Crown race / headtube installation issue
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Crown race / headtube installation issue
HI ,
i'm building a road bike using scott addict rc 2011 frame , i had FSA (Mod.Orbit Z 9/M 1 – 1/8 "Semi Integrated Headset/Headset TH 9/M Orbit Z) along with it .
problem is that after fitting crown race at the bottom of the fork , there's a slightly big gap between race and the bearing , accordingly when installing the fork , there's 2mm gap between headtube and fork ..
i thought about buying a different crown race which may have same diameter but with lower height , but i don't want to go through removing the crown race again as it's now very tight fit .
side question .. first problem was that base of the fork had extra epoxy,carbon fiber residue from manufacturing , i used a sand paper very lightly to remove that , that was a batter option for me than pressing to hard on the crown race to make it fit or sand crown race which may make it uneven and damage carbon layers in future , was that the best action to do
i'm building a road bike using scott addict rc 2011 frame , i had FSA (Mod.Orbit Z 9/M 1 – 1/8 "Semi Integrated Headset/Headset TH 9/M Orbit Z) along with it .
problem is that after fitting crown race at the bottom of the fork , there's a slightly big gap between race and the bearing , accordingly when installing the fork , there's 2mm gap between headtube and fork ..
i thought about buying a different crown race which may have same diameter but with lower height , but i don't want to go through removing the crown race again as it's now very tight fit .
side question .. first problem was that base of the fork had extra epoxy,carbon fiber residue from manufacturing , i used a sand paper very lightly to remove that , that was a batter option for me than pressing to hard on the crown race to make it fit or sand crown race which may make it uneven and damage carbon layers in future , was that the best action to do
Last edited by hythamfekry; 11-28-19 at 05:07 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: se MIch.
Posts: 2,312
Bikes: 1938 claud butler,1983 Basso,teledyne titan,teocali super,nrs,1993 stumpjumper fsr,Paramountain,Paramount Buell(sold),4 banger,Zaskar LE,Colnago Master Ibex MTB,1987ish,.etc....
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 803 Post(s)
Liked 2,984 Times
in
1,498 Posts
?
are you certain the bearing+race angles match? looks to be very improper.could you have the upper bearing with diff. angle installed?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Any chance the lower bearing is upside down?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,084
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4205 Post(s)
Liked 3,864 Times
in
2,312 Posts
Not if the second photo is also the way the lower bearing was installed on reassembly. But I do question the match between the lower bearing and the crown race WRT their mating conical angles. I also have questions about how photo 2 relates to #3 . #2 shows the bearing sitting rather high off the crown race yet #3 seems to show the headtube and fork about the common distance from each other.
This might be one of those challenges that has a simple answer which is hard to see without being there. Andy
This might be one of those challenges that has a simple answer which is hard to see without being there. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#5
Senior Member
The bearing looks like it is not as fully seated on the race as it should be. But seems to me pieces are missing.
In OP pic 3 and on @‘02 NRS PIC, there is a flared section on both the upper and lower parts of the headset. This pic, the two parts at the top specifically, would seem to indicate that the flared section is part of a cover that goes over the top of the bearing in OPS pic. Perhaps that makes up,for the gap?
In OP pic 3 and on @‘02 NRS PIC, there is a flared section on both the upper and lower parts of the headset. This pic, the two parts at the top specifically, would seem to indicate that the flared section is part of a cover that goes over the top of the bearing in OPS pic. Perhaps that makes up,for the gap?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,266
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 714 Post(s)
Liked 800 Times
in
475 Posts
The bearing looks like it is not as fully seated on the race as it should be. But seems to me pieces are missing.
In OP pic 3 and on @‘02 NRS PIC, there is a flared section on both the upper and lower parts of the headset. This pic, the two parts at the top specifically, would seem to indicate that the flared section is part of a cover that goes over the top of the bearing in OPS pic. Perhaps that makes up,for the gap?
In OP pic 3 and on @‘02 NRS PIC, there is a flared section on both the upper and lower parts of the headset. This pic, the two parts at the top specifically, would seem to indicate that the flared section is part of a cover that goes over the top of the bearing in OPS pic. Perhaps that makes up,for the gap?
#7
Industry guy
The residue from manufacturing limits the accurate fit of the fork crown race. I am not certain if a traditional mill is going to
work on carbon fiber.
Accuracy of this fit (or lack of it) is imperative in correctly seating these precision parts. Perfect assembly (and function)
depends on the fit of the every element of the headset.
Not being in tune with carbon frames, and what mill to accomplish this, I will say that a headset requires parallel top and bottom faces
on the headtube. If the seating isn't correct at installation, the cups will likely shift on riding, and could lead to binding.
In the Campagnolo pro tool box, there is a measuring die to check the fit before installing the fork crown race.
Lacking a tool like that, a precision caliper and a methodical cleaning of the steerer tube as it meets the fork crown is the only solution I can see.
I killed(ie split) a fork crown race on a vintage Omas headset doing this, and learned a valuable and expensive lesson.
work on carbon fiber.
Accuracy of this fit (or lack of it) is imperative in correctly seating these precision parts. Perfect assembly (and function)
depends on the fit of the every element of the headset.
Not being in tune with carbon frames, and what mill to accomplish this, I will say that a headset requires parallel top and bottom faces
on the headtube. If the seating isn't correct at installation, the cups will likely shift on riding, and could lead to binding.
In the Campagnolo pro tool box, there is a measuring die to check the fit before installing the fork crown race.
Lacking a tool like that, a precision caliper and a methodical cleaning of the steerer tube as it meets the fork crown is the only solution I can see.
I killed(ie split) a fork crown race on a vintage Omas headset doing this, and learned a valuable and expensive lesson.
#8
Senior Member
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
https://shop.fullspeedahead.com/en/f...444a468b88f78/
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
No , i installed it in correct direction as per PDF below
https://shop.fullspeedahead.com/en/f...444a468b88f78/
https://shop.fullspeedahead.com/en/f...444a468b88f78/
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
that's what weird , this is headset is 1 pack which should be integrated together , but for some reason , crown race height seems to be high ..
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not if the second photo is also the way the lower bearing was installed on reassembly. But I do question the match between the lower bearing and the crown race WRT their mating conical angles. I also have questions about how photo 2 relates to #3 . #2 shows the bearing sitting rather high off the crown race yet #3 seems to show the headtube and fork about the common distance from each other.
This might be one of those challenges that has a simple answer which is hard to see without being there. Andy
This might be one of those challenges that has a simple answer which is hard to see without being there. Andy
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: se MIch.
Posts: 2,312
Bikes: 1938 claud butler,1983 Basso,teledyne titan,teocali super,nrs,1993 stumpjumper fsr,Paramountain,Paramount Buell(sold),4 banger,Zaskar LE,Colnago Master Ibex MTB,1987ish,.etc....
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 803 Post(s)
Liked 2,984 Times
in
1,498 Posts
I have FSA Orbit Z deep cups,zero stack.the crown sits a little high but not as high as yours.also the lower cup COVERS the gap & is sealed by the rubber seal attached to the crown race.lower pic is with bearing inside cup,crown race atop.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
thanks for the pics ..
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: se MIch.
Posts: 2,312
Bikes: 1938 claud butler,1983 Basso,teledyne titan,teocali super,nrs,1993 stumpjumper fsr,Paramountain,Paramount Buell(sold),4 banger,Zaskar LE,Colnago Master Ibex MTB,1987ish,.etc....
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 803 Post(s)
Liked 2,984 Times
in
1,498 Posts
OK, I sent a pm to explain what is going on here, but I'll do it in public. You have two lower head races on that fork, and who ever told you it was brand new was spoofing you, there are bearing marks on the old bearing race that is still on the fork. When you remove the first bearing race the clearance on the lower race will be correct, and likely the upper clearance will correct as well. Put simply: you have two lower bearing races on that fork. Remove the wrong one and all should work well together. Smiles, MH
#17
Senior Member
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Marks from installation as fitting crown was too tight that's why i don't want to remove it again , here is closer look for the race (it's a single one , fork is new came without any races ) , also attached is pdf of headset specs , which shows all parts are here (2 bearing , 2 cups , crown , top cap with rubber piece , open race )
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: se MIch.
Posts: 2,312
Bikes: 1938 claud butler,1983 Basso,teledyne titan,teocali super,nrs,1993 stumpjumper fsr,Paramountain,Paramount Buell(sold),4 banger,Zaskar LE,Colnago Master Ibex MTB,1987ish,.etc....
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 803 Post(s)
Liked 2,984 Times
in
1,498 Posts
Crown race angle wrong?
Have you tried your old crown race on new bearing? PDF says 1.2mm gap.possible new part is not correct,bearing seat not same as bearing angle.have old parts to check-confirm???
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Shall i use pvc tube and use some strokes on it on top of the bearing/crown race/fork .. so it's snug into place ?
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
this is new frame (warrant replacement) so it came without race installed , not sure of other race with lower height will fit or not , however i can't know it other race will work or not until i buy it and have it in hand .
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: se MIch.
Posts: 2,312
Bikes: 1938 claud butler,1983 Basso,teledyne titan,teocali super,nrs,1993 stumpjumper fsr,Paramountain,Paramount Buell(sold),4 banger,Zaskar LE,Colnago Master Ibex MTB,1987ish,.etc....
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 803 Post(s)
Liked 2,984 Times
in
1,498 Posts
the gap looks excessive without the deep cup installed.maybe the way this headset is designed.as an extra precaution even though the bearings are sealed,some manufactures advise adding a layer of grease over the seal for extra protection.the upper split ring gap closes/lowers once the bearing cover,spacers,stem are assembled & properly torqued to specs.looks like your doing every thing accordingly,just the way its designed from what I can see.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
the gap looks excessive without the deep cup installed.maybe the way this headset is designed.as an extra precaution even though the bearings are sealed,some manufactures advise adding a layer of grease over the seal for extra protection.the upper split ring gap closes/lowers once the bearing cover,spacers,stem are assembled & properly torqued to specs.looks like your doing every thing accordingly,just the way its designed from what I can see.
Last edited by hythamfekry; 11-30-19 at 03:17 PM.