Dropout Screws Spring Location -- Where and Why?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 929
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 372 Post(s)
Liked 528 Times
in
279 Posts
I'd have to rate that as a first definition factoid. Please tell me the correct number of links for the chain on my '81 Colnago and just where exactly to set the adjustment screws to take full advantage of that chain length. I expect that critically missing info is what has been holding me back for several decades now. OMG!! I could have been Famous! I could have been Somebody! Now this feels like the right time for me to start cutting myself for being so stoopid
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
I'd have to rate that as a first definition factoid. Please tell me the correct number of links for the chain on my '81 Colnago and just where exactly to set the adjustment screws to take full advantage of that chain length. I expect that critically missing info is what has been holding me back for several decades now. OMG!! I could have been Famous! I could have been Somebody! Now this feels like the right time for me to start cutting myself for being so stoopid
But do you have an alternative explanation for why those screws are in there? What do you think would happen if they are not there?
But really, when I'm done setting a wheel position that helps me set up your friction shifting just right, (for some reason my Masi is finicky this way) I do not want it messed with. I tend to spend a lot of time on fine tuning. Maybe I'm the stupid one, but I get my bikes working well. If you don't have the need, so what, YMMV. And I truly like to have those little wheel stops making my wheel installations consistent.
Likes For Road Fan:
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 756
Bikes: 1969 Peugeot PX10, 1992 Della Santa, Linus Roadster 8, Biria 700C ST-8
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 791 Post(s)
Liked 504 Times
in
320 Posts
I’m still wondering why “vertical” drop outs are so obviously not vertical. At least from that picture which looks a little more upright from horizontal but certainly not vertical.
Last edited by Joe Bikerider; 09-25-20 at 07:25 PM.
#55
Sekine SHT
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 6
Bikes: 1975 Sekine SHT, Sekine SHS, Kuwahara Apollo MKIII (stolen)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,474
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1635 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 824 Times
in
533 Posts
The 80's French Simplex dropout, do not use those silly little springs,...........ptouie!
They use miniature Delrin hockey pucks with holes through them,......... of course!!
They use miniature Delrin hockey pucks with holes through them,......... of course!!
__________________
72 Line Seeker
83 Davidson Signature
84 Peugeot PSV
84 Peugeot PY10FC
84 Gitane Tour de France.
85 Vitus Plus Carbone 7
86 ALAN Record Carbonio
86 Medici Aerodynamic (Project)
88 Pinarello Montello
89 Bottecchia Professional Chorus SL
95 Trek 5500 OCLV (Project)
72 Line Seeker
83 Davidson Signature
84 Peugeot PSV
84 Peugeot PY10FC
84 Gitane Tour de France.
85 Vitus Plus Carbone 7
86 ALAN Record Carbonio
86 Medici Aerodynamic (Project)
88 Pinarello Montello
89 Bottecchia Professional Chorus SL
95 Trek 5500 OCLV (Project)
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
--Shannon
--Shannon
#58
Senior Member
57 posts and counting on whether the spring goes inside or out....
For you perusing pleasure, only on C&V Forum.
For you perusing pleasure, only on C&V Forum.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
You can get anything you want, at Classic and Vintage Bikes... (except an answer)
--Shannon
Likes For ShannonM:
#60
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
163 Posts
Well, at least another generation of cyclists has been disabused of the notion that they were put there to convert a bike from “racing” (short wheelbase) to “touring” (long wheelbase) with a minimum of fuss, which was what I was told by fellow greenhorns, who didn’t race either but loved to BS about stuff.
My cycling “crowd” back then was mostly guys who hadn’t been athletic in school, so didn’t compete on bikes as adults, thus missing out on the deep knowledge of equipment and techniques that the racing fraternity got. The racing clubs did allow “civilians” to join their group rides back then just by showing up, so if you were willing to suffer physically and take not-so-gentle direction you could learn a lot. But I don’t recall dropout screws being on the curriculum.
As to the answer about where the springs belong, bikes on display in bike shops always had them inside the dropouts. So that’s one answer. Elaborating, the adjusters need the springs to stay put. Springless, with the wheel clamped in place, the screw is free to move backward, spoiling the adjustment for when you need to remove the wheel. If it is inside the dropout, it will still survive to do its job if the part sticking out back loses the knurled nut or breaks off altogether, as frequently happened when bikes were crammed into Volkswagens. So there should be no controversy about where the springs belong when you combine history with analysis of consequences of failure— which orientation causes the lesser impairment and the lesser need to buy a new part immediately? If you were happy with where the wheel was positioned, you would never need to replace a broken-off adjuster screw, provided it still had its spring. You even still had some adjustment, requiring a narrow screwdriver with the wheel out.
(Granted, as one poster said, if you needed the wheel almost all the way back, there wouldn’t be room for the thickness of the fully compressed spring and the screw head, so then yes the spring would have to go outside behind the dropout.)
There are alternatives to springs, as pcb showed us. His setup would hold adjustment if the screw broke off flush with the jam nut.
The thread wandered away when it tried to figure out if the adjusters actually did what they were claimed (by me and others) to do: assist with B-pivot tension.
My cycling “crowd” back then was mostly guys who hadn’t been athletic in school, so didn’t compete on bikes as adults, thus missing out on the deep knowledge of equipment and techniques that the racing fraternity got. The racing clubs did allow “civilians” to join their group rides back then just by showing up, so if you were willing to suffer physically and take not-so-gentle direction you could learn a lot. But I don’t recall dropout screws being on the curriculum.
