Shimano 105 vs Ultegra
#1
Life Feeds On Life
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hondo,Texas
Posts: 2,143
Bikes: Too many Motobecanes
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4410 Post(s)
Liked 4,521 Times
in
3,023 Posts
Shimano 105 vs Ultegra
My gravel bike has an Ultegra drivetrain minus the crank that is a FSA with gxp bb. With my new wheelset I put on a 105 cassette which was much cheaper than the Ultegra. Besides a saving a few ounces in weight is Ultegra that much better than 105? I’m not a racer just an enthusiast so quality is important but I don’t need top of the line.
#2
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
The 105 Cassette might actually last longer. Just ride it, and if you notice it is inferior, you can always upgrade it after you wear it out (or before if it really bugs you). In general, this is a good cost-effective way to save money.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
Probably not, they are both steel cogs with a different surface treatment, unlike DA which has a few titanium cogs. So I'd expect the same lifetime and that has been my experience using them interchangeably on various wheelsets in 10/11 speed iterations.
#4
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
Ok, at least now I feel like I am justified using Ultegra. (They do seem to wear out quickly.)
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I do race (on the road mostly) and I almost always go with 105 for cassettes, especially on training wheels. (And I don't think it's even a few ounces, it's more like 25-30 g (1oz = 28.3g).) Cassettes are consumables; I don't see a compelling reason to spend $20-30 more on a product that doesn't last any longer or shift any better.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
#7
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
Do you rotate chains? Thats the #1 way to extend cassette life IMO and ensure the chains and cogs wear together. 3-4 chains in rotation with a cassette should net you 10k miles, which I never really hit because I'm spreading out on so many wheelsets and constantly swapping and upgrading.
#8
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 154
Bikes: 1996 Cannondale R900, 2016 Trek Boone, 2005 Giant Yukon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 584 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times
in
54 Posts
It's less then a few ounces iirc. I'm running a 105 cassette with an otherwise ultegra DT.