Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Would a self driving car world make it safe for cyclists?

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Would a self driving car world make it safe for cyclists?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-18, 07:53 PM
  #1551  
SHBR
C*pt*i* Obvious
 
SHBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 1,337
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 44 Posts
Anyone going to work is going to appreciate being chauffeured.
Some people prefer to ride their bicycles to work, crazy huh?

All those people who drive themselves to work are doing it wrong.

Carry on though, all of this dream talk is quite entertaining.
SHBR is offline  
Old 02-15-18, 08:00 PM
  #1552  
tyrion
Senior Member
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,076

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninety5rpm
You're not getting it. For extra income anyone could buy a small fleet of cars, trucks , whatever is demanded in a given area, and have them sprinkled around areas that are not very densely populated. Maybe they only get a few rides a day, but enough to pay the costs including the loan payments, plus a few extra bucks for your rainy day.
.
A few rides a day won't pay for a fleet of cars.
tyrion is offline  
Old 02-15-18, 08:35 PM
  #1553  
Ninety5rpm
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tyrion
A few rides a day won't pay for a fleet of cars.
Car rental companies gets 30/day per car and are viable. No reason these cars can't be viable for about the same daily revenue.

$30 is just ten $3 rides. Or 5 $6 rides.

It will work.
Ninety5rpm is offline  
Old 02-15-18, 09:00 PM
  #1554  
Ninety5rpm
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SHBR
Some people prefer to ride their bicycles to work, crazy huh?

All those people who drive themselves to work are doing it wrong.

Carry on though, all of this dream talk is quite entertaining.
People who prefer to ride will of course continue to ride. But that's about 1% of commuters, give or take depending on where you are.

Wrong? It's not a moral question.

It's a path of least resistance issue.

Once getting a ride is sufficiently cheap and convenient, it will be preferred over driving. Of course different people will have different thresholds. But as more use the services, the prices will drop and the convenience will increase as the services get tweaked and improved which will bring in more and more people to use them.

Consider Phoenix. The initial area will be relatively small, and so will the fleet. But as they grow the fleet, they will grow the area covered. That's how it will grow. Incrementally, encompassing more and more people.

It can snowball from 0 to 90% usage in a matter of months or even weeks in a given area.
Ninety5rpm is offline  
Old 02-15-18, 09:09 PM
  #1555  
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,990

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,541 Times in 1,049 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninety5rpm
People who prefer to ride will of course continue to ride. But that's about 1% of commuters, give or take depending on where you are.
[SKIP]
It can snowball from 0 to 90% usage in a matter of months or even weeks in a given area.
Just where do you get your inside information Kool-Aid from?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 02-15-18, 09:44 PM
  #1556  
SHBR
C*pt*i* Obvious
 
SHBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 1,337
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 44 Posts
The amount of shillage and zealotry from some users here, combined with the lack of facts or real world anecdotes in this thread, gives new meaning to the term Kool-Aid.
SHBR is offline  
Old 02-15-18, 10:28 PM
  #1557  
Rollfast
What happened?
 
Rollfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927

Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times in 255 Posts
I'm out of that but I have plenty of sucralose left.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
Rollfast is offline  
Old 02-15-18, 10:33 PM
  #1558  
Rollfast
What happened?
 
Rollfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927

Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times in 255 Posts
Self-driving cars won't object to your choice of music and change the station I hope.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
Rollfast is offline  
Old 02-15-18, 10:42 PM
  #1559  
KD5NRH
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninety5rpm
Car rental companies gets 30/day per car and are viable.
Car rental companies don't buy the fuel, and aren't liable if the car gets in an at-fault wreck.
KD5NRH is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 07:20 AM
  #1560  
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Bit of a reality check... from "behind the curtain..."

