SRAM, Shimano, KMC - chains
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,389
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,971 Times
in
1,918 Posts
SRAM, Shimano, KMC - chains
I've used SRAM, Shimano, & KMC chains in the past & based on my experiences for 8 speed equipped bicycles, the Shimano seemed to be the overall best when considering Cost, Performance, & durability.
Now that I have a 2x11 bicycle that takes a 11 speed chain, I'm looking at going with a SRAM chain as it seems it's more favorable based on the consumer reviews I've been reading. Currently the 11 speed chain is a Shimano HG601-11, & it seems noisier than the Shimano 8 speed chains that I've had in the past. The chain's alignment is good & shifting is good, meshing is good, it just seems to have a bit of noise that I can hear more than I'd deem normal compared to the other setup.
the cost for a 11 speed 114 link chain is not as low as the 8 speed stuff, so before jumping the gun I wanted to read what BF members recommend.
The KMC brand is the lowest cost whereas the SRAM is slightly more expensive. Shimano is a lot more expensive, nearly double the SRAM price. Is there a cost relation as to why the price gaps or is it "just because" it is & the three chains will perform & last the same?
I use Pedros Slick Wax & like the product with my 3x8 speed & decided to carry it over to the 2x11 speed chain.
Now that I have a 2x11 bicycle that takes a 11 speed chain, I'm looking at going with a SRAM chain as it seems it's more favorable based on the consumer reviews I've been reading. Currently the 11 speed chain is a Shimano HG601-11, & it seems noisier than the Shimano 8 speed chains that I've had in the past. The chain's alignment is good & shifting is good, meshing is good, it just seems to have a bit of noise that I can hear more than I'd deem normal compared to the other setup.
the cost for a 11 speed 114 link chain is not as low as the 8 speed stuff, so before jumping the gun I wanted to read what BF members recommend.
The KMC brand is the lowest cost whereas the SRAM is slightly more expensive. Shimano is a lot more expensive, nearly double the SRAM price. Is there a cost relation as to why the price gaps or is it "just because" it is & the three chains will perform & last the same?
I use Pedros Slick Wax & like the product with my 3x8 speed & decided to carry it over to the 2x11 speed chain.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#2
Member
I have had great success with KMC chains. Very nice quality, shift well. I've recently started using their X chains, partly because a mechanic/shop owner in Richmond, Vermont that I trust stocks them. For my 10 speed bikes, the KMC X10, for 11 speed bikes, KMC X11. Comes with the MissingLink, which I like a lot. Easy to put on and take off. Since they're around $25, you can change your chain yearly and not break the bank.
#3
Heft On Wheels
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,123
Bikes: Specialized,Cannondale,Argon 18
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 560 Times
in
346 Posts
Well here we go
I have used shimano and KMC and both work fine in all my 11 and 9 speed bikes. If I find a sale I buy a bunch.
I have used shimano and KMC and both work fine in all my 11 and 9 speed bikes. If I find a sale I buy a bunch.
Likes For sdmc530:
#4
Senior Member
May I just suggest, none of the above if at all possible?
Wippermann
https://www.connexchain.com/en.html
Wippermann
https://www.connexchain.com/en.html
#5
Recreational Road Cyclist
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MetroWest, Mass.
Posts: 548
Bikes: 1990 Peter Mooney road bike
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times
in
134 Posts
Now that I have a 2x11 bicycle that takes a 11 speed chain, I'm looking at going with a SRAM chain as it seems it's more favorable based on the consumer reviews I've been reading. Currently the 11 speed chain is a Shimano HG601-11, & it seems noisier than the Shimano 8 speed chains that I've had in the past.
Likes For BCDrums:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
How many hours of use does it take to wear out a bicycle chain? How much personal experience can one rider have? I can understand user reviews if somebody has a truly atrocious experience. For average, typical bicycle chain use, I don't see much value in user reviews.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 177 Times
in
99 Posts
How many hours of use does it take to wear out a bicycle chain? How much personal experience can one rider have? I can understand user reviews if somebody has a truly atrocious experience. For average, typical bicycle chain use, I don't see much value in user reviews.
Likes For Ross520:
#8
Senior Member
Don't buy the cheap SRAM NX chain. Cost only $14, but shifts like crap, rusts and wears quickly. I don't have experience with their higher level chains, though.
You can get the lower KMC and Shimano chains for a bit over $20 and they are fine.
You can get the lower KMC and Shimano chains for a bit over $20 and they are fine.
