There are no C&V sins
#1
You gonna eat that?
Thread Starter
There are no C&V sins
Every once in a while, a thread pops up asking whether it is a "sin" to do this or that to their C&V bike. The answer is always: No. It is your bike. You are allowed to do whatever you want to it.
The only exception I can think of is whether one thinks of their C&V bike as an investment they may want to sell later. If that's the case, as long as you don't make any permanent changes, you're good to go.
It's your bike. Enjoy it, for cryin' out loud.
The only exception I can think of is whether one thinks of their C&V bike as an investment they may want to sell later. If that's the case, as long as you don't make any permanent changes, you're good to go.
It's your bike. Enjoy it, for cryin' out loud.
#3
Curmudgeon in Training
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rural Retreat, VA
Posts: 1,956
Bikes: 1974 Gazelle Champion Mondial, 2010 Cannondale Trail SL, 1988 Peugeot Nice, 1992ish Stumpjumper Comp,1990's Schwinn Moab
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
/pulls out hack saw and goes to work on that pesky derailleur hanger on his chrome paramount.
/while he's at it, the frame is a bit too large, let's take a centimeter or two out of the head tube and seat tube.
/while he's at it, the frame is a bit too large, let's take a centimeter or two out of the head tube and seat tube.
#4
Senior Member
^+1
Hacking parts off a vintage hi-end frame is just wrong. Sure, you own it, but do you really have to do that to it? I don't object to making it into a fixie or whatever; just don't do things that are irreversible.
Hacking parts off a vintage hi-end frame is just wrong. Sure, you own it, but do you really have to do that to it? I don't object to making it into a fixie or whatever; just don't do things that are irreversible.
#5
No one cares
if you hack up your bike you're going to piss off a LOT of people on the internet. Are you sure you really want to do that?
__________________
I prefer emails to private messages - holiday76@gmail.com
Jack Taylor Super Tourer Tandem (FOR SALE), Jack Taylor Tour of Britain, Px-10, Carlton Flyer, Fuji The Finest, Salsa Fargo, Santa Cruz Tallboy, Carver All-Road .
I prefer emails to private messages - holiday76@gmail.com
Jack Taylor Super Tourer Tandem (FOR SALE), Jack Taylor Tour of Britain, Px-10, Carlton Flyer, Fuji The Finest, Salsa Fargo, Santa Cruz Tallboy, Carver All-Road .
#6
bikegeekmn
Join Date: May 2009
Location: duluth
Posts: 284
Bikes: Miyata710, 04' Fisher Cake, '63 Raleigh 3-speed sport, Giant FCR1, 89''Mita Quick Cross, Lotus Grand Prix Luxe, Nashbar Al. DT shifter road bike,
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The same quandry is all over the auto industry with hot rodders and restorers.
So, make it a hot rod or restore it.
Use is what it's all about.
So, make it a hot rod or restore it.
Use is what it's all about.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
No sins???....
https://www.lunt.demon.co.uk/obree/chrisandobree.jpg
The guy on the left is certainly looking very devilish with his "special" handlebar configuration!
....but then, I have seen a bunch of homeless guys around SF doing the same on their bikes.......maybe they know something we don't??
Chombi
https://www.lunt.demon.co.uk/obree/chrisandobree.jpg
The guy on the left is certainly looking very devilish with his "special" handlebar configuration!
....but then, I have seen a bunch of homeless guys around SF doing the same on their bikes.......maybe they know something we don't??
Chombi
#10
Ride heavy metal.
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Teenage Wasteland, USA
Posts: 1,538
Bikes: '74 Raleigh LTD-3, '76 Motobecane Grand Jubile, '83 Fuji TSIII (customized commuter), '10 Mercier Kilo WT (fixed obsession), '83 Bianchi Alloro, '92 Bridgestone MB-1 (project), '83 Specialized Expedition (project), '79 Peugeot UO-8 (sold)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I disagree:
(thread)
While this wasn't a PX-10 Mixte (if they exist) or some other rare French bike, it's still sinful in my book.
