Cycling computer recommendation....
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Cycling computer recommendation....
I will be updating from my Lezyne SuperGPS, and am looking at the following:
Wahoo Elemnt Bolt
Wahoo Elemnt Roam
Garmin Edge 530
Stages Dash M50/L50
I am running Varia radar, and all are now compatible.
My highest priority is reliability. I despise losing ride data. It's irrational, but I'll sulk for a week if a unit crashes or freezes, and I can't recover data. It's gotta work, every time.
Second highest priority is UI speed and flow. If the unit is under powered, or the UI is buggy or slow, that's a no-go. If navigation or moving between data screens is doggy, it's not the unit for me.
I value training data, but don't need compatibility with training websites to upload workouts from. I do want to be able to enter interval workouts in the unit on the fly if possible though. I think Garmin may be the only one that can do that ??
I like add-ons such as the Garmin Climb Pro, but not at the expense of reliability or cost of UI speed. Battery life is important, but my rides aren't more than 5-8hrs. I'm not a weight weenie, but lighter and compact is good. Visibility of data is important. I carry my smartphone with me, so having features tethered to the phone isn't a problem.
Turn by turn navigation would be nice, but the superiority of the nav is less important to me than a reliable and quick-using unit with data metrics I can access on the ride.
Not sure if there are any folks with experience using more than one of the aforementioned units, but I'd be obliged for any of your thoughts and experiences. Thanks !
Wahoo Elemnt Bolt
Wahoo Elemnt Roam
Garmin Edge 530
Stages Dash M50/L50
I am running Varia radar, and all are now compatible.
My highest priority is reliability. I despise losing ride data. It's irrational, but I'll sulk for a week if a unit crashes or freezes, and I can't recover data. It's gotta work, every time.
Second highest priority is UI speed and flow. If the unit is under powered, or the UI is buggy or slow, that's a no-go. If navigation or moving between data screens is doggy, it's not the unit for me.
I value training data, but don't need compatibility with training websites to upload workouts from. I do want to be able to enter interval workouts in the unit on the fly if possible though. I think Garmin may be the only one that can do that ??
I like add-ons such as the Garmin Climb Pro, but not at the expense of reliability or cost of UI speed. Battery life is important, but my rides aren't more than 5-8hrs. I'm not a weight weenie, but lighter and compact is good. Visibility of data is important. I carry my smartphone with me, so having features tethered to the phone isn't a problem.
Turn by turn navigation would be nice, but the superiority of the nav is less important to me than a reliable and quick-using unit with data metrics I can access on the ride.
Not sure if there are any folks with experience using more than one of the aforementioned units, but I'd be obliged for any of your thoughts and experiences. Thanks !
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,964
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3305 Post(s)
Liked 2,143 Times
in
1,210 Posts
I like two of the Garmins I’ve used, a 1000 and now a 1030, but I use them for navigation and wanted units that I could add Topo maps. The maps display better on Garmins as well, IMO.
As maps aren’t your priority the best option is the Bolt. Not sure about intervals though, I’ve never used that. Wahoo has had time to debug what few items ever had issues and they are now selling for $230. The turn-by-turn was always good, the map was just poor. Paired with RideWithGPS and you can get good TBT and it’s known as a rock solid if unexciting unit.
As maps aren’t your priority the best option is the Bolt. Not sure about intervals though, I’ve never used that. Wahoo has had time to debug what few items ever had issues and they are now selling for $230. The turn-by-turn was always good, the map was just poor. Paired with RideWithGPS and you can get good TBT and it’s known as a rock solid if unexciting unit.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 961' 42.28° N, 83.78° W (A2)
Posts: 2,344
Bikes: Mongoose Selous, Trek DS
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times
in
189 Posts
I like two of the Garmins I’ve used, a 1000 and now a 1030, but I use them for navigation and wanted units that I could add Topo maps. The maps display better on Garmins as well, IMO.
