Montana to require hi Vis clothing for cyclists.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
Montana to require hi Vis clothing for cyclists.
https://montanafreepress.org/2021/01...-for-cyclists/
IMO, it's a bit of good, but a lot of bad. Requiring lighting - good. Requiring a 3 foot passing distance - good. Requiring Hi-Viz clothing - bad. Requiring riders to keep right (with very few good exceptions) - bad.
The hi-viz clothing requirement is bad because it gives the authorities an excuse to NOT charge bad drivers. I would like to think I'm being cynical, but I think it's a realistic fear. The local cycling group is backing it, even though they agree that the requirements are a bad part, they think the good outweighs the bad. I'm unsure.
I hate that it puts ALL the responsibility on the cyclist though. If the law included increased penalties or minimum penalties for negligent drivers, I might be more willing to back it, but I guess since I'm not in Montana, they don't really care what I think
IMO, it's a bit of good, but a lot of bad. Requiring lighting - good. Requiring a 3 foot passing distance - good. Requiring Hi-Viz clothing - bad. Requiring riders to keep right (with very few good exceptions) - bad.
The hi-viz clothing requirement is bad because it gives the authorities an excuse to NOT charge bad drivers. I would like to think I'm being cynical, but I think it's a realistic fear. The local cycling group is backing it, even though they agree that the requirements are a bad part, they think the good outweighs the bad. I'm unsure.
I hate that it puts ALL the responsibility on the cyclist though. If the law included increased penalties or minimum penalties for negligent drivers, I might be more willing to back it, but I guess since I'm not in Montana, they don't really care what I think
Likes For Notso_fastLane:
#2
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
https://montanafreepress.org/2021/01...-for-cyclists/
IMO, it's a bit of good, but a lot of bad. Requiring lighting - good. Requiring a 3 foot passing distance - good. Requiring Hi-Viz clothing - bad. Requiring riders to keep right (with very few good exceptions) - bad.
The hi-viz clothing requirement is bad because it gives the authorities an excuse to NOT charge bad drivers. I would like to think I'm being cynical, but I think it's a realistic fear. The local cycling group is backing it, even though they agree that the requirements are a bad part, they think the good outweighs the bad. I'm unsure.
I hate that it puts ALL the responsibility on the cyclist though. If the law included increased penalties or minimum penalties for negligent drivers, I might be more willing to back it, but I guess since I'm not in Montana, they don't really care what I think
IMO, it's a bit of good, but a lot of bad. Requiring lighting - good. Requiring a 3 foot passing distance - good. Requiring Hi-Viz clothing - bad. Requiring riders to keep right (with very few good exceptions) - bad.
The hi-viz clothing requirement is bad because it gives the authorities an excuse to NOT charge bad drivers. I would like to think I'm being cynical, but I think it's a realistic fear. The local cycling group is backing it, even though they agree that the requirements are a bad part, they think the good outweighs the bad. I'm unsure.
I hate that it puts ALL the responsibility on the cyclist though. If the law included increased penalties or minimum penalties for negligent drivers, I might be more willing to back it, but I guess since I'm not in Montana, they don't really care what I think
Likes For rydabent:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
Also, wearing a hi-viz shirt/jacket does squat for those of us on recumbents (or worse, velomobiles!). I wonder how they will deal with that? I have a large reflective red section on the back of my velo, but I'm pretty sure it's nowhere near 200 sq. in.
Likes For work4bike:
Likes For rydabent:
#6
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,957
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 987 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times
in
527 Posts
This is a proposed bill, brought up by a legislator probably to satisfy one of his constituents. These sorts of proposals usually don't go anywhere, but when they do advance a lot of the silliness usually goes away. Here's the text of that part:
200 sq.in. is not a lot especially if distributed front, side, and back. Recumbent riders can still comply although it won't be all that effective of a "fix".
Write to Mr. Loge as well as to your rep. and tell them what you think.
