BEWARE – Merlin Metalworks, DEAN Bikes, Janus Cycle Group
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,077
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 1,567 Times
in
1,029 Posts
There is not company victimizing here, It is simply an explanation of a few of the items in which blame was placed upon Merlin when in certain facts there was no blame to be made, or solutions were reached per the customer's request. Per John being on the website, if someone has a link to the location of his presence please note it, he is 100% not any part of the group anymore. Per responsibility of the company, certain items fall to the responsibility of the manufacturer when the issue is brought up by a customer, this is a given. Certainly a manufacturer would not intent to present improper items or spec dimensions and should this happen it get the chance to make it right. This was done to the customer's request. As the OP noted, he found fault in the frame, he sent it back, Merlin fixed those faults at no charge. He requested seat tube shims, they were sent. Heaps of hours were spent remedying the requests, and yet the customer is clearly still dissatisfied. At what point do a company's responsibility end when they have done the customer specific requests for solutions and yet there is still not only dissatisfaction, but even active boardline defamation. Many of OP's statements in this thread about the workings of Merlin and Janus are complete assumptions.
Last edited by Kontact; 09-11-23 at 03:09 PM.
Likes For Kontact:
#77
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
nobody is bragging here. It was noted that the Merlin would give customer an RA if requested, customer requested shims for replacement. This is the solution the customer expressed to resolve issue. There are many reasons a seat post might get sloppy, with having a frame in hand how is one supposed to remedy the fixable issue. Clearly you have made up your mind on the matter so its somewhat a non issue. The notes in this thread are just to shed light on generally a previously one sided slant.
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,077
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 1,567 Times
in
1,029 Posts
nobody is bragging here. It was noted that the Merlin would give customer an RA if requested, customer requested shims for replacement. This is the solution the customer expressed to resolve issue. There are many reasons a seat post might get sloppy, with having a frame in hand how is one supposed to remedy the fixable issue. Clearly you have made up your mind on the matter so its somewhat a non issue. The notes in this thread are just to shed light on generally a previously one sided slant.
On November 16th while assembling the bike I installed the seatpost, which until now was still in the box, and that the seatpost was loose in the frame to the point that the supplied clamp would barely tighten it. I contacted Peter who said that this was “within tolerance” but that he would send a better clamp.
I went for a 30 mile ride and when I returned found that the seatpost had sunk into the frame almost 1/4”.
So I put this news into an email to Peter that the bike was basically unrideable in its current condition due to a defective frame. I never got a response and have apparently been “ghosted” as a “problem” customer.
I went for a 30 mile ride and when I returned found that the seatpost had sunk into the frame almost 1/4”.
So I put this news into an email to Peter that the bike was basically unrideable in its current condition due to a defective frame. I never got a response and have apparently been “ghosted” as a “problem” customer.
The OP talks about clamps, you bring up shims. The OP says he was told the bike was in spec, you say he was offered an RA for the seat post.
Seems like it isn't even the same story.
The problem for Merlin/Janus is that they have a bike that won't retain a seat post, and the response from Merlin makes it sound like the customer didn't want it fixed. Does that seem likely? Does it help make Merlin look on top of the situation?
Last edited by Kontact; 09-11-23 at 07:53 PM.
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,077
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 1,567 Times
in
1,029 Posts
As a service manager, I have been on the receiving end of a custom frame builder saying "we consider that in spec". This seems to be the ultimate warranty denial card that some companies play when they realize that something so essential is wrong with the bike that they might as well throw the frame out and start over.
Which is why I give some credence to the OP's story.
But I also know that some people get too involved in the process, trying to get to a workable solution. The right answer is more "this isn't right, and you need to fix it". But that takes a lot more time and is painful when the builder keeps insisting that everything is fine. It is hard to argue with someone that maintains a different reality than everyone else.
Which is why I give some credence to the OP's story.
But I also know that some people get too involved in the process, trying to get to a workable solution. The right answer is more "this isn't right, and you need to fix it". But that takes a lot more time and is painful when the builder keeps insisting that everything is fine. It is hard to argue with someone that maintains a different reality than everyone else.
Likes For Kontact:
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,800
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,026 Times
in
723 Posts
nobody is bragging here. It was noted that the Merlin would give customer an RA if requested, customer requested shims for replacement. This is the solution the customer expressed to resolve issue. There are many reasons a seat post might get sloppy, with having a frame in hand how is one supposed to remedy the fixable issue. Clearly you have made up your mind on the matter so its somewhat a non issue. The notes in this thread are just to shed light on generally a previously one sided slant.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#82
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,517
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
2,058 Posts
What does "within spec" mean? As someone who wrote and enforced specs on manufactured goods, without a written, measurable, quantifiable spec it's opinion and means nothing.