As maps aren’t your priority the best option is the Bolt. Not sure about intervals though, I’ve never used that. Wahoo has had time to debug what few items ever had issues and they are now selling for $230. The turn-by-turn was always good, the map was just poor. Paired with RideWithGPS and you can get good TBT and it’s known as a rock solid if unexciting unit.
As maps aren’t your priority the best option is the Bolt. Not sure about intervals though, I’ve never used that. Wahoo has had time to debug what few items ever had issues and they are now selling for $230. The turn-by-turn was always good, the map was just poor. Paired with RideWithGPS and you can get good TBT and it’s known as a rock solid if unexciting unit.
Likes For bobwysiwyg:
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
As maps aren’t your priority the best option is the Bolt. Not sure about intervals though, I’ve never used that. Wahoo has had time to debug what few items ever had issues and they are now selling for $230. The turn-by-turn was always good, the map was just poor. Paired with RideWithGPS and you can get good TBT and it’s known as a rock solid if unexciting unit.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#6
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,587
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3915 Post(s)
Liked 1,967 Times
in
1,403 Posts
I bought my Edge 800 in 2010, still use it. We have 2 of them on the tandem. Never had a problem with them, other than running out of battery at ~10 hours. I have a battery pack I use if it's going to be longer than that. I also upload everything. I really like the ability to follow a route and also to see the route on the screen. Only thing is that I wish the screen were larger, but I could upgrade and get that.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I bought my Edge 800 in 2010, still use it. We have 2 of them on the tandem. Never had a problem with them, other than running out of battery at ~10 hours. I have a battery pack I use if it's going to be longer than that. I also upload everything. I really like the ability to follow a route and also to see the route on the screen. Only thing is that I wish the screen were larger, but I could upgrade and get that.
#8
Banned.
I use Cyclemeter on my iphone mounted on a QuadLock. I has been flawlessly reliable for the last five years. It does all the things you require, automatically sends your location at regular intervals to any email addresses you Iist. It also does all the things an iphone does--I've even had brief Facetime chats while riding out in the country. The one thing it can't do is be compact and light, but you carry a smartphone anyway.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Using the phone itself has some virtue, so thank-you for the suggestion. While it would fulfill many of the functions I am looking for, my preference is to confine the phones bulk and form to my jersey pocket, and to have a computer more slight up front. Cheers !
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437
Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times
in
414 Posts
Love my Bolt, but have no experience with other computers to compare it to. Def rock solid, have never had an issue or lost any data, screens are easy to setup and navigate while riding. Map size/detail is a bit lacking, but I've also never gotten lost when following a route that I've loaded (which is the only time I use the map screen, if I'm out exploring and want to see where I am, I stop and look at the map on my phone).
Just saw a Roam in person the other day, and it is considerably larger than the Bolt, and it's color, so the map/nav is probably easier to use. Personally, I like the small form factor of the Bolt, and it's still very easy to see important ride data like speed, time, distance, etc. (depending on how much data you display, the fonts get smaller the more rows you display, but I have no problems seeing with four rows of data).
Just saw a Roam in person the other day, and it is considerably larger than the Bolt, and it's color, so the map/nav is probably easier to use. Personally, I like the small form factor of the Bolt, and it's still very easy to see important ride data like speed, time, distance, etc. (depending on how much data you display, the fonts get smaller the more rows you display, but I have no problems seeing with four rows of data).
Likes For Rides4Beer:
#11
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 424
Bikes: 2016 Cervelo R3 & 1999 Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 161 Post(s)
Liked 139 Times
in
80 Posts
I moved from a Garmin 510 to the Bolt. I had maybe 1-2 lockups on the Garmin over the 2 years I had it but have had no lockups/lost data on the Bolt since I've gotten it a little over a year ago. The main reason I moved from the Garmin is because I couldn't get used to the touch screen. The Bolt has buttons with a nice tactile feel; the screen has good (non color) contrast; it isn't too big or too small; the screen is responsive. At the end of a ride I have it set to auto load to Strava, RideWithGPS, and DropBox. I can recommend the Bolt.
