Classic and Vintage bikes that didn’t wow
10-16-18, 10:32 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Classic and Vintage bikes that didn’t wow
The recent “bucket list” thread got me thinking. I am one of those people who tends to like the bike I am riding. Some are special but I am generally at a loss to identify the small differences. Kind of like wine.
So I am wondering if others have ridden “good” or “great” bikes that fell flat. Not rustbucket Huffys—I mean quality tubeset bikes that fit, with no mechanical problems, with decent wheels and acceptable tires, that for whatever reason failed to impress.
So I am wondering if others have ridden “good” or “great” bikes that fell flat. Not rustbucket Huffys—I mean quality tubeset bikes that fit, with no mechanical problems, with decent wheels and acceptable tires, that for whatever reason failed to impress.
10-16-18, 10:38 AM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,256
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 478 Times
in
258 Posts
I think that, like wine, many of a particular quality will taste the same... and then you get a really nice one and you do go "wow, that's good". For me this is true of tyres, of frames, of groupsets... most taste very similar and are very nice. But then you try titanium (for example), and you go "wow, that's good".
10-16-18, 10:40 AM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,433
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5887 Post(s)
Liked 3,470 Times
in
2,079 Posts
Pretty much any vintage bike on the local craigslist where the seller is asking too much money doesn't wow.
10-16-18, 10:43 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Prior Lake
Posts: 558
Bikes: 1989 Tommasini Super Prestige, 1985 Chris Kvale, 1977 Colnago Super, 1992 Serotta Colorado, 1984 Schwinn Cimarron
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times
in
20 Posts
I didn’t like the Bridgestone RB-T and RB-1 that I had. Don’t understand the appeal outside of the Grant ideology which I find to be sound.
Hated the Cinelli Supercorsa I had. Pretty bike but ride did nothing for me.
Hated the Cinelli Supercorsa I had. Pretty bike but ride did nothing for me.
10-16-18, 11:16 AM
#5
Bad example
I don’t ride a lot of bikes (I still own the great majority of bikes I’ve had over the years!) but I gave away only two old bikes, even though they were fun to ride, because I knew they just were not going to work for me long term. The rest of them include some custom bikes and a 1975 California Masi, as well as my pile of cheap weird old French and Japanese bikes. They are all different yet are all a treat in their own ways. The two I disposed of, an old Gaspipe Schwinn and a Raleigh Capri, were nice for short flat smooth car-free rides but just did not have the spark that my other bikes had.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
10-16-18, 11:40 AM
#6
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,921
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,088 Times
in
637 Posts
The main disappointments so far have been a full 531, Trek Tri Series. It was the perfect size for me, but it just felt dead. It seemed to be a black hole for pedaling energy. I also had a Trek 760 that I had a similar impression of. It was a little small for me, which might have been part of the problem. The other one was purely in between my ears. 1954 Hetchin's Magnum Opus. Again, my size. It rode pretty well, but I could never get past feeling self-conscious that I was riding around on a museum piece. Sold them all on. The Trek Tri series must have been quite a dog, as the fellow I sold it to didn't like it either, and barely kept it a week before he was looking to be rid of it.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
Likes For USAZorro:
10-16-18, 12:06 PM
#7
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,983
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26382 Post(s)
Liked 10,359 Times
in
7,195 Posts
...I have tried to like the handling of this bicycle, but I just can't.
Likes For 3alarmer:
10-16-18, 12:29 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
My 2nd good bicycle was a Scapin, back in the mid-1970s. Nothing since has matched it. Several Marinoni have come very close but almost everything else has failed to wow me, including dozens that are highly regarded by other members.
10-16-18, 12:33 PM
#9
~>~
A machine that is perfectly suitable for a rider of a certain size, riding style and pedaling technique often just won't work well for another.
At the time I was racing my Vitus 979 my teammate had a Cannondale Criterium that suited his aggressive big gear sprinters' temperament and style very well as race results showed.
Neither of us would have traded machines but understood that each was the "right" choice for the other although we trained and raced together.
