1x12 the new gearing for Road Racing?
#101
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#103
Chases Dogs for Sport
This forum cracks me up. Lots of opinions. Lots of passion. Lots of speculation and projection. Precious little experience.
I rode and raced 1x for a couple years. At first, it was really cool. But after the "new" wore off, I started to notice the gaps and the lack of flexibility (at times) compared to 2x. Sometimes, it was a gear ratio that wasn't available 1x. Sometimes, it was a slower multi-shift going from downhill to uphill or vice versa (sometimes four TIMES as many shifts to get to the same place). And the worst, in hilly or mountainous racing situations was spinning out, yet falling behind, because the 2x guys ALWAYS had a higher gear. I won't race 1x ever again, if I can help it. The advantages (which are few) aren't worth the price you pay in flexibility and performance.
I rode and raced 1x for a couple years. At first, it was really cool. But after the "new" wore off, I started to notice the gaps and the lack of flexibility (at times) compared to 2x. Sometimes, it was a gear ratio that wasn't available 1x. Sometimes, it was a slower multi-shift going from downhill to uphill or vice versa (sometimes four TIMES as many shifts to get to the same place). And the worst, in hilly or mountainous racing situations was spinning out, yet falling behind, because the 2x guys ALWAYS had a higher gear. I won't race 1x ever again, if I can help it. The advantages (which are few) aren't worth the price you pay in flexibility and performance.
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
468 Posts
This is what keeps me from 1X. I'm pretty sensitive to cadence and nothing would frustrate me more than constantly being in between gears.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
#105
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,509
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20801 Post(s)
Liked 9,448 Times
in
4,666 Posts
You either die a hero poseur or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain a retrogrouch.
#106
Senior Member
There's a legit crit machine -- notice the single water bottle cage, the pre-race chain on the big cog. All set to go. Built for a clear purpose.
#107
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#108
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Why not that 10-33 cassette with a double chainring? Use the ring that you can live with for 95% of a route, switch to the other maybe 2x on the entire ride to the other ring for the balance 5% of the ride?
#109
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
On the amateur race level, the small chain ring is just along for the ride during most crits. And if you do a gear chart, a typical 2x10 setup really gives you 14 distinct gears with a 53/39 11-25.
Makes a lot of sense to me if you're not climbing a mountain or a big hill.
Makes a lot of sense to me if you're not climbing a mountain or a big hill.
#110
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Looks like it'd get dropped.
And what's up with that rear wheel?! Plus some friction in that gear combo, undoubtedly.
#111
Senior Member
It's true that a 2x whatever gets you more ratios, usually a wider range. But if someone is training on the same terrain that they're racing, and a 1x works on those course, I don't see what the huge deal is.
#112
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
One persistent theme here is that there are these "big jumps" in a 1x drivetrain. I'm an amateur racer, and I do a fair amount of training on the road with my cross bike, which is a 1x11. It has about the same bottom gear as my road bike, but somewhat less on the top end. I don't feel like I'm suffering between gears. I'd say it's got a better selection of gear ratios than my very first race bike, which was a 2x7.
It's true that a 2x whatever gets you more ratios, usually a wider range. But if someone is training on the same terrain that they're racing, and a 1x works on those course, I don't see what the huge deal is.
It's true that a 2x whatever gets you more ratios, usually a wider range. But if someone is training on the same terrain that they're racing, and a 1x works on those course, I don't see what the huge deal is.
And it's not always about bottom gears and top gears; it's about gear jumps and friction. A big/big combo "feels" like turning a wheel with the brake rubbing. You can just hear the nastiness. Similar to being in the 11. I'd actually run a 55 if I could so I wouldn't need to go below the 13-14 in really fast racing situations. Straighter drivelines are faster.
Of course it's a personal preference, but it irritates the hell out of me when I'm maxed out and fishing for a gear and it's just not there. It used to always seem like it was the 16 when I first started, but I've got that one now. Still face that issue from time to time going from 19-21-23 on longer hills, but I don't do those that frequently. But those are 2x jumps. Start making that 3, and 4, and 5. Yuck. Sure, I and others could "survive", but why? Makes no sense to me.
At the end of the day, anyone can justify anything they want to themselves. But it's not likely to be such an easy sale to others, especially ones that take their performance seriously and have worked out what works well for them.
Anyway, as a quickly aging Cat 1 crit racer struggling to maintain some semblance of relevance and skill, that's why I won't ever be running 1x. Nor do I ever plan on running disc brakes, but that's another tale.
