Best frame for heavy rider
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Best frame for heavy rider
Hi all! I started riding recently, less than one year ago. Im 6 ft tall and 230 lbs. I'm currently riding in a specialized 2004,56 cm (I know, is small). I need recommendations of aluminum frames that I can use to start building my own ride. I currently have a Shimano 105 groupset that I can use in the build. I heard good things of the Cannondale Caad 10 but I would love to hear from you. Any help is appreciated!
#2
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,492 Times
in
4,189 Posts
I would be surprised if there are mass produced aluminum frames that can't handle a 230# rider.
Most every company has a stated max for their frames...granted thars really just listed so if one breaks and the person is heavier, the company can say it isn't their fault.
230# just isn't excessive.
There are a lot of wheels that have a 100kg max, so call it 220#, but there is also an endless number of wheels that can easily handle 230#.
Look up what local shops sell, read up on offerings from those brands, and try a few out.
Most every company has a stated max for their frames...granted thars really just listed so if one breaks and the person is heavier, the company can say it isn't their fault.
230# just isn't excessive.
There are a lot of wheels that have a 100kg max, so call it 220#, but there is also an endless number of wheels that can easily handle 230#.
Look up what local shops sell, read up on offerings from those brands, and try a few out.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#4
PBP Ancien (2007)
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 358
Bikes: Cannondale CAADX (for commuting), Cannondale CAAD12, Cannondale CAAD12 Team CNCPT, Giant Contend 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 156 Times
in
106 Posts
I'm the exact same weight as you and regularly ride on four aluminium frames including a CAAD12 with no problems at all. Similarly, I ride on Shimano factory-built wheels (mainly low-end) and have never had a single issue.
#5
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,997
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4957 Post(s)
Liked 8,098 Times
in
3,833 Posts
To echo the above...230lbs is not excessive, unless you're chasing something at the extremely lightweight end of the spectrum. Pretty much any regular frame from a reputable manufacturer is going to serve you fine.
EDIT: When I got back on my bike after a 15 year hiatus, I weighed 225. My bike was almost 20 years old and crabon fiber. It didn't aspolde.
EDIT: When I got back on my bike after a 15 year hiatus, I weighed 225. My bike was almost 20 years old and crabon fiber. It didn't aspolde.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Last edited by Eric F; 04-04-23 at 03:58 PM.
Likes For Eric F:
#6
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
Yep, I know guys that big and bigger who just ride regular frames.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,299
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8284 Post(s)
Liked 9,053 Times
in
4,479 Posts
I've ridden at 220, sometimes more, and I've had a couple aluminum Cannondales and they are quite sturdy. The biggest issue I have is wheels.
Likes For big john:
#8
Steel is real
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,958
Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1998KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon,1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 670 Post(s)
Liked 977 Times
in
648 Posts
A Columbus Max frame steel or a Reynolds 708 classic frame would be ideal for you
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Aluminium fatigues, so it's less than ideal for a heavy rider - if you keep it long enough, it may break.
What's wrong with steel, or better yet, carbon? A 1.5kg carbon frame is tough as nails.
What's wrong with steel, or better yet, carbon? A 1.5kg carbon frame is tough as nails.
Likes For Kimmo:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,376
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2485 Post(s)
Liked 2,956 Times
in
1,679 Posts
The original poster asked for aluminum frame suggestions. To head off the apparently inevitable parade of suggestions of other frame materials, here's a page with some factual information about the fatigue characteristics of well-designed aluminum frames (as well as others). Most of us have seen this information before, but that doesn't stop people from ignoring the data.
Quoting from that page:
This ground-breaking article, first published in a German magazine, compared the resistance of aluminum, carbon-fiber and steel frames to fatigue failure. Damon Rinard considered the article so important that he struggled mightily to prepare a translation of it. It deserves a new translation, which appears here.
What is so important about the testing this article describes? Even the testers were surprised to find that the high-quality lightweight aluminum and carbon-fiber frames they tested were more resistant to fatigue failure than heavier, high-quality steel frames. A caveat, though, is appropriate: the results hold for a frame which is ridden hard but not damaged or abused: corrosion, nicks, dents, scratches and stresses due to incorrect installation of components could alter the results, as the article itself notes.
Quoting from that page:
This ground-breaking article, first published in a German magazine, compared the resistance of aluminum, carbon-fiber and steel frames to fatigue failure. Damon Rinard considered the article so important that he struggled mightily to prepare a translation of it. It deserves a new translation, which appears here.