Anything that messes with the frame's integrity, ruins desirable lugwork or paint jobs, or ruins a bike's usefulness should be a sin. Also, letting a great and useable bike turn to rust propped up outside your house or in your shed should be classified as a sin.
(thread)
While this wasn't a PX-10 Mixte (if they exist) or some other rare French bike, it's still sinful in my book.
Anything that messes with the frame's integrity, ruins desirable lugwork or paint jobs, or ruins a bike's usefulness should be a sin. Also, letting a great and useable bike turn to rust propped up outside your house or in your shed should be classified as a sin.
#11
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
The words "you own it, you can do whatever you like with it" don't sit well with me, even if they describe the legal situation accurately. I am inclined to think damaging and/or destroying objects of historical significance is, in its way, a crime against humanity. Obviously the level of the crime must be considered in proportion the the level of the object's historical significance, but the nature of the crime is the same either way. Given that the historical significance of any factory-made bicycle is practically nil, it is practically impossible to commit any great crime against humanity upon it; but if it were something of real significance, the potential is there.
Doohickie, here's a somewhat extreme case. Let's say I picked up a genuine Wright Brothers bike at a yard sale for ten bucks. It would now be mine to do as I want with it, right? Legally, yes, of course. But if I decided I didn't want a track bike with wooden rims, and decided to have proper Campy drops brazed in instead of the track ends, along with shifter bosses etc and a flashy repaint, then, don't you think that would be something akin to a sin? I do.
Grinding the derailleur hanger off a chrome Paramount? Oh, it's a silly thing to do, but let's not blow it out of proportion.
Doohickie, here's a somewhat extreme case. Let's say I picked up a genuine Wright Brothers bike at a yard sale for ten bucks. It would now be mine to do as I want with it, right? Legally, yes, of course. But if I decided I didn't want a track bike with wooden rims, and decided to have proper Campy drops brazed in instead of the track ends, along with shifter bosses etc and a flashy repaint, then, don't you think that would be something akin to a sin? I do.
Grinding the derailleur hanger off a chrome Paramount? Oh, it's a silly thing to do, but let's not blow it out of proportion.
#12
Freewheel Medic
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: An Island on the Coast of GA!
Posts: 12,885
Bikes: Snazzy* Schwinns, Classy Cannondales & a Super Pro Aero Lotus (* Ed.)
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1453 Post(s)
Liked 2,196 Times
in
963 Posts
I'd say the only "sin" is when the bike of a famous rider, is drastically changed.
For instance, if the Paramount that Lance Armstrong raced as a teenager, had its braze-ons removed, RD hanger clipped, was re-painted, and turned into fixie, I'd call that a "C&V sin."
For instance, if the Paramount that Lance Armstrong raced as a teenager, had its braze-ons removed, RD hanger clipped, was re-painted, and turned into fixie, I'd call that a "C&V sin."
__________________
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!
Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!
Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com
#13
You gonna eat that?
Thread Starter
#14
12345
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: south france
Posts: 1,240
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No sins???....
https://www.lunt.demon.co.uk/obree/chrisandobree.jpg
The guy on the left is certainly looking very devilish with his "special" handlebar configuration!
....but then, I have seen a bunch of homeless guys around SF doing the same on their bikes.......maybe they know something we don't??
Chombi
https://www.lunt.demon.co.uk/obree/chrisandobree.jpg
The guy on the left is certainly looking very devilish with his "special" handlebar configuration!
....but then, I have seen a bunch of homeless guys around SF doing the same on their bikes.......maybe they know something we don't??
Chombi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZU9cy4fjvg
#15
"Shake n Bake!"
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Can I tell you how to ride, set up, adjust, paint, customize, or restore YOUR personal bike??? NO... Your going to make those decisions for yourself. We all love C&V, but we don't personally own them all. I have a love for vintage Volkswagen's also, and when I see a baja bug I think to myself, Lame! But do I have control or any say over what the owner chooses to do with his or her car... None whatsoever.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,752 Times
in
939 Posts
The same quandry is all over the auto industry with hot rodders and restorers.
So, make it a hot rod or restore it.
Use is what it's all about.
So, make it a hot rod or restore it.