As to the answer about where the springs belong, bikes on display in bike shops always had them inside the dropouts. So that’s one answer. Elaborating, the adjusters need the springs to stay put. Springless, with the wheel clamped in place, the screw is free to move backward, spoiling the adjustment for when you need to remove the wheel. If it is inside the dropout, it will still survive to do its job if the part sticking out back loses the knurled nut or breaks off altogether, as frequently happened when bikes were crammed into Volkswagens. So there should be no controversy about where the springs belong when you combine history with analysis of consequences of failure— which orientation causes the lesser impairment and the lesser need to buy a new part immediately? If you were happy with where the wheel was positioned, you would never need to replace a broken-off adjuster screw, provided it still had its spring. You even still had some adjustment, requiring a narrow screwdriver with the wheel out.
(Granted, as one poster said, if you needed the wheel almost all the way back, there wouldn’t be room for the thickness of the fully compressed spring and the screw head, so then yes the spring would have to go outside behind the dropout.)
There are alternatives to springs, as pcb showed us. His setup would hold adjustment if the screw broke off flush with the jam nut.
The thread wandered away when it tried to figure out if the adjusters actually did what they were claimed (by me and others) to do: assist with B-pivot tension.
Last edited by conspiratemus1; 09-26-20 at 12:46 PM.
#61
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,602
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3869 Post(s)
Liked 6,461 Times
in
3,194 Posts
Likes For SurferRosa:
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
#63
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
1,929 Posts
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
Well, at least another generation of cyclists has been disabused of the notion that they were put there to convert a bike from “racing” (short wheelbase) to “touring” (long wheelbase) with a minimum of fuss, which was what I was told by fellow greenhorns, who didn’t race either but loved to BS about stuff.
My cycling “crowd” back then was mostly guys who hadn’t been athletic in school, so didn’t compete on bikes as adults, thus missing out on the deep knowledge of equipment and techniques that the racing fraternity got. The racing clubs did allow “civilians” to join their group rides back then just by showing up, so if you were willing to suffer physically and take not-so-gentle direction you could learn a lot. But I don’t recall dropout screws being on the curriculum.
As to the answer about where the springs belong, bikes on display in bike shops always had them inside the dropouts. So that’s one answer. Elaborating, the adjusters need the springs to stay put. Springless, with the wheel clamped in place, the screw is free to move backward, spoiling the adjustment for when you need to remove the wheel. If it is inside the dropout, it will still survive to do its job if the part sticking out back loses the knurled nut or breaks off altogether, as frequently happened when bikes were crammed into Volkswagens. So there should be no controversy about where the springs belong when you combine history with analysis of consequences of failure— which orientation causes the lesser impairment and the lesser need to buy a new part immediately? If you were happy with where the wheel was positioned, you would never need to replace a broken-off adjuster screw, provided it still had its spring. You even still had some adjustment, requiring a narrow screwdriver with the wheel out.
(Granted, as one poster said, if you needed the wheel almost all the way back, there wouldn’t be room for the thickness of the fully compressed spring and the screw head, so then yes the spring would have to go outside behind the dropout.)
There are alternatives to springs, as pcb showed us. His setup would hold adjustment if the screw broke off flush with the jam nut.
The thread wandered away when it tried to figure out if the adjusters actually did what they were claimed (by me and others) to do: assist with B-pivot tension.
My cycling “crowd” back then was mostly guys who hadn’t been athletic in school, so didn’t compete on bikes as adults, thus missing out on the deep knowledge of equipment and techniques that the racing fraternity got. The racing clubs did allow “civilians” to join their group rides back then just by showing up, so if you were willing to suffer physically and take not-so-gentle direction you could learn a lot. But I don’t recall dropout screws being on the curriculum.
As to the answer about where the springs belong, bikes on display in bike shops always had them inside the dropouts. So that’s one answer. Elaborating, the adjusters need the springs to stay put. Springless, with the wheel clamped in place, the screw is free to move backward, spoiling the adjustment for when you need to remove the wheel. If it is inside the dropout, it will still survive to do its job if the part sticking out back loses the knurled nut or breaks off altogether, as frequently happened when bikes were crammed into Volkswagens. So there should be no controversy about where the springs belong when you combine history with analysis of consequences of failure— which orientation causes the lesser impairment and the lesser need to buy a new part immediately? If you were happy with where the wheel was positioned, you would never need to replace a broken-off adjuster screw, provided it still had its spring. You even still had some adjustment, requiring a narrow screwdriver with the wheel out.
(Granted, as one poster said, if you needed the wheel almost all the way back, there wouldn’t be room for the thickness of the fully compressed spring and the screw head, so then yes the spring would have to go outside behind the dropout.)
There are alternatives to springs, as pcb showed us. His setup would hold adjustment if the screw broke off flush with the jam nut.
The thread wandered away when it tried to figure out if the adjusters actually did what they were claimed (by me and others) to do: assist with B-pivot tension.
As far as doing what we now know a B-pivot does, I believe that explanation more than I believe the tourer-conversion story. Adjusting free length was important, and that's a decent explanation for what I raised, that the shifting might go off-kilter in the middle of a race, even though a B-screw was not a thing back then. On my Masi I still sometimes struggle to get it (with NR gearing) to handle a 26 tooth cogset gracefully across all the gearing positions.
As for the spring location, I think we're in agreement. If you need to have a screw which needs to have a spring, it's better to have it inside the slot than sticking out the back.
Conspiratemus1, I hope you are not dissatisfied!
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
And as far as the aimless discussion drift, C&V here is not exceptional.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,033
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4510 Post(s)
Liked 6,374 Times
in
3,666 Posts
Likes For merziac: