good commuting tire for a mountainbike?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
good commuting tire for a mountainbike?
Hey kids,
I've got a friend who's decided he's not going to invest a whole bunch into bicycle commuting till he's tried it out for a while. So we dusted off and adjusted and fit his old mountain bike to him, but I told him I'd at least like to see him off of knobbies and onto something a little more road friendly.
Any tire suggestions?
Thanks.
I've got a friend who's decided he's not going to invest a whole bunch into bicycle commuting till he's tried it out for a while. So we dusted off and adjusted and fit his old mountain bike to him, but I told him I'd at least like to see him off of knobbies and onto something a little more road friendly.
Any tire suggestions?
Thanks.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 765
Bikes: Raleigh Glacier MTB/Commuter. Cannondale CAAD5, Windsor Timeline fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just put Forte City's in 1.5" on my MTB recently and I am happy with them so far. I got them on sale from Performance bike for about $7 a piece.
#6
rebmeM roineS
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,216
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 347 Times
in
226 Posts
Originally Posted by MyBikeGotStolen
I just put Forte City's in 1.5" on my MTB recently and I am happy with them so far. I got them on sale from Performance bike for about $7 a piece.
#7
On Sabbatical
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,543
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Any cheap-thin tire will do him, unless you are also wanting him to have flat protection.
You can get plenty of 1.5" slicks for less than $20 a pair and they will do the trick I'd bet.
Lately I've been rolling on 26x1.75" Maxxis Overdrive tires with kevlar and a nifty reflective sidewall strip and I really enjoy these tires.
You can get plenty of 1.5" slicks for less than $20 a pair and they will do the trick I'd bet.
Lately I've been rolling on 26x1.75" Maxxis Overdrive tires with kevlar and a nifty reflective sidewall strip and I really enjoy these tires.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 765
Bikes: Raleigh Glacier MTB/Commuter. Cannondale CAAD5, Windsor Timeline fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JanMM
can't beat that price but for a few dollars more the Fast City ST/K 1.25" 90psi from Performance is zippier. Not a delicate tire - we have them on our tandem.
#9
I like chrome.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 285
Bikes: 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Mongoose ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HardyWeinberg
I'm a major big apple fan. Very tough, as well as big and smooth.
I just got some 26" x 2.35" Big Apples for my Surly 1x1 mountain bike, and they are awesome.
The 26" x 2.0" Big Apples are nice too. I have them on my Dahon Jack.
Both sizes are nice.
#10
not a role model
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by MyBikeGotStolen
I just put Forte City's in 1.5" on my MTB recently and I am happy with them so far. I got them on sale from Performance bike for about $7 a piece.
The Ritchey Tom slick was a better tire in that width range. The Schwalbe Big Apple was a major step up though. I don't currently have a 26" bike, but if I did I would be buying either Big Apples (2") or Marathon Supremes (2"). Obviously not the budget-friendly choices though.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like the 1.4" Ritchey Tom Slicks. Cheap, fast, and while not as indestructible as the Schwalbe's, I'm guessing, I rarely get flats on mine.
#14
Cycle Year Round
Specialized Fat Boy 26 x 1.25. Good puncture resistance, 100 psi, wears well and it handles extremely well. about $20-$25
#15
CRIKEY!!!!!!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: all the way down under
Posts: 4,276
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1590 Post(s)
Liked 689 Times
in
366 Posts
Originally Posted by greenstork
Continental Sport Contacts 26x1.3"
Also if he has never done it let him change one of the tires so he'll have a degree of confidence if/when he flats.
You've earnt a whole bunch of good karma points for helping someone deiscover the joys of cycle commuting, good for you.
__________________
"Surely one can love his own country without becoming hopelessly lost in an all-consuming flame of narrow-minded nationalism" - Fred Birchmore
"Surely one can love his own country without becoming hopelessly lost in an all-consuming flame of narrow-minded nationalism" - Fred Birchmore
#16
Senior Member
Originally Posted by CastIron
Specialized Nimbus Armadillo. Good tire. $hit ride.
#17
Senior Member
Originally Posted by JeffS
I wasn't happy with the Forte City, though it's definitely the price winner.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: corpus christi,texas
Posts: 423
Bikes: canondale silk trail--92 schwinn criss cross--sun atlas x type--fugi odessa--2018 trek domane ALR5 disc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Donkey Hodie
+1 on the Schwalbe Big Apple tires.
I just got some 26" x 2.35" Big Apples for my Surly 1x1 mountain bike, and they are awesome.
The 26" x 2.0" Big Apples are nice too. I have them on my Dahon Jack.
Both sizes are nice.
I just got some 26" x 2.35" Big Apples for my Surly 1x1 mountain bike, and they are awesome.
The 26" x 2.0" Big Apples are nice too. I have them on my Dahon Jack.
Both sizes are nice.
Thanks Carlton.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,013
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have had the Forte Versa Trac/K 26x2.0's for about a month. I really like them. Tough, sturdy tires that ride like a slick on the pavement and like a knobby in the dirt. Great all round tire for an all around bike.