"Rides like a lumber wagon" and "frightening to descend on" were both "true" assessments by the wrong rider on either machine.
Putting a lot of time, effort and $,$$$ in finding that C&V "Grail" bike based on legend/rumor/myth/fantasy only to find that it doesn't ride to expectations must be quite disappointing.
If you find a machine that works particularly well for you, new or old, hang onto it.
-Bandera
At the time I was racing my Vitus 979 my teammate had a Cannondale Criterium that suited his aggressive big gear sprinters' temperament and style very well as race results showed.
Neither of us would have traded machines but understood that each was the "right" choice for the other although we trained and raced together.
"Rides like a lumber wagon" and "frightening to descend on" were both "true" assessments by the wrong rider on either machine.
Putting a lot of time, effort and $,$$$ in finding that C&V "Grail" bike based on legend/rumor/myth/fantasy only to find that it doesn't ride to expectations must be quite disappointing.
If you find a machine that works particularly well for you, new or old, hang onto it.
-Bandera
10-16-18, 12:35 PM
#10
Bad example
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
10-16-18, 12:35 PM
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
10-16-18, 01:47 PM
#12
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,725
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2152 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
1,203 Posts
Ther have certainly been a bunch of iconic bikes that have passed through my hands over the years with which I was unimpressed. A Davis Phinney that just.would.not.go.fast. Couple of MAX tubing bikes that were fast but just seemed too stiff and jangly. Some that rode OK but had paint/rust problems that would have been more expensive to fix than the thing was worth. More than a few that I figured were just built early on Monday or late on Friday and were maybe not the best representatives of their respective breeds.
BUT I've also decided that part of the whole deal is...me. Gotta use a good set of wheels (build your own!), a good set of tires, the right saddle and the correct setup. Swap stuff around until you arrive at the best combination for that particular ride. Hence the Reflect, etc. thread.
Makes me a little sad to think that some of those bike that just didn't ride well (except for the badly built ones) could have been turned around with a little more effort on my part.
BUT I've also decided that part of the whole deal is...me. Gotta use a good set of wheels (build your own!), a good set of tires, the right saddle and the correct setup. Swap stuff around until you arrive at the best combination for that particular ride. Hence the Reflect, etc. thread.
Makes me a little sad to think that some of those bike that just didn't ride well (except for the badly built ones) could have been turned around with a little more effort on my part.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
10-16-18, 02:30 PM
#13
Senior Member
Cannondales, I want to like them but they just don’t feel right. I’ve owned a bunch but always end up selling them after a couple rides. The last ST I had was the perfect size and it still tore up my knees. Not sure if it’s the geometry or just me.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
10-16-18, 03:24 PM
#15
Sapient
If these can now be considered vintage-
First- Cannondales 3.0 series road bikes with the aluminum fork. Never could abide the geometry or the ride characteristics. Really almost all of the fist generation aluminum road bikes. Unless you were a monster racing crits they were so stiff they beat you to death (except the gorgeous, flexy Vitus's).
Second- First generation Trek OCLV carbon fiber (about 1996 or 1997). Spent many miles on a Project One 5200 or 5500 (don't remember which). I was riding a titanium Paramount at the time and the Treks just felt dull and lifeless. It may have been the fancy/horrible Race Lite wheels.
First- Cannondales 3.0 series road bikes with the aluminum fork. Never could abide the geometry or the ride characteristics. Really almost all of the fist generation aluminum road bikes. Unless you were a monster racing crits they were so stiff they beat you to death (except the gorgeous, flexy Vitus's).
Second- First generation Trek OCLV carbon fiber (about 1996 or 1997). Spent many miles on a Project One 5200 or 5500 (don't remember which). I was riding a titanium Paramount at the time and the Treks just felt dull and lifeless. It may have been the fancy/horrible Race Lite wheels.
10-16-18, 03:35 PM
#16
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
Kind of afraid to say....there are always fans of some kind of bike.
but
the early Trek Aluminums.
but
the early Trek Aluminums.
Last edited by RobbieTunes; 10-17-18 at 09:39 PM.