Outwardly, these companies talk relentlessly about the life-saving potential of self-driving cars, but behind closed doors, they are plotting ways to outmaneuver their rivals — often at the expense of an unsuspecting public. It’s telling that we learned more about the behind-the-scenes machinations to build self-driving cars from the Waymo-Uber trial than we did from any publicly disclosed safety report.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/13/1...car-confidence
genec is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 07:37 AM
  #1561  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,713 Times in 2,531 Posts
I once had a grad student tell me that he could make drones with perfect software, no possible issues. Then one day, I came into the lab and there was a robot-shaped hole in the wall. These vehicles are going to be shipped with major flaws in the software that will only show up after many miles. After the first facebook live video of someone screaming driving over a cliff comes out, we will not have to worry about them any more. The fact that they are being allowed on the road at all right now is ridiculous.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 10:33 AM
  #1562  
mr_bill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
I once had a grad student tell me that he could make drones with perfect software, no possible issues. Then one day, I came into the lab and there was a robot-shaped hole in the wall. These vehicles are going to be shipped with major flaws in the software that will only show up after many miles. After the first facebook live video of someone screaming driving over a cliff comes out, we will not have to worry about them any more. The fact that they are being allowed on the road at all right now is ridiculous.
You’re worried that a grad student's huberis leads to hUBERis?

BTW, all BMW owners were recalled after this incident due to major flaws in greyware:



Same objections were raised for fly-by-wire, and yet not only do certified sytems have an excellent safety record, drive-by-wire is deployed on millions of consumer vehicles driving trillions of miles. Throttle cables have been replaced, and many cars have EPS sytems capable of winning the fight over most owners for control of their vehicles.

(And Audi/Toyota myths in three, two, one....)

-mr. bill

Last edited by mr_bill; 02-16-18 at 12:38 PM.
mr_bill is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 10:36 AM
  #1563  
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
After the first facebook live video of someone screaming driving over a cliff comes out, we will not have to worry about them any more. The fact that they are being allowed on the road at all right now is ridiculous.
Yup, just like the military lost all interest after the crash of the Wright Flyer resulted in the death of the Army Lt. who was a passenger evaluating the craft. Clearly heavier-than-air flight was a pipe dream without any practical applications.

I fully expect there to be some highly publicized crashes involving AVs. But when contrasted with the ongoing loss of 30000 lives/yr just in the US these won't be sufficient to stop development of ever more capable sensors and software.
prathmann is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 10:53 AM
  #1564  
squirtdad
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,865

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2345 Post(s)
Liked 2,853 Times in 1,553 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninety5rpm
Car rental companies gets 30/day per car and are viable. No reason these cars can't be viable for about the same daily revenue.

$30 is just ten $3 rides. Or 5 $6 rides.

It will work.
when was that last time you rented a car? I just paid 44 a day, plus tax..... for a cheapo Hyndai..... i am sure you can find deals for 30 but that is not the going or average rate.

Beyond that the rental car business model includes buying cars at low rates and reselling them to recoup a major portion of operational cost.

This would not apply to your Unicorn model of AV fleets at beck and call.

Companies that run A/V fleets would have to determine, life cycle of vehicles, technology cycle and have a functional, technological and cosmetic maintenance cycle to maintain the vehicles.

another big unknown....and question of speed of adoption and use of AV cars.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)



squirtdad is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 11:40 AM
  #1565  
Ninety5rpm
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Just where do you get your inside information Kool-Aid from?
What inside information? I'm just extrapolating from what I think will happen based on what I've seen and read so far.
Ninety5rpm is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 11:54 AM
  #1566  
Ninety5rpm
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
I once had a grad student tell me that he could make drones with perfect software, no possible issues. Then one day, I came into the lab and there was a robot-shaped hole in the wall. These vehicles are going to be shipped with major flaws in the software that will only show up after many miles. After the first facebook live video of someone screaming driving over a cliff comes out, we will not have to worry about them any more. The fact that they are being allowed on the road at all right now is ridiculous.
Originally Posted by prathmann
Yup, just like the military lost all interest after the crash of the Wright Flyer resulted in the death of the Army Lt. who was a passenger evaluating the craft. Clearly heavier-than-air flight was a pipe dream without any practical applications.

I fully expect there to be some highly publicized crashes involving AVs. But when contrasted with the ongoing loss of 30000 lives/yr just in the US these won't be sufficient to stop development of ever more capable sensors and software.
These two posts really exemplify the stark contrast in views on this topic.

I am baffled by the view that believes it is "ridiculous" to allow autonomous vehicles on the road at all right now, after Google has had them on the road for years over millions of miles with zero significant issues. And they're only getting better and better.

Even Teslas with their crappy Level 2 driver assist systems is doing much better than human-driver-only cars.

Do you not recognize the foolhardy Luddite attitudes within yourselves?
Ninety5rpm is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 12:22 PM
  #1567  
Ninety5rpm
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by squirtdad
when was that last time you rented a car? I just paid 44 a day, plus tax..... for a cheapo Hyndai..... i am sure you can find deals for 30 but that is not the going or average rate.

Beyond that the rental car business model includes buying cars at low rates and reselling them to recoup a major portion of operational cost.

This would not apply to your Unicorn model of AV fleets at beck and call.

Companies that run A/V fleets would have to determine, life cycle of vehicles, technology cycle and have a functional, technological and cosmetic maintenance cycle to maintain the vehicles.

another big unknown....and question of speed of adoption and use of AV cars.
Whether it's $30 or $60/day it really doesn't matter.

The market will determine the appropriate number of cars in a given area for the demand that is there. My only point is that if an area can support rental cars and Ubers with human-driven drivers today, there is a much larger potential market for self-driven hailed cars.

That should be obvious.
Ninety5rpm is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 12:48 PM
  #1568  
squirtdad
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,865

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2345 Post(s)
Liked 2,853 Times in 1,553 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninety5rpm
Car rental companies gets 30/day per car and are viable. No reason these cars can't be viable for about the same daily revenue.

$30 is just ten $3 rides. Or 5 $6 rides.

It will work.
Originally Posted by squirtdad
when was that last time you rented a car? I just paid 44 a day, plus tax..... for a cheapo Hyndai..... i am sure you can find deals for 30 but that is not the going or average rate.

Beyond that the rental car business model includes buying cars at low rates and reselling them to recoup a major portion of operational cost.

This would not apply to your Unicorn model of AV fleets at beck and call.

Companies that run A/V fleets would have to determine, life cycle of vehicles, technology cycle and have a functional, technological and cosmetic maintenance cycle to maintain the vehicles.

another big unknown....and question of speed of adoption and use of AV cars.
Originally Posted by Ninety5rpm
Whether it's $30 or $60/day it really doesn't matter.

The market will determine the appropriate number of cars in a given area for the demand that is there. My only point is that if an area can support rental cars and Ubers with human-driven drivers today, there is a much larger potential market for self-driven hailed cars.

That should be obvious.
as usual missed the point or ignored it.

it is not an equal cost comparison to state rental cars cost 30 dollars a days, therefore AV fleet cars that generate 30 dollars a day of rides are economically feasible.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)



squirtdad is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 01:02 PM
  #1569  
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,990

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,541 Times in 1,049 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninety5rpm
My only point is that if an area can support rental cars and Ubers with human-driven drivers today, there is a much larger potential market for self-driven hailed cars.

That should be obvious.
What area "supports" Uber given that it is losing Billions of Dollars every year, year after year? This hard economic reality and the insufficient driver income (thus the astoundingly high turnover in drivers) makes it obvious that Uber, with its business model of low fares regardless of expenses, is "supporting" its customers with the low fare subsidies and low driver reimbursement.

It is a big unknown if Uber and its ilk can or will ever be "supported" (IOW run a profitable operation) by anything but investors willing to lose money indefinitely.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 03:34 PM
  #1570  
Ninety5rpm
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by squirtdad
as usual missed the point or ignored it.

it is not an equal cost comparison to state rental cars cost 30 dollars a days, therefore AV fleet cars that generate 30 dollars a day of rides are economically feasible.
I missed nothing nor ignored anything. I said it doesn't matter.

Remember, we're talking about economic viability of AV hailed ride services in low density areas.

Say an AV costs $50k. Amortized over 5 years at 5% that's $1000/mo. Or $33/day. Plus fuel (low for electric), maintenance (comparable to rental cars and taxis) and maybe storage (which would be minimal in the low density areas we're talking about).

Totally viable.
Ninety5rpm is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 03:41 PM
  #1571  
Ninety5rpm
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
What area "supports" Uber given that it is losing Billions of Dollars every year, year after year? This hard economic reality and the insufficient driver income (thus the astoundingly high turnover in drivers) makes it obvious that Uber, with its business model of low fares regardless of expenses, is "supporting" its customers with the low fare subsidies and low driver reimbursement.

It is a big unknown if Uber and its ilk can or will ever be "supported" (IOW run a profitable operation) by anything but investors willing to lose money indefinitely.
I don't understand why you keep ignoring the significance of AVs removing the cost of the human driver from the equation, which is the biggest cost associated with the business. That factors enormously in fare prices as well as profit calculations.
Ninety5rpm is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 04:50 PM
  #1572  
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninety5rpm
I don't understand why you keep ignoring the significance of AVs removing the cost of the human driver from the equation, which is the biggest cost associated with the business. That factors enormously in fare prices as well as profit calculations.
Well while AVs remove the human driver, they add the cost of owning the vehicle... to the tune of 10s of thousands per vehicle... that isn’t chicken feed.
genec is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 05:21 PM
  #1573  
Ninety5rpm
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Well while AVs remove the human driver, they add the cost of owning the vehicle... to the tune of 10s of thousands per vehicle... that isn’t chicken feed.
That's just shifting the cost from the driver/owner to the service itself (or to a local fleet owner) - either way the cost of owning the vehicle is part of the business calculus. Whether the vehicle cost portion of the fare goes to the driver/owner or the server owner or the local fleet owner doesn't really matter.

Now, you can argue that the an AV cost will be more than say the typical Uber X Prius, but the cost of a typical Uber XL or Uber Black vehicle is probably comparable.

And by the time they're mass producing these things all identically the cost is likely to drop substantially.
Ninety5rpm is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 05:27 PM
  #1574  
tyrion
Senior Member
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,076

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
One of the big issues in transportation as a service is the depreciation of the vehicle - if they depreciate anywhere close to the rate computers do, that would really impact the business model of AV taxis.

[Computers (and phones, etc.) don't depreciate because their capabilities decrease, they depreciate because technology constantly drives the cost/capability down. This is great for the computer business and I'd think car manufacturers would love to replicate that rapid obsolescence.]
tyrion is offline  
Old 02-16-18, 05:33 PM
  #1575  
Ninety5rpm
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Unbelievable. Waymo has already been approved to compete with Uber in Arizona. Uber is so screwed. Phoenix cyclists are so lucky!

And those of you with little faith in the technological and economic viability of AVs are even more wrong than I thought.

The self-driving carmaker spun out of Google was approved on Jan. 24 to operate as a transportation network company (TNC) in Arizona, the state department of transportation told Quartz. Waymo applied for the permit on Jan. 12. Its application, which was reviewed by Quartz, contained images of the autonomous Chrysler Pacifica minivans the company is testing in five US states.

The application realizes a long-held fear of Uber’s: that Waymo intends not just to build driverless cars, but to operate its own ride-hailing business. Waymo has been testing a self-driving car service in the Phoenix area since last April that lets passengers hail cars through an app, similar to Uber. TNC status would allow it to charge for these rides, which are currently free.

...
Waymo confirmed to Quartz that the TNC permit moves it a step closer to the commercial, on-demand ride service it plans to launch in Phoenix this year. “As we continue to test drive our fleet of vehicles in greater Phoenix, we’re taking all the steps necessary to launch our commercial service this year,” a Waymo spokesman said in an emailed statement. The company said it hasn’t announced rates yet for those rides. Waymo plans to operate commercially in other cities in the future, but declined to provide specifics.

Alphabet chief financial officer Ruth Porat said on the company’s fourth-quarter earnings call on Feb. 1 that Waymo was excited about its progress in Phoenix, and working toward a public ride-hailing program. “Riders will be able to use a Waymo app to hail one of our fully driving, self-driving cars without a driver at the wheel,” she said.

Uber declined to comment.


https://qz.com/1208897/alphabets-way...ete-with-uber/

Incremental roll out. Starting in Phoenix. If you haven't bought GOOGL yet...
Ninety5rpm is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.