Help with Cannondale frame size
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 66
Bikes: TREK750/TREK 790/TREK 7.5 FX/ CANNONDALE CAAD 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Help with Cannondale frame size
I'm shopping around for my first road bike and have found a 2010 CAAD 9 that I may take a look at. The bike is a couple of hours away, so before I make the trip I thought I'd glean a little advice here. I'm 5'-11.5" and have a 32.5 inseam. I currently ride hybrids that are 20 and 21 inches ( too large a frame size for me according to LBS) and prefer the 21 inch because I feel less "cramped". Here is my question: the CAAD 9 that I'm considering is 58cm, and I'm wondering if it will be too big, even though I prefer a slightly larger frame than what my size calls for?
Thanks
Thanks
#3
Beer >> Sanity
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride a 58 Caad9 and I'm 6'3" with about a 34 cycling inseam. A 58 may be a bit small for me but the next size up is a bit large.
#4
Senior Member
I have the exact situation with cdale. I ride a 58cm thats a tad to small, but the 60cm is to large. For the OP, I also would agree that a 58cm is too large...
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 526
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd say 56cm as well. I am 5'10 with a 30in inseam and normally ride a 54cm. However, I found that the 56cm actually fit me better. I'd go to your local Cannondale dealer and have them give you an initial bike fit/sizing and a test ride.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 5'11" with a 30" inseam and I find that I'm more comfortable on a 54cm as I'm less stretched out. On the other hand, my back is also slightly flatter since the saddle to bar drop is more.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: West, Tn.
Posts: 1,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
6'1" 32" pants inseam. 58. Very comfortable. 56 was too small for me. I could see you going either way, depending on the bike build. Ride them all before buying!!
I go against the grain here. I'd rather be slightly stretched than slightly cramped.
I go against the grain here. I'd rather be slightly stretched than slightly cramped.
Last edited by bigbadwullf; 10-23-12 at 09:34 AM.
#10
Senior Member
I'm shopping around for my first road bike and have found a 2010 CAAD 9 that I may take a look at. The bike is a couple of hours away, so before I make the trip I thought I'd glean a little advice here. I'm 5'-11.5" and have a 32.5 inseam. I currently ride hybrids that are 20 and 21 inches ( too large a frame size for me according to LBS) and prefer the 21 inch because I feel less "cramped". Here is my question: the CAAD 9 that I'm considering is 58cm, and I'm wondering if it will be too big, even though I prefer a slightly larger frame than what my size calls for?
Thanks
Thanks
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hamilton ON
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 6 feet and felt too stretched out and too "on top" of the bike with a 58 Supersix. The fitter at the shop agreed that the 58 was too big for me. I got a 56 and it feels good.
#12
Señor Blues
5' 11" here w 34" inseam. My 58cm CAAD 10 is an extremely good fit for me. 58 could possibly work for you..
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
You might not like the standover on a 58 with your short legs.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2953 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Boynton Beach, Fl
Posts: 159
Bikes: 2011 Cannondale Synapse , M300 and Specialized Stumpjumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 5"10 with 31" inseam and ride a 54 Cannondale. Any larger was just uncomfortable for standover and reach. My opinion (which is worth little) would be a 56.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pennsyl-tuckey
Posts: 684
Bikes: '86 Cannondale SR400, '86 Pugeot PX10, '92 Bianchi Axis, '95 Bianchi Campione d'Italia, '00 Fondriest X-Status, '08 Specialized Roubaix, '13 Cannondale CAADX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I'm about your size and my old C'dale measures 56. My 6'2" wife rides a CAAD 5 in 58, and while I can ride it, it ain't comfy.
I know, in my youth I thought "trophy wife" meant "the biggest you can catch"....too bad I can't use her as an excuse for another 56 or two.
I know, in my youth I thought "trophy wife" meant "the biggest you can catch"....too bad I can't use her as an excuse for another 56 or two.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 66
Bikes: TREK750/TREK 790/TREK 7.5 FX/ CANNONDALE CAAD 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks to all for the input. Went to my LBS today, got fit tested and road 4 bikes. The 58cm was good in terms of leg extension and "roominess" but I felt somewhat overextended with my arm reach. I'm sure I could make the 58 work, but all in all the 56 just seemed a better fit. I'm going to pass on the used CAAD9. New development: Today at the LBS I test rode both the CAAD10 and the Synapse, which has created another conundrum. The Synapse, with it's more relaxed geometry, was to some degree more comfortable than the CAAD10 and probably more conducive to my non-racing riding needs. However, my LBS is located in a little village with lots of winding streets and turns and when I test rode the CAAD it was way to cool as to how nimble and responsive that bike was. Gotta think this one through.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ya huh - if the CAAD geometry is naything like the supersix (and I believe it is) they have a nicely horizontal top tube - none of this new fangled, sloping tubes...so the standover may squash your little friends.
#19
Señor Blues
Thanks to all for the input. Went to my LBS today, got fit tested and road 4 bikes. The 58cm was good in terms of leg extension and "roominess" but I felt somewhat overextended with my arm reach. I'm sure I could make the 58 work, but all in all the 56 just seemed a better fit. I'm going to pass on the used CAAD9. New development: Today at the LBS I test rode both the CAAD10 and the Synapse, which has created another conundrum. The Synapse, with it's more relaxed geometry, was to some degree more comfortable than the CAAD10 and probably more conducive to my non-racing riding needs. However, my LBS is located in a little village with lots of winding streets and turns and when I test rode the CAAD it was way to cool as to how nimble and responsive that bike was. Gotta think this one through.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Cannondale hasn't made a road bike with a true horizontal top tube since 2005. They don't slope as much as some others, but slope they do.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
#21
Senior Member
I gotta agree here.. I went into my LBS looking to pick up a Synapse, one ride on a CAAD8 and I was sold.. (I wouldnt let myself even ride the CAAD10, I knew it was out of my budget and didn't want to make the decision any harder than it already was..). I'm not knocking the Synapse but the CAAD just seemed to "fit" me.
#22
Beer >> Sanity
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks to all for the input. Went to my LBS today, got fit tested and road 4 bikes. The 58cm was good in terms of leg extension and "roominess" but I felt somewhat overextended with my arm reach. I'm sure I could make the 58 work, but all in all the 56 just seemed a better fit. I'm going to pass on the used CAAD9. New development: Today at the LBS I test rode both the CAAD10 and the Synapse, which has created another conundrum. The Synapse, with it's more relaxed geometry, was to some degree more comfortable than the CAAD10 and probably more conducive to my non-racing riding needs. However, my LBS is located in a little village with lots of winding streets and turns and when I test rode the CAAD it was way to cool as to how nimble and responsive that bike was. Gotta think this one through.
Re the caad vs synapse dilemma yep, you gotta think it through. Ride each one several times in several types of rides. Pick the one that you enjoy the most. Don't buy too much into the marketing hype. Sure, they are different but not that different. If you are looking at the alloy synapse vs the caad I'd get the caad. That's what I did originally. I thought the caad was just snappier and more fun. I like my carbon synapse though too but use it more as my longer distance bike.
I gotta agree here.. I went into my LBS looking to pick up a Synapse, one ride on a CAAD8 and I was sold.. (I wouldnt let myself even ride the CAAD10, I knew it was out of my budget and didn't want to make the decision any harder than it already was..). I'm not knocking the Synapse but the CAAD just seemed to "fit" me.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yep - I'm aware...was just saying in comparison to some other popular makes (eg Specialized) it has a comparitively horizontal top tube.
Last edited by Lexi01; 10-24-12 at 06:50 PM.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 66
Bikes: TREK750/TREK 790/TREK 7.5 FX/ CANNONDALE CAAD 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#25
Semper Fi
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,943
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 358 Times
in
241 Posts
I think you will like the 56cm in which ever bike you choose. Either the CAAD 8/10 or the Synapse are all good bikes. It will depend on what kind of riding you are going to do. Synapse is a more relaxed geometry and has more comfort engineered on to the stays. CAAD 10 is more stiff and better suited to fast training or racing. That said I chose the CAAD 10 4 this year and ride it on long rides with out problems as far as vibration or overly stiff feeling. Mine is the 56cm, I am 6'-1" but have a 31" inseam, the 56cm fits better all the way around. Both of my C'Dales are 56cm so it seems to be the size for my short legs and long torso.
__________________
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13