#21
I like chrome.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 285
Bikes: 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Mongoose ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by carlton
Could you give us a detailed account of the ride smoothness between the two as well as the speed differences or the rolling resistences?
Thanks Carlton.
Thanks Carlton.
In my short comparison rides from earlier today, I would have to say that I was leaning towards thinking that the lighter and smaller Apples on the Dahon felt more quick and smooth.. This might be psychological however, and at this point I do not feel it is fair for me to make a final judgment between the two. Keep in mind that the Dahon has more of an upright geometry with the raised handlebar height, plus it is made out of aluminum opposed to the steel surly.
I plan on riding the snot out of my surly for now, and then maybe switching to the skinnier Apples somewhere down the line.
Both tires felt quick, and they both felt extremely smooth for such fatty tires. It might be splitting hairs when comparing these two tires. I think that both sizes have the same amount of road contact, with the main differences being the weight, and the amount of pressure or cushion/shock that can be applied to the fatter of the two tires. The amount of tire air pressure that is being applied is another factor for me to consider.
I also think that both sizes of the 26 inch Big Apples might have close to the same rolling resistance because they have the same amount of tire contact with the road(I am not sure about this).
Part of me wants to secretly switch the tires to see if my mother will notice (she is purely a recreational cyclist).
#22
Videre non videri
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Originally Posted by greenstork
Continental Sport Contacts 26x1.3"
Haven't had a flat yet. And they roll well too!
If you want a bit more cushioning, get the fatter 1.6" version. I use them as well.
#23
I like chrome.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 285
Bikes: 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Mongoose ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One thing for sure is that I am not worried too much about crappy road conditions with either of the Schwalbe Big Apple tires (especially with the larger sized tires). I think these tires are great for city streets, and roads undergoing construction which there is always plenty of in my area.
The tires I was using previously to the 26" x 2.35" Big Apples were huge Maxxis Hookworms at 26" x 2.50"
While not much smaller, the Big Apples in 2.35 " size feel alot more nimble and quick than the Hookworms did.
Those Hookworms are behemoth sized tires!
Another good thing about the fatter tires, is that you can put the max pressure recommended for a faster feeling ride, or you can lower the pressure to act like shock absorbing suspension. Weather the tire pressure is low or high, the Big apples definitely soak up the bumps and the drops from sidewalk curbs very nicely.
The tires I was using previously to the 26" x 2.35" Big Apples were huge Maxxis Hookworms at 26" x 2.50"
While not much smaller, the Big Apples in 2.35 " size feel alot more nimble and quick than the Hookworms did.
Those Hookworms are behemoth sized tires!
Another good thing about the fatter tires, is that you can put the max pressure recommended for a faster feeling ride, or you can lower the pressure to act like shock absorbing suspension. Weather the tire pressure is low or high, the Big apples definitely soak up the bumps and the drops from sidewalk curbs very nicely.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Posts: 1,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Just go to a bike shop or any place that sells bike tires and get some 1.3" to 1.5" wide MTB slicks (and tubes also). There's cheap ones for <$10 each. Inflate to 60-70 PSI.
-------
When I think of a "good" commuting tire I think of puncture resistance, to avoid "unscheduled delays"--and I think the best tire out now is the Schwalbe Marathon Plus--but they cost ~$45 US per tire. The M+'s come in 1.3" and 1.75" wide versions.
-------
I don't recommend Big Apples because unless your bicycle has wider rims, the Big Apples will handle like crap unless you overinflate them. If you get huge fat tires and have to overinflate them, they're not providing any actual advantage to being so wide,,, and you might as well just run narrower tires that your narrow rims can handle better, and get a lot less rolling mass and faster accelleration.
If his bike has "downhill"-width rims (~35mm+) then Big Apples are a good idea. If his bike has the typical ~25mm wide rims that most MTB's come with, then stick with tires 1.5" wide or less.
~
-------
When I think of a "good" commuting tire I think of puncture resistance, to avoid "unscheduled delays"--and I think the best tire out now is the Schwalbe Marathon Plus--but they cost ~$45 US per tire. The M+'s come in 1.3" and 1.75" wide versions.
-------
I don't recommend Big Apples because unless your bicycle has wider rims, the Big Apples will handle like crap unless you overinflate them. If you get huge fat tires and have to overinflate them, they're not providing any actual advantage to being so wide,,, and you might as well just run narrower tires that your narrow rims can handle better, and get a lot less rolling mass and faster accelleration.
If his bike has "downhill"-width rims (~35mm+) then Big Apples are a good idea. If his bike has the typical ~25mm wide rims that most MTB's come with, then stick with tires 1.5" wide or less.
~
#25
Cat None
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,508
Bikes: LOOK KG 461, LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think I had a set of Michelin or Continental tires on my mtb when I was commuting on it. I haven't had the best of luck with Performance brand tires so I haven't bought a set of them in probably 9-10 years.