Use is what it's all about.
I agree with reversible modifications. I agree with cosmetic replacement when replacement is warranted. But I do not agree with destroying the original state of an old bicycle just because you happen to own it. In this case, the word destroy means irreversible modifications.
But that is just me. I will repair, but I do not modify, frame sets. I have, however, been known to over polish a component or two. Is that the same thing? Perhaps it is. Oh no:-(
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,744
Bikes: Miele Azsora, Kuwahara Cascade
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The guy is Graeme Obree, who slumped over his handle bars like a downhill ski racer, see 35 seconds in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZU9cy4fjvg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZU9cy4fjvg
#18
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 354
Bikes: team miyata, '73 p-14, MB-3, centurion lemans, Mystery TT, mongoose atb '85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Amen
Every once in a while, a thread pops up asking whether it is a "sin" to do this or that to their C&V bike. The answer is always: No. It is your bike. You are allowed to do whatever you want to it.
The only exception I can think of is whether one thinks of their C&V bike as an investment they may want to sell later. If that's the case, as long as you don't make any permanent changes, you're good to go.
It's your bike. Enjoy it, for cryin' out loud.
The only exception I can think of is whether one thinks of their C&V bike as an investment they may want to sell later. If that's the case, as long as you don't make any permanent changes, you're good to go.
It's your bike. Enjoy it, for cryin' out loud.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ontario
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#21
Restore, ride, repeat...
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 403
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got grief for putting fenders on my Paramount by some people. I also put a rack on it and use modern panniers. I think that is the kind of "sin" Doohickie is talking about. I know a lot of people would keep a paramount cleaner looking this one is mine and I love riding it all the time.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 568
Bikes: Forty of them
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
21 Posts
Since I don't plan to be buried with my bikes (or anything else I own, for that matter) they're not actually "mine". I'm just taking care of them for a while and our collective historical heritage is more important than my own selfish desires. When these things are gone they are GONE and that happens far too often for me to treat them as anything other than an endangered species. Literally... although at least the Kakapo can reproduce. But you wouldn't kill one of those, would you?
But, y'know, the Mona Lisa is just a painting and if the owner thinks it'll look better with a Manhatten skyline I guess it'd be okay.
But, y'know, the Mona Lisa is just a painting and if the owner thinks it'll look better with a Manhatten skyline I guess it'd be okay.
#23
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
232 Posts
It's a tough question that deserves thought. What one can do (or not) isn't the same as what one should do (or not).
I'd love to own an early '70's PX10, for example. But as configured from the factory it wouldn't be a good bike for me. I'd want to lower the gearing and swap out the Simple derailleurs, the tubular tires, maybe the saddle too. I could keep the parts, but if I never intended to sell the bike they'd just be collecting dust in a box. Now, if someone else had already done that then I'd consider owning. Otherwise I'll let a collector buy it. I don't want to do those things, especially if someone else went through all the trouble to restore it.
I'd love to own an early '70's PX10, for example. But as configured from the factory it wouldn't be a good bike for me. I'd want to lower the gearing and swap out the Simple derailleurs, the tubular tires, maybe the saddle too. I could keep the parts, but if I never intended to sell the bike they'd just be collecting dust in a box. Now, if someone else had already done that then I'd consider owning. Otherwise I'll let a collector buy it. I don't want to do those things, especially if someone else went through all the trouble to restore it.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 904
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I believe the word "sin" originates from an old archery term, meaning to "miss the mark" If so, yes there are certian ways in which you could "miss the mark" in remuddleing. Even if it wasn't a PX10, what happened to that blue Mixte was a sin. Sorry, got to call it what it is.
#25
Restore, ride, repeat...
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 403
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That mixte is an extreme case. I think what the OP is talking about are minor cosmetic things, maybe a paint job. How about an old bike with modern components? or maybe a nice bike with a horrible, big gel saddle that is comfortable for its owner. I actually know of someone who owns a 60's cinelli with straight bars because he wasn't in the best of shapes and he needed something comfortable. is that a sin?
Last edited by elguicho; 11-24-10 at 04:52 PM.