Can Shimano handle a 10 tooth cog?
#1
With a mighty wind
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,624
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 904 Times
in
507 Posts
Can Shimano handle a 10 tooth cog?
More hypothetical since I'm only shopping.
Let's say I found a bike I liked but I wanted a different 1X gear set up. Said bike would probably have GRX.
If I switched to a XDR freehub and tossed a 10-42 cassette on, would it work? I know they are published as 11 tooth minimum but has anyone tried it.
Like I said, this is hypothetical. I'd probably opt for Force 1 on a new bike but there's quite a bit I like better with the mostly Shimano setup.
Let's say I found a bike I liked but I wanted a different 1X gear set up. Said bike would probably have GRX.
If I switched to a XDR freehub and tossed a 10-42 cassette on, would it work? I know they are published as 11 tooth minimum but has anyone tried it.
Like I said, this is hypothetical. I'd probably opt for Force 1 on a new bike but there's quite a bit I like better with the mostly Shimano setup.
#3
Dangerous Old Man
There is a possible slight problem, it your bike was designed for an 11 as the smallest, which most are, the 10 may not work, the chain might rub the frame back by the axle.
#4
Non omnino gravis
From a September post in the 3T bike blog, Gerard Vroomen says they used the SRAM 10-42 cassette, and it worked just fine, though shifting was a bit better when paired with a SRAM chain. It's mostly down in the QnA at the bottom.
#5
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Mid Atlantic, Nawf Cackalaky, Rawlywood
Posts: 68
Bikes: 3 road steelys, 3 alu, 1 mtb, 1cx
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
15 Posts
The Shimano GRX should be able to handle the 10t cog mechanically. The main challenges are to use the appropriate chain and to
make sure the frame handles the cassette space with proper chain clearance.
Moulton bikes were Shimano ultegra equipped back in the late 90's and early 2000's and they had no mechanical drivetrain problems
using a 63t big ring and a 9t smallest cassette cog for top gear. Ultegra at that time was listed in the compatibility charts for 11t and 12t.
make sure the frame handles the cassette space with proper chain clearance.
Moulton bikes were Shimano ultegra equipped back in the late 90's and early 2000's and they had no mechanical drivetrain problems
using a 63t big ring and a 9t smallest cassette cog for top gear. Ultegra at that time was listed in the compatibility charts for 11t and 12t.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 644 Times
in
365 Posts
Cogs with fewer teeth have a smaller diameter. The free hub outer diameter will determine the smallest size cog that will fit.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,122
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 3,917 Times
in
2,336 Posts
For further chance of reading comprehension challenge check out 2.2.1 Chordal Action
This is one reason why I dislike the trend to tiny rear cogs. I like a smooth and long lasting drivetrain. Andy
This is one reason why I dislike the trend to tiny rear cogs. I like a smooth and long lasting drivetrain. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#9
With a mighty wind
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,624
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 904 Times
in
507 Posts
For further chance of reading comprehension challenge check out 2.2.1 Chordal Action
This is one reason why I dislike the trend to tiny rear cogs. I like a smooth and long lasting drivetrain. Andy
This is one reason why I dislike the trend to tiny rear cogs. I like a smooth and long lasting drivetrain. Andy
For me it's really a matter of simplicity to achieve a better low end. Currently running 11-42 x 40 on a gravel bike is a 90% solution. I do encounter steep enough hills that I'd like to go a smidge lower or higher on, depending on up vs down.
Options are 11-46 x 42, a double, or 10-42 x 38. You know as well as I do that when I'm in the 10 that I'll be half tucked and alternating between coast and pedaling. I think my losses or inconsistency at this point will be minimal. I'm not a machine.
#10
Non omnino gravis
#11
With a mighty wind
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,624
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 904 Times
in
507 Posts
As someone with a lot (A LOT) of miles on a 10-42, I can say that going from the 11-42 to the 10-42 is huge-- with a 38T in the front, going from an 11 to a 10 in the back is almost 10GI. It's absolutely worth it. And I use the cheapest SRAM 10-42 I can get. xD all the way.