#113
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Or a 22 cog 11-40, if you want people to give up the front shifter.
#114
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
The difference in most road races are climbs. One of the weaknesses of having wider gaps between gears on a climb is that it makes getting the wattage right more difficult. If the group is going up a hill at a pace that wattage X and the only gear that will allow that wattage forces your cadence down to 50 rpm, you are probably getting dropped. On the flats limited gear choice is not as dire. A rider is probably sitting in saving energy.
#115
Senior Member
I'm sure we could go back and forth about the practicality of either, but what may be practical for you isn't for me, nor for a lot of people. I'm an amateur racer as well and raced about 30 crits without a single road race last year, but within 10 miles of my front door I have about a dozen 30 sec-2+ minute hills that eclipse 15%. Even dropping 700 watts for a minute won't get me up those climbs in the big ring (more than once, at least).
And it's not always about bottom gears and top gears; it's about gear jumps and friction. A big/big combo "feels" like turning a wheel with the brake rubbing. You can just hear the nastiness. Similar to being in the 11. I'd actually run a 55 if I could so I wouldn't need to go below the 13-14 in really fast racing situations. Straighter drivelines are faster.
Of course it's a personal preference, but it irritates the hell out of me when I'm maxed out and fishing for a gear and it's just not there. It used to always seem like it was the 16 when I first started, but I've got that one now. Still face that issue from time to time going from 19-21-23 on longer hills, but I don't do those that frequently. But those are 2x jumps. Start making that 3, and 4, and 5. Yuck. Sure, I and others could "survive", but why? Makes no sense to me.
At the end of the day, anyone can justify anything they want to themselves. But it's not likely to be such an easy sale to others, especially ones that take their performance seriously and have worked out what works well for them.
Anyway, as a quickly aging Cat 1 crit racer struggling to maintain some semblance of relevance and skill, that's why I won't ever be running 1x. Nor do I ever plan on running disc brakes, but that's another tale.
And it's not always about bottom gears and top gears; it's about gear jumps and friction. A big/big combo "feels" like turning a wheel with the brake rubbing. You can just hear the nastiness. Similar to being in the 11. I'd actually run a 55 if I could so I wouldn't need to go below the 13-14 in really fast racing situations. Straighter drivelines are faster.
Of course it's a personal preference, but it irritates the hell out of me when I'm maxed out and fishing for a gear and it's just not there. It used to always seem like it was the 16 when I first started, but I've got that one now. Still face that issue from time to time going from 19-21-23 on longer hills, but I don't do those that frequently. But those are 2x jumps. Start making that 3, and 4, and 5. Yuck. Sure, I and others could "survive", but why? Makes no sense to me.
At the end of the day, anyone can justify anything they want to themselves. But it's not likely to be such an easy sale to others, especially ones that take their performance seriously and have worked out what works well for them.
Anyway, as a quickly aging Cat 1 crit racer struggling to maintain some semblance of relevance and skill, that's why I won't ever be running 1x. Nor do I ever plan on running disc brakes, but that's another tale.
#116
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
Of course it's a personal preference, but it irritates the hell out of me when I'm maxed out and fishing for a gear and it's just not there. It used to always seem like it was the 16 when I first started, but I've got that one now. Still face that issue from time to time going from 19-21-23 on longer hills, but I don't do those that frequently. But those are 2x jumps. Start making that 3, and 4, and 5. Yuck. Sure, I and others could "survive", but why? Makes no sense to me.
Anyway, as a quickly aging Cat 1 crit racer struggling to maintain some semblance of relevance and skill, that's why I won't ever be running 1x. Nor do I ever plan on running disc brakes, but that's another tale.
Anyway, as a quickly aging Cat 1 crit racer struggling to maintain some semblance of relevance and skill, that's why I won't ever be running 1x. Nor do I ever plan on running disc brakes, but that's another tale.
I got the Domane 6.9 disc(with 9000 series Di2), for $800 less than the rim brake version, and just recently spent the saved $$$ on a second wheelset. After riding discs on the road for 8 months, I never want to go back to rim brakes again. I'd go back to mechanical shifting, before rim brakes.
#117
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
Saddle slammed all the way forward, and SRAM wiped all over it.
WTF is up with that rear hoop?
If this is your bike, I apologize.
#118
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times
in
18 Posts
This forum cracks me up. Lots of opinions. Lots of passion. Lots of speculation and projection. Precious little experience.
