Foot length and shoe sizing
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Foot length and shoe sizing
Hi GUys,
Read that cycling shoes should NOT have much toe wiggle room. Question is if I trace my foot on a paper and it shoes 27cm as the length, when I select a shoe online, should I look at 27 or add .5 cm or so and get the 27.5cm size?
No choice but online for me.
Read that cycling shoes should NOT have much toe wiggle room. Question is if I trace my foot on a paper and it shoes 27cm as the length, when I select a shoe online, should I look at 27 or add .5 cm or so and get the 27.5cm size?
No choice but online for me.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,396
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times
in
337 Posts
Cycling shoes should fit snug with very little space in front of the toes. The correct width is important, too; shoes that are too narrow compress the metatarsi, which leads to nerve inflammation. Shoes that are too wide, though, don't support the foot and let it slide around, which can lead to blisters. Different brands favor different widths.
To make thins more difficult, length varies from brand to brand. F'rinstance, I've worn sizes 44.5 to 46, and 44 would be in there too if I didn't write off one brand right away.
Your best bet is to trace your foot and send the tracing with your street shoe size, your athletic shoe size, or your mondo ski boot size--anything the shoe people you're ordering from can use as a reference--and let them use some judgement. In addition, buy shoes that come in half sizes.
If you're interested I can relate the fit characteristics of some brands you might be considering.
To make thins more difficult, length varies from brand to brand. F'rinstance, I've worn sizes 44.5 to 46, and 44 would be in there too if I didn't write off one brand right away.
Your best bet is to trace your foot and send the tracing with your street shoe size, your athletic shoe size, or your mondo ski boot size--anything the shoe people you're ordering from can use as a reference--and let them use some judgement. In addition, buy shoes that come in half sizes.
If you're interested I can relate the fit characteristics of some brands you might be considering.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I know my Shimano is 44, and looking for Fizik, Giro and Lake comparative sizing. Already ordered Fizik in 43, and just about to order a Giro in 43.5.
#4
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
I like my shoes slightly big with a decent amount of room across the ball of the foot. And I like shoes with laces so I can tighten and loosen them as necessary.
I wear my shoes summer and winter. In the summer, I wear thinner socks so the shoes can be a bit tighter, but then my feet can swell a bit in the heat so I want to be able to loosen them off. In the winter, I wear thick socks so my shoes need to be looser to accommodate the socks and give my toes lots of wiggle room.
I wear my shoes summer and winter. In the summer, I wear thinner socks so the shoes can be a bit tighter, but then my feet can swell a bit in the heat so I want to be able to loosen them off. In the winter, I wear thick socks so my shoes need to be looser to accommodate the socks and give my toes lots of wiggle room.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
Disagree that cycling shoes need to be snug. IMO, there should be adequate room for your foot to spread under load and for air to circulate. Insufficient width or room to move can cause hot spots or numbness. Your foot will swell slightly in hot weather. In cooler weather, insufficient room restricts blood flow causing cold numb toes. In providing force the the pedal, your forefoot presses down, and the heel and instep pull back and up. There is no reason for the front of the shoe to be snug.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 1,282
Bikes: two blacks, a blue and a white.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 445 Post(s)
Liked 847 Times
in
410 Posts
I just ordered new, slightly larger shoes because the current pair is a bit too snug. The current shoes were OK until the summer heat hit and the rides started exceeding 40 miles, then the across-the-toes pain began (plenty of forum posts on this). Your feet are truly funny, muscular, bony water bags and they do change. Cycling shoes, however, do not. They don't stretch, they don't really "break-in" very much, and they way they fit on the first day is close to what you should expect for years.
Also, a few searches will will produce tables showing that manufacturers' sizes don't align well at all. Do your homework, try many pairs on if you can. If ordering off the web, find a place with a "free return" policy and order TWO pairs straddling the size you think you need, keep them pristine on the carpet without cleats, return the pair that's not as good a fit.
If you're going to ride more than casually, I suggest "stepping up" and paying for good shoes. Doesn't matter what bike you're riding if your feet aren't happy.
Also, a few searches will will produce tables showing that manufacturers' sizes don't align well at all. Do your homework, try many pairs on if you can. If ordering off the web, find a place with a "free return" policy and order TWO pairs straddling the size you think you need, keep them pristine on the carpet without cleats, return the pair that's not as good a fit.
