lean agility. Can I turn this “light touring” bike into an “all out” touring bike without being reckless? How can I make this the coziest and strongest it can be?
I’m aiming for insights and recommendations on some new handlebars, rims, tires, brakes, and fenders (or something fender-ish?) that will give me as much comfort, load bearing capacity, and braking power as I can fit into the constraints of this frame. While also allowing me to ride in the rain and splash in filthy city puddles
Thanks very much!
I picked up a Specialized that I believe to be an '84 or '85 Sequoia based on the serial number (M4FG0266, as far as I can read), the number of bottle mounts/ eyelets (seat tube, downtube on both sides), the front and rear eyelets for a rack, the headtube stud for a pump, and the chrome drive-side chainstay. (Though my Specialized is red. From what I have seen and read, all of the Sequoias from this era/year are blue. Repaint perhaps? I also don't know how to explain the chrome fork, since Sequoias seem to have the same color fork as the frame, but the fork is stamped as a Specialized).
I'm daydreaming of setting this baby up for some long-ish touring of big hilly terrain on the west coast. And when I'm not touring, I'd like to just have this as a fairly beefy commuter, with racks kept on for groceries etc. I generally value strength/comfort/load bearing capacity over lean agility. Can I turn this “light touring” bike into an “all out” touring bike without being reckless? How can I make this the coziest and strongest it can be?
I’m aiming for insights and recommendations on some new handlebars, rims, tires, brakes, and fenders (or something fender-ish?) that will give me as much comfort, load bearing capacity, and braking power as I can fit into the constraints of this frame. While also allowing me to ride in the rain and splash in filthy city puddles
Thanks very much!
#2
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,704 Times
in
937 Posts
IMO- The Sequoia wasn't meant for that. Think of it as a more sprightly all-rounder.
It's a lighter tube set and a shorter wheelbase than your average tourer. Yes, you can throw some racks, a triple and some ATB derailleurs on it- but it's not meant to be "beefy."
It's a lighter tube set and a shorter wheelbase than your average tourer. Yes, you can throw some racks, a triple and some ATB derailleurs on it- but it's not meant to be "beefy."
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#3
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,704 Times
in
937 Posts
BTW- I'm NOT saying to not throw some racks and a triple and ATB derailleurs on there- just saying that it's not a burly bike.
If'n I had a Sequoia this is exactly how I'd build it.
Suntour XC long cage RD
Suntour Mountech FD
Suntour Barcons
Nitto Technomic/B177 bars
Sugino AT- 48-38-28
Suntour sealed bearing hubs and BB
SR SP-11 pedals
Blackburn rear rack
Suntour Superbe seat post
Brooks B17
Dura Ace 7400 brakes- dual pivot in the front, single pivot in the rear
Tektro RRL brake levers.
Nothing but the good **** goes on a bike of this caliber.
If'n I had a Sequoia this is exactly how I'd build it.
Suntour XC long cage RD
Suntour Mountech FD
Suntour Barcons
Nitto Technomic/B177 bars
Sugino AT- 48-38-28
Suntour sealed bearing hubs and BB
SR SP-11 pedals
Blackburn rear rack
Suntour Superbe seat post
Brooks B17
Dura Ace 7400 brakes- dual pivot in the front, single pivot in the rear
Tektro RRL brake levers.
Nothing but the good **** goes on a bike of this caliber.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Burien WA
Posts: 513
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse, LeMond Victoire, Bianchi Campione d'Italia, Kona Hei Hei, Ritchey Ultra, Schwinn "Paramount" PDG, '83 Trek 640
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 268 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
212 Posts
The tubing on the Sequoia was more stout than the standard "sport touring" bike, as commented on by multiple reviews. I'm sure it'll handle light loads. Particularly if you use bikepacking-style bags for your bigger tours, rather than panniers.
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
Thanks very much! What kind of touring would be in range for this frame then? (I guess I'm unfamiliar with the scope of sport touring/all rounder kinda bikes).
For reference, I'm about 6 feet and 180 lbs. I would aim for traveling for a week or so with a sleeping bag, pad, tent, clothes. On paved road.
Even if maximum beefiness isn't in the cards, I'm aiming for the coziest, sturdiest, comfiest feel I can get for my ass and hands.
For reference, I'm about 6 feet and 180 lbs. I would aim for traveling for a week or so with a sleeping bag, pad, tent, clothes. On paved road.
Even if maximum beefiness isn't in the cards, I'm aiming for the coziest, sturdiest, comfiest feel I can get for my ass and hands.
