Bowman Palace:R
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 648
Bikes: Canyon, Bowman & Colnago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
20 Posts
Bowman Palace:R
I wanted to share my thoughts on the Bowman Palace:R.
I had been eyeing them for some time (not that I needed an aluminum frame or another bike, for that matter). Then one day I noticed Bowman was having a winter sale so I figured, why not? I built it up using a Shimano 105 R7000 groupset and a set of Fulcrum Racing 3 C17 wheels. So far I've only had time to take it for one ride but the bike proved to be very light, stiff and lively. I was really impressed at how well it cornered. My initial thoughts are:
I would love to hear other's thoughts and/or experiences with the Bowman Palace:R.
I had been eyeing them for some time (not that I needed an aluminum frame or another bike, for that matter). Then one day I noticed Bowman was having a winter sale so I figured, why not? I built it up using a Shimano 105 R7000 groupset and a set of Fulcrum Racing 3 C17 wheels. So far I've only had time to take it for one ride but the bike proved to be very light, stiff and lively. I was really impressed at how well it cornered. My initial thoughts are:
- The clearance for a rear tire is very, very tight (this is not an understatement nor is it hyperbole).
- I initially tried using a Continental GP4000sII.
- No good. Lots of rubbing on the brake bridge. The tire ballooned out to 27.7mm on the 17mm (internal) width rims
- Ended up using a set of Continental GP5000 25c tires and now have a good 2mm of clearance under the brake bridge
- I initially tried using a Continental GP4000sII.
- Front Derailleur Hanger
- I think this was misaligned slightly went it was attached to the seat tube.
- Whenever I tightened the bolt for the FD it would align the rear of the cage outward
- I remedied this by pushing/holding the FD in place while tightening the bolt--so far no issues.
- Whenever I tightened the bolt for the FD it would align the rear of the cage outward
- I think this was misaligned slightly went it was attached to the seat tube.
- It reminds me a lot of the Cannondale CAAD 10 (or 12).
- Bowman customer service was great!
- I had about a million questions prior to ordering the frame and they were very patient and responded with 24 hours to each of emails.
- Very helpful with ordering spare parts (to have on hand), i.e. extra derailleur hanger and headset bearings.
- Contrary to what Bowman customer service told me, the drive side of the bottom bracket shell could have been faced just a hair.
- Although, it doesn't seem like a do or die situation. So far no issues.
- 105 R7000 Groupset
- Shifts every bit well as my Ultegra R8000
- Shift levers require a slightly heavier touch than Ultegra R8000
- Finish is not as nice as Ultegra R8000
I would love to hear other's thoughts and/or experiences with the Bowman Palace:R.
Last edited by mrblue; 01-26-20 at 06:01 PM.
Likes For mrblue:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,946
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 1,706 Times
in
982 Posts
First reaction: I really like the colour scheme. In this day of matte black bikes, I like a bike that stands out. However the lack of tire clearance at the rear brake bridge is a worry in this day of people opting for wider tires
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 648
Bikes: Canyon, Bowman & Colnago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
20 Posts
Bowman did just come out with a disc brake version so perhaps that will alleviate the issue of tight clearance for the rear wheel. However, they did say they have no intention of discontinuing the rim brake version now that the disc brake version is available. Hopefully, they'll address this issue in the future.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,946
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 1,706 Times
in
982 Posts
It is easily possible for bike companies to build even rim brake models that can accommodate wider tires. My 2007 Look 595 currently has 700 x 25 tires with tons of extra room, probably enough for 700x 28. The position of the rear brake bridge determines tire clearance along with the width between seat stays and chainstay clearance. Direct mount calliper brakes can also improve tire clearance. They could easily design their frame to handle much wider tires if they chose to do so. A disc brake version with similar clearances will not be much of an improvement
Last edited by alcjphil; 01-26-20 at 06:33 PM.
#5
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
My R2 has clearance for fairly fat 25s on wide rims, and could probably fit 28s.
#6
Senior Member
My Palace R is 3 years old. I built it up with SRAM Force mechanical 11 speed and HED Belgium wheels. I’ve had no problem with 25 mm tires rubbing. In my opinion, it is a superb frame that rides and handles as well, or better, than any of my 9 road bikes with the exception of my Alchemy Helios. The Helios is sex on two wheels, in my humble opinion. I consider the Bowman the best bang for the buck frame I have ridden. If I could only have one bike, it would be the Palace R for its combination of riding characteristics and relatively low cost. I bought my frame for $720.00, including shipping.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,489
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1757 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times
in
744 Posts
Go to 5:48 for a short review. Seems like a very nice ride.
#8
Senior Member
Oooh you got the new metallic blue/orange colorway! that looks nice. No complaints about my Palace:r, really love the tight handling. Same experience with tire clearance, and might be the only thing to keep me from buying another (at least for the rim brake model) GP4000 700x25 were really like 28s on here-no clearance at all, so I've been riding Vittoria 700x25 instead which run truer to size. I originally pre-ordered a black/jade finish but there was a mixup with factory so I took lime instead of waiting, which worked out, and I still get compliments on.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 648
Bikes: Canyon, Bowman & Colnago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
20 Posts
I remember seeing the lime colorway when Bowman first introduced it. I really like it! However, what I really love about the frame is the external cable routing. My other bikes have internal routing and every time I need to change a cable it turns into a longer process than it needs to be.
#10
Senior Member
Yes that and the threaded 68mm BB were also selling points. Those technologies haven't let me down in the ~30 years I've been riding, why change them
I remember seeing the lime colorway when Bowman first introduced it. I really like it! However, what I really love about the frame is the external cable routing. My other bikes have internal routing and every time I need to change a cable it turns into a longer process than it needs to be.
#11
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
Because if they can convince you you need to change them, they can sell you another bike!
#13
Senior Member
Well I never got to actually ride the Continentals - too little clearance IMO, and unfortunately I haven't ridden any of the modern Continentals for comparison since about '93, but I will give them a shot again ONE OF THESE DAYS lol. What I have on my Palace atm are Vittoria Rubino Pro III 700x25 - nothing spectacular about these tires, but for me they just work, great value, handle well and predictable, are relatively light, true to size and I've had great luck with very few punctures. They're an older now discontinued model, but I stockpiled several whenever I've found them on sale, they're cheap like $20-25. When this current set wears out I have a set of the newer Rubino Pro Graphene 2.0 to try next.
Last edited by MagicHour; 02-21-20 at 12:57 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 648
Bikes: Canyon, Bowman & Colnago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
20 Posts
Well I never got to actually ride the Continentals - too little clearance IMO, and unfortunately I haven't ridden any of the modern Continentals for comparison since about '93, but I will give them a shot again ONE OF THESE DAYS lol. What I have on my Palace atm are Vittoria Rubino Pro III 700x25 - nothing spectacular about these tires, but for me they just work, great value, handle well and predictable, are relatively light, true to size and I've had great luck with very few punctures. They're an older now discontinued model, but I stockpiled several whenever I've found them on sale, they're cheap like $20-25. When this current set wears out I have a set of the newer Rubino Pro Graphene 2.0 to try next.
#15
Senior Member
Looks like around ~4mm or so under the rear brake bridge. Wheels are Fulcrum Quattro LG (24.2 mm outer width/17C inner) w Vittoria Rubino Pro III 700x25.
Thanks for the info. I've been thinking about trying something different as I've been using Continentals for quite a while on all my bikes. I found the Conti GP5000's fit giving me a couple millimeters of clearance under the brake bridge. How much clearance to the Vittoria's give you? I wonder if they might give me a bit better clearance than the GP5000's.