If you're going to ride more than casually, I suggest "stepping up" and paying for good shoes. Doesn't matter what bike you're riding if your feet aren't happy.
#7
Senior Member
I like my shoes much wider than my feet (I normally fit just fine in standard women's/B width shoes, but buy men's/D width bike shoes) but absolutely no extra length, because my feet will slide forward in too-long shoes and then my heels will chafe. It causes no end of annoyance at bike stores, because they always insist on me trying on one size up, and I have to talk them into bringing out my proper size as well.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Further North than U
Posts: 2,000
Bikes: Spec Roubaix, three Fisher Montare, two Pugs
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Shoe length is unrelated to shoe fit other than it needs to not touch your longest toe. Shoe fit is determined by the arch. Shoes that are too narrow can cause a hot foot due to the metatarsal nerve being pinched. https://www.joeybike.com/advice/body_.../foot_care.php
#9
OM boy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Goleta CA
Posts: 4,369
Bikes: a bunch
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 517 Post(s)
Liked 644 Times
in
438 Posts
when you're measuring like that, you're actually falling onto the Mondo size scale. There are equivalencies to the other size scales, US, UK & Euro. Each manufacturer will have a slightly different length/fit. I suggest getting a self-sizing chart, for the shoe manufacturer you plan on buying from - IE - SIDI does have such as paper scale you can download, print out and measure from. Their's is accurate for their shoes. I would expect most of the better known shoe manus will also have their own similar paper scale.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If a shoe doesn't fit in your measured size, then it's the wrong shoe. Sizing-up just causes more places for the shoe to fit wrong. A square peg will eventually fit in a round hole if you make the hole big enough, but it won't fit properly. The flex point can be less of an issue in stiff soled bike shoes, but the rest of it should fit in shape, volume, and width, regardless. I've tried a bunch and the sizing is clearly meaningless or the shapes and volume are completely different. You can't go by brand either, but by individual model. Each model will fit differently, typically.
It looks like 27cm should be a 43.5 European which is usually, but not always a size 10 US. That's about the same size I wear in properly fitted shoes, but not all are labeled 43.5 European. I don't think I've ever noticed a mondopoint(mm) on any labels.
It looks like 27cm should be a 43.5 European which is usually, but not always a size 10 US. That's about the same size I wear in properly fitted shoes, but not all are labeled 43.5 European. I don't think I've ever noticed a mondopoint(mm) on any labels.
Last edited by License2Ill; 07-15-13 at 12:56 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,396
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times
in
337 Posts
You can achieve a degree of customization with different insoles or footbeds, but shoe fit has to be approached holistically.
#12
Senior Member
Fizik 43 is narrower for me compared to Shimano 44. Tried both. Giro Trans in 44 was narrower than Shimano (also tried). Shimano 44 is roughly the same width as a Specialized Expert (Carbon Sole) 43.
If you have wide feet, I would highly recommend the wide width Shimano. Mavic Zyxelium (sp?) in a 9.5 is equivalent in length to a Specialized Expert 43 but is narrower.
I have not yet tried Lake or Northwave.
Specialized really ticked me off because they went to a narrower last with the latest generation S-works and Pro (tried both). No idea why.
If you have wide feet, I would highly recommend the wide width Shimano. Mavic Zyxelium (sp?) in a 9.5 is equivalent in length to a Specialized Expert 43 but is narrower.
I have not yet tried Lake or Northwave.
Specialized really ticked me off because they went to a narrower last with the latest generation S-works and Pro (tried both). No idea why.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
^^Thanks. Shimano 44 is too wide as well as a bit long for me, so I'm hoping the Fizik in 43 and Giro in 43.5 [which is what I finally ordered] should do.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not so much the width I think I've had an issue with in trying various pairs of individual models on. It's the volume and shape. It's hard to establish the difference between width and volume in some because higher volume can make up for narrower width sometimes and lower volume can feel like narrower width sometimes. The other issues are in shape, some are very straight, others may have a curve suited to higher or lower arches, and the same for the width and shape of the heel.
The Shimanos I remember trying last were higher volume than others in the right size(length) the best I've found in any cycling shoe, but were short in the toe, almost like a women's shoe(they may have been unisex, I don't remember). The heel was wider than I liked too. As you can imagine, going up a half size only made it worse.