Likes For MidTNBrad:
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I moved from a Garmin 510 to the Bolt. I had maybe 1-2 lockups on the Garmin over the 2 years I had it but have had no lockups/lost data on the Bolt since I've gotten it a little over a year ago. The main reason I moved from the Garmin is because I couldn't get used to the touch screen. The Bolt has buttons with a nice tactile feel; the screen has good (non color) contrast; it isn't too big or too small; the screen is responsive. At the end of a ride I have it set to auto load to Strava, RideWithGPS, and DropBox. I can recommend the Bolt.
Likes For MidTNBrad:
Likes For Rides4Beer:
Likes For topflightpro:
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,964
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 731 Times
in
438 Posts
I haven't used the 530, have a 520 and recently bought a Bolt after being fed up by issues with the 520, with the last straw being a well-known issue where the Varia radar will stop reporting if the unit drops the BT phone connection even if it reconnects. I saw the same issue reported on the Garmin 530 forums, so Wahoo won by default
There are only 2 things I like better about the Garmin: Di2 hood buttons are programmable (Wahoo only maps them to the physical computer buttons) and profile support lets me move it between bikes and not have useless sensor fields.
Everything else I like better on the Bolt, though the 530 might be more competitive than the 520. Battery life, UI responsiveness, screen clarity - yes even maps are easier for me to read. Also notable is that the Bolt supports workouts and displays more info about intervals, while my 520 only showed the interval type and power range.
There are only 2 things I like better about the Garmin: Di2 hood buttons are programmable (Wahoo only maps them to the physical computer buttons) and profile support lets me move it between bikes and not have useless sensor fields.
Everything else I like better on the Bolt, though the 530 might be more competitive than the 520. Battery life, UI responsiveness, screen clarity - yes even maps are easier for me to read. Also notable is that the Bolt supports workouts and displays more info about intervals, while my 520 only showed the interval type and power range.
Likes For surak:
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I haven't used the 530, have a 520 and recently bought a Bolt after being fed up by issues with the 520 [...]
There are only 2 things I like better about the Garmin: Di2 hood buttons are programmable (Wahoo only maps them to the physical computer buttons) and profile support lets me move it between bikes and not have useless sensor fields.
There are only 2 things I like better about the Garmin: Di2 hood buttons are programmable (Wahoo only maps them to the physical computer buttons) and profile support lets me move it between bikes and not have useless sensor fields.
Regarding interval programs on the Bolt, do those need to be created on the computer and uploaded ? Or can they be built directly on the Bolt or in the app ?
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,964
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3305 Post(s)
Liked 2,143 Times
in
1,210 Posts
I think Garmin is blowing out stock, Edge 520 Plus $200
https://www.clevertraining.com/garmi...cling-computer
https://www.clevertraining.com/garmi...cling-computer
#22
newbie
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Alexandria, Va
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Bolt or Roam
I bought a Bolt to replace a Garmin 510 which served me well. The Bolt does everything I need it to do, and is much more intuitive than the Garmin. if I were shopping today I would definitely look at the Roam which wasn’t available.
Likes For Timdugan:
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Yes, in looking at DCRainmaker's recent review of the Stages Dash units, in the comparison table with the Bolt and Edge 530, only the Edge allows on-unit impromptu intervals to be set up.
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I really appreciated everyone's feedback, and settled on the Bolt for my current needs profile, despite it being a few years old now. I purchased the recent Stealth Black edition, and will appreciate it as an incremental upgrade from my Lezyne Super GPS.
Likes For santoku:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
While I like the idea of the Roam, the price is way off the mark considering they didn't increase the processing power of the unit. If I was a heavy user of dynamic navigation, I would consider the Roam or Edge 830/1030, but I'm not.
I really appreciated everyone's feedback, and settled on the Bolt for my current needs profile, despite it being a few years old now. I purchased the recent Stealth Black edition, and will appreciate it as an incremental upgrade from my Lezyne Super GPS.
I really appreciated everyone's feedback, and settled on the Bolt for my current needs profile, despite it being a few years old now. I purchased the recent Stealth Black edition, and will appreciate it as an incremental upgrade from my Lezyne Super GPS.
Better for reliability, no?