#12
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Im looking into doing the same with a 36..... But im really considering the ETHIRTEEN which is like 240-320$ and goes to 9T... i think the top speed would increase a lot
CHAT gpt says it increases like 50%+ But i really dont know... what you think?
CHAT gpt says it increases like 50%+ But i really dont know... what you think?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,122
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 3,917 Times
in
2,336 Posts
The issue with assuming a smaller tooth count, besides wear rate increase and that chordal effect I mentioned 4 years ago (post #8), will lead to more bike speed is that one also needs to be able to apply more power. I don't see where increase the drag (mostly aero but a little mechanical friction as well) with increased speed can happen without more power. I'd love to be shown this is wrong
So the next aspect is can the rider with a set amount of power not be able to apply it to the bike if the cog wasn't smaller. This does speak to the rider's ability to pedal effectively for the ratio they are in or want to have. And this is trainable without spending any $. Andy
So the next aspect is can the rider with a set amount of power not be able to apply it to the bike if the cog wasn't smaller. This does speak to the rider's ability to pedal effectively for the ratio they are in or want to have. And this is trainable without spending any $. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Last edited by Andrew R Stewart; 04-25-24 at 02:09 PM.
#14
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The issue with assuming a smaller tooth count, besides wear rate increase and that chordal effect I mentioned 4 years ago (post #8), will lead to more bike speed is that one also needs to be able to apply more power. I don't see where increase the drag (mostly aero but a little mechanical friction as well) with increased speed can happen without more power. I'd love to be shown this is wrong
So the next aspect is can the rider with a set amount of power not be able to apply it to the bike if the cog wasn't smaller. This does speak to the rider's ability to pedal effectively for the ratio they are in or want to have. And this is trainable without spending any $. Andy
So the next aspect is can the rider with a set amount of power not be able to apply it to the bike if the cog wasn't smaller. This does speak to the rider's ability to pedal effectively for the ratio they are in or want to have. And this is trainable without spending any $. Andy
Basically im consistently always riding at my 11T while on flats. Maybe not at incredibly high cadence but i only use the last 2 Cogs for any kind of ride for that bike (gravel&road hybrid)
I have a top speed problem with my drivetrain currently from my point of view, im considering going to 10t or 9t.
Do you think this increased wear is VERY big? is there any information on that? Thanks for the response
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,122
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 3,917 Times
in
2,336 Posts
After 4 years no surprise that links evolve, have you tried to google the word?
Your stated cadence and gearing use is exactly what I was thinking it is. Which is why I mentioned training your body to achieve faster cadence, which has a number of advantages IMO.
But I have dealt with too many fellow riders and customers who, like you, feel that they need a higher ratio gearing to believe that you would consider my opinion as having merit. Enjoy your ride. Andy
Your stated cadence and gearing use is exactly what I was thinking it is. Which is why I mentioned training your body to achieve faster cadence, which has a number of advantages IMO.
But I have dealt with too many fellow riders and customers who, like you, feel that they need a higher ratio gearing to believe that you would consider my opinion as having merit. Enjoy your ride. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#16
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,123
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 945 Post(s)
Liked 662 Times
in
374 Posts
Here is a gear inch comparison between 10/42 and 11/42. Both with 38 tooth chain ring and 40/622 tires. The 10 tooth will gain about 10 gear inches at the top end.
#17
With a mighty wind
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,624
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 904 Times
in
507 Posts
I started this thread. I ended (after some odd mis-steps) with Campagnolo Ekar.
I’m running 10-44 with a 38t chainring. Off pavement it’s a great setup. The 38x10 is basically only used for steep downhill coasting. If I hit pavement, I can spin it out with a tailwind.
I would estimate that I use the 10t cog 5% of the time, possibly less. I’m not terribly worried about the drag.
I’m running 10-44 with a 38t chainring. Off pavement it’s a great setup. The 38x10 is basically only used for steep downhill coasting. If I hit pavement, I can spin it out with a tailwind.
I would estimate that I use the 10t cog 5% of the time, possibly less. I’m not terribly worried about the drag.