10-16-18, 04:04 PM
#17
smelling the roses
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México
Posts: 15,320
Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5
Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7081 Post(s)
Liked 901 Times
in
612 Posts
Every time you post a pic on this bridge, it takes me right back to a former life. Thanks! Now back to our regularly scheduled programming.
10-16-18, 06:08 PM
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,249
Bikes: 1964 Legnano Roma Olympiade, 1973 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Peugeot PR10, 2002 Specialized Allez, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2013 Culprit Croz Blade
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 818 Times
in
421 Posts
I've never owned a bike I didn't love, but back in my racing days, I had (still have) a 1964 Legnano Roma. My best friend had a copper colored Bianchi Specialissima that I coveted big time. Then one day, his bike developed a high speed shimmy. I thought he was messing with me, so we traded bikes, and his Bianchi's shimmy scared the crap out if me. End of my lust for that bike. He later had a bad crash on it, probably not the bike's fault. I still have my Legnano, his Bianchi has moved on to other owners, though recently he mentioned tracking it down, and maybe getting it back ... go figure.
10-16-18, 06:40 PM
#19
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
If these can now be considered vintage-
Second- First generation Trek OCLV carbon fiber (about 1996 or 1997). Spent many miles on a Project One 5200 or 5500 (don't remember which). I was riding a titanium Paramount at the time and the Treks just felt dull and lifeless. It may have been the fancy/horrible Race Lite wheels.
Second- First generation Trek OCLV carbon fiber (about 1996 or 1997). Spent many miles on a Project One 5200 or 5500 (don't remember which). I was riding a titanium Paramount at the time and the Treks just felt dull and lifeless. It may have been the fancy/horrible Race Lite wheels.
10-16-18, 06:45 PM
#20
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
I am probably like rccardr, though: a build that doesn't work, with good components and a good frame, often has something missing that I missed.
10-16-18, 08:07 PM
#22
bocobiking
A 1988 50th Anniversary Schwinn Paramount. It always seemed to ride like a tank. I love my 1974 Paramount, but not the '88.
Anyone want to buy the frame and Stronglight headset? 63cm c-to-t.
Anyone want to buy the frame and Stronglight headset? 63cm c-to-t.
Last edited by bocobiking; 10-16-18 at 08:10 PM.
10-16-18, 08:55 PM
#23
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,823 Times
in
1,709 Posts
Guess I'm not the only one nonplussed by my Cinelli Supercorsa experience; this bike didn't jazz me at all:
It was heavy - much more so than any of my other bikes which had identical components (most people know I'm a Campy NR/SR guy through and through). It also didn't inspire in the ride department; because of the weight it felt a little dead. I sold it a little less than a year after having it refinished.
DD
It was heavy - much more so than any of my other bikes which had identical components (most people know I'm a Campy NR/SR guy through and through). It also didn't inspire in the ride department; because of the weight it felt a little dead. I sold it a little less than a year after having it refinished.
DD
Last edited by Drillium Dude; 10-16-18 at 09:06 PM.
10-16-18, 10:32 PM
#24
Senior Member
Tried to ride an early 90's Cannondale road bike, when new at the shop. Loved the look, hated the ride. Most dead ride I ever experienced.
__________________
Chris
Crapmaster Emeritus
Chris
Crapmaster Emeritus
10-16-18, 10:39 PM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,995 Posts
The main disappointments so far have been a full 531, Trek Tri Series. It was the perfect size for me, but it just felt dead. It seemed to be a black hole for pedaling energy. I also had a Trek 760 that I had a similar impression of. It was a little small for me, which might have been part of the problem. The other one was purely in between my ears. 1954 Hetchin's Magnum Opus. Again, my size. It rode pretty well, but I could never get past feeling self-conscious that I was riding around on a museum piece. Sold them all on. The Trek Tri series must have been quite a dog, as the fellow I sold it to didn't like it either, and barely kept it a week before he was looking to be rid of it.
Some were quite pretty, but just not happy bikes, indeed they felt "dead". Black holes for pedal energy.
