Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Interesting French constructeur bike

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Interesting French constructeur bike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-19, 10:54 AM
  #1  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
Interesting French constructeur bike

I spotted this bike on eBay.fr (don't ask me what I'm doing there ). The listing has ended as not sold but I'm interested in messaging the seller.

It is listed as a Dujardin, who was a constructeur active from the 30s to the 60s according to Jan Heine. He was known for purchasing the Nivex derailleur factory near the end of the Nivex's production.

The bike looks like the product of a custom shop, being fillet-brazed, with a nice, worked-over fork crown, and of course the Nivex dropouts, which has been horrendously modified to take a parallelogram derailleur. Whoever did that also hacked off the original Nivex chainstay mount.

I'm tempted to make a low offer, citing the lack of transfers, modifications to the frame, and repaint. I'd be willing to fabricate and braze the chainstay mount and repair the driveside dropout. But I don't know where I'd find a Nivex derailleur, let alone a compatible hub. The only Nivex on eBay is $2500





TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 11:14 AM
  #2  
bertinjim 
Senior Member
 
bertinjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Niagara Region, Canada
Posts: 1,455

Bikes: 1970s Alex Singer, 1960s Peugeot PX 10, 1960s Bertin C37, 1973 Carre Bertin C 37, 1972 Carlton Kermesse, 1981 Peugeot PX 14 Super Competition

Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times in 157 Posts
TenGrainBread -

Same place as the bike, EBay France. Very nice randonneuse, by the way.
bertinjim is online now  
Old 09-02-19, 12:14 PM
  #3  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
@cb400bill meant to post this in regular C&V, can you move it? Thanks ☺️
TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 12:30 PM
  #4  
cb400bill
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,650

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3090 Post(s)
Liked 6,595 Times in 3,781 Posts
Thread moved to C&V.
cb400bill is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 12:59 PM
  #5  
juvela
Senior Member
 
juvela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alta California
Posts: 14,265
Mentioned: 415 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 3,338 Times in 2,178 Posts
-----

Wondering why designer chose to place rear canti on seatstays rather than laterals.

Makes for an unnecessarily awkward cable path.

Sure to be a good reason am not seeing...


-----
juvela is offline  
Likes For juvela:
Old 09-02-19, 01:15 PM
  #6  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times in 1,995 Posts
Mafac cantilever brakes protrude a leg catching amount.
More torture for the cable, less for the legs.
repechage is offline  
Likes For repechage:
Old 09-02-19, 01:19 PM
  #7  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
Originally Posted by juvela
-----

Wondering why designer chose to place rear canti on seatstays rather than laterals.

Makes for an unnecessarily awkward cable path.

Sure to be a good reason am not seeing...


-----
Only reason I can think of is chainstays being short enough that there is no room for straddle cable between tire and seat tube. And perhaps maker didn't want to place straddle around seat tube because straddle would need to be very long to make this work, reducing mechanical advantage.
TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 10-29-19, 05:41 PM
  #8  
scarlson 
Senior Member
 
scarlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089

Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem

Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times in 723 Posts
I just bought it

We'll see how things go. I'm going to try to restore it to its Nivex-licious glory, pending Jan Heine's possible introduction of repro Nivex derailleurs. In the meantime, there's always the Suntour S-1!
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
scarlson is offline  
Likes For scarlson:
Old 10-29-19, 09:57 PM
  #9  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by scarlson
I just bought it

We'll see how things go. I'm going to try to restore it to its Nivex-licious glory, pending Jan Heine's possible introduction of repro Nivex derailleurs. In the meantime, there's always the Suntour S-1!
This is your chance to reverse engineer a Nivex as well as a lever front derailleur!
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 10-29-19, 10:42 PM
  #10  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
Originally Posted by scarlson
I just bought it

We'll see how things go. I'm going to try to restore it to its Nivex-licious glory, pending Jan Heine's possible introduction of repro Nivex derailleurs. In the meantime, there's always the Suntour S-1!
Hell yeah!! I saw it got relisted recently and the thought crossed my mind again as well given the RH repro in dev. Glad you pulled the trigger!
TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 10-30-19, 05:38 AM
  #11  
J.Higgins 
2-Wheeled Fool
 
J.Higgins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,346

Bikes: Surly Ogre, Brompton

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1385 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times in 457 Posts
Originally Posted by scarlson
I just bought it

We'll see how things go. I'm going to try to restore it to its Nivex-licious glory, pending Jan Heine's possible introduction of repro Nivex derailleurs. In the meantime, there's always the Suntour S-1!
Grats on your new bike. Please post some pics as you go!
J.Higgins is offline  
Old 10-30-19, 06:48 AM
  #12  
abshipp 
Senior Member
 
abshipp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 4,127

Bikes: 1975 Motobecane Grand Jubile, 2020 Holdsworth Competition, 2022 Giant Trance 29 3

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3359 Post(s)
Liked 3,638 Times in 1,244 Posts
Originally Posted by TenGrainBread
Hell yeah!! I saw it got relisted recently and the thought crossed my mind again as well given the RH repro in dev. Glad you pulled the trigger!
Just curious, have you seen anything that implies that RH will be offering the repro Nivex for sale? Other than the fact that there has been at least one produced, so most of the R&D is complete and it would likely be just a matter of producing them?

