Brazed cargo frame
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Brazed cargo frame
Hi all
I'm planing on making my first frame or rather my first conversion from a 26" MTB frame to a cargo frame.
i only have access to a ****ty flux core welder, which based on my research wouldn't do the job right and i don't have the budget to buy a proper tig welder, my only option is to go with brazing.
is brazing going to be strong enough for a cargo bike?
I'm planing on making my first frame or rather my first conversion from a 26" MTB frame to a cargo frame.
i only have access to a ****ty flux core welder, which based on my research wouldn't do the job right and i don't have the budget to buy a proper tig welder, my only option is to go with brazing.
is brazing going to be strong enough for a cargo bike?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
Hi all
I'm planing on making my first frame or rather my first conversion from a 26" MTB frame to a cargo frame.
i only have access to a ****ty flux core welder, which based on my research wouldn't do the job right and i don't have the budget to buy a proper tig welder, my only option is to go with brazing.
is brazing going to be strong enough for a cargo bike?
I'm planing on making my first frame or rather my first conversion from a 26" MTB frame to a cargo frame.
i only have access to a ****ty flux core welder, which based on my research wouldn't do the job right and i don't have the budget to buy a proper tig welder, my only option is to go with brazing.
is brazing going to be strong enough for a cargo bike?
****ty flux core welders work quite well on anything between 2mm and 3/32in thick which puts you in the ballpark for a heavy mild steel cargo bike so you might just get away with it. Welding anything to the existing bike frame is going to be sketchy but you could get away with it on the HT or BB shell. Depends how redneck you plan for this project to be
Another option for low cost TIG is to do scratch start with a stick welder. You don't need much power for bike frames (80 amps maximum) and DC for steel so a cheap stick machine plus a TIG torch, a bottle of Argon, and plenty of practice will do the job. The main challenge with such a rig for bike frame purposes would be the lack of a foot pedal.
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i was thinking silver brazing without lugs since i was planing on using non standard / bike tubes, for the head tube 48mm outer and 34mm inner diameter should fit 1,1/8 headset and for the down tube maybe something bigger to support the weight.
my problem with welding is that im probably going to burn holes in the frame and brazing seem easier to get right and looks better as well.
in terms of wight performance and considering that it is my first time, is it worth to try the cheap flux core welder or should go with thick brazing?
my problem with welding is that im probably going to burn holes in the frame and brazing seem easier to get right and looks better as well.
in terms of wight performance and considering that it is my first time, is it worth to try the cheap flux core welder or should go with thick brazing?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,075
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,859 Times
in
2,307 Posts
i was thinking silver brazing without lugs since i was planing on using non standard / bike tubes, for the head tube 48mm outer and 34mm inner diameter should fit 1,1/8 headset and for the down tube maybe something bigger to support the weight.
my problem with welding is that im probably going to burn holes in the frame and brazing seem easier to get right and looks better as well.
in terms of wight performance and considering that it is my first time, is it worth to try the cheap flux core welder or should go with thick brazing?
my problem with welding is that im probably going to burn holes in the frame and brazing seem easier to get right and looks better as well.
in terms of wight performance and considering that it is my first time, is it worth to try the cheap flux core welder or should go with thick brazing?
Bronze/brass is the choice for filleted tubes for a variety of reasons, if welding is out. Strength is then about the fit of the miters, the proper brazing techniques and how big a fillet. The rule I was taught is the fillet size should be about 4 times the tube wall thickness. No reason why a bronze/brass filleted bike should be as strong as a welded one and might have other advantages too. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
64 Posts
I've seen a bunch of tall bikes and what not made with stick welders, so as pointed out before, it's apparently not unworkable when working with thick heavy tubing.
Most industrial literature points to big fillets actually being worse and weaker than small fillets, with worse fatigue strength, increased difficulty in inspecting penetration, increased porosity, etc. Natural concavity is proof of flow, a convex bead is generally considered bad. The filler material doing the work is the filler material filling the gap. The guy behind Fillet-pro says 3:1 fillets work well on thin tubes. Bontrager felt that the smallest size fillets he tested and felt were reasonably possible at ~2.5mm were the strongest, in large part based on HAZ analysis. The mechanics behind braze strength are more complicated than just multiplying UTS by 4, but those size fillets tend to work reasonably well in practice.
Silver also has been used for fillet brazing, notably in construction 753 frames. Raleigh SBDU made some, so did Herse. SBDU supposedly had a 2 step process, one alloy for what some people call tinning, or the penetrating part of the brazing, and another to build up a fillet. I'm not sure what Herse did. These examples seemed to have moderately small fillets. It's certainly possible, but the process is enough of a mystery that I'm not sure there's any good reason not to just use fillet pro. It should also be noted that silver may actually produce weaker joints than brass due to weakening the tubes directly at the joints. Silver brazing severely tempers the steel reducing strength, brass brazing goes above critical and allows the rest of the frame to cool the joint when cooled in air, allowing the steel to slightly harden, but with weakening beyond the joints.
