South African Bianchi Find
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
South African Bianchi Find
Dear fellow bike slaves
I'm wondering whether anybody has some clues to slate my curiosity. I saw an ad for a battered Bianchi, claimed to be a 1994 model, for the equivalent of 28USD, and bought it on the spot. I now have it in hand and am trying to figure out what I have (in terms of age, model, original components etc).
It's currently fitted with a chromed Colnago fork, mostly Shimano 600 components (including hubs) and an ITM stem. Columbus SL tubing for the frame. Would love any insights or tips! The fork is badly rusted and I will probably attempt a rechrome. As for the frame - should I consider a respray?
The BB shell has the following numbers on:
8C
1265
I'm wondering whether anybody has some clues to slate my curiosity. I saw an ad for a battered Bianchi, claimed to be a 1994 model, for the equivalent of 28USD, and bought it on the spot. I now have it in hand and am trying to figure out what I have (in terms of age, model, original components etc).
It's currently fitted with a chromed Colnago fork, mostly Shimano 600 components (including hubs) and an ITM stem. Columbus SL tubing for the frame. Would love any insights or tips! The fork is badly rusted and I will probably attempt a rechrome. As for the frame - should I consider a respray?
The BB shell has the following numbers on:
8C
1265
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Wow, that's really rough with massive wear on the large chainring!
Bianchi can be very difficult to identify, as they varied so much from one market to another. Most members (myself included) are familiar with the North American models, which puts us a disadvantage when it comes to other countries. Having said that, the serial number would indicate 1988. The decals are 1990s but by 1994 I would have expected vertical dropouts. Still, the stay caps look more 1990s than 1988. Is the down tube tube round or oval where it enters the BB shell?
Bianchi can be very difficult to identify, as they varied so much from one market to another. Most members (myself included) are familiar with the North American models, which puts us a disadvantage when it comes to other countries. Having said that, the serial number would indicate 1988. The decals are 1990s but by 1994 I would have expected vertical dropouts. Still, the stay caps look more 1990s than 1988. Is the down tube tube round or oval where it enters the BB shell?
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Wow, that's really rough with massive wear on the large chainring!
Bianchi can be very difficult to identify, as they varied so much from one market to another. Most members (myself included) are familiar with the North American models, which puts us a disadvantage when it comes to other countries. Having said that, the serial number would indicate 1988. The decals are 1990s but by 1994 I would have expected vertical dropouts. Still, the stay caps look more 1990s than 1988. Is the down tube tube round or oval where it enters the BB shell?
Bianchi can be very difficult to identify, as they varied so much from one market to another. Most members (myself included) are familiar with the North American models, which puts us a disadvantage when it comes to other countries. Having said that, the serial number would indicate 1988. The decals are 1990s but by 1994 I would have expected vertical dropouts. Still, the stay caps look more 1990s than 1988. Is the down tube tube round or oval where it enters the BB shell?
I'm hoping to find some replacements for the chainrings, shoudn't be hard, the other option is to put something like a 9 speed campy groupset on...
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,154
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2363 Post(s)
Liked 1,749 Times
in
1,191 Posts
So a downtube shifter for the rear, and a brifter for the front? And a non-functional rear brifter? "Eclectic" build, sort of an inverse Lance.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
A round down tube would having be leaning towards the 1988 date as indicated by the serial number. Circa 1990-1991 Bianchi introduced their Superset II frame configuration and one of the features was a down tube that was oval at the bottom bracket end, with the major axis oriented transversely, to increase lateral stiffness in the bottom bracket region. They had to develop a special bottom bracket shell to accept the tubes and I would consume that since this was a marketable performance feature, as opposed to just cosmetics, that it would have been adopted across all markets.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thank you for the information. I've managed to find time to strip the frame and have some more information.
The rear hub spacing is 126mm - which to me would indicate an earlier date, around 1988 as has been discussed. The rear dropouts are Gipiemme. It has a small knob to hang the chain on whil removing the tyre.
It appears as though the frame has been resprayed, which leads me to believe that the decals applied are not period correct - that's why they look like early 90's.
Finally, and most sadly, the frame has been in a bad crash, and there is a serious crack in the headtube. Fixing this might take the project way over budget, and I would assume that only a full tube replacement would suffice. Any opinions?
The rear hub spacing is 126mm - which to me would indicate an earlier date, around 1988 as has been discussed. The rear dropouts are Gipiemme. It has a small knob to hang the chain on whil removing the tyre.
It appears as though the frame has been resprayed, which leads me to believe that the decals applied are not period correct - that's why they look like early 90's.
Finally, and most sadly, the frame has been in a bad crash, and there is a serious crack in the headtube. Fixing this might take the project way over budget, and I would assume that only a full tube replacement would suffice. Any opinions?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
I might be tempted to just have the inside of the head tube cleaned and run a weld bead over the crack. There's a good amount of clearance between the head tube and fork. It's not a proper repair but it a whole lot less expensive. You should consult some forum framebuilders like @gugie .
#9
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times
in
865 Posts
Gotta figure that where a crack starts is usually a highest-stress area.
Using weld to fix such a location seems to beg for a repeat performance(?).
Using weld to fix such a location seems to beg for a repeat performance(?).
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
This was from a crash impact, so don't think it's a weak area in general or anything like that. I've asked a few local framebuilders for advice.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Typically, front end crash damage manifests itself as bent top and down tubes, just behind the head lug. The head tube itself rarely cracks, unless it was overheated during the brazing process, which lowers the strength of the steel.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
The previous owner totalled the fork in the crash, so I know it was intense, but I hear you - this crack is in the middle of the tube, quite strange. Have you had any experience with a TIG weld to fix this sort of crack? I might feel a bit unsafe on it.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
Having said all this, I would think about trying it with my welder if it were my bike. What do you have to lose? Worst case, you cut the tube/melt out the braze and replace it the traditional way.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I hear you on that. Might be worth a shot. Only problem is if I intend to sell it on, I would want to feel confident in the repair.
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
After visiting 3 local framebuilders and being told by each that a comprehensive fix would blow the budget before even looking at painting, a new fork, or any other components, I've decided to pass the project on and await the next frame with less complications. C'est la vie!