I think it would be awesome to see it go into production, but compared to the other offerings by RH that, while boutique, are more or less standard equipment for modern bikes I can't really see any place for the Nivex repro in the bicycling world outside of custom builders.

Jan did a lot to popularize wider supple tires for bikes, and I know that getting roadies on to that bandwagon was a huge feat and he and the RH/BQ team deserve a lot of praise for their efforts, but trying to get people to buy in to a derailleur standard that is so different from everything else seems a little unrealistic. I mean, a lot of people will drop $160 on a pair of tires to try out something new, especially since if you don't like it you can just switch back.

But exploring the world of a Nivex repro involves a much bigger commitment. At the very least it would involve having an existing frame modified with new dropouts and RD mount, and then you're stuck with a bike that you can only use that particular derailleur on.

And considering what would likely be a very limited run, can you imagine how much the RD and shifter would cost? If RH already charges close to $200 for a single centerpull brake, of which they make a lot of, I can only imagine that it would end up being close to $1000

Not trying to be a downer or overly critical, as the first time I saw a picture of that RD on Instagram I got really excited. I just really can't see much of a market for it. Although I suppose that there are enough people with interest and enough money that would cause the first production run to sell out immediately. I mean, I would go for it if I could
abshipp is offline  
Old 10-30-19, 06:51 AM
  #13  
abshipp 
Senior Member
 
abshipp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 4,127

Bikes: 1975 Motobecane Grand Jubile, 2020 Holdsworth Competition, 2022 Giant Trance 29 3

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3359 Post(s)
Liked 3,638 Times in 1,244 Posts
Originally Posted by scarlson
I just bought it

We'll see how things go. I'm going to try to restore it to its Nivex-licious glory, pending Jan Heine's possible introduction of repro Nivex derailleurs. In the meantime, there's always the Suntour S-1!
Congrats!

The S-1 is interesting, thanks for mentioning it. I've never heard of that one before. Looks to be quite an affordable option as well
abshipp is offline  
Old 10-30-19, 10:00 AM
  #14  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by abshipp
But exploring the world of a Nivex repro involves a much bigger commitment. At the very least it would involve having an existing frame modified with new dropouts and RD mount, and then you're stuck with a bike that you can only use that particular derailleur on.
Is that a true statement? I think the chain rest we tend to see on the dropout is more of a nice-to-have than a necessity, and I don't think the Nivex mount would get in the way if you decided to use a more common RD. Perhaps an alternate method for hanging up the chain when removing the wheel could be devised, so that you can use normal wheels.

Just curious, have you seen anything that implies that RH will be offering the repro Nivex for sale? Other than the fact that there has been at least one produced, so most of the R&D is complete and it would likely be just a matter of producing them?

I think it would be awesome to see it go into production, but compared to the other offerings by RH that, while boutique, are more or less standard equipment for modern bikes I can't really see any place for the Nivex repro in the bicycling world outside of custom builders.

Jan did a lot to popularize wider supple tires for bikes, and I know that getting roadies on to that bandwagon was a huge feat and he and the RH/BQ team deserve a lot of praise for their efforts, but trying to get people to buy in to a derailleur standard that is so different from everything else seems a little unrealistic. I mean, a lot of people will drop $160 on a pair of tires to try out something new, especially since if you don't like it you can just switch back.

And considering what would likely be a very limited run, can you imagine how much the RD and shifter would cost? If RH already charges close to $200 for a single centerpull brake, of which they make a lot of, I can only imagine that it would end up being close to $1000

Not trying to be a downer or overly critical, as the first time I saw a picture of that RD on Instagram I got really excited. I just really can't see much of a market for it. Although I suppose that there are enough people with interest and enough money that would cause the first production run to sell out immediately. I mean, I would go for it if I could
I'm not sure if I would actually like a lever front derailleur, but I daydream about RH offering one plus the braze-ons to mount it to a frame. All of the geometry and testing done, you just need to decide on your big chainring size and have it stuck on a bike by a framebuilder. How cool would that be!
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498

Last edited by ThermionicScott; 10-30-19 at 10:06 AM.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 10-30-19, 10:18 AM
  #15  
abshipp 
Senior Member
 
abshipp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 4,127

Bikes: 1975 Motobecane Grand Jubile, 2020 Holdsworth Competition, 2022 Giant Trance 29 3

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3359 Post(s)
Liked 3,638 Times in 1,244 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Is that a true statement? I think the chain rest we tend to see on the dropout is more of a nice-to-have than a necessity, and I don't think the Nivex mount would get in the way if you decided to use a more common RD. Perhaps an alternate method for hanging up the chain when removing the wheel could be devised, so that you can use normal wheels.