There's a few reasons for large fillets. There's tradition. It helps reduce stress risers at the joints. It can make the joint stronger in the case of poor braze penetration, what is now called "bronze welding" in other industries often has little or no penetration but instead relies on a built up bead for strength. Bontrager claims fillets larger than the smallest size rotary tool are easier to finish, although this stops being the case with big lumpy fillets. Most people also think large fillets look good from a purely aesthetic standpoint, and small fillets barely look different from steel welds at 5 feet away.
All that muddying the water is just to point out that despite numerous exceptions and supplementary and seemingly contradictory information, 4:1 in brass is generally safe and sufficient, there's no particular reason to deviate from this in terms of material or size if you aren't interested in experimenting, which you probably shouldn't if you're learning how to do it.
Most industrial literature points to big fillets actually being worse and weaker than small fillets, with worse fatigue strength, increased difficulty in inspecting penetration, increased porosity, etc. Natural concavity is proof of flow, a convex bead is generally considered bad. The filler material doing the work is the filler material filling the gap. The guy behind Fillet-pro says 3:1 fillets work well on thin tubes. Bontrager felt that the smallest size fillets he tested and felt were reasonably possible at ~2.5mm were the strongest, in large part based on HAZ analysis. The mechanics behind braze strength are more complicated than just multiplying UTS by 4, but those size fillets tend to work reasonably well in practice.
Silver also has been used for fillet brazing, notably in construction 753 frames. Raleigh SBDU made some, so did Herse. SBDU supposedly had a 2 step process, one alloy for what some people call tinning, or the penetrating part of the brazing, and another to build up a fillet. I'm not sure what Herse did. These examples seemed to have moderately small fillets. It's certainly possible, but the process is enough of a mystery that I'm not sure there's any good reason not to just use fillet pro. It should also be noted that silver may actually produce weaker joints than brass due to weakening the tubes directly at the joints. Silver brazing severely tempers the steel reducing strength, brass brazing goes above critical and allows the rest of the frame to cool the joint when cooled in air, allowing the steel to slightly harden, but with weakening beyond the joints.
There's a few reasons for large fillets. There's tradition. It helps reduce stress risers at the joints. It can make the joint stronger in the case of poor braze penetration, what is now called "bronze welding" in other industries often has little or no penetration but instead relies on a built up bead for strength. Bontrager claims fillets larger than the smallest size rotary tool are easier to finish, although this stops being the case with big lumpy fillets. Most people also think large fillets look good from a purely aesthetic standpoint, and small fillets barely look different from steel welds at 5 feet away.
All that muddying the water is just to point out that despite numerous exceptions and supplementary and seemingly contradictory information, 4:1 in brass is generally safe and sufficient, there's no particular reason to deviate from this in terms of material or size if you aren't interested in experimenting, which you probably shouldn't if you're learning how to do it.
Last edited by Kuromori; 02-02-20 at 10:09 PM.
Likes For Kuromori:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
34mm is the right ID for the headset in theory but basic rolled tubing will have a weld seam on the inside that will need cleaning up. Bicycle tubes are often supplied a little bit too small on the ID with the idea that you ream them out to the exact diameter, typically with a hand-reamer. The proper tool for this is rather expensive but you can manage with a cheap adjustable reamer. I would say see how you get on and how well the headset looks like it's going to fit. You also should face the tubes so that the ends are parallel (another expensive hand-tool although the reaming tool is often combined with the facing tool). Alternatives are to use a lathe before you build the tube into the bike or just to get close enough with sanders and files. It's not the proper way but it's a cargo bike, your first frame, and often there's a lot to be gained from just diving in and having a go without too high expectations from your first project.
my problem with welding is that im probably going to burn holes in the frame and brazing seem easier to get right and looks better as well. in terms of wight performance and considering that it is my first time, is it worth to try the cheap flux core welder or should go with thick brazing?
If you do get into using proper bike tubing at some point in the future (0.9mm wall and thinner for the main tubes) flux-core is not even an option and you will need TIG or (the right sort of) brazing at that point.
BTW you should also check out Phil Vandelay on YouTube as he has designed and made quite a few cargo bikes (taking plenty of liberties with things like reaming of head-tubes in the early days .
#7
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
fillet brazing is a good skill to have, but it isn't particularly easy. I have done some fillets with silver (fillet pro), but I think you will find it difficult. LFB fillets with collapse with a little too much heat, but nothing like silver does. Bronze (LFB) is far cheaper as well. But you should practice.