What is so important about the testing this article describes? Even the testers were surprised to find that the high-quality lightweight aluminum and carbon-fiber frames they tested were more resistant to fatigue failure than heavier, high-quality steel frames. A caveat, though, is appropriate: the results hold for a frame which is ridden hard but not damaged or abused: corrosion, nicks, dents, scratches and stresses due to incorrect installation of components could alter the results, as the article itself notes.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,376
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2485 Post(s)
Liked 2,956 Times
in
1,679 Posts
Just did a search and found a blog post speculating on why 708 is so rare that even most bike enthusiasts don't know of its existence.
Quoting:
I can think of one other possible reason why, not only did so few people buy bikes made from 708, but why, apparently, so few (comparatively, anyway) bikes were made from it. A butted frame tube has the same thickness through the circumference of the tube. This means that whether the builder or manufacturer brazes or welds the frame tubes together, and whether or not lugs are used, a consistent level of heat can be maintained around the circumference. In contrast, ribbed frame tubes have thick and thin sections, which makes it more difficult to maintain consistent heat levels. An area that is heated more loses more strength than one that is heated less. Thus, I imagine that it would be more difficult to make a strong joint with ribbed than with butted tubes.
#12
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,927 Times
in
4,160 Posts
The original poster asked for aluminum frame suggestions. To head off the apparently inevitable parade of suggestions of other frame materials, here's a page with some factual information about the fatigue characteristics of well-designed aluminum frames (as well as others). Most of us have seen this information before, but that doesn't stop people from ignoring the data.
Quoting from that page:
This ground-breaking article, first published in a German magazine, compared the resistance of aluminum, carbon-fiber and steel frames to fatigue failure. Damon Rinard considered the article so important that he struggled mightily to prepare a translation of it. It deserves a new translation, which appears here.
What is so important about the testing this article describes? Even the testers were surprised to find that the high-quality lightweight aluminum and carbon-fiber frames they tested were more resistant to fatigue failure than heavier, high-quality steel frames. A caveat, though, is appropriate: the results hold for a frame which is ridden hard but not damaged or abused: corrosion, nicks, dents, scratches and stresses due to incorrect installation of components could alter the results, as the article itself notes.
Quoting from that page:
This ground-breaking article, first published in a German magazine, compared the resistance of aluminum, carbon-fiber and steel frames to fatigue failure. Damon Rinard considered the article so important that he struggled mightily to prepare a translation of it. It deserves a new translation, which appears here.
What is so important about the testing this article describes? Even the testers were surprised to find that the high-quality lightweight aluminum and carbon-fiber frames they tested were more resistant to fatigue failure than heavier, high-quality steel frames. A caveat, though, is appropriate: the results hold for a frame which is ridden hard but not damaged or abused: corrosion, nicks, dents, scratches and stresses due to incorrect installation of components could alter the results, as the article itself notes.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,376
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2485 Post(s)
Liked 2,956 Times
in
1,679 Posts
They seem to have tested two titanium frames: a Merlin and a (Russian-built) Schmolke. The Merlin didn't last very long in the testing, failing earlier than most. The Schmolke did much better. (The testers put the frames through 100,000 cycles at one level of stress and then another 100,000 at a higher stress level. The Schmolke made it to 160,000 cycles. A Cannondale aluminum frame, a Trek OCLV carbon frame, and a Principia aluminum frame were the only frames that made it through all 200,000 cycles.)
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
My most-ridden bikes are built around a pair of budget Chinese CF frames, followed by an aluminum Fuji with a carbon fork. Two of the three have 105–great group.
Forget your weight—- build what pleases and/ or excited you.
Likes For Maelochs:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,299
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8284 Post(s)
Liked 9,053 Times
in
4,479 Posts
Likes For big john:
#16
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To echo the above...230lbs is not excessive, unless you're chasing something at the extremely lightweight end of the spectrum. Pretty much any regular frame from a reputable manufacturer is going to serve you fine.
EDIT: When I got back on my bike after a 15 year hiatus, I weighed 225. My bike was almost 20 years old and crabon fiber. It didn't aspolde.
EDIT: When I got back on my bike after a 15 year hiatus, I weighed 225. My bike was almost 20 years old and crabon fiber. It didn't aspolde.
#17
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,997
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4957 Post(s)
Liked 8,098 Times
in
3,833 Posts
I'm not sure what they mean by "entry level". I expect either bike will suit you just fine, if that's what you want.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#18
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,997
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4957 Post(s)
Liked 8,098 Times
in
3,833 Posts
This doesn't surprise me at all. Those old OCLV frames are notoriously tough. I'm still beating on an OCLV MTB frame that is old enough to legally drink.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,376
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2485 Post(s)
Liked 2,956 Times
in
1,679 Posts
Might be worth a live chat with a Trek rep to find out. It might mean that an entry-level frame is not going to be one of their cutting-edge lightweight frame and that the design goal had more to do with durability instead. Just guessing, though.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
My stats are about the same, although I also have a cracked Ti frame in my garage waiting to hear back from a Ti framebuilder about a repair.