I'm not sure if I would actually like a lever front derailleur, but I daydream about RH offering one plus the braze-ons to mount it to a frame. All of the geometry and testing done, you just need to have it stuck on a bike by a framebuilder. How cool would that be!
I suppose you could have both the Nivex mount as well as the standard Campy hanger, but then you would have a superfluous braze-on all the time. I suppose that I'm assuming that this would be done the "right way" with all of the appropriate accouterments (like the chain rest, vertical dropouts with extended front bits, etc), but I suppose that's just because I don't like having unused stuff like a bare derailleur hanger.

And yes, I do have a road bike converted to fixed gear with a naked Huret hanger hanging out in the breeze, but lets just ignore that for right now...

I would love to try out a Nivex or Cyclo type drivetrain after reading about how well they supposedly shift. I'm with you on the lever front derailleur, I think they are really cool looking and I would love to ride with one someday, but I don't think I would like it all that much for a daily driver
abshipp is offline  
Likes For abshipp:
Old 11-03-19, 08:58 PM
  #16  
scarlson 
Senior Member
 
scarlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089

Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem

Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times in 723 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Is that a true statement? I think the chain rest we tend to see on the dropout is more of a nice-to-have than a necessity, and I don't think the Nivex mount would get in the way if you decided to use a more common RD. Perhaps an alternate method for hanging up the chain when removing the wheel could be devised, so that you can use normal wheels.
I've been thinking about this a fair amount, and I don't think you'd need a special wheel, just a special axle. Something could be made pretty easily with a lathe, and mass-produced. Beyond that, it's possible that you could make the left dropout minimal enough that a normal hub/wheel could be moved laterally to clear a chain on a chainrest after falling 2cm from the dropouts. Even the chainrest isn't a dealbreaker. What about the old Campagnolo portacatena? Something bolt-on seems easy enough to mass-produce, or even 3D-print.

Originally Posted by abshipp
Just curious, have you seen anything that implies that RH will be offering the repro Nivex for sale? Other than the fact that there has been at least one produced, so most of the R&D is complete and it would likely be just a matter of producing them?
Nope, this is pure speculation, based on exactly the factor you mentioned.

I think it would be awesome to see it go into production, but compared to the other offerings by RH that, while boutique, are more or less standard equipment for modern bikes I can't really see any place for the Nivex repro in the bicycling world outside of custom builders.

Jan did a lot to popularize wider supple tires for bikes, and I know that getting roadies on to that bandwagon was a huge feat and he and the RH/BQ team deserve a lot of praise for their efforts, but trying to get people to buy in to a derailleur standard that is so different from everything else seems a little unrealistic. I mean, a lot of people will drop $160 on a pair of tires to try out something new, especially since if you don't like it you can just switch back.

But exploring the world of a Nivex repro involves a much bigger commitment. At the very least it would involve having an existing frame modified with new dropouts and RD mount, and then you're stuck with a bike that you can only use that particular derailleur on.

And considering what would likely be a very limited run, can you imagine how much the RD and shifter would cost? If RH already charges close to $200 for a single centerpull brake, of which they make a lot of, I can only imagine that it would end up being close to $1000

Not trying to be a downer or overly critical, as the first time I saw a picture of that RD on Instagram I got really excited. I just really can't see much of a market for it. Although I suppose that there are enough people with interest and enough money that would cause the first production run to sell out immediately. I mean, I would go for it if I could
I totally agree. It would be a big pain to put them together and they would probably cost a thousand dollars. Which I probably would not pay, given that I'm stretched to the limit with bike hobbies as it is, and I have a perfectly good Suntour S-1 and a brazing torch. What I would really hope for is that Jan might realize he can't break even on them unless he charges way too much, and so ends up cutting his losses and calling this a labor of love, and releases the plans to the public. Then I'd machine myself two of them.

Originally Posted by TenGrainBread
Hell yeah!! I saw it got relisted recently and the thought crossed my mind again as well given the RH repro in dev. Glad you pulled the trigger!
I am glad you don't think I am stepping on your toes for buying it!!
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
scarlson is offline  
Old 11-03-19, 09:18 PM
  #17  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
@scarlson Didn't step on my toes at all. I have other projects to work on.
TenGrainBread is offline  
Likes For TenGrainBread:
Old 11-25-19, 09:26 PM
  #18  
scarlson 
Senior Member
 
scarlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089

Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem

Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times in 723 Posts
I got the bike fairly recently. It shipped OK although one of the MAFAC pads somehow slipped its binder bolt and escaped. It was nowhere to be found in the box.