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,077
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 1,567 Times
in
1,029 Posts
Precisely. It is a platitude, not a number. A technical sounding way of saying "seems okay to me".
#84
Senior Member
You were way too patient with these guys. They sold you a defective product. Fix it immediately (within a week), or return for refund. If refused, immediate credit card charge back. Simple as that, end of story. You are doing business with a merchant, not negotiating a divorce from your wife.
Credit card chargeback has a time limit of 90-120 days from date of purchase, depending on the bank. Once you miss that window, your only other recourse is small claims court (as you found out the hard way). Amex has a reputation for good customer service and fast chargeback resolution. I only use Amex for high dollar purchases.
Since you paid a deposit ahead of time, that $1500 would have missed the chargeback deadline. But at least you wouldn't have lost the remainder of the $7000.
Credit card chargeback has a time limit of 90-120 days from date of purchase, depending on the bank. Once you miss that window, your only other recourse is small claims court (as you found out the hard way). Amex has a reputation for good customer service and fast chargeback resolution. I only use Amex for high dollar purchases.
Since you paid a deposit ahead of time, that $1500 would have missed the chargeback deadline. But at least you wouldn't have lost the remainder of the $7000.
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,660
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,323 Times
in
674 Posts
Tough thread to follow but not clear about the seatpost sizing. Some titanium manufacturers use aluminum sleeves for a variety of reasons and is that just the case in this instance. Or is the sleeve out of spec? My adventure frame for example has a aluminum sleeve in the seat tube with a id. For a 27.2 seatpost.
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,077
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 1,567 Times
in
1,029 Posts
Tough thread to follow but not clear about the seatpost sizing. Some titanium manufacturers use aluminum sleeves for a variety of reasons and is that just the case in this instance. Or is the sleeve out of spec? My adventure frame for example has a aluminum sleeve in the seat tube with a id. For a 27.2 seatpost.
The OP's sleeve was too large inside to effectively clamp his seatpost.
All the sleeved ti bikes I've ever serviced or owned were on the other end of the spectrum: perfectly fit or slightly undersized.
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,660
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,323 Times
in
674 Posts
Ti bike companies have used permanently bonded ti, carbon and aluminum sleeves to make the thin seat tube tubing thick enough for clamping and to get down to the common 27.2 size.
The OP's sleeve was too large inside to effectively clamp his seatpost.
All the sleeved ti bikes I've ever serviced or owned were on the other end of the spectrum: perfectly fit or slightly undersized.
The OP's sleeve was too large inside to effectively clamp his seatpost.
All the sleeved ti bikes I've ever serviced or owned were on the other end of the spectrum: perfectly fit or slightly undersized.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7e88da7b65.jpg
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,077
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 1,567 Times
in
1,029 Posts
But this image from up in the thread indicates the OP did not use the sleeve. Something does not add up with this story. This is also the OP's second thread regarding this frameset and mucking about with it.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7e88da7b65.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7e88da7b65.jpg
My recollection is that has tried to address the oversized and permanently bonded sleeve with shims, and then tried to remove and replace the undersized sleeve completely.
You don't normally have an option to use it or not with the sleeve. As I mentioned, it is bonded in place. The one on my 96 Merlin in so nicely done you can't see it.
#89
Senior Member
How can you tell? The sleeve should not be visible from the outside.
My recollection is that has tried to address the oversized and permanently bonded sleeve with shims, and then tried to remove and replace the undersized sleeve completely.
You don't normally have an option to use it or not with the sleeve. As I mentioned, it is bonded in place. The one on my 96 Merlin in so nicely done you can't see it.
My recollection is that has tried to address the oversized and permanently bonded sleeve with shims, and then tried to remove and replace the undersized sleeve completely.
You don't normally have an option to use it or not with the sleeve. As I mentioned, it is bonded in place. The one on my 96 Merlin in so nicely done you can't see it.
But this image from up in the thread indicates the OP did not use the sleeve. Something does not add up with this story. This is also the OP's second thread regarding this frameset and mucking about with it.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7e88da7b65.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7e88da7b65.jpg
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,077
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 1,567 Times
in
1,029 Posts
But this image from up in the thread indicates the OP did not use the sleeve. Something does not add up with this story. This is also the OP's second thread regarding this frameset and mucking about with it.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7e88da7b65.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7e88da7b65.jpg