NB. THis doesn't mean steel is weaker or worse than aluminium or Ti or carbon, but I believe it proves the claims of steel being automatically superior to be nonsense. The life span of a frame is based on the design, construction, and level of use/abuse.
NB. THis doesn't mean steel is weaker or worse than aluminium or Ti or carbon, but I believe it proves the claims of steel being automatically superior to be nonsense. The life span of a frame is based on the design, construction, and level of use/abuse.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,299
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8284 Post(s)
Liked 9,053 Times
in
4,479 Posts
My stats are about the same, although I also have a cracked Ti frame in my garage waiting to hear back from a Ti framebuilder about a repair.
NB. THis doesn't mean steel is weaker or worse than aluminium or Ti or carbon, but I believe it proves the claims of steel being automatically superior to be nonsense. The life span of a frame is based on the design, construction, and level of use/abuse.
NB. THis doesn't mean steel is weaker or worse than aluminium or Ti or carbon, but I believe it proves the claims of steel being automatically superior to be nonsense. The life span of a frame is based on the design, construction, and level of use/abuse.
The stiffest, most bone jarring bike I ever had was steel.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,883
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 768 Post(s)
Liked 1,744 Times
in
1,015 Posts
At one point in time, I was in excess of 300, rode a Specialize Allez on some mavic wheels and running 23's at 110 psi. you will have no issues with whatever to go with unless, as mentioned, you go with some weight type thing that has a weight limit of 50 lbs.
#23
Steel is real
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,958
Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1998KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon,1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 670 Post(s)
Liked 977 Times
in
648 Posts
Interesting. Thanks for mentioning 708. I can't remember whether I ever even heard of it before encountering mentions on Bike Forums, and I've been a fan of Reynolds bikes since I got my first 531 bike, a Helyett, in 1964.
Just did a search and found a blog post speculating on why 708 is so rare that even most bike enthusiasts don't know of its existence.
Quoting:
I can think of one other possible reason why, not only did so few people buy bikes made from 708, but why, apparently, so few (comparatively, anyway) bikes were made from it. A butted frame tube has the same thickness through the circumference of the tube. This means that whether the builder or manufacturer brazes or welds the frame tubes together, and whether or not lugs are used, a consistent level of heat can be maintained around the circumference. In contrast, ribbed frame tubes have thick and thin sections, which makes it more difficult to maintain consistent heat levels. An area that is heated more loses more strength than one that is heated less. Thus, I imagine that it would be more difficult to make a strong joint with ribbed than with butted tubes.
Just did a search and found a blog post speculating on why 708 is so rare that even most bike enthusiasts don't know of its existence.
Quoting:
I can think of one other possible reason why, not only did so few people buy bikes made from 708, but why, apparently, so few (comparatively, anyway) bikes were made from it. A butted frame tube has the same thickness through the circumference of the tube. This means that whether the builder or manufacturer brazes or welds the frame tubes together, and whether or not lugs are used, a consistent level of heat can be maintained around the circumference. In contrast, ribbed frame tubes have thick and thin sections, which makes it more difficult to maintain consistent heat levels. An area that is heated more loses more strength than one that is heated less. Thus, I imagine that it would be more difficult to make a strong joint with ribbed than with butted tubes.
I have a Peugeot Prestige in Reynolds 708 classic and it is the bike I own since 1996 , it rides wells and it is a secure and comfy ride.An interesting article of the same bike than mine
Last edited by georges1; 04-06-23 at 03:16 AM.
Likes For georges1:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 884
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 772 Times
in
404 Posts
Caveat - I've not owned really expensive bike frames, so I can't compare. But compared to what I've owned and ridden - the Emonda ALR is flat out awesome. Compared to my CAAD 3 R800 - night and day. The Emonda is stiff where it needs to be but has zero of that road buzz/harshness of the R800.
The bike is smooth and comfortable - and I'm not shy about saying my opinion that good aluminum frames can be as good or better than cheap carbon. The Emonda is much better than both of my lower tier CF frames.
Wheels - when I started riding again I picked up a used bike with an aluminum Dura Ace wheel set. I weighed in at 240# at that time, and grenaded both wheels in a hurry. First, I kept blowing out spokes on the rear wheel, then I cracked the front wheel, and the rear wheel cracks showed up later. A expensive set of wheels thrown in the bin...
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,376
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2485 Post(s)
Liked 2,956 Times
in
1,679 Posts
Caveat - I've not owned really expensive bike frames, so I can't compare. But compared to what I've owned and ridden - the Emonda ALR is flat out awesome. Compared to my CAAD 3 R800 - night and day. The Emonda is stiff where it needs to be but has zero of that road buzz/harshness of the R800.
Last edited by Trakhak; 04-06-23 at 03:36 PM.