In any case, it came with some cool stuff. Since we're on the subject of brakes, here is a mystery for you all.

The seller says the brakes are MAFAC. I just don't know. The straddle yokes are, for sure, old-logo MAFAC (M.A.F.A.C. with all the dots between the letters, as opposed to the newer logo that doesn't have the dots). But the brake arms themselves don't say anything! They look really high quality, all the hardware is brass or bronze except for that one rusty steel eye bolt that lost the brake pad in shipping (and which I will replace with a bronze one I make). Here are some pictures.






You can see in the last picture that MAFAC has been faintly scratched into the brake arm by ...someone... I know it's possible to tell the age of MAFAC brakes by the logo. So can anyone tell me when the "chicken-scratch logo" was used?

In all seriousness, I looked through all of VeloBase and found nothing that looked like these. I am stumped.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
scarlson is offline  
Old 11-25-19, 09:51 PM
  #19  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
scarlson take a gander through Amir's Flickr. He has the most extensive documentation of MAFAC components I've seen. Plus as a bonus, a few pages in he has a crazy amount of photos, drawings, and catalogue scans of Nivex derailleurs and dropouts!

https://www.flickr.com/photos/mafac_brakes/albums/
TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 11-25-19, 09:54 PM
  #20  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
What is the distance between the center of the brake pivot and the center of the post mounting holes? MAFACs are 23mm for the Criterium brake and 25mm for the Tandem. The design didn't change over the years, so if you measure and it's off from these, it might be a copycat, which there have been known to be.

In the Flickr I posted above I also seem to remember Amir having a few photos with dimensions of the thin hex bolts used on MAFAC cantis. Another part to measure against.

I'll say to my eyes the arms look a little thicker than MAFACs. Just an eyeballed guess though.
TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 11-25-19, 10:53 PM
  #21  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,041

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4511 Post(s)
Liked 6,378 Times in 3,667 Posts
Originally Posted by TenGrainBread
What is the distance between the center of the brake pivot and the center of the post mounting holes? MAFACs are 23mm for the Criterium brake and 25mm for the Tandem. The design didn't change over the years, so if you measure and it's off from these, it might be a copycat, which there have been known to be.

In the Flickr I posted above I also seem to remember Amir having a few photos with dimensions of the thin hex bolts used on MAFAC cantis. Another part to measure against.

I'll say to my eyes the arms look a little thicker than MAFACs. Just an eyeballed guess though.
So when you say copycat, do you mean fakes or did maybe Herse, Singer or the like make their own from scratch which of course is not a stretch by any stretch.

These look to my eye to be very close to the real thing and just as well made.

Maybe these are no name ala Campy priceless grail version from the time warp.
merziac is offline  
Old 11-25-19, 11:01 PM
  #22  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
Originally Posted by merziac
So when you say copycat, do you mean fakes or did maybe Herse, Singer or the like make their own from scratch which of course is not a stretch by any stretch.

These look to my eye to be very close to the real thing and just as well made.

Maybe these are no name ala Campy priceless grail version from the time warp.
Herse's brakes were quite different from the MAFAC cantis. They had a more triangular geometry. MAFAC came out with their Jacky model cantilever in the 70s, which were closer in design to the Herse brakes, but many years after Herse designed his.

Singer is well-known for his cam-driven brakes which are even further from the MAFAC design.

I've heard rumors of MAFAC knock offs here and there. I don't have any specific examples though.
TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 11-26-19, 04:25 AM
  #23  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by abshipp
I suppose you could have both the Nivex mount as well as the standard Campy hanger, but then you would have a superfluous braze-on all the time. . .
The Suntour S-1 mounts to an inconspicuous threaded boss brazed underneath the chain stay and uses the usual derailleur hanger for a chain hanger similar to Nivex and Campagnolo Porta Catena. So a bike with an S-1 would be easy to convert back to a conventional derailleur.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 11-26-19, 07:05 AM
  #24  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
If you look through the Hirose videos on youtube, there are a couple where he makes a Nivex style derailleur. I have found that it's a really bad idea for me to watch any of his videos, I don't need any more projects.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 11-27-19, 04:10 PM
  #25  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
What would be really cool is if someone would reverse engineer a Nivex mech for 3D printing and make all the parts downloadable. Having all the parts printed commercially wouldn't be cheap, but just having them available would be great
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Likes For rhm:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.