Argon in tyres?
#26
Senior Member
What about Helium? Would that make for a lighter ride?
__________________
1980 Sekine RM-40 | 1990 Miyata 1000LT | 1980 Raleigh Sprite Mixte | 1979 Raleigh Grand Prix
1980 Sekine RM-40 | 1990 Miyata 1000LT | 1980 Raleigh Sprite Mixte | 1979 Raleigh Grand Prix
#28
Videre non videri
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Helium is rare, non-renewable and the supply will gradually decrease and almost no helium will be available commercially within decades or up to a century or so, it is predicted.
Argon stays in the atmosphere and is also pretty common (More than 0.9% of the air is argon).
Argon stays in the atmosphere and is also pretty common (More than 0.9% of the air is argon).
#29
Senior Member
Hmm... good point. I think you want the measurement criteria of pressure per weight. So compare the partial vapour-pressure of argon and its weight vs. CO2 vs. ambient air. The water-vapour in air can allow you to reduce the amount and weight needed tremendously if you keep it at 100-C and above..
#30
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I can be as flip as the next guy, but this is "thread crapping", pure and stinky. If the topic doesn't interest you, then post elsewhere.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#31
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
As I recall, the issue with increased diffusion of some gases had to do with the solubility of those gases in the case material (rubber). And from my chemistry, I recall that solubility is generally determined by the shapes and local charges of the molecules. Since argon is chemically inert, it essentially has no shape or local charges, so it is effectively insoluble.
Doesn't mean that it won't diffuse through the structure, or leak. But I bet it would do so at a slower rate than other gases (except krypton, xenon, or radon ).
Doesn't mean that it won't diffuse through the structure, or leak. But I bet it would do so at a slower rate than other gases (except krypton, xenon, or radon ).
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#32
Videre non videri
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
As I recall, the issue with increased diffusion of some gases had to do with the solubility of those gases in the case material (rubber). And from my chemistry, I recall that solubility is generally determined by the shapes and local charges of the molecules. Since argon is chemically inert, it essentially has no shape or local charges, so it is effectively insoluble.
Doesn't mean that it won't diffuse through the structure, or leak. But I bet it would do so at a slower rate than other gases (except krypton, xenon, or radon ).
Doesn't mean that it won't diffuse through the structure, or leak. But I bet it would do so at a slower rate than other gases (except krypton, xenon, or radon ).
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cambridge, Mass.
Posts: 311
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As I recall, the issue with increased diffusion of some gases had to do with the solubility of those gases in the case material (rubber). And from my chemistry, I recall that solubility is generally determined by the shapes and local charges of the molecules. Since argon is chemically inert, it essentially has no shape or local charges, so it is effectively insoluble.
Doesn't mean that it won't diffuse through the structure, or leak. But I bet it would do so at a slower rate than other gases (except krypton, xenon, or radon ).
Doesn't mean that it won't diffuse through the structure, or leak. But I bet it would do so at a slower rate than other gases (except krypton, xenon, or radon ).
I did some google searching, and found a paper: Barrer, R.M. "Permeation, diffusion, and solution of gases in organic polymers." Trans. Farad. Soc. 35 628. It shows that the permeability of argon -- and thus how fast it will leave through the tire rubber, given the same pressure, tire thickness, etc. -- is about three times that of nitrogen. The units for this permeability look a bit goofy, but just take note that the outflow rate would be measured in "moles" or number of molecules, because it is this that determines pressure in the tire.
Some of the replies to this post indicated it might be a waste of time. Don't worry, OP, I think it's an okay question! In fact, I can remember an exam question some time ago regarding patents that Air Products, Inc., (in Allentown, Pa.) had filed for a gas that could be used to pressurize tennis balls. They claimed that the gas increased the usable life of the tennis balls by a factor of two or something like that. I guess I would argue that questions like these, then, can be fruitful/significant!
[EDIT: The tennis ball invention is US Patent 4,358,111.]
#35
Call me The Breeze
I think there are two issues here, for the technically inclined. First, how soluble is a gas in rubber tires? Second, how fast do the gas molecules move through the rubber once it is taken up in the rubber -- that is, what is its diffusivity? These are both functions of the gas's and the polymer's (in this case, rubber) chemical composition, as DMF pointed out, but are fundamentally two different properties. When these two factors are combined, engineers refer to the overall permeability, which is the mass flux (of the gas through the rubber in this case) per unit area per unit time, normalized according to the pressure drop across the rubber.
I did some google searching, and found a paper: Barrer, R.M. "Permeation, diffusion, and solution of gases in organic polymers." Trans. Farad. Soc. 35 628. It shows that the permeability of argon -- and thus how fast it will leave through the tire rubber, given the same pressure, tire thickness, etc. -- is about three times that of nitrogen. The units for this permeability look a bit goofy, but just take note that the outflow rate would be measured in "moles" or number of molecules, because it is this that determines pressure in the tire.
