Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

What's the difference between all mountain and trail

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

What's the difference between all mountain and trail

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-05, 02:30 PM
  #1  
dhfd
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What's the difference between all mountain and trail

I tried the search feature, but didn't find anything really related...what is the difference between a trail bike and all mountain?

I've got an '01 Giant XtC SE1 HT and have FS envy!

Initially, I'd thought when/if the time came to get a FS bike I'd get an XC bike. But now there's all these different types of FS bikes. I'm not real big into jumping, etc so know I'm not in the market for a freeride bike, but what are the advantages/disadvantages for an all-mountain vs trail vs XC bike?

thanks!
Jeff
dhfd is offline  
Old 10-06-05, 03:00 PM
  #2  
Jason222
Banned.
 
Jason222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 2,123

Bikes: Trek Jack...trials bike soon.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
All mountain is just trail riding a lot harder. Some drops and stuff, but not anything really crazy.
Jason222 is offline  
Old 10-06-05, 03:16 PM
  #3  
C Law
Too Much Crazy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660

Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by dhfd
...what is the difference between a trail bike and all mountain?
Trail bikes are just a tad beefier to handle some freeriding. the weights increase and the pedal efficiency is less important for dual suspension bikes.
C Law is offline  
Old 10-06-05, 03:26 PM
  #4  
dhfd
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
These are some of the bikes I've been looking (drooling) at are the:
Specialized FSRxc Comp, I like the Epic too, but a lot more $$$
Giant Trance 3 and NRS
Cannondale Prophet 600 and Scalpel
Rocky Mountain Slayer 30 and Element 30

I guess any of these would fit that description? Is there a good post, site that explains the differences in rear suspension setups?

another question, I know disc brakes perform better than rim brakes, but what's the pros and cons between hydraulic and mechanical disc brakes?
dhfd is offline  
Old 10-06-05, 06:43 PM
  #5  
zx108
Senior Member
 
zx108's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: N.J.
Posts: 1,545
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hold on i am a little confused.

arent there differnet types of trails(like xc trails, freeride trails)and arent all mountain bikes 'trail' bikes becasue if you arent riding trails what are you riding fire roads?

and is trails and singletrack the same thing, i think so but not sure now?
zx108 is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 02:05 AM
  #6  
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Talk about a gray area. I define a "trail" bike as a beefed up XC bike. Imagine the sort of thing an intelligent Clydesdale would build for use on XC trails. All-mountain is a step up from XC in terms of what the bike can be expected to handle. It can handle XC trail duties competently (don't expect to win races however) and can handle the lighter end of Freeriding
__________________
Raiyn is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 04:07 AM
  #7  
nathank
cycle-powered
 
nathank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
Posts: 1,848

Bikes: '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i too found this one a little confusing, but i think it goes like this:
* XC is normal bike for riding trails (say under 30 lbs and 70-72 degree head tube)
* All-Mountain has more travel (in the 130-150mm range) and a little more relaxed geometry (say 68-71 degress) and weight say 30-35lbs
* Trail bike is a beefed-up "all-mountain" bike or a "quicker" Freerider that weighs in the 34-38 lb range
* Freerider - emphasis on durability (strong frame for drops), slack head angle (66-68 degress) and weight anywhere from 32-40 lbs - travel from 120mm to 200mm -- BUT still "pedal-friendly" so you can ride it uphill
* Downhill - lots of travel, heava-duty everything and no longer pleasant to ride uphill (i.e. too heavy or fork too tall so you can't climb without the front tire coming off the ground)

this is my guess as to what the "Trail" bike is, mostly based on the Specialized Enduro SX Trail...