#6
Newbie
Thread Starter
Thanks for the dream part/list suggestions! BTW I just added a gallery to show how the bike looks now (I can't post photos in thread yet due to noob status)
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 1,987
Bikes: several Eddy Merz (ride like Eddy, braze like Jim!)
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1098 Post(s)
Liked 1,862 Times
in
683 Posts
Does your bike have the built in wiring for generator and lights?
Such forethought!!!!
Such forethought!!!!
__________________
"Leave the gun. Take the Colnagos."
"Leave the gun. Take the Colnagos."
Last edited by Robvolz; 02-02-24 at 01:55 PM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,091
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 269 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4520 Post(s)
Liked 6,407 Times
in
3,686 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,467
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 801 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times
in
411 Posts
Sounds to me like you'd be best off getting a different frame. Your two priorities are (1) Heavy duty commuting, and (2) Long tourings in hilly terrain. Standing up to pedal on an overloaded bike just doesn't feel good. Hopefully Jim Merz will drop in to let you know his thoughts at some point.
If you reallllly wanted to do this, I'd recommend a low-rider front rack with panniers for your everyday heavy duty commuting, and including perhaps a half-size framebag, the kind that is shaped like a rectangle and hangs below the top tube.
For the tour, you'd just need to add on a small saddle bag and small rear rack. Might be alright as long as you balance the load well, keeping more weight in the front and keeping the weight as low as possible.
Tubus makes great mid-fork clamps for a low-rider front rack. Your bike will need them if you go this route.
If you reallllly wanted to do this, I'd recommend a low-rider front rack with panniers for your everyday heavy duty commuting, and including perhaps a half-size framebag, the kind that is shaped like a rectangle and hangs below the top tube.
For the tour, you'd just need to add on a small saddle bag and small rear rack. Might be alright as long as you balance the load well, keeping more weight in the front and keeping the weight as low as possible.
Tubus makes great mid-fork clamps for a low-rider front rack. Your bike will need them if you go this route.
Last edited by Piff; 02-02-24 at 02:09 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 1,987
Bikes: several Eddy Merz (ride like Eddy, braze like Jim!)
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1098 Post(s)
Liked 1,862 Times
in
683 Posts
The original forks had eyelets all over the place. Any chance you have that?
__________________
"Leave the gun. Take the Colnagos."
"Leave the gun. Take the Colnagos."
Likes For rando_couche:
#13
Happy banana slug
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,702
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1534 Post(s)
Liked 1,534 Times
in
920 Posts
Likes For polymorphself:
#15
Newbie
Thread Starter
#16
Newbie
Thread Starter
Likes For Insidious C.:
#18
mycocyclist
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Monkey Junction, Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,237
Bikes: 1964 Schwinn Paramount P-13 DeLuxe, 1964 Schwinn Sport Super Sport, 1972 Falcon San Remo, 1974 Maserati MT-1, 1974 Raleigh International, 1984 Lotus Odyssey, 198? Rossin Ghibli, 1990 LeMond Le Vanquer (sic), 1991 Specialized Allez Transition Pro, +
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 822 Times
in
453 Posts
BF member Andy_K has lowrider rack mounts added to his Sequoia. Maybe he can comment on how the Sequoia handles touring loads.
Judging from the pic, you have a quality front fork on your bike, original of not.
Judging from the pic, you have a quality front fork on your bike, original of not.
OP's Album.
Last edited by machinist42; 02-02-24 at 07:47 PM.
Likes For machinist42:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,745
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3231 Post(s)
Liked 3,874 Times
in
1,440 Posts
BF member Andy_K has lowrider rack mounts added to his Sequoia. Maybe he can comment on how the Sequoia handles touring loads.
This picture looks like I've got a decent load on it, but it's really just more clothes than I really needed for a three day credit-card tour. This bike was perfect for that. I haven't tried a really heavy load.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
Likes For Andy_K:
#20
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 53
Bikes: '94 Eddy Merckx Century TSX '86 Schwinn Paramount, '89 Schwinn Paramount, '84 Specialized Sequoia, '85 Schwinn Le Tour Luxe, '86 Schwinn Prelude, '92 Cannondale T600, '78 Guerciotti, '91 Giant ATX 770, '87 Schwinn Le Tour(beater)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times
in
18 Posts
BTW- I'm NOT saying to not throw some racks and a triple and ATB derailleurs on there- just saying that it's not a burly bike.
If'n I had a Sequoia this is exactly how I'd build it.
