Convert 7 Speed to 8-9 speed
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 21
Bikes: Bridgestone MB-3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
1 Post
Convert 7 Speed to 8-9 speed
Rebuild questions for a 1993 Bridgestone MB-3. I am putting new wheels, cassette and chain on my MB-3. I also need to replace the original bottom bracket. The new wheel set is from Quality Wheels with current model Deore hubs. The rear freehub is an 8-10 speed model - Deore FH-T610.
I had originally intended to simply stick with a 7 speed cassette but am also considering an upgrade to 9 speed. I understand that I would need to change out rear derailleur, shifters and go with a narrower chain. My question is regarding the front crank and derailleur. I currently have the original Deore DX crank and front derailleur. Do those need to be changed or will they work with a narrow chain? Thanks in advance.
I had originally intended to simply stick with a 7 speed cassette but am also considering an upgrade to 9 speed. I understand that I would need to change out rear derailleur, shifters and go with a narrower chain. My question is regarding the front crank and derailleur. I currently have the original Deore DX crank and front derailleur. Do those need to be changed or will they work with a narrow chain? Thanks in advance.
Last edited by AZ4Mtb; 10-10-19 at 11:02 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 675
Bikes: Soma Double Cross Disc (2017), red Hardrock FS (circa 1996)
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 217 Post(s)
Liked 155 Times
in
102 Posts
Old rear derailleur may work.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/speeds.html#chainrings - article on compatibility. I have run 7/8 speed SunRace crankset with a 9 speed chain.
Front derailleur will probably work. Yes, the chain is narrower, but anyway it has more degrees of freedom (mounting height and angle) than the rear one. It may be hard to adjust it even with 7 speed chain. Changing front to friction shifter will mitigate these problems in case you decide to stick with the old crankset and FD.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/speeds.html#chainrings - article on compatibility. I have run 7/8 speed SunRace crankset with a 9 speed chain.
Front derailleur will probably work. Yes, the chain is narrower, but anyway it has more degrees of freedom (mounting height and angle) than the rear one. It may be hard to adjust it even with 7 speed chain. Changing front to friction shifter will mitigate these problems in case you decide to stick with the old crankset and FD.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times
in
570 Posts
The existing parts should work fine. I have used 9-speed chains on full 8-speed drivetrains before without issue. You should need to change only the cassette, chain, and shifters initially, and that's probably where I'd start.
#4
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
#5
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,115
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 853 Post(s)
Liked 1,434 Times
in
816 Posts
I am running a 10 speed Shimano cassette with original 105, indexed, 6 speed , rear and front derailleurs, and original 6 speed 105 DT shift levers set in friction mode. It shifts great, just took a short while to get the travel distance for the levers. If you are a bit off on a shift, just move the levers a bit in the correct direction. Very easy.
#6
Quidam Bike Super Hero
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Stone Mountain, GA (Metro Atlanta, East)
Posts: 1,135
Bikes: 1995 Trek 800 Sport, aka, "CamelTrek"
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
282 Posts
Went from 7 to 9 when ebaying a pair of rims. Changed chain and shifters.... Rder mostly worked but often phantom shifted in the middle.... Finally reached sanity with a 9 speed derailleur. Still happily using the original front derailleur from 1995....
#7
Senior Member
I am running a 10 speed Shimano cassette with original 105, indexed, 6 speed , rear and front derailleurs, and original 6 speed 105 DT shift levers set in friction mode. It shifts great, just took a short while to get the travel distance for the levers. If you are a bit off on a shift, just move the levers a bit in the correct direction. Very easy.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times
in
570 Posts
I've been advocating using friction shifting with 10 speed for years here. It does work great. I have 2 bikes with Campy downtube shifters with 10sp rear, I believe both Shimano, but maybe one has Campy on it at the moment. But it doesn't matter. It wasn't the indexed shifters that made 10sp work so well, it is the ramps on the cogs plus the chain. It takes a light touch on the shifter and it is almost never between gears since they are spaced so closely anyway.
I don't think your experience and mine are necessarily mutually exclusive. Perhaps you're more adroit at it than I. Or, are you saying that the closer 10-speed spacing means the chain is almost never skipping around -- that no matter where you have the shifter, you're pretty much always positively in a gear?
#9
Senior Member
Do you find friction shifting to get more difficult (or at least more sensitive) with closer gear spacing? I'll be the first to admit that I'm not a professional friction shifter...but I do find it more difficult with my 9-speed bikes than with 8-speed or below (or even traditional 5- and 6-speed spacing). I have found that the wider the spacing, the more forgiving, and less sensitive, the system seems to be.
I don't think your experience and mine are necessarily mutually exclusive. Perhaps you're more adroit at it than I. Or, are you saying that the closer 10-speed spacing means the chain is almost never skipping around -- that no matter where you have the shifter, you're pretty much always positively in a gear?
I don't think your experience and mine are necessarily mutually exclusive. Perhaps you're more adroit at it than I. Or, are you saying that the closer 10-speed spacing means the chain is almost never skipping around -- that no matter where you have the shifter, you're pretty much always positively in a gear?
Likes For zacster:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
Shimano 105 on my original 92 Trek 1400 was indexed for 7 speed, but in friction mode covered a 9 speed cassette well...
#11
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
I never had much luck getting a 7-sp triple FD to work with a 9-sp chain and indexed shifters. You had to push the cage so far to get the chain to pick up the next ring, that you used the whole shift, and the trim positions, that now there wasn't enough throw left in the shifter to make the next one. I imagine this wouldn't be a problem running friction, but i was trying to work with the shifters at hand.
The one double i did, an RX-100 (7/8-sp) had no problems with a 9-sp chain and cranks.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 21
Bikes: Bridgestone MB-3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
1 Post
MB-3 Rebuild Questions - Half Way There
Thanks for all the helpful replies. As posted before, I am rebuilding a Bridgestone MB-3 that needed new wheels and new drive train. I am at the point where I need to figure out my proper bottom bracket spindle length as the BB also needs to be replaced. As per previous I am converting the bike from 3x7 to 3x8 while I am at it. The original component group was all Deore DX. Here is what I have obtained for the upgrade followed by what I have done so far:
New Alex DT19 Rims with Shimano Deore Hubs (8-11 speed non disk rear hub 135mm spacing).
New (old) Deore XT M739 3x8 rapid fire shifters
New (old) Deore XT M739 rear derailleur
New (old) Deore XT M735 front derailleur
New SHIMANO 8 Speed Cassette - HG50 and new HG71 Chain
While the original dropout spacing for the MB-3 is specified as 135mm I had to cold form the rear triangle to fit the new rear hub because it was about 2.5mm too tight. I could get the rear wheel in but I required me to muscle it somewhat. Now it pops into place with minimal effort and will fall out of the dropouts if the QR is opened.
The rear cassette is installed and the wheels are on and I have measured for chain line with the new hub/cassette combo. I am keeping the original Deore DX crank and just installing new chain wheels. My new rear chain line is 43.5mm and my front chain line is 47mm with the DX crank and the original Tioga BB40. The Tioga BB has a 120mm spindle and I want to replace it with a sealed cartridge setup. I am looking at the Origin8 Torqlite or the OMNI Racer JIS Square Taper BBs. Sheldon Brown's guide to BBs shows the symmetrical equivalent for a 120mm spindle as 124mm. If I am understanding all of this correctly, I've moved the chain line of my rear cassette in about 2-3mm closer to the center line of the bike with the jump from a 7 speed to an 8 speed rear hub. So, can I install BB with a 122.5 spindle and end up with a 45.5 front CL? That would leave me with a 2mm difference back to front if I am understanding the effect of spindle length on the chain line. Also, nobody seems to make a 124mm spindle anyway so I would need to go up to 127mm and that seems like the wrong direction to be headed...
Thanks again.
New Alex DT19 Rims with Shimano Deore Hubs (8-11 speed non disk rear hub 135mm spacing).
New (old) Deore XT M739 3x8 rapid fire shifters
New (old) Deore XT M739 rear derailleur
New (old) Deore XT M735 front derailleur
New SHIMANO 8 Speed Cassette - HG50 and new HG71 Chain
While the original dropout spacing for the MB-3 is specified as 135mm I had to cold form the rear triangle to fit the new rear hub because it was about 2.5mm too tight. I could get the rear wheel in but I required me to muscle it somewhat. Now it pops into place with minimal effort and will fall out of the dropouts if the QR is opened.
The rear cassette is installed and the wheels are on and I have measured for chain line with the new hub/cassette combo. I am keeping the original Deore DX crank and just installing new chain wheels. My new rear chain line is 43.5mm and my front chain line is 47mm with the DX crank and the original Tioga BB40. The Tioga BB has a 120mm spindle and I want to replace it with a sealed cartridge setup. I am looking at the Origin8 Torqlite or the OMNI Racer JIS Square Taper BBs. Sheldon Brown's guide to BBs shows the symmetrical equivalent for a 120mm spindle as 124mm. If I am understanding all of this correctly, I've moved the chain line of my rear cassette in about 2-3mm closer to the center line of the bike with the jump from a 7 speed to an 8 speed rear hub. So, can I install BB with a 122.5 spindle and end up with a 45.5 front CL? That would leave me with a 2mm difference back to front if I am understanding the effect of spindle length on the chain line. Also, nobody seems to make a 124mm spindle anyway so I would need to go up to 127mm and that seems like the wrong direction to be headed...