of course there are also other terms like Enduro (basically All-Mountain) and "Long-Travel XC" or "Long-Travel-Enduro" which i take to mean lighter-weight XC/all-mountain bikes with increased travel (as opposed to a Freerider with the same travel which would have a beefier frame/components and thus weigh more)

but, yeah, when i first heard "Trail Bike" i was a little confused and expected more and XC bike. i think the main difference is that it should be durable but light enough to be pedalled easily and also not have too slack of angles so it still corners "quickly" and doesn't have that "slow" feeling that big freeride/downhill bikes have when riding fast corners -- i.e. "flickability" as well as durability are important

so... ready for the disagreement and correction...
nathank is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 07:32 AM
  #8  
cryptid01
one less horse
 
cryptid01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Hinterlands
Posts: 5,601
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by nathank
this is my guess as to what the "Trail" bike is, mostly based on the Specialized Enduro SX Trail...
A stock SXT weighs over 40 lbs, though, and is nowhere near what I would consider a competent climber, at least compared to a regular Enduro. Caveat - this is mainly due to the extra tall 66 fork, which rakes out the front end significantly.
cryptid01 is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 07:47 AM
  #9  
nathank
cycle-powered
 
nathank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
Posts: 1,848

Bikes: '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gastro
A stock SXT weighs over 40 lbs, though, and is nowhere near what I would consider a competent climber, at least compared to a regular Enduro. Caveat - this is mainly due to the extra tall 66 fork, which rakes out the front end significantly.
really? i thought the SX trail was around 37lbs or so...
in any case the SX Trail is between the Specialized Enduro (all-mountain) and the Big-Hit/Demo8/Demo9 (Freeride/Downhill)
but yeah, if you're right and the SX Trail is so heavy and with the 66 that makes it pretty difficult to climb... my 38lb '04 Kona Coiler is pretty close to the limit for "good" climbing in my opinion (i have the '04 Z1 fork with 130mm with ETA so i sink it for the climb) -- last weekend i did a 8,000feet of climbing (with heavy backpack) and it was work!!!
nathank is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 09:15 AM
  #10  
C Law
Too Much Crazy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660

Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by zx108
hold on i am a little confused.

arent there differnet types of trails(like xc trails, freeride trails)and arent all mountain bikes 'trail' bikes becasue if you arent riding trails what are you riding fire roads?
there are all sorts of different types of trails.

A Trail bike is a marketing term that confuses. Think of an all mountain with out the up.

I originally heard the term 'trail bike' and thought it specifically applied to hardtails.

To differentiate between non XC hardtails that were designed to only dirt jump/urban and ones that were designed to do all things. freeride, downhill, jumping , pedalling uphill.

But now I think applying it to FS bikes is confusing because of the all mountain category.
C Law is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 09:39 AM
  #11  
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Unsuspended. I honestly think all mountain, in its original meaning, was meant to be like fr going up. Old school fr before lifts. The original Stinky 6 would be an all mountain machine for example. The industry (and the riders) have pushed fr further and further away from pedaling. If you pedal a big bike now, no matter the destination, its all mountain. hahaha
Maelstrom is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 10:03 AM
  #12  
C Law
Too Much Crazy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660

Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
Unsuspended. I honestly think all mountain, in its original meaning, was meant to be like fr going up. Old school fr before lifts. The original Stinky 6 would be an all mountain machine for example.
And to confuse matters further, I think the 'lightweight' 5'' travel 'all mountain' bike prevalent today really should be considered a XC bike (at least how it was defined until the last few years). Stumpjumper, ID, 5 spot, yeti 575, etc. Long travel XC.

I think with the new bikes, 6'' travel machines built to pedal (6 pack enduro, etc...)are all mountain and below that is XC. (generalization I am sure there are excpetions)

Anyway, I would say it would be very confusing if you were a new MTBer w/ $2500 looking to spend.
C Law is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 10:15 AM
  #13  
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by unsuspended
Anyway, I would say it would be very confusing if you were a new MTBer w/ $2500 looking to spend.
Especially if you didn't quite know where you would fit in. I am a 6x6 kind of guy. Thank god I know that otherwise my head might unscrew ahhaha
Maelstrom is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 11:06 AM
  #14  
cryptid01
one less horse
 
cryptid01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Hinterlands
Posts: 5,601
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
Thank god I know that otherwise my head might unscrew ahhaha
Hence the thousands of "which bike should I get" threads, most of which appear to have been written by those with unscrewed (or at least cross-threaded) heads...
cryptid01 is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 11:49 AM
  #15  
rasheed
mmm babaghanouj.
 
rasheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: toronto, canada.
Posts: 848

Bikes: 2003 norco fluid 3.0, 2016 Intense Tracer 275C Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
from what i've seen on the various forums, the term "trail bike" is mostly used by riders and the term "all mountain" more of a marketing industry thing... and both, i'd say, refer to the same thing: a bike that isn't pure cross-country and isn't pure extreme freeride. it's basically a bike you can ride any type of trail on and have some "fun" with - going up, down, throwing it off stuff, jumps, hucks, etc. without the fear of anything breaking easily. in other words, what freeride was originally supposed to be.


rasheed is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 12:34 PM
  #16  
zx108
Senior Member
 
zx108's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: N.J.
Posts: 1,545
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thank you everyone, i get it

i tell ya, keeping up with mtb terminology is a round the clock job
zx108 is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 12:45 PM
  #17  
harris
Norcal 29er
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mendocino Norcal
Posts: 158

Bikes: Gary fisher Mt Tam 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Downhill
freeride
allmountain
trailbike
hardtail trail
xc
hardtail xc
xc race


the farther up the list you go, the beefier it gets. dirtjump, 4x and dual slalom are a little different because the have the beefiness, but are set up for very specific things.


harris
harris is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 08:26 PM
  #18  
Killer B
THIS BIKE'S 4 U !!!!
 
Killer B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Western, NC .... (Pisgah, Bent Creek, DuPont)
Posts: 1,272

Bikes: HARO Xtreme X2, K2 Lithium 3.0, K2 Beast, K2 Flyin' Monkey, DiamondBack Accent EX, DiamondBack Axis TR

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dhfd
I tried the search feature, but didn't find anything really related...what is the difference between a trail bike and all mountain?

thanks!
Jeff
******************************************************************

Originally Posted by dhfd
I tried the search feature, but didn't find anything really related...what is the difference between a trail bike and all mountain?
thanks!
Jeff

Well Jeff,

I'd say the the difference is about $250+ ....

The MtnBike Companies are just trying to increase their sales dollars, and so they try any way they can to "make a buck".... There's actually NO "new" inventions nor any new suspensions to speak of. Just another gimmick....
Killer B is offline  
Old 10-07-05, 09:49 PM
  #19  
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Killer B
******************************************************************




Well Jeff,

I'd say the the difference is about $250+ ....

The MtnBike Companies are just trying to increase their sales dollars, and so they try any way they can to "make a buck".... There's actually NO "new" inventions nor any new suspensions to speak of. Just another gimmick....
Compared to what? There are newer shock designs, there are newer and better suspension designs which do have benefits regardless of what you believe. While 99% are stolen technologies from other industries they are very new to bikes, which offer very unique characteristics to design. The pedal motion negates almost any useful design built for mx for example and the torque is different and inconsistent. Such a blanket statement is just plain false

Shocks now are head and shoulders above what they were even 3 years ago. Stable platform, high and low frequency controls, more enchances progressiveness, brain technology (not my bag but it works for those who like it) etc.... heck even the standard fox has been improved upon. And now they are coming out with air shocks that feel like coil but weight signifigantly less.

To dismiss these as gimmicks is pretty naive. The claim they aren't new...ok thats possible if you compare it to other industries where most of the ideas are coming from, but again not gimmicks.
Maelstrom is offline  
Old 10-08-05, 06:54 AM
  #20  
mtnbiker66
Old School Rad
 
mtnbiker66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The old Mountains
Posts: 8,206

Bikes: Blur LT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The way I see it if your on a XC bike its more of a race type bike,an all MTN bike is what I call a trail bike.I think of my main bike as a trail bike,around 30 pounds,5 inches of travel.
__________________
Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......
mtnbiker66 is offline  
Old 10-08-05, 06:17 PM
  #21  
dhfd
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think I've got it narrowed down to the:
Specialized FSRxc Comp
Giant Trance 2
Cannondale Prophet 600...

any input on these?
dhfd is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.