#9
Firm but gentle
My 2 cents
I’m prefacing this with the fact that I have only owned a few SRAM drivetrains, I like Shimano a lot, and use it exclusively for the road. I feel that Shimano chains are slightly more eager to make a quick and clean shift, I have never used Whipperman. Don’t pinch pennies on a crucial component: regardless of brand, XTR/Dura Ace or XT/Ultegra level Shimano, SRAM seems to do the mid range price a little better. Wear doesn’t matter to me, I frequently throw a new chain on at 2,000 miles or so, I get a lot of life from cassettes and to a lesser extent chainrings.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,389
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,971 Times
in
1,918 Posts
My interval for replacing a chain uses a personal measurement derived from an unique formula that determines satisfactory life span
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
Likes For Troul:
#11
Firm but gentle
There’s More! (bonus drivel)
I recently got a cheap road bike with a Sora 9 speed drive train, it came with a KMC chain, and when it wore out I put in a SRAM (pc 951? I think) and it was wider and made me adjust (spread) the front derailleur in crude manner.
#12
Senior Member
May I just suggest, none of the above if at all possible?
Wippermann
https://www.connexchain.com/en.html
Wippermann
https://www.connexchain.com/en.html
Likes For SlvrDragon50:
#13
Senior Member
I have about 1K miles on my first SRAM driveset - 1x11 on a Jamis Renegade - and my first KMC chain. A testing article had the KMC chain rated worse in friction (more power loss) until KMC recommended NFS oil. Kind of expensive, but they claim you use less and I like trying out stuff like that.
I'm very impressed with the SRAM Force1 groupset. Not sure I can really tell the difference with the chain and only 1,000 miles is not enough for any kind of endurance/reliability testing. I have a chain wear indicator tool - not showing any wear yet. On my Trek road bike with Shimano chain, I usually get 3-4K miles before hitting the recommended replacement point.
I'm very impressed with the SRAM Force1 groupset. Not sure I can really tell the difference with the chain and only 1,000 miles is not enough for any kind of endurance/reliability testing. I have a chain wear indicator tool - not showing any wear yet. On my Trek road bike with Shimano chain, I usually get 3-4K miles before hitting the recommended replacement point.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NE Tennessee
Posts: 917
Bikes: Giant TCR/Surly Karate Monkey/Foundry FireTower/Curtlo Tandem
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times
in
62 Posts
I buy KMC 10 speed by the foot. When I restring any of our tandems, it takes much more than typical lengths.
#17
Senior Member
The problem is you have to buy a LOT to make it worthwhile. Especially since you then need to buy the relatively expensive master links that come with each chain. Of course, for tandems or recumbents bulk may be the best option to avoid splicing multiple chains.
Another problem (for me at least) is that I have 10 and 11-speed bikes in my fleet (plus my daughter's and wife's 8-speed). One can use 11-speed chains for 10-speed, but that seems wasteful.
So to really buy a lot you would have to consolidate speed number. And the next problem is, I'm always contemplating to 12-speed at the enext rear wheel upgrade on my good bikes. Don't want to buy 5 years worth of 11-speed chains, only to then be prevented from upgrading.
Just something else to consider. If you keep your bike unchanged for 10 years, it may be worth it if you get master links for cheap.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NE Tennessee
Posts: 917
Bikes: Giant TCR/Surly Karate Monkey/Foundry FireTower/Curtlo Tandem
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times
in
62 Posts
I usually get mine from Alex at MTB tandems.
I stick exclusively to 10 speed driver trains. Road. MTB. Bikepacking. Road and mountain tandems. Makes life much easier.
I stick exclusively to 10 speed driver trains. Road. MTB. Bikepacking. Road and mountain tandems. Makes life much easier.
#19
Non omnino gravis
Chain tests performed in laboratory conditions on test rigs are meaningless to the consumer. They are strictly for manufacturer clout. I've used chains from pretty much every major brand, and lubes ranging from plain wax to almost-perfume-expensive MucOff Hydrodynamic.
...and you know what? Of chains of the same speed (and therefore plate width,) no chain lasts significantly longer than any other. The variance is within 10%, and could be narrowed down to riding conditions as much as anything else. The lube doesn't matter, the brand/cost of the chain doesn't matter.
So I buy the cheapest chains I can find (like the usually lambasted SRAM PC-1110) and wax them (for cleanliness above all else) and they last 3,000-3,300 miles... just like every other brand/make/model. Some might shift a little better out of the box, some might run a little quieter on a particular cassette.
But once you peel back the bling of coatings or "special technologies," a chain is a chain is a chain. They're built the same way to do the same thing. Buy the chain you like. Buy it if it's coated and you like that. But don't expect miracles.
For point of reference, I had a Wipperman 10SB followed immediately by a KMC 10.93 last almost the exact same amount of miles, on the same bike, using the same lubrication. But that 10SB was one sexy chain.
...and you know what? Of chains of the same speed (and therefore plate width,) no chain lasts significantly longer than any other. The variance is within 10%, and could be narrowed down to riding conditions as much as anything else. The lube doesn't matter, the brand/cost of the chain doesn't matter.
So I buy the cheapest chains I can find (like the usually lambasted SRAM PC-1110) and wax them (for cleanliness above all else) and they last 3,000-3,300 miles... just like every other brand/make/model. Some might shift a little better out of the box, some might run a little quieter on a particular cassette.
But once you peel back the bling of coatings or "special technologies," a chain is a chain is a chain. They're built the same way to do the same thing. Buy the chain you like. Buy it if it's coated and you like that. But don't expect miracles.
For point of reference, I had a Wipperman 10SB followed immediately by a KMC 10.93 last almost the exact same amount of miles, on the same bike, using the same lubrication. But that 10SB was one sexy chain.
#20
Senior Member
Chain tests performed in laboratory conditions on test rigs are meaningless to the consumer. They are strictly for manufacturer clout. I've used chains from pretty much every major brand, and lubes ranging from plain wax to almost-perfume-expensive MucOff Hydrodynamic.
...and you know what? Of chains of the same speed (and therefore plate width,) no chain lasts significantly longer than any other. The variance is within 10%, and could be narrowed down to riding conditions as much as anything else. The lube doesn't matter, the brand/cost of the chain doesn't matter.
So I buy the cheapest chains I can find (like the usually lambasted SRAM PC-1110) and wax them (for cleanliness above all else) and they last 3,000-3,300 miles... just like every other brand/make/model. Some might shift a little better out of the box, some might run a little quieter on a particular cassette.
But once you peel back the bling of coatings or "special technologies," a chain is a chain is a chain. They're built the same way to do the same thing. Buy the chain you like. Buy it if it's coated and you like that. But don't expect miracles.
For point of reference, I had a Wipperman 10SB followed immediately by a KMC 10.93 last almost the exact same amount of miles, on the same bike, using the same lubrication. But that 10SB was one sexy chain.
...and you know what? Of chains of the same speed (and therefore plate width,) no chain lasts significantly longer than any other. The variance is within 10%, and could be narrowed down to riding conditions as much as anything else. The lube doesn't matter, the brand/cost of the chain doesn't matter.
So I buy the cheapest chains I can find (like the usually lambasted SRAM PC-1110) and wax them (for cleanliness above all else) and they last 3,000-3,300 miles... just like every other brand/make/model. Some might shift a little better out of the box, some might run a little quieter on a particular cassette.
But once you peel back the bling of coatings or "special technologies," a chain is a chain is a chain. They're built the same way to do the same thing. Buy the chain you like. Buy it if it's coated and you like that. But don't expect miracles.
For point of reference, I had a Wipperman 10SB followed immediately by a KMC 10.93 last almost the exact same amount of miles, on the same bike, using the same lubrication. But that 10SB was one sexy chain.
And even that test is questionable. The design is poor.
#21
Senior Member
I think wiping off the chain after the ride and lubing every once a while will be more effective pro-longing the life of the chain than spending $80 on a chain.
Likes For HerrKaLeun:
#22
Non omnino gravis
And the Wipperman/Connex is eliminated outright for someone like me who uses a two-chain rotation per bike-- I ride three bikes every week, and each bike goes through (roughly) a pair of chains a year. It's not nickel 'n diming to balk at the prospect of spending $400 a year on chains, when $90 in chains does the same job.
#23
Heft On Wheels
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,123
Bikes: Specialized,Cannondale,Argon 18
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 560 Times
in
346 Posts
I'm too lazy to google "chain in bulk". But there are sources selling by the foot when i once considered that.
The problem is you have to buy a LOT to make it worthwhile. Especially since you then need to buy the relatively expensive master links that come with each chain. Of course, for tandems or recumbents bulk may be the best option to avoid splicing multiple chains.
Another problem (for me at least) is that I have 10 and 11-speed bikes in my fleet (plus my daughter's and wife's 8-speed). One can use 11-speed chains for 10-speed, but that seems wasteful.
So to really buy a lot you would have to consolidate speed number. And the next problem is, I'm always contemplating to 12-speed at the enext rear wheel upgrade on my good bikes. Don't want to buy 5 years worth of 11-speed chains, only to then be prevented from upgrading.
Just something else to consider. If you keep your bike unchanged for 10 years, it may be worth it if you get master links for cheap.
The problem is you have to buy a LOT to make it worthwhile. Especially since you then need to buy the relatively expensive master links that come with each chain. Of course, for tandems or recumbents bulk may be the best option to avoid splicing multiple chains.
Another problem (for me at least) is that I have 10 and 11-speed bikes in my fleet (plus my daughter's and wife's 8-speed). One can use 11-speed chains for 10-speed, but that seems wasteful.
So to really buy a lot you would have to consolidate speed number. And the next problem is, I'm always contemplating to 12-speed at the enext rear wheel upgrade on my good bikes. Don't want to buy 5 years worth of 11-speed chains, only to then be prevented from upgrading.
Just something else to consider. If you keep your bike unchanged for 10 years, it may be worth it if you get master links for cheap.
I should have been more clear, the only bulk I can find is an insane amount and costs $2500! I was hoping you had a deal where I could get a little less I guess. I don't want 500 feet of chain.
I don't mind buying a high number of chains when a deal arises but there is usually waist that I am always looking to end. I know its like 5-10 links per chain but that would be cool to stop throwing away.
#24
Senior Member
I should have been more clear, the only bulk I can find is an insane amount and costs $2500! I was hoping you had a deal where I could get a little less I guess. I don't want 500 feet of chain.
I don't mind buying a high number of chains when a deal arises but there is usually waist that I am always looking to end. I know its like 5-10 links per chain but that would be cool to stop throwing away.
I don't mind buying a high number of chains when a deal arises but there is usually waist that I am always looking to end. I know its like 5-10 links per chain but that would be cool to stop throwing away.
I recall a store where you could order in foot increments. Not sure if it was in 10' increments or more. At the time it didn't make sense to me since separate master links are quite pricey.
I'm also not sure if the bulk chain is any good. i doubt it has the same nice shift/coating or whatever features of XT, for example. I assume it is rock bottom of whatever brand.
Edit: if what you found really was $2,500 for 500', that is $5/ft. A chain is about 5 ft, so you use up $25 and still have to buy a link. so you pay almost $30 and had to buy years of bulk chain. You can get good brand 11-speed chains for $20 (inc. link). you see how bulk chain doesn't make sense. Probably better to hunt for a bargain of 5 chains or so.
Last edited by HerrKaLeun; 05-06-20 at 02:53 PM.
Likes For HerrKaLeun:
#25
Heft On Wheels
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,123
Bikes: Specialized,Cannondale,Argon 18
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 560 Times
in
346 Posts
that is what bulk means......... yes, it only pays to buy a lot if you use a lot. If you go to a bike manufacturer and buy 100 bikes, I'm sure they give you a good price per bike. but most people don't buy 100 bikes at a time. Same with chains it seems.
I recall a store where you could order in foot increments. Not sure if it was in 10' increments or more. At the time it didn't make sense to me since separate master links are quite pricey.
I'm also not sure if the bulk chain is any good. i doubt it has the same nice shift/coating or whatever features of XT, for example. I assume it is rock bottom of whatever brand.
Edit: if what you found really was $2,500 for 500', that is $5/ft. A chain is about 5 ft, so you use up $25 and still have to buy a link. so you pay almost $30 and had to buy years of bulk chain. You can get good brand 11-speed chains for $20 (inc. link). you see how bulk chain doesn't make sense. Probably better to hunt for a bargain of 5 chains or so.
I recall a store where you could order in foot increments. Not sure if it was in 10' increments or more. At the time it didn't make sense to me since separate master links are quite pricey.
I'm also not sure if the bulk chain is any good. i doubt it has the same nice shift/coating or whatever features of XT, for example. I assume it is rock bottom of whatever brand.
Edit: if what you found really was $2,500 for 500', that is $5/ft. A chain is about 5 ft, so you use up $25 and still have to buy a link. so you pay almost $30 and had to buy years of bulk chain. You can get good brand 11-speed chains for $20 (inc. link). you see how bulk chain doesn't make sense. Probably better to hunt for a bargain of 5 chains or so.