Suntour XC long cage RD
Suntour Mountech FD
Suntour Barcons
Nitto Technomic/B177 bars
Sugino AT- 48-38-28
Suntour sealed bearing hubs and BB
SR SP-11 pedals
Blackburn rear rack
Suntour Superbe seat post
Brooks B17
Dura Ace 7400 brakes- dual pivot in the front, single pivot in the rear
Tektro RRL brake levers.
Nothing but the good **** goes on a bike of this caliber.
If'n I had a Sequoia this is exactly how I'd build it.
Suntour XC long cage RD
Suntour Mountech FD
Suntour Barcons
Nitto Technomic/B177 bars
Sugino AT- 48-38-28
Suntour sealed bearing hubs and BB
SR SP-11 pedals
Blackburn rear rack
Suntour Superbe seat post
Brooks B17
Dura Ace 7400 brakes- dual pivot in the front, single pivot in the rear
Tektro RRL brake levers.
Nothing but the good **** goes on a bike of this caliber.
Likes For kwhiner:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,990
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 502 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
256 Posts
The tube set, which is quite nice on Sequoia frames, won’t be an issue if you were to use front loading rather than rear for most of your load, especially since you mention that you already have mid-fork eyelets. But it might benefit from a bit of fork re-rake for lower trail. @gugie, located in Beaverton, OR, is a popular member of this forum, and has done LOTS of fork rerakes, as well as many other frame mods for C&Vers. He could give you an idea if the rerake would be beneficial and possible without affecting the chrome finish on the fork. He’s quite familiar with @Andy_K’s Sequoia.
He did his magic to my Miyata 912 (a stiff-ish and relatively short wheel base frame, FAR from traditional touring tubes or geometry) working with just the fork, making it a respectable tourer with a front load. It’s equally delightful without a load other than the front bag, empty or full.
I’d expect the Sequoia would be a great bike as a front load tourer. If I was going to replace the modified 912 (that I’ve had for 45 years), either a 531 Motobecane or 80’s Sequoia would be far and away on top of my wish list, including a stop for Gugificazione!
Here’s a shot of the modified 912 - black with red panniers that were intentionally overloaded as a test on this very windy and cold C&V group tour down the Willamette Valley, same trip as Andy mentions regarding his lovely Sequoia a few posts up^. My Gugificazione 912 with front load and lower trail fork handled the winds quite nicely, even when it was a stiff crosswind. If I was still a touring sort of person, I’d use this bike for credit card (no camping, which isn’t my style anyway) tours of any length.
He did his magic to my Miyata 912 (a stiff-ish and relatively short wheel base frame, FAR from traditional touring tubes or geometry) working with just the fork, making it a respectable tourer with a front load. It’s equally delightful without a load other than the front bag, empty or full.
I’d expect the Sequoia would be a great bike as a front load tourer. If I was going to replace the modified 912 (that I’ve had for 45 years), either a 531 Motobecane or 80’s Sequoia would be far and away on top of my wish list, including a stop for Gugificazione!
Here’s a shot of the modified 912 - black with red panniers that were intentionally overloaded as a test on this very windy and cold C&V group tour down the Willamette Valley, same trip as Andy mentions regarding his lovely Sequoia a few posts up^. My Gugificazione 912 with front load and lower trail fork handled the winds quite nicely, even when it was a stiff crosswind. If I was still a touring sort of person, I’d use this bike for credit card (no camping, which isn’t my style anyway) tours of any length.
Last edited by Dfrost; 02-05-24 at 02:14 AM.
Likes For Dfrost:
#23
Junior Member
I’m not sure how far down the rabbit hole you are willing to go, but you could always do a 650b conversion. By dropping down a size in wheel diameter you gain room for fatter tires. I’d imagine 38’s and fenders no problem, possibly 42’s without. That said, it’s not a cheap conversion. You would need new wheels, tires, tubes and more than likely longer reach brakes. I did it to an 82 Miyata 710 and couldn’t be happier with the results. A web search on 650b conversion should give you a pretty good idea if it’s something you’d be interested in or not.
Likes For Wharf Rat:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,745
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3231 Post(s)
Liked 3,874 Times
in
1,440 Posts
I also experimented briefly with 650Bx38. That worked, though I had to drop the rear brake a bit for reach and fenders were tighter than I was comfortable with.
I've read that the later Sequoias had a bit more tire clearance, so the OP may very well be able to use 700x32 with fenders.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
Likes For Andy_K: