Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Quill Stem Questions

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Quill Stem Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-24, 05:02 PM
  #1  
Noonievut
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 947
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 262 Times in 129 Posts
Quill Stem Questions

I’m new to quill stems and had some questions. Thanks

1) When you tighten the top bolt is there a general torque spec? I have the Velo-Orange quill stem with removable faceplate. I didn’t notice a torque setting on the stem.

2) Also, for my understanding, if you overtighten does that damage/wear down the bearings like non-quill (e.g., top cap bolt just snug, whereas too tight or too loose not good).

3) For fit reasons, I may switch to something like the VO threadless stem adaptor and traditional stem(s). The bike (Rivendell) has a 1” threaded headset. Is it just a matter of removing the old one and putting a new one in, tightening to spec?

4) Whether the quill stem or the threadless stem adapter, how far down can I push the stem into the headset/head tube before tightening it? I know there is a minimal insertion limit but is there a maximum?

5) Bonus question and nothing to do with stems. When you put an aluminum seatpost (Thomson) into a steel frame (Riv with the seatpost bolt through the frame, no separate collar) do you grease the post? I initially had slip with the stock post and haven’t pulled it out yet to see if it’s greased. I was curious as to whether a fibre paste (with grit) would be good.
Noonievut is offline  
Old 02-10-24, 05:22 PM
  #2  
mpetry912 
aged to perfection
 
mpetry912's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,820

Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Liked 1,263 Times in 667 Posts
there's no torque spec for this

you want to imagine that you are drawing a wedge or a cone against the walls of the steerer tube

you want it good and snug but do not want to deform or distort the steerer tube.

I'd say 200-240 inch lbs just by guess but your educated "feel" as the bolt tightens is a better guide.

grease the lower stem, wedge, and bolt threads

/markp
mpetry912 is offline  
Likes For mpetry912:
Old 02-10-24, 05:58 PM
  #3  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,002

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6199 Post(s)
Liked 4,816 Times in 3,323 Posts
I use to straddle the front wheel as I tightened quill stems. Every now and then as I tightened it I would hold the front wheel from moving with my legs and try turn the bars. If they moved the stem in the steerer tube, then I'd tighten the bolt some more till turning the bars wouldn't let the quill stem twist askew.

I think the big concern with over tightening the quill is that it will bulge the steerer tube. And that would be doubly bad if the quill was in the area of the top headset bearing. Which it shouldn't be if you don't go beyond max extension line from showing on the stem.

4) Whether the quill stem or the threadless stem adapter, how far down can I push the stem into the headset/head tube before tightening it? I know there is a minimal insertion limit but is there a maximum?
I think you can push it as far as you can. You'll probably hit the brake bolt before you got it too low to damage the bottom bearing. And that would only be if you had a obscenely tall stem that could make it to the bottom of the headtube/steerer tube.

I'd favor getting that threadless adapter. I used one with my '91 Paramount. It was much easier to change the pista type stems when I wanted to try out different length of reach to the bars/hoods. Didn't have to unwrap the bars and remove the STI's.

Last edited by Iride01; 02-10-24 at 06:09 PM.
Iride01 is offline  
Likes For Iride01:
Old 02-10-24, 06:03 PM
  #4  
Garthr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Right where I'm supposed to be
Posts: 1,634

Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 117 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times in 127 Posts
Originally Posted by Noonievut
I’m new to quill stems and had some questions. Thanks

1) When you tighten the top bolt is there a general torque spec? I have the Velo-Orange quill stem with removable faceplate. I didn’t notice a torque setting on the stem.

2) Also, for my understanding, if you overtighten does that damage/wear down the bearings like non-quill (e.g., top cap bolt just snug, whereas too tight or too loose not good).

3) For fit reasons, I may switch to something like the VO threadless stem adaptor and traditional stem(s). The bike (Rivendell) has a 1” threaded headset. Is it just a matter of removing the old one and putting a new one in, tightening to spec?

4) Whether the quill stem or the threadless stem adapter, how far down can I push the stem into the headset/head tube before tightening it? I know there is a minimal insertion limit but is there a maximum?

5) Bonus question and nothing to do with stems. When you put an aluminum seatpost (Thomson) into a steel frame (Riv with the seatpost bolt through the frame, no separate collar) do you grease the post? I initially had slip with the stock post and haven’t pulled it out yet to see if it’s greased. I was curious as to whether a fibre paste (with grit) would be good.
I've only used a torque wrench for crank bolts so I can't speak to any torque values for stems or bars for that matter. 6" allen wrenches are great for quill stem tightening. The longer the lever, the easier it is tighten. I'd like to say use "common sense" force, but there really isn't such a thing as I've seen too many people think if more is good, even more must be even better.(( sigh )) I've never had a bar or stem slip of come undone and I go by feel. When the bolt won't turn anymore, taper off the pressure. I find torque values only really useful as a tool to get a feel of how much to tighten something without it. Don't be a slave to it otherwise. I know these are just words, but just words is all we have here. There comes a point where you just gotta trust yourself, without a net, so to speak.

The quill stem has no effect on your threaded headset adjustment. A quill stem shouldn't be slammed all the way down to the bend, at least raise it a few mm's from that so there's no stress point. Sometimes a head tube is short and quill long and the quill only goes in so far. In that case get a shorter quill.

I've used the VO quill adapter and threadless stem for years. Same common sense approach to tightening as above. It can only go down so far, about an inch above where it starts to flare upwards. Other brands without the flare can go lower.

