Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Help with Cannondale frame size

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Help with Cannondale frame size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-12, 08:59 PM
  #1  
labas
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 66

Bikes: TREK750/TREK 790/TREK 7.5 FX/ CANNONDALE CAAD 9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Help with Cannondale frame size

I'm shopping around for my first road bike and have found a 2010 CAAD 9 that I may take a look at. The bike is a couple of hours away, so before I make the trip I thought I'd glean a little advice here. I'm 5'-11.5" and have a 32.5 inseam. I currently ride hybrids that are 20 and 21 inches ( too large a frame size for me according to LBS) and prefer the 21 inch because I feel less "cramped". Here is my question: the CAAD 9 that I'm considering is 58cm, and I'm wondering if it will be too big, even though I prefer a slightly larger frame than what my size calls for?

Thanks
labas is offline  
Old 10-22-12, 09:13 PM
  #2  
beatlebee 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ?
Posts: 2,300

Bikes: i may have bike(s)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
56
beatlebee is offline  
Old 10-22-12, 09:13 PM
  #3  
bikerjp
Beer >> Sanity
 
bikerjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449

Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride a 58 Caad9 and I'm 6'3" with about a 34 cycling inseam. A 58 may be a bit small for me but the next size up is a bit large.
bikerjp is offline  
Old 10-22-12, 09:25 PM
  #4  
hendrick81
Senior Member
 
hendrick81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sandy Eggo
Posts: 2,129

Bikes: 2006 caad8, 2010 caad9 1, 2011 caad10 4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
I have the exact situation with cdale. I ride a 58cm thats a tad to small, but the 60cm is to large. For the OP, I also would agree that a 58cm is too large...
hendrick81 is offline  
Old 10-22-12, 11:06 PM
  #5  
FPSDavid
1337
 
FPSDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 858

Bikes: CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm the same height and had a 58 CAAD8 that was too big, and now a 56 CAAD10 that is perfect.
FPSDavid is offline  
Old 10-22-12, 11:38 PM
  #6  
neospazzy
Senior Member
 
neospazzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 526
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd say 56cm as well. I am 5'10 with a 30in inseam and normally ride a 54cm. However, I found that the 56cm actually fit me better. I'd go to your local Cannondale dealer and have them give you an initial bike fit/sizing and a test ride.
neospazzy is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 01:16 AM
  #7  
fureshi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5'11" with a 30" inseam and I find that I'm more comfortable on a 54cm as I'm less stretched out. On the other hand, my back is also slightly flatter since the saddle to bar drop is more.
fureshi is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 07:43 AM
  #8  
NRZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5'10" here with just under 32 inseam, ride a 56cm Caad9 and feel very good on it for extended trips and short bursts.
NRZ is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 08:03 AM
  #9  
bigbadwullf
Senior Member
 
bigbadwullf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: West, Tn.
Posts: 1,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
6'1" 32" pants inseam. 58. Very comfortable. 56 was too small for me. I could see you going either way, depending on the bike build. Ride them all before buying!!

I go against the grain here. I'd rather be slightly stretched than slightly cramped.

Last edited by bigbadwullf; 10-23-12 at 09:34 AM.
bigbadwullf is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 09:14 AM
  #10  
hls811
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by labas
I'm shopping around for my first road bike and have found a 2010 CAAD 9 that I may take a look at. The bike is a couple of hours away, so before I make the trip I thought I'd glean a little advice here. I'm 5'-11.5" and have a 32.5 inseam. I currently ride hybrids that are 20 and 21 inches ( too large a frame size for me according to LBS) and prefer the 21 inch because I feel less "cramped". Here is my question: the CAAD 9 that I'm considering is 58cm, and I'm wondering if it will be too big, even though I prefer a slightly larger frame than what my size calls for?