2) on a highway with a speed limit IN EXCESS of 35 miles an hour or greater,shall wear exterior garments above the waist with a total of not less than2 00 square inches of hunter orange, high-visibility lime, or retro-reflective material visible at all times while riding. GARMENTS MAY INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING MEETING THE COLOR OR RETRO-REFLECTIVE REQUIREMENT:
A) BICYCLE JERSEYS;
(B)ATHLETIC APPAREL;
C)SAFETY VESTS;
(D)HUNTER VESTS;OR
(E)GARMENTS ON WHICH RETROREFLECTIVE TAPE HAS BEEN APPLIED.
A) BICYCLE JERSEYS;
(B)ATHLETIC APPAREL;
C)SAFETY VESTS;
(D)HUNTER VESTS;OR
(E)GARMENTS ON WHICH RETROREFLECTIVE TAPE HAS BEEN APPLIED.
Write to Mr. Loge as well as to your rep. and tell them what you think.
#7
Been around the block
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Liked 231 Times
in
167 Posts
Bright colored garments really only work for drivers during the day, and for the ones that are really paying attention to the road in the first place. Highly reflective apparel is good for the nighttime, and though I wear reflective apparel, but I prefer to put more highly reflective material on the moving parts of my bikes, like crank arms, pedals, wheels, shoes, ankle straps, and gloves (for hand signals), since it really gets my attention when I happen to be driving around cyclists at night in one of my vehicles at night.
On another note, whenever I visit my family members in Montana, it's hard to watch motorcycle riders riding without helmets, and passengers riding around unsecured in the back of pickups on public roadways, especially after my many years of motorsports involvement.
On another note, whenever I visit my family members in Montana, it's hard to watch motorcycle riders riding without helmets, and passengers riding around unsecured in the back of pickups on public roadways, especially after my many years of motorsports involvement.
Likes For roundypndr:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,174
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 381 Post(s)
Liked 145 Times
in
93 Posts
new market for 15" x 15" hunter orange, high vis lime, retroreflective tape flags/bandanas to safety pin on back of shirt/jersey. I hate lime and prefer neon yellow. A regular size bandana is about 20 x 20...cut it down to 15" x 15", maybe slap a safety pizza or triangle on the back and have a blast ; )
Last edited by BikeLite; 02-18-21 at 06:21 AM.
Likes For BikeLite:
#9
Senior Member
I wonder if when they said "lime" if they really meant yellow. IE, the typical and common neon yellow "hi-vis" color we see everywhere nowadays? I've heard some people call it "lime" but to me it is more yellow than green. Green, even bright lime green, doesn't strike me as a safety color; more like a camouflage color.
#10
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,650
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3091 Post(s)
Liked 6,601 Times
in
3,785 Posts
I'd guess that this is what they meant.
__________________
#11
Senior Member
#12
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,650
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3091 Post(s)
Liked 6,601 Times
in
3,785 Posts
I own that Endura jacket and it is VERY visible.
__________________
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,947
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3777 Post(s)
Liked 1,048 Times
in
792 Posts
I wonder if when they said "lime" if they really meant yellow. IE, the typical and common neon yellow "hi-vis" color we see everywhere nowadays? I've heard some people call it "lime" but to me it is more yellow than green. Green, even bright lime green, doesn't strike me as a safety color; more like a camouflage color.
Likes For work4bike:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
Anyway, if hi-viz clothing keeps riders from being hit (and killed), it might be OK have fewer drivers charged versus having more cyclists hit or killed.
Last edited by njkayaker; 02-19-21 at 06:58 AM.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
More or less.
They are (probably) talking about a particular fluorescent green that for which the eye happens to be particularly sensitive to.
This particular color isn't always the best choice. Sometimes, fluorescent pink/orange can work better.
Nothing is going to be perfect. But this requirement might be better than nothing,
Keep in mind that dark (even black) clothing is very popular.
They are (probably) talking about a particular fluorescent green that for which the eye happens to be particularly sensitive to.
This particular color isn't always the best choice. Sometimes, fluorescent pink/orange can work better.
