Half-step-granny for commuting?
#1
Am-a-tour
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NOVA
Posts: 126
Bikes: 2020 New Albion Privateer, 1983 Schwinn Super Sport, 2022 Rivendell Atlantis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times
in
40 Posts
Half-step-granny for commuting?
Hi all,
I'm considering an arrangement for my hilly commute, where I would run 46-38-28 in front, with 9sp 12-36 in rear. Is this folly?
Thanks.
I'm considering an arrangement for my hilly commute, where I would run 46-38-28 in front, with 9sp 12-36 in rear. Is this folly?
Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974
Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times
in
827 Posts
I've never been good at figuring gear ratios, but I've been commuting in hilly Colorado Springs for 30 years and a wider spread of gear ratios is always better. I have five bikes and have modified three for lower gearing while keeping or extending the highest gearing (for high-speed descents). The lower gears are especially important now that I'm in my 60s and straining hard against pedals is not good for my knees and other body parts.
I bought a used set of wheels for my 26" studded snow tires which came with one of those crazy-low bail-out gears, which felt comically low with my snow-bike's wide-range triple, until that first time I needed to ascend a steep blocks-long hill against a still winter head-wind in the snow with a full commute bag made heavier by winter-weight office clothes. Sure, it required a fair amount of spinning to reach only 4mph, but my knees were happy, and I didn't have to dismount and try to push the bike uphill a few streets at 2mph.
My latest purchase is a light, close-geared road bike with a compact double and I am going to figure out if I can get a significantly smaller ring up front, or a wider spread in back.
I bought a used set of wheels for my 26" studded snow tires which came with one of those crazy-low bail-out gears, which felt comically low with my snow-bike's wide-range triple, until that first time I needed to ascend a steep blocks-long hill against a still winter head-wind in the snow with a full commute bag made heavier by winter-weight office clothes. Sure, it required a fair amount of spinning to reach only 4mph, but my knees were happy, and I didn't have to dismount and try to push the bike uphill a few streets at 2mph.
My latest purchase is a light, close-geared road bike with a compact double and I am going to figure out if I can get a significantly smaller ring up front, or a wider spread in back.
Likes For BobbyG:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times
in
1,213 Posts
Only you can say; I suspect your low gear may be lower than you really need, but when you've got a heavy load and hit a steep hill at the end of the work day, you may be very happy to have it.
OTOH, gearing like this will make weekend rides a breeze when you venture into the foothills and perhaps even Skyline Drive/BRP.
OTOH, gearing like this will make weekend rides a breeze when you venture into the foothills and perhaps even Skyline Drive/BRP.
Likes For pdlamb:
#4
Miles to Go
28 ring 36 cog gets you down to 21.1 gear inches, which should be plenty low enough. The stepping isn't bad, either. I personally would go with 26/36/48, but I carry a heavy load on occasion.
Gear calculator:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
Gear calculator:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
#5
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Your described setup is not half step. I'm not really seeing how it's different from most inexpensive hybrids. It will be fine.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Likes For Darth Lefty:
#6
Happy banana slug
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,696
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1533 Post(s)
Liked 1,530 Times
in
917 Posts
#7
Senior Member
This isn't half step gearing, the gap between the middle and large chainrings is slightly smaller than typical these days but not by a lot. Half step gearing would have those rings very close in size, no more than 4 teeth difference and maybe less. That said, no folly here, this will work just fine. Half step gearing is a relic of days long gone when freewheels had many fewer sprockets and front derailleurs weren't very good for large shifts. Most people find it too annoying to actually use properly and it's not really necessary with modern rear sprocket clusters and powerful, effective front derailleurs, and that's why it isn't really a thing on modern bikes. You would have a hard time even setting up true half step gearing with modern components - most cassettes are too closely spaced to really make it work.
#8
Am-a-tour
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NOVA
Posts: 126
Bikes: 2020 New Albion Privateer, 1983 Schwinn Super Sport, 2022 Rivendell Atlantis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times
in
40 Posts
This isn't half step gearing, the gap between the middle and large chainrings is slightly smaller than typical these days but not by a lot. Half step gearing would have those rings very close in size, no more than 4 teeth difference and maybe less. That said, no folly here, this will work just fine. Half step gearing is a relic of days long gone when freewheels had many fewer sprockets and front derailleurs weren't very good for large shifts. Most people find it too annoying to actually use properly and it's not really necessary with modern rear sprocket clusters and powerful, effective front derailleurs, and that's why it isn't really a thing on modern bikes. You would have a hard time even setting up true half step gearing with modern components - most cassettes are too closely spaced to really make it work.