The Keen Commuter sandals appeared to actually be narrow, or at least low volume, with a huge wide heel. Not only was the heel big and the width narrow and the volume small, the shape exacerbates all those issues because it was straight as a string. My higher arched feet need volume, not width, need more curve, and less heel width for a good fit, but someone with a floppy low arch will typically have a foot that is wider, lower volume, more straight, and wider at the heel. Again, going up a size just it made it worse in the heel, didn't fix the volume issues, and made it feel like a clown shoe in length due to the flex point.
Unfortunately, none of that has to do with measured size, except maybe width needs for some. The width needs to be measured though since volume and shape needs can be mistaken for width issues.
The Shimanos I remember trying last were higher volume than others in the right size(length) the best I've found in any cycling shoe, but were short in the toe, almost like a women's shoe(they may have been unisex, I don't remember). The heel was wider than I liked too. As you can imagine, going up a half size only made it worse.
The Keen Commuter sandals appeared to actually be narrow, or at least low volume, with a huge wide heel. Not only was the heel big and the width narrow and the volume small, the shape exacerbates all those issues because it was straight as a string. My higher arched feet need volume, not width, need more curve, and less heel width for a good fit, but someone with a floppy low arch will typically have a foot that is wider, lower volume, more straight, and wider at the heel. Again, going up a size just it made it worse in the heel, didn't fix the volume issues, and made it feel like a clown shoe in length due to the flex point.
Unfortunately, none of that has to do with measured size, except maybe width needs for some. The width needs to be measured though since volume and shape needs can be mistaken for width issues.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South West Pa
Posts: 122
Bikes: 1995 Canondale 2.8 frame (R800) with a mix of same era Shimano and Campy parts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Let's make it even MORE INTERESTING...... I have a full size difference in length and a half size difference in width between my feet, AND I am a C\AA width on the wide\shorter foot!
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,396
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times
in
337 Posts
If you're interested, Bont will mix sizes on special order.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South West Pa
Posts: 122
Bikes: 1995 Canondale 2.8 frame (R800) with a mix of same era Shimano and Campy parts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
CC62 - Brother, you have the title, I suspect that you have adapted commendably.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,396
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times
in
337 Posts
Good luck.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South West Pa
Posts: 122
Bikes: 1995 Canondale 2.8 frame (R800) with a mix of same era Shimano and Campy parts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bont looks interesting... but upwards of $1000 for a pair of shoes.... NOT IF I WANT TO STAY MARRIED - I won't pay that for custom skates.... *SIGH* no custom shoes for this Zebra.... I'll just deal with it... Get them a little small on the bigger foot and stretch it. Add insole to the smaller foot to take up some space, Add shims as needed....
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,396
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times
in
337 Posts
Bont looks interesting... but upwards of $1000 for a pair of shoes.... NOT IF I WANT TO STAY MARRIED - I won't pay that for custom skates.... *SIGH* no custom shoes for this Zebra.... I'll just deal with it... Get them a little small on the bigger foot and stretch it. Add insole to the smaller foot to take up some space, Add shims as needed....
#24
Other Worldly Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: The old Northwest Coast.
Posts: 1,540
Bikes: 1973 Motobecane Grand Jubilee, 1981 Centurion Super LeMans, 2010 Gary Fisher Wahoo, 2003 Colnago Dream Lux, 2014 Giant Defy 1, 2015 Framed Bikes Minnesota 3.0, several older family Treks
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 194 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
53 Posts
There's a world of difference between a shoe ridden for an hour or two and all day in hot weather. I normally wear a 47 euro (13 USA) but my feet swell after hours of hot riding so a touring shoe in 48 Euro is far better. Midsoles make a huge difference as do vents, open design & socks. Then winter comes.
__________________
Make ******* Grate Cheese Again
Make ******* Grate Cheese Again
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ellensburg,WA
Posts: 3,180
Bikes: Schwinn Broadway, Specialized Secteur Sport(crashed) Spec. Roubaix Sport, Spec. Crux
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 179 Post(s)
Liked 169 Times
in
84 Posts
Shoe length needs to be correct as well or you may have issues with not being able to place your cleats correctly.
__________________
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria