3-arm "circular" cranks vs. 5-arm starfish design
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
3-arm "circular" cranks vs. 5-arm starfish design
Hi all. Currently building up a pretty frame from the 80s, and I like the look of the Dia-Compe ENE Ciclo double crankset -- I can't upload a photo, but the design has 3 arms, and the arms branch as they approach the outer ring, creating three 'circles', in contrast to the 'starfish' shape of standard 80s cranks. Other details include cold-forged arms. I read that this process makes them even stronger, but this made me wonder if the rings, on the other hand, were not more flexible than rings with 5 arms of support, if the "circular" design improves stiffness relative to 'radial' arms, etc., etc..
My question is for anyone who's experienced both this 3-arm design and the more common 5-arm starfish of 80s/90s Sugino cranks etc. What were your impressions, how did they compare? Thanks in advance for your input.
My question is for anyone who's experienced both this 3-arm design and the more common 5-arm starfish of 80s/90s Sugino cranks etc. What were your impressions, how did they compare? Thanks in advance for your input.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,449
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 874 Post(s)
Liked 2,289 Times
in
1,279 Posts
I have one bike that has a three arm Campy crank and the rest of my bikes all have five arm Campy or Ambrosio. At my age and strength , honestly, I can’t tell the difference in rigidity . I would go with the cranks that give you the best ratios gear wise to fit your type of riding.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,820
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,328 Times
in
784 Posts
Absent finite element analysis or accurate mechanical testing, you have no way of knowing which set of arms is stiffer.
Neither does anyone else.
The various patterns you see in cranksets are all (supposedly) the result of careful compromise between the various factors of material cost, manufacturing cost, form, and function.
And I suggest that that is the order in which most manufacturers today consider them.
Neither does anyone else.
The various patterns you see in cranksets are all (supposedly) the result of careful compromise between the various factors of material cost, manufacturing cost, form, and function.
And I suggest that that is the order in which most manufacturers today consider them.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,705 Times
in
2,613 Posts
Here’s a photo of that Dia Compe crankset from the manufacturer’s site:
FWIW, there are a few other 3-arm sets currently available: Herse/Compass, Sun XCD, Andel.
FWIW, there are a few other 3-arm sets currently available: Herse/Compass, Sun XCD, Andel.
Likes For nlerner:
#5
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,847
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2298 Post(s)
Liked 2,054 Times
in
1,254 Posts
Just to be a pedant, the term Starfish is used to refer to one particular crankset made by Mavic. The rest are generally called 3 pin, or 5 pin.
Mavic courtesy Velobase.
Mavic courtesy Velobase.
#6
Death fork? Naaaah!!
I have a TA three-arm crank on a Gitane. Can't tell any difference from the TA Cylotouriste on a <otobecane.
Top
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
I agree there's no straightforward way to prove greater stiffness, at least at the consumer's level of technology. I'm also not clear on whether stiffness matters to a rider or is perceptible. But assuming cold-forged cranksets are stronger, you can get the same strength, if not stiffness, with the same or lesser amount of material. The sales metric, as with frames, is less mass with equal durability. So if the weight of this chainset is more like that of a Rene Herse than another double capable of 46/30 which is not cold-forged (I can't think of one at the moment), there's a tangible difference. Real nice looking design, though!
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1608 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times
in
1,103 Posts
My suspicion is that the 5 pin is designed to survive lateral forces from accidents. A three pin would be optimal for driving a chain.
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
I don't know how much riding the OP is going to do, but my choice would come down to the availability of different chainrings.
Last edited by seypat; 02-03-21 at 04:58 PM.
Likes For seypat:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
#11
PM me your cotters
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: ATL
Posts: 3,241
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1137 Post(s)
Liked 590 Times
in
422 Posts
That said, I do like the look of that crankset.
__________________
███████████████
███████████████
Likes For francophile:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107
Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times
in
422 Posts
Dia Compe has a 96 BCD. Old Shimano 600 cranks are 95 BCD. They could have at least revived an old standard and made some 30t chainrings.
Likes For bark_eater:
#13
Hoards Thumbshifters
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 1,157
Bikes: '23 Black Mtn MC, '87 Bruce Gordon Chinook, '08 Jamis Aurora, '86 Trek 560, '97 Mongoose Rockadile, & '91 Trek 750
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 246 Post(s)
Liked 338 Times
in
193 Posts
It should be said too, that if you already have a Sugino crankset they are great and sturdy and polish beautifully.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
This is the best answer, assuming OP plans to ride the bike far enough to wear out a chainring. I would modify to say "availability and cost of replacement chainrings" though. If there's a $50 crankset, but the chainrings cost $75 versus a $75 crankset with rings that cost $50 or the BCD is common enough to enable me to use a wide variety of rings, I'm going with the latter every time.
That said, I do like the look of that crankset.
That said, I do like the look of that crankset.
Last edited by seypat; 02-03-21 at 09:15 AM.
Likes For seypat:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Now, get off my lawn!
Last edited by seypat; 02-03-21 at 04:59 PM.
#16
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Like someone else mentioned, the most important factor here is the gearing.
there should be a sufficiently fast jump between the two ratios, no dead space in between, and a versatile granny gear useful for both climbing and flat terrain. You shouldn't feel like you have to always compensate by changing thenresr cassette ratio when changing between front chainrings.
there should be a sufficiently fast jump between the two ratios, no dead space in between, and a versatile granny gear useful for both climbing and flat terrain. You shouldn't feel like you have to always compensate by changing thenresr cassette ratio when changing between front chainrings.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,929 Times
in
2,554 Posts
It's 90% marketing, With good design, you can optimize anything from 3 to 6 stars for any standard of stiffness and strength you want. There will be minor weight and aero trade-offs but not race winning or losing. The final and ultimate solution will not happen until software people can encrypt "bling" into the FEA code.
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wow, this forum is the best thing since sliced bread! Thank you everyone for your input! I have to say that I agree with the latter posts, in that the gearing is the main deciding factor -- this is the reason for building this bike to begin with: 10%+ hills in my neck of the woods. Initially I chose this crankset because I couldn't find any cheaper options for 48/36, but have since found a few (Sugino is top contender for competition with this Dia-Compe Ene Ciclo, for me at the moment). Glad to hear that there aren't any horror stories of these differently-designed rings, or with 3-pin designs in general. That was my main fear and reason for posting.
So, beyond the gearing choices, it sounds like it's mostly an aesthetic difference. (Still grateful for any input anyone may want to share!)
So, beyond the gearing choices, it sounds like it's mostly an aesthetic difference. (Still grateful for any input anyone may want to share!)
#19
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
I think the difference in stiffness would be marginal unless you are a 240lb bodybuilder cranking out 500+w up a hill in a regular basis.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,705 Times
in
2,613 Posts
The Andel crank I mentioned above comes in 46/30t configuration if you want some serious climbing gears. I put one on my Rivendell Roadini.
#21
Senior Member
Yep. 110 and 130mm 5-pin rings will be around after the cockroaches are gone. Availability of 3-pin rings is sketchy at best, even when the cranks are in production.