Shorter cranks for stoker?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Shorter cranks for stoker?
Hi,
We are enjoying our tandem immensely (we've had it for a couple of years, having ridden it several thousand miles).
But we still have one intractable problem: My wife can't generate power at the high cadence I need in order to generate power. I'm a lot taller than my wife, with legs at least 15% longer than hers. And yet, on our tandem, her cranks are 170, and mine are 175. I would think that her cranks should be 15% shorter than mine.
Has anyone here tried much shorter cranks for a much shorter stoker, and, if so, did it help?
Thanks!
Mark
We are enjoying our tandem immensely (we've had it for a couple of years, having ridden it several thousand miles).
But we still have one intractable problem: My wife can't generate power at the high cadence I need in order to generate power. I'm a lot taller than my wife, with legs at least 15% longer than hers. And yet, on our tandem, her cranks are 170, and mine are 175. I would think that her cranks should be 15% shorter than mine.
Has anyone here tried much shorter cranks for a much shorter stoker, and, if so, did it help?
Thanks!
Mark
#2
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Yes. It helped her. Our bike came with the same crank lengths that you have. I like the formula 5.5* inseam = crank length in mm., inseam meaning the standing in your socks, a book in your crotch method, not pants inseam. For my stoker that worked out to 149mm. I bought a shortened stoker crankset from these folks: Short Bicycle Cranks
They provided the 172.5 version shortened down to 151mm Your ideal crank length spec might be different.
The shorter cranks have worked out well for us. I think we're a little slower on the climbs because cadence is lower and so her leverage used to be greater, but maybe a little faster on the flats and shallow or short climbs because we can use higher cadence effectively. She much prefers it anyway and that's the end game.
They provided the 172.5 version shortened down to 151mm Your ideal crank length spec might be different.
The shorter cranks have worked out well for us. I think we're a little slower on the climbs because cadence is lower and so her leverage used to be greater, but maybe a little faster on the flats and shallow or short climbs because we can use higher cadence effectively. She much prefers it anyway and that's the end game.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#3
Junior Member
If you want to experiment with different lengths without committing to a full crank replacement you might try this: https://www.sjscycles.co.uk/componen...eners/?geoc=US
Likes For unikid:
#4
Junior Member
An interesting article on the topic: https://bikedynamics.co.uk/FitGuidecranks.htm
#5
Senior Member
You can definitely use crank length differential to sort out cadence mismatch. Your intuition is correct that shortening your stoker's cranks would let her comfortably spin -- and make power -- at higher cadences. You can also put longer crankarms on the front for a similar effect.
#6
Full Member
I use 175mm cranks on the tandem, and she has found she *must* have 165mm cranks on her bikes, including the tandem.
As a data point, we did a test ride on a stock tandem with 175mm/170mm cranks and she began experiencing knee pain within 10 miles of easy riding.
Getting her the correct crank length drove us to sourcing rather pricey Lightning cranks on our Machiatto, but they are worth every penny.
#7
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
If one has stoker crank length sorted, a very effective cadence drill is to take it up to a steady 100 cadence on some fairly flat terrain and hold it there for about 30 minutes continuously, shifting as necessary. We do it in HR zone 3. We've found this works better for both of us on the tandem than on our separate trainers, I suppose because the tandem is our primary outdoor bike.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#8
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
See, not an intractable problem. Tandems are so much fun.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks all; we'll give it a try!
I've ordered her a set of 150mm cranks.
I've ordered her a set of 150mm cranks.
Last edited by 124Spider; 04-22-20 at 02:48 PM.
#10
Full Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 262
Bikes: 2010 Bob Brown Cycles tandem, 2019 Co-Mo Carrera tandem, 1980 Richardson tandem, 2014 Cervelo R3, 2018 Specialized Roubaix, 1985 Bianchi Campione, 1983 Trek 720, 2020 Trek Fuel EX8, 2021 Salsa Mukluk
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
70 Posts
I'm 6'3" while my wife is 5'1", and we've been riding 175/165 since the mid '80s. I don't exactly recall how we determined her crank length, but I do remember that we struggled with cadence just a bit when we first started riding a tandem. I'm assuming that my wife went from 170 to 165, but we haven't had any problems since.
#11
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NE Tennessee
Posts: 917
Bikes: Giant TCR/Surly Karate Monkey/Foundry FireTower/Curtlo Tandem
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times
in
62 Posts
A while back, I measured my me and my wife's inseams. I took the ratio and got crank arm lengths that matched. I was running 170 and she was 155. It worked okay but not great. With the latest crank set, I got her 170 and me 175. She has a hard time spinning so is more comfortable with putting out power so the added leverage works better for us.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The new (150) cranks arrived yesterday, and I installed them. We went for a ride today, and preliminary results are very encouraging!
For this particular ride, I would normally average around 84 rpm on my half-bike, but I would keep to to around 79 on the tandem. And my stoker would struggle with that.
Today, we averaged 84 rpm, and my stoker's power was significantly up from normal. Subjectively, she felt much more comfortable at higher revs than before.
So far, so good!
Mark
For this particular ride, I would normally average around 84 rpm on my half-bike, but I would keep to to around 79 on the tandem. And my stoker would struggle with that.
Today, we averaged 84 rpm, and my stoker's power was significantly up from normal. Subjectively, she felt much more comfortable at higher revs than before.
So far, so good!
Mark
Likes For 124Spider:
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
We bought da Vinci cranks, to replace da Vinci cranks; easier, since the rings attached to both of stoker's cranks don't have to be replaced. I did not weigh the shorter cranks; our tandem weighs over 50 pounds, and a few grams this way or that isn't much of an issue.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
To bring this to a close, we've ridden close to 1000 miles with her shorter cranks, and it's definitely a huge improvement.
Thanks for your help!
Mark
Thanks for your help!
Mark