Yes, grease the post and if it's a new frame apply some inside the tube. I prefer using Permatex anti-seize for posts as well as quill stems as it's for aluminum contacting steel. You can get it in bottle with an applicator in the cap. I've hear of many a Riv frames with slipping posts. I find that puzzling myself as I've never anything but perfectly tight fits on all frames I've ever owned. If it does and it's new frame, contact Riv as it's up to them to make it right if the frame isn't to perfect spec. 26.8 or 27.2 means just that ! No one should have to resort to friction paste or torque-heroics to get a post to stay on a steel frame. Apply some anti-sieze to those seatpost bolt threads too, and the inside where the bolts contact the frame, just to make it easiest to tighten.
Garthr is offline  
Likes For Garthr:
Old 02-10-24, 06:12 PM
  #5  
veganbikes
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,551

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4361 Post(s)
Liked 4,002 Times in 2,671 Posts
ALWAYS GREASE METAL ON METAL! Seatposts, quill stems, bolts...A good seatpost and a good frame shouldn't have a difficult interface between seatpost and frame and if you do make sure you have the correct stuff first and foremost, make sure it is properly lubricated and torqued and if still having issues reach out to the frame manufacturer and see what they suggest.,
veganbikes is online now  
Likes For veganbikes:
Old 02-10-24, 07:15 PM
  #6  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,099

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4211 Post(s)
Liked 3,881 Times in 2,316 Posts
Originally Posted by Noonievut
I’m new to quill stems and had some questions. Thanks

1) When you tighten the top bolt is there a general torque spec? I have the Velo-Orange quill stem with removable faceplate. I didn’t notice a torque setting on the stem. Park's torque chart suggests from 16-29 foot pounds for the quill/wedge bolt and about the same for a two bolt removeable face plate's bolts. For this stuff I rarely use a torque wrench and instead tighten fasteners enough to stay put when stress tested. But I also have only metal stems and such on my bikes.

2) Also, for my understanding, if you overtighten does that damage/wear down the bearings like non-quill (e.g., top cap bolt just snug, whereas too tight or too loose not good). No. The bearing preload is primarily set by the threaded top race and its lock nut. There is a very small amount of steerer tube length shortening when a quill stem is installed and tightened so in the ideal world the bearing preload should be adjusted after a stem is installed. But this is a very small factor that most here likely never heard of (because it's so small an effect). One of the nice aspects of a quill type stem in a threaded fork is that separation of stem securement and headset bearing preload adjustments.

3) For fit reasons, I may switch to something like the VO threadless stem adaptor and traditional stem(s) To show my age I consider that quill stems are the "traditional" design The bike (Rivendell) has a 1” threaded headset. Is it just a matter of removing the old one and putting a new one in, tightening to spec? No, without serious fork changes a threadless headset won't properly fit and be adjusted on a threaded fork. The threadless stem (or riser) needs to be clamped to a smooth and stress free surface (the threads are crack starting concentration points) or there's a possibility that the steerer top will crack and break off at a thread. As the threads are covered and hidden from view the usual "periodic monitoring" is far less likely to be done too.

4) Whether the quill stem or the threadless stem adapter, how far down can I push the stem into the headset/head tube before tightening it? I know there is a minimal insertion limit but is there a maximum? With a quill stem and threaded steerer the usual minimum height/max insertion is determined by a) the bottom of the quill (where the wedge is) can't enter the butted lower portion of the steerer as that section has a narrower ID, b) The stem's exterior shape at the top of the stem grows in diameter or the "fillet" flow of the shape onto the extension's underside flairs out enough to jam up in the steerer's top. Both are fairly obvious and the industry focuses on the opposite limits not being exceeded.

5) Bonus question and nothing to do with stems. When you put an aluminum seatpost (Thomson) into a steel frame (Riv with the seatpost bolt through the frame, no separate collar) do you grease the post? Yes or even better is an anti seize compound. I initially had slip with the stock post and haven’t pulled it out yet to see if it’s greased. Post slippage is usually a sign of a fit problem although sometimes binder slot length can be too short to allow good clamping pressures I was curious as to whether a fibre paste (with grit) would be good. Assembly paste can do wonders for poor fit ups and/or when material/fastener strengths are lacking. It also should act as a galvanic corrosion barrier
Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
Old 02-10-24, 07:42 PM
  #7  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,728

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,593 Times in 1,437 Posts
You want it functionally tight. Meaning tight enough to steer without slipping.

I do this using the wheel between the knees test described above. It takes amazingly little handlebar force to steer, so if the bars resist twisting, they're tight enough.

I prefer tight enough to need some force to move, but not so much that I can see or feel the fork flex. We used to call this "race tight" because it allowed the bar to twist in a crash, to reduce damage or injury.

For the rest, read Andy's post above.
FBinNY is offline  
Likes For FBinNY:
Old 02-10-24, 08:44 PM
  #8  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,933 Times in 2,558 Posts
+
Originally Posted by FBinNY
You want it functionally tight. Meaning tight enough to steer without slipping.

I do this using the wheel between the knees test described above. It takes amazingly little handlebar force to steer, so if the bars resist twisting, they're tight enough.

I prefer tight enough to need some force to move, but not so much that I can see or feel the fork flex. We used to call this "race tight" because it allowed the bar to twist in a crash, to reduce damage or injury.

For the rest, read Andy's post above.
+1 "Race tight" means your brake lever might survive and race again. (Having the levers themselves mounted "race tight" further improves the odds.) Scarred brake levers were a badge of honor. I've straightened both bars and levers after crashes to ride home.

Last edited by 79pmooney; 02-10-24 at 08:45 PM. Reason: Didn't get my quotes right
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney:
Old 02-11-24, 05:18 AM
  #9  
Noonievut
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 947
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 262 Times in 129 Posts
Thanks everyone for all the advice
Noonievut is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.