#18
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the thing is that i have a 36T maximum capacity with my crank Chainring. It not letting me go any bigger with the 0 offset i need for my eagle drivetrain (sram 12 speed)
Right now im looking at going XD but its costs like a wheelset LOL, and the other option is messing with the crank or puting a new crank. but there again i will mess up my chainline.
Im probably gonna have to just stick to what i have and put very burly tires to increase comfort and decrease my need for more top speed. I usually use this bike for flats... Is a gravel style with eagle. and flatbar
Right now im looking at going XD but its costs like a wheelset LOL, and the other option is messing with the crank or puting a new crank. but there again i will mess up my chainline.
Im probably gonna have to just stick to what i have and put very burly tires to increase comfort and decrease my need for more top speed. I usually use this bike for flats... Is a gravel style with eagle. and flatbar
#20
Senior Member
The diagrams were comparing two different gearing scenarios. The key is comparing the gear-inches measurement of total gearing. Look at the difference on the high gears (rightmost triangle on each). One chart has a 10T high cog, the other an 11T high cog.
Last edited by Duragrouch; 04-27-24 at 11:49 PM.
#21
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yeah i could understand that but still i dont see what this diagrams actually means in the sense of getting a grasp of the difference between 10 a 11.... Apparently since the position is way left, it seems like atleast it woud have a 5-10% difference in the ammount of force that is transmited but still cant tell if there is a big difference on the ammount of chain links are making contact with the Cassette. Or any idea of how much faster will the COG wear out.
anyway, DT swiss makes it obsene to change Driver on rear wheel. They literally sell the part for 100$+ tax and shipping. Being a 5 gram piece of aluminum or steel. Really seems very stupid and incoherent. i payed like 200 euro for the wheel itself
Does anyoone know if there are ways for change your DT SWISS DRIVER without shelling out hundreds?
Thanks mates!
anyway, DT swiss makes it obsene to change Driver on rear wheel. They literally sell the part for 100$+ tax and shipping. Being a 5 gram piece of aluminum or steel. Really seems very stupid and incoherent. i payed like 200 euro for the wheel itself
Does anyoone know if there are ways for change your DT SWISS DRIVER without shelling out hundreds?
Thanks mates!
#22
Senior Member
yeah i could understand that but still i dont see what this diagrams actually means in the sense of getting a grasp of the difference between 10 a 11.... Apparently since the position is way left, it seems like atleast it woud have a 5-10% difference in the ammount of force that is transmited but still cant tell if there is a big difference on the ammount of chain links are making contact with the Cassette. Or any idea of how much faster will the COG wear out.
anyway, DT swiss makes it obsene to change Driver on rear wheel. They literally sell the part for 100$+ tax and shipping. Being a 5 gram piece of aluminum or steel. Really seems very stupid and incoherent. i payed like 200 euro for the wheel itself
Does anyoone know if there are ways for change your DT SWISS DRIVER without shelling out hundreds?
Thanks mates!
anyway, DT swiss makes it obsene to change Driver on rear wheel. They literally sell the part for 100$+ tax and shipping. Being a 5 gram piece of aluminum or steel. Really seems very stupid and incoherent. i payed like 200 euro for the wheel itself
Does anyoone know if there are ways for change your DT SWISS DRIVER without shelling out hundreds?
Thanks mates!
Last edited by Duragrouch; 04-28-24 at 11:38 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,226
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4502 Post(s)
Liked 1,643 Times
in
1,082 Posts
"Gear inches" is really just an arbitrary number to express the ratio of pedal cadence to wheel speed. Ignore the numbers; consider the ratios between the numbers. Or just look at the graph that depicts those ratio differences visually.
#24
Senior Member
Now Sheldon Brown's favorite, Gain Ratio, I think is more dimensionless, and even takes into account crank arm length.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,226
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4502 Post(s)
Liked 1,643 Times
in
1,082 Posts
So whether your top gear is a 122 gear inches or 121 is rather immaterial compared to figuring out if you have the range and steps that are useful. And any system can demonstrate that relationship.