Edited to add, I have a pretty brutal uphill climb out of the city to my house on the way home, which is what prompted the change in the first place. 46-34 just wasn't cutting it, and hot weather is coming.
#9
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
You can find a zillion cranks that are 48-38-28. Sometimes two teeth off from there. They are fine. The 10-12 tooth mid-top shift is what the triple derailleur is designed for. What are you trying to do? Your choices are strange.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#10
Am-a-tour
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NOVA
Posts: 126
Bikes: 2020 New Albion Privateer, 1983 Schwinn Super Sport, 2022 Rivendell Atlantis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times
in
40 Posts
So, I ordered a modern bog-standard Altus FD, and the cage is too wide for the Q of the cranks and couldn't shift to the 48 without interfering with the DS crank.
Thus, 28-34-48.
#11
Am-a-tour
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NOVA
Posts: 126
Bikes: 2020 New Albion Privateer, 1983 Schwinn Super Sport, 2022 Rivendell Atlantis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times
in
40 Posts
IMHO, it's kind of a sleeper out there for anyone that may be looking into Surly or Marin steel bikes, but a bit cheaper. The geometry is almost identical to the Surly Cross Check, with a taller head tube to allow for more upright riding if that's how you want to build it up. It can fit 700x42 slicks, and any kind of rack. It was my "poor man's riv" before I bit the bullet and got the real thing, and now it's my commute/around town/basket with sweep bars bike. I've put about 3500 miles on mine, and have found it to be extremely versatile, comfortable, and useful.
Likes For nick_a:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
Can't resist - I'm old enough for a two steppin' granny.
My three geared bike have:
The good bike - 50-38-24 with a 9-speed Campy that I between 13-23 and 12 (to 14) -28 depending on ride, wheel, conditioning and mood.
Raleigh Competition - 52-42-24 with 13-26 7-speed
Pro Miyata - 52-42-30 with 13-26 7-speed. (Campy Chorus crankset. Haven't looked into BCDs and chainring options yet. It is pure race so muscling is appropriate.)
I've never worked out the steps. They are probably horrible. I shift racing style, trying to stay in the ring up front that allows me to tackle what's in front of me with the rear.
My three geared bike have:
The good bike - 50-38-24 with a 9-speed Campy that I between 13-23 and 12 (to 14) -28 depending on ride, wheel, conditioning and mood.
Raleigh Competition - 52-42-24 with 13-26 7-speed
Pro Miyata - 52-42-30 with 13-26 7-speed. (Campy Chorus crankset. Haven't looked into BCDs and chainring options yet. It is pure race so muscling is appropriate.)
I've never worked out the steps. They are probably horrible. I shift racing style, trying to stay in the ring up front that allows me to tackle what's in front of me with the rear.
#13
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
I've seen a Sugino triple crank like that with really close rings on a Rivendell. But it also had friction shifters and a double type FD. Not a recipe for good shifting but that's sort of their thing
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,994
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2497 Post(s)
Liked 740 Times
in
523 Posts
If the cage width of the FD is causing interference with the DS crank, I don't see how altering the tooth counts of the chainrings is going to help! You might look at the high limit screw, or BB spindle length even, but if a 28,34,48 will work, then so will a 28,38,48 unit triple, and that will be massively easier to find.
#15
Am-a-tour
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NOVA
Posts: 126
Bikes: 2020 New Albion Privateer, 1983 Schwinn Super Sport, 2022 Rivendell Atlantis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times
in
40 Posts
If the cage width of the FD is causing interference with the DS crank, I don't see how altering the tooth counts of the chainrings is going to help! You might look at the high limit screw, or BB spindle length even, but if a 28,34,48 will work, then so will a 28,38,48 unit triple, and that will be massively easier to find.
The setup I went with works great, and I'm not clear on why it seemingly confuses and upsets you so much.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,994
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2497 Post(s)
Liked 740 Times
in
523 Posts
Not wanting to buy another FD, I went with a tooth count difference that works with the Ultegra FD I had on hand. BB spindle length has no impact over the distance between crank and chainring.
The setup I went with works great, and I'm not clear on why it seemingly confuses and upsets you so much.
The setup I went with works great, and I'm not clear on why it seemingly confuses and upsets you so much.