Thanks
I'm 6' and I just got a 56cm, 58 seemed too big.. Do you have a Cannondale dealer close by? It might make sense to stop on just to see if they have a 56 or 58cm bike you can sit on..
hls811 is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 12:01 PM
  #11  
Parson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hamilton ON
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 6 feet and felt too stretched out and too "on top" of the bike with a 58 Supersix. The fitter at the shop agreed that the 58 was too big for me. I got a 56 and it feels good.
Parson is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 03:57 PM
  #12  
on the path
Señor Blues
 
on the path's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 1,598

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD 10, Breezer Venturi Custom Build, IRO Singlespeed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
5' 11" here w 34" inseam. My 58cm CAAD 10 is an extremely good fit for me. 58 could possibly work for you..
on the path is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 04:23 PM
  #13  
halfspeed
Senior Member
 
halfspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275

Bikes: are better than yours.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
You might not like the standover on a 58 with your short legs.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
halfspeed is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 04:46 PM
  #14  
caloso
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2953 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by halfspeed
You might not like the standover on a 58 with your short legs.
This.
caloso is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 05:12 PM
  #15  
Ruby13
Senior Member
 
Ruby13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Boynton Beach, Fl
Posts: 159

Bikes: 2011 Cannondale Synapse , M300 and Specialized Stumpjumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5"10 with 31" inseam and ride a 54 Cannondale. Any larger was just uncomfortable for standover and reach. My opinion (which is worth little) would be a 56.
Ruby13 is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 05:58 PM
  #16  
BentLink
Senior Member
 
BentLink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pennsyl-tuckey
Posts: 684

Bikes: '86 Cannondale SR400, '86 Pugeot PX10, '92 Bianchi Axis, '95 Bianchi Campione d'Italia, '00 Fondriest X-Status, '08 Specialized Roubaix, '13 Cannondale CAADX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'm about your size and my old C'dale measures 56. My 6'2" wife rides a CAAD 5 in 58, and while I can ride it, it ain't comfy.

I know, in my youth I thought "trophy wife" meant "the biggest you can catch"....too bad I can't use her as an excuse for another 56 or two.
BentLink is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 06:44 PM
  #17  
labas
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 66

Bikes: TREK750/TREK 790/TREK 7.5 FX/ CANNONDALE CAAD 9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks to all for the input. Went to my LBS today, got fit tested and road 4 bikes. The 58cm was good in terms of leg extension and "roominess" but I felt somewhat overextended with my arm reach. I'm sure I could make the 58 work, but all in all the 56 just seemed a better fit. I'm going to pass on the used CAAD9. New development: Today at the LBS I test rode both the CAAD10 and the Synapse, which has created another conundrum. The Synapse, with it's more relaxed geometry, was to some degree more comfortable than the CAAD10 and probably more conducive to my non-racing riding needs. However, my LBS is located in a little village with lots of winding streets and turns and when I test rode the CAAD it was way to cool as to how nimble and responsive that bike was. Gotta think this one through.
labas is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 07:02 PM
  #18  
Lexi01
Senior Member
 
Lexi01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659

Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by halfspeed
You might not like the standover on a 58 with your short legs.
Ya huh - if the CAAD geometry is naything like the supersix (and I believe it is) they have a nicely horizontal top tube - none of this new fangled, sloping tubes...so the standover may squash your little friends.
Lexi01 is offline  
Old 10-23-12, 10:02 PM
  #19  
on the path
Señor Blues
 
on the path's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 1,598

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD 10, Breezer Venturi Custom Build, IRO Singlespeed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by labas
Thanks to all for the input. Went to my LBS today, got fit tested and road 4 bikes. The 58cm was good in terms of leg extension and "roominess" but I felt somewhat overextended with my arm reach. I'm sure I could make the 58 work, but all in all the 56 just seemed a better fit. I'm going to pass on the used CAAD9. New development: Today at the LBS I test rode both the CAAD10 and the Synapse, which has created another conundrum. The Synapse, with it's more relaxed geometry, was to some degree more comfortable than the CAAD10 and probably more conducive to my non-racing riding needs. However, my LBS is located in a little village with lots of winding streets and turns and when I test rode the CAAD it was way to cool as to how nimble and responsive that bike was. Gotta think this one through.
Stop thinking and get the CAAD already! (sorry, wrong thread.. )
on the path is offline  
Old 10-24-12, 06:43 AM
  #20  
halfspeed
Senior Member
 
halfspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275

Bikes: are better than yours.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Lexi01
Ya huh - if the CAAD geometry is naything like the supersix (and I believe it is) they have a nicely horizontal top tube - none of this new fangled, sloping tubes...so the standover may squash your little friends.
Cannondale hasn't made a road bike with a true horizontal top tube since 2005. They don't slope as much as some others, but slope they do.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
halfspeed is offline  
Old 10-24-12, 06:47 AM
  #21  
hls811
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by on the path
Stop thinking and get the CAAD already! (sorry, wrong thread.. )
I gotta agree here.. I went into my LBS looking to pick up a Synapse, one ride on a CAAD8 and I was sold.. (I wouldnt let myself even ride the CAAD10, I knew it was out of my budget and didn't want to make the decision any harder than it already was..). I'm not knocking the Synapse but the CAAD just seemed to "fit" me.
hls811 is offline  
Old 10-24-12, 09:57 AM
  #22  
bikerjp
Beer >> Sanity
 
bikerjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449

Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by labas
Thanks to all for the input. Went to my LBS today, got fit tested and road 4 bikes. The 58cm was good in terms of leg extension and "roominess" but I felt somewhat overextended with my arm reach. I'm sure I could make the 58 work, but all in all the 56 just seemed a better fit. I'm going to pass on the used CAAD9. New development: Today at the LBS I test rode both the CAAD10 and the Synapse, which has created another conundrum. The Synapse, with it's more relaxed geometry, was to some degree more comfortable than the CAAD10 and probably more conducive to my non-racing riding needs. However, my LBS is located in a little village with lots of winding streets and turns and when I test rode the CAAD it was way to cool as to how nimble and responsive that bike was. Gotta think this one through.
How much riding experience do you have? I found that when I first started I felt this way too. Eventually put a 90mm stem on (stock was 110). then after riding a while I went back to 100mm and now I'm at 120mm. Not saying a 56 might not be the better fit for you but keep in mind you current level of flexibility and where you might be in a year or so.

Re the caad vs synapse dilemma yep, you gotta think it through. Ride each one several times in several types of rides. Pick the one that you enjoy the most. Don't buy too much into the marketing hype. Sure, they are different but not that different. If you are looking at the alloy synapse vs the caad I'd get the caad. That's what I did originally. I thought the caad was just snappier and more fun. I like my carbon synapse though too but use it more as my longer distance bike.

Originally Posted by hls811
I gotta agree here.. I went into my LBS looking to pick up a Synapse, one ride on a CAAD8 and I was sold.. (I wouldnt let myself even ride the CAAD10, I knew it was out of my budget and didn't want to make the decision any harder than it already was..). I'm not knocking the Synapse but the CAAD just seemed to "fit" me.
The newer caad8 is not a cheaper caad10. It's a different bike.
bikerjp is offline  
Old 10-24-12, 06:18 PM
  #23  
Lexi01
Senior Member
 
Lexi01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659

Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by halfspeed
Cannondale hasn't made a road bike with a true horizontal top tube since 2005. They don't slope as much as some others, but slope they do.
Yep - I'm aware...was just saying in comparison to some other popular makes (eg Specialized) it has a comparitively horizontal top tube.

Last edited by Lexi01; 10-24-12 at 06:50 PM.
Lexi01 is offline  
Old 10-24-12, 07:00 PM
  #24  
labas
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 66

Bikes: TREK750/TREK 790/TREK 7.5 FX/ CANNONDALE CAAD 9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by halfspeed
You might not like the standover on a 58 with your short legs.
I highly resemble that statement.
labas is offline  
Old 10-25-12, 06:26 AM
  #25  
qcpmsame 
Semper Fi
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,943
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 358 Times in 241 Posts
I think you will like the 56cm in which ever bike you choose. Either the CAAD 8/10 or the Synapse are all good bikes. It will depend on what kind of riding you are going to do. Synapse is a more relaxed geometry and has more comfort engineered on to the stays. CAAD 10 is more stiff and better suited to fast training or racing. That said I chose the CAAD 10 4 this year and ride it on long rides with out problems as far as vibration or overly stiff feeling. Mine is the 56cm, I am 6'-1" but have a 31" inseam, the 56cm fits better all the way around. Both of my C'Dales are 56cm so it seems to be the size for my short legs and long torso.
__________________
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977

I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13


qcpmsame is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.