Nothing is going to be perfect. But this requirement might be better than nothing,
Keep in mind that dark (even black) clothing is very popular.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
It doesn't help you but you are part of a very small percentage of the riding population.
Nothing is going to be perfect.
It might be a nuisance if you had to wear the clothing to comply with the law but even that's not a big deal.
=========================
It would be interesting to know how big your reflector is. You might be able to be legally compliant by adding some extra tape.
#17
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
More or less.
They are (probably) talking about a particular fluorescent green that for which the eye happens to be particularly sensitive to.
This particular color isn't always the best choice. Sometimes, fluorescent pink/orange can work better.
Nothing is going to be perfect. But this requirement might be better than nothing,
Keep in mind that dark (even black) clothing is very popular.
They are (probably) talking about a particular fluorescent green that for which the eye happens to be particularly sensitive to.
This particular color isn't always the best choice. Sometimes, fluorescent pink/orange can work better.
Nothing is going to be perfect. But this requirement might be better than nothing,
Keep in mind that dark (even black) clothing is very popular.
#18
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
This piece of wrongmindedness from the article:
"He said he developed the proposal to address the concerns of drivers hauling heavy loads who have a hard time slowing or stopping when approaching cyclists on narrow, winding roads."
"He said he developed the proposal to address the concerns of drivers hauling heavy loads who have a hard time slowing or stopping when approaching cyclists on narrow, winding roads."
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#19
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts
Maybe you are interpreting it wrong. There is a big difference in trying to stop 80,000 pounds as opposed to a 2000 pound car. Being able to notice things further off is potentially more important for vehicles that are heavier.
#20
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
I am not interpreting it wrong at all. Let me ask you a question. If you were operating an 80,000 pound vehicle in an area with narrow winding roads, what might you do differently than you would if you were operating a 2000 pound vehicle?
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,483
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1237 Post(s)
Liked 324 Times
in
249 Posts
Green IS more visible actually. Because there is more blue and yellow in the environment to reflect.
I remember this from 40 years ago, during my waterskiing years. Red sure is useless. My float jacket was bright yellow.
However, I still REFUSE to wear viz on a bicycle. My panier bins don't have it either.
My dyno lights are on full time, makes no sense not to. Trucks saw me just FINE on my tours, They were seeing me from a quarter mile back and changing lanes according to where I was on the shoulder.
Requiring this for race bikes in day time is NOT going to happen. LOL.
Far safer to have a mirror anyway. Viz sure didn't save the group in Nevada last year.
I remember this from 40 years ago, during my waterskiing years. Red sure is useless. My float jacket was bright yellow.
However, I still REFUSE to wear viz on a bicycle. My panier bins don't have it either.
My dyno lights are on full time, makes no sense not to. Trucks saw me just FINE on my tours, They were seeing me from a quarter mile back and changing lanes according to where I was on the shoulder.
Requiring this for race bikes in day time is NOT going to happen. LOL.
Far safer to have a mirror anyway. Viz sure didn't save the group in Nevada last year.
Last edited by GamblerGORD53; 02-19-21 at 12:49 PM.
#23
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts
No one is trying to give the heavy vehicle drivers an excuse to make it okay for hitting a cyclist. Seems they are just trying to make it easier for a cyclist to be noticed by anyone.
Even I have issues on my bike when going in and out of bright sunny parts of the road or trail into very dark shady spots and happen upon a walker or cyclist in colors that match the surroundings. For me brightly colored clothing and bikes do make it easier to be seen from further away.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
This is just yet another Montana bill that will die die die.
A few years ago the Montana bills that went viral (but went nowhere) were to ban bikes from two lane roads (which was amended to complete streets along the way, but died too) and Pokemon Go while driving.
-mr. bill
A few years ago the Montana bills that went viral (but went nowhere) were to ban bikes from two lane roads (which was amended to complete streets along the way, but died too) and Pokemon Go while driving.
-mr. bill
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
-mr. bill