Thanks again.
#13
Senior Member
Thanks for all the helpful replies. As posted before, I am rebuilding a Bridgestone MB-3 that needed new wheels and new drive train. I am at the point where I need to figure out my proper bottom bracket spindle length as the BB also needs to be replaced. As per previous I am converting the bike from 3x7 to 3x8 while I am at it. The original component group was all Deore DX. Here is what I have obtained for the upgrade followed by what I have done so far:
New Alex DT19 Rims with Shimano Deore Hubs (8-11 speed non disk rear hub 135mm spacing).
New (old) Deore XT M739 3x8 rapid fire shifters
New (old) Deore XT M739 rear derailleur
New (old) Deore XT M735 front derailleur
New SHIMANO 8 Speed Cassette - HG50 and new HG71 Chain
While the original dropout spacing for the MB-3 is specified as 135mm I had to cold form the rear triangle to fit the new rear hub because it was about 2.5mm too tight. I could get the rear wheel in but I required me to muscle it somewhat. Now it pops into place with minimal effort and will fall out of the dropouts if the QR is opened.
The rear cassette is installed and the wheels are on and I have measured for chain line with the new hub/cassette combo. I am keeping the original Deore DX crank and just installing new chain wheels. My new rear chain line is 43.5mm and my front chain line is 47mm with the DX crank and the original Tioga BB40. The Tioga BB has a 120mm spindle and I want to replace it with a sealed cartridge setup. I am looking at the Origin8 Torqlite or the OMNI Racer JIS Square Taper BBs. Sheldon Brown's guide to BBs shows the symmetrical equivalent for a 120mm spindle as 124mm. If I am understanding all of this correctly, I've moved the chain line of my rear cassette in about 2-3mm closer to the center line of the bike with the jump from a 7 speed to an 8 speed rear hub. So, can I install BB with a 122.5 spindle and end up with a 45.5 front CL? That would leave me with a 2mm difference back to front if I am understanding the effect of spindle length on the chain line. Also, nobody seems to make a 124mm spindle anyway so I would need to go up to 127mm and that seems like the wrong direction to be headed...
Thanks again.
New Alex DT19 Rims with Shimano Deore Hubs (8-11 speed non disk rear hub 135mm spacing).
New (old) Deore XT M739 3x8 rapid fire shifters
New (old) Deore XT M739 rear derailleur
New (old) Deore XT M735 front derailleur
New SHIMANO 8 Speed Cassette - HG50 and new HG71 Chain
While the original dropout spacing for the MB-3 is specified as 135mm I had to cold form the rear triangle to fit the new rear hub because it was about 2.5mm too tight. I could get the rear wheel in but I required me to muscle it somewhat. Now it pops into place with minimal effort and will fall out of the dropouts if the QR is opened.
The rear cassette is installed and the wheels are on and I have measured for chain line with the new hub/cassette combo. I am keeping the original Deore DX crank and just installing new chain wheels. My new rear chain line is 43.5mm and my front chain line is 47mm with the DX crank and the original Tioga BB40. The Tioga BB has a 120mm spindle and I want to replace it with a sealed cartridge setup. I am looking at the Origin8 Torqlite or the OMNI Racer JIS Square Taper BBs. Sheldon Brown's guide to BBs shows the symmetrical equivalent for a 120mm spindle as 124mm. If I am understanding all of this correctly, I've moved the chain line of my rear cassette in about 2-3mm closer to the center line of the bike with the jump from a 7 speed to an 8 speed rear hub. So, can I install BB with a 122.5 spindle and end up with a 45.5 front CL? That would leave me with a 2mm difference back to front if I am understanding the effect of spindle length on the chain line. Also, nobody seems to make a 124mm spindle anyway so I would need to go up to 127mm and that seems like the wrong direction to be headed...
Thanks again.
#14
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
I understand that I would need to change out rear derailleur, shifters and go with a narrower chain. My question is regarding the front crank and derailleur. I currently have the original Deore DX crank and front derailleur. Do those need to be changed or will they work with a narrow chain? Thanks in advance.
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 21
Bikes: Bridgestone MB-3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
1 Post
Thanks for your reply. I am way past this part. I have already opened up my rear spacing and have wheels installed. I am trying to figure out chain line. I think I need to start a new thread because I am getting lots of responses to the older parts of this one...
#16
Newbie
I'm messing with several 90's 3X7 mountain bikes. Still original Deore setups. They came with a 122.5 BB. 135mm rear spacing. I think the 122.5 is too long. That's just from eyeballing the chain line angles by eye. I changed one bike to a 118mm BB. I think that centers the chain better on the rear cogs. I'm looking at moving to 3X8. For me a 120mm BB would be what I'd like using with that setup.