Some of the replies to this post indicated it might be a waste of time. Don't worry, OP, I think it's an okay question! In fact, I can remember an exam question some time ago regarding patents that Air Products, Inc., (in Allentown, Pa.) had filed for a gas that could be used to pressurize tennis balls. They claimed that the gas increased the usable life of the tennis balls by a factor of two or something like that. I guess I would argue that questions like these, then, can be fruitful/significant!
[EDIT: The tennis ball invention is US Patent 4,358,111.]
I did some google searching, and found a paper: Barrer, R.M. "Permeation, diffusion, and solution of gases in organic polymers." Trans. Farad. Soc. 35 628. It shows that the permeability of argon -- and thus how fast it will leave through the tire rubber, given the same pressure, tire thickness, etc. -- is about three times that of nitrogen. The units for this permeability look a bit goofy, but just take note that the outflow rate would be measured in "moles" or number of molecules, because it is this that determines pressure in the tire.
Some of the replies to this post indicated it might be a waste of time. Don't worry, OP, I think it's an okay question! In fact, I can remember an exam question some time ago regarding patents that Air Products, Inc., (in Allentown, Pa.) had filed for a gas that could be used to pressurize tennis balls. They claimed that the gas increased the usable life of the tennis balls by a factor of two or something like that. I guess I would argue that questions like these, then, can be fruitful/significant!
[EDIT: The tennis ball invention is US Patent 4,358,111.]
#36
Pwnerer
Busted again. I'll have to find another thread to recycle methane in.
#39
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Plot the pressure decrease over time. Then we can puzzle about the results. In this wise are theories born (and buried).
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#41
Videre non videri
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
#42
Senior Member
Easily over $200 for a normal size tank, and about $25-$30 to fill it. I have an argon/C02 welding tank, on my welder of course, lol.,,,,BD
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
So many bikes, so little dime.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
.......regarding patents that Air Products, Inc., (in Allentown, Pa.) had filed for a gas that could be used to pressurize tennis balls. They claimed that the gas increased the usable life of the tennis balls by a factor of two or something like that. I guess I would argue that questions like these, then, can be fruitful/significant!
[EDIT: The tennis ball invention is US Patent 4,358,111.]
[EDIT: The tennis ball invention is US Patent 4,358,111.]
Bike tubes can be refilled as often as you need to, including daily for high-pressure track tires with latex tubes.
#44
Eugenian
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Helium.
Lots of Helium.
Edit: Just realized this was already suggested.
Well, comparing these gases to the currently used fresh air, all of these are unreasonable as they are not practical. A simple pump of air is. The benefit weight wise of any other gas is probably not worth the trouble.
Lots of Helium.
Edit: Just realized this was already suggested.
Well, comparing these gases to the currently used fresh air, all of these are unreasonable as they are not practical. A simple pump of air is. The benefit weight wise of any other gas is probably not worth the trouble.
#45
Senior Member
The question was theoretical - I'm not likely to go start trying to fill my tires with helium and if I where it would not likely be on a regular basis due to the cost of air (free) versus helium (not free). Given the theoretical nature of the question - renew-ability is moot point.
__________________
1980 Sekine RM-40 | 1990 Miyata 1000LT | 1980 Raleigh Sprite Mixte | 1979 Raleigh Grand Prix
1980 Sekine RM-40 | 1990 Miyata 1000LT | 1980 Raleigh Sprite Mixte | 1979 Raleigh Grand Prix
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cambridge, Mass.
Posts: 311
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I figure the weight savings would be about 8 g per tire for 27"x1" tires at 100 psig. As was pointed out, however, helium is becoming more scarce, so don't tell the WWs....
#47
coffeeeeee
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: somewhere in Pennsyl-tucky
Posts: 238
Bikes: all that I ride
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Helium, though normally uncharged and non-reactive, is one of the most difficult gases to contain. You'd have to refill your tires more often than with regular air, or nitrogen, or argon even, possibly during the course of a longer ride.
I'm sure the He tire fill's been tried by racers; I don't think it would be such a hot idea though.
I think there was something like this on another thread.
I'm sure the He tire fill's been tried by racers; I don't think it would be such a hot idea though.
I think there was something like this on another thread.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 1,383
Bikes: Cinelli Supercoursa 69, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Mondonico Diamond Extra 05, Coors Light Greg Lemond (built by Scapin) 88, Scapin MTB, Stumpjumper 83, Specialized Stumpjumper M4, Lemond Poprad 2001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
This thread is toast...
#50
Pwnerer
I would argue that methane is even more difficult to contain, especially when one's finger is pulled.