Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reload this Page >

took the past week off, ate more, lost weight?

Search
Notices
Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

took the past week off, ate more, lost weight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-08, 09:16 AM
  #1  
feethanddooth
this one's optimistic...
Thread Starter
 
feethanddooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central new jersey
Posts: 723

Bikes: cannondale r400 2006 kona smoke 2005 scott cr1 team

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
took the past week off, ate more, lost weight?

is there an explaination to this? when i say ate more i mean gorged myself on things like cookies and overall junk food in addition to my normal diet which is pretty good (imo)
feethanddooth is offline  
Old 02-10-08, 09:35 AM
  #2  
Vetboy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Same happened to me first week of Dec - went to Walt Disney world for 5 days and a Disney cruise for 3 days. Only rode 4 times in 1.5 weeks and for short durations. Ate like a horse (and not the healthiest, although I tried). Came home weighing 2 lbs lighter than when I left?!? I wonder if it has something to do with an atkins effect - lots of high fat foods does seem to cause weight loss if carbs are restricted. Perhaps a loss of muscle mass offset a gain in fat. Hydration??? Who knows.
Vetboy is offline  
Old 02-10-08, 10:53 AM
  #3  
ModoVincere
Riding Heaven's Highways on the grand tour
 
ModoVincere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,675
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
probably water weight. Glycogen requires large amounts of water in the cells. If you were not exercising as much, the cells might have decided they did not need as much glyocogen stored up.
__________________
1 bronze, 0 silver, 1 gold
ModoVincere is offline  
Old 02-10-08, 12:55 PM
  #4  
felt1
Idiot
 
felt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Corona, ca
Posts: 753

Bikes: Kirklee(custom), GT GTR Ultra, Salsa Mamasita

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sometimes the food surplus goes towards building muscle. Increase in muscle=higher metabolism. But ModoVincere logic seems more likely.
felt1 is offline  
Old 02-10-08, 01:40 PM
  #5  
El Julioso
Bikes are good
 
El Julioso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 111

Bikes: 2000 Schwinn Moab 1, heavily modified

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah, weight changes don't mean a whole lot without body fat percentage checks at the start and end of the period of time in question... since you have no idea whether the lost mass came from muscle, water, or fat.
El Julioso is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 10:00 PM
  #6  
Creakyknees
ride lots be safe
 
Creakyknees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Yeah I'm more and more convinced that calories in/out is not a complete model. The variable is metabolism, and we're just now getting to understand how the body regulates metabolism up/down depending on training stress and diet.

But look at it from an evolutionary perspective - training load is similar to being in a struggle for survival (fighting long intense battles every day or so, or running for hours to catch a measly squirrel), and limited calories intake means there might not be any more tomorrow - so better hold onto whatever we got. So the body adapts by becoming very efficient, basically running the lowest metabolism possible to accomplish the work. This is why you get so droned out during heavy training period, everything is set on low simmer.

Now, you take some time off (the war's over! we don't have to run to catch food anymore!) and pig out on sugary / fatty stuff (we found fresh fruits and fat critters!) and the body can ramp up the metabolism, make all those long-delayed internal repairs and improvements that have been on hold. And it knows, heck, we don't need all the extra fat / mass because we're so efficient now, and besides we're getting plenty more where that came from, so let it go.

Of course, yo do this too long and the body slacks off and goes back to in-efficient mode. But a few days will do wonders. If you've been training hard before this, I bet you get back on the bike and feel like you're flying.

Anyway, that's my probably distorted view of what I seem to be reading in the literature these days.
Creakyknees is offline  
Old 02-12-08, 01:04 AM
  #7  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,533

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Blood volume goes down when not exercising. Weight loss. You lose that pump in your muscles. More weight. Never fear, that weight loss will turn right around a bite you good in a couple of weeks. I get the same thing: when I start working out again after a layoff, I'll gain weight right away, usually a couple of pounds, sometimes three.
Carbonfiberboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.