I rode and raced 1x for a couple years. At first, it was really cool. But after the "new" wore off, I started to notice the gaps and the lack of flexibility (at times) compared to 2x. Sometimes, it was a gear ratio that wasn't available 1x. Sometimes, it was a slower multi-shift going from downhill to uphill or vice versa (sometimes four TIMES as many shifts to get to the same place). And the worst, in hilly or mountainous racing situations was spinning out, yet falling behind, because the 2x guys ALWAYS had a higher gear. I won't race 1x ever again, if I can help it. The advantages (which are few) aren't worth the price you pay in flexibility and performance.
I rode and raced 1x for a couple years. At first, it was really cool. But after the "new" wore off, I started to notice the gaps and the lack of flexibility (at times) compared to 2x. Sometimes, it was a gear ratio that wasn't available 1x. Sometimes, it was a slower multi-shift going from downhill to uphill or vice versa (sometimes four TIMES as many shifts to get to the same place). And the worst, in hilly or mountainous racing situations was spinning out, yet falling behind, because the 2x guys ALWAYS had a higher gear. I won't race 1x ever again, if I can help it. The advantages (which are few) aren't worth the price you pay in flexibility and performance.
#119
Senior Member
I think in the end it comes down to the physiology of the rider -- those who are extremely sensitive to a fixed cadence are going to do everything they can with their gearing to stay on it, while with others, it's just not that big of a deal if a couple shifts are 12 percent instead of 8 percent, or whatever.
1x12 or 1x whatever seems to me like it will fit lots of riders' needs, and I'm surprised that no one in this discussion has mentioned those who've succeeded on the most restrictive of gearing, the ol' 1x1.
Here is a guy who rode a singlespeed in a field of derailleur bikes for the win: https://cyclinghometour.wordpress.co...hequamegon-40/
Yes, it's a mountain bike race, but the 40-mile course is hilly, with long climbs and starts on a highway descent and a grassy field, with stretches of gravel road along the way.
1x12 or 1x whatever seems to me like it will fit lots of riders' needs, and I'm surprised that no one in this discussion has mentioned those who've succeeded on the most restrictive of gearing, the ol' 1x1.
Here is a guy who rode a singlespeed in a field of derailleur bikes for the win: https://cyclinghometour.wordpress.co...hequamegon-40/
Yes, it's a mountain bike race, but the 40-mile course is hilly, with long climbs and starts on a highway descent and a grassy field, with stretches of gravel road along the way.
#120
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
As Sonny and Cher sang, the beat goes on. The same could be said for 3x vs 1x or 2x. Whatever floats your boat. I've road rides on triples with straight blocks thinking, "it doesn't get any better than this." You only go onto a ring if you need it, and you don't have to shift through a bunch of effing cogs. For the life of me, I have no idea why someone would want to shift through 10, or 12, or 14 cogs to get from one end of their range to the other. Even with electronic, that's a lot of shifting or holding a button. Different strokes for different folks.
Last edited by seypat; 03-07-19 at 10:25 AM.
#121
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I think in the end it comes down to the physiology of the rider -- those who are extremely sensitive to a fixed cadence are going to do everything they can with their gearing to stay on it, while with others, it's just not that big of a deal if a couple shifts are 12 percent instead of 8 percent, or whatever.
1x12 or 1x whatever seems to me like it will fit lots of riders' needs, and I'm surprised that no one in this discussion has mentioned those who've succeeded on the most restrictive of gearing, the ol' 1x1.
Here is a guy who rode a singlespeed in a field of derailleur bikes for the win: https://cyclinghometour.wordpress.co...hequamegon-40/
Yes, it's a mountain bike race, but the 40-mile course is hilly, with long climbs and starts on a highway descent and a grassy field, with stretches of gravel road along the way.
1x12 or 1x whatever seems to me like it will fit lots of riders' needs, and I'm surprised that no one in this discussion has mentioned those who've succeeded on the most restrictive of gearing, the ol' 1x1.
Here is a guy who rode a singlespeed in a field of derailleur bikes for the win: https://cyclinghometour.wordpress.co...hequamegon-40/
Yes, it's a mountain bike race, but the 40-mile course is hilly, with long climbs and starts on a highway descent and a grassy field, with stretches of gravel road along the way.
#125
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I think in the end it comes down to the physiology of the rider -- those who are extremely sensitive to a fixed cadence are going to do everything they can with their gearing to stay on it, while with others, it's just not that big of a deal if a couple shifts are 12 percent instead of 8 percent, or whatever.