Disc Brakes; Yay or Nay?
#126
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,519
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7662 Post(s)
Liked 3,506 Times
in
1,850 Posts
Who has time to live in the future unless he is not fully living in the present---in which case he is wasting both times.
#127
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
My wife just bought a bike with Tektro Mira brakes, for a tour. Didn't think anything of them, until she crashed and I had to jump on and tweak the brifters and shifting. Holy crap, are they atrocious compared to my Spyre and Shimano hydros. I couldn't believe how crappy they were, and I'm a guy who has $3 V brakes on another touring bike which stop well enough to feel comfortable hitting 45MPH coming down a 13% gravel grade.
If that is what goes out the door from the LBS on entry level bikes, I don't see them retaining market share in any large number.
Do remember after all, all the name brand manufacturers still sell freewheel bikes
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 2,900
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Basso Loto, Pinarello Stelvio, Redline Cyclocross
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Hello Folks.... First post here. My terminology may be amiss so cut me some slack.
I hope to purchase a road bike in the spring of '19. I've narrowed it down to a Cannondale Synapse Tiagra or a Scott Speedster 20.
On the Scott at Lim Bicycles I can get the Speedster with Disc Brakes for $825. Without the Disk Brakes it's $660.
Fact is I don't ride in inclement weather. Sure, anyone can get caught in a shower or downpour but honestly it rarely happens. That said, are Disk Brakes the ultimate end all for a fair weather rider such as myself. Are Clamp style breaks on the outs.?? Is it worth the increase in cost on the Scott mentioned above.??
I hope to purchase a road bike in the spring of '19. I've narrowed it down to a Cannondale Synapse Tiagra or a Scott Speedster 20.
On the Scott at Lim Bicycles I can get the Speedster with Disc Brakes for $825. Without the Disk Brakes it's $660.
Fact is I don't ride in inclement weather. Sure, anyone can get caught in a shower or downpour but honestly it rarely happens. That said, are Disk Brakes the ultimate end all for a fair weather rider such as myself. Are Clamp style breaks on the outs.?? Is it worth the increase in cost on the Scott mentioned above.??
#129
☢
I'm not interested in a huge debate... just trying to advise the OP based on my experience. My rationale for my comments regarding the future was based largely on my experience searching for a canti bossed cx frame to build up for my son. Not an easy task anymore. How many folks are making canti cx or gravel or adventure bikes in 2018? No need arguing about the effectiveness or likability of one vs. the other. It's just happening whether we like it or not.
#130
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Furthest corner of NeverNeverLand(Cedar City, UT)
Posts: 12
Bikes: '77 Raleigh Record Ace, '03 Trek 4300 drop convert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I built a wheelset for a bike in the late '70's from a set of Schwinn "s7" rims spoked to a Suntour 12 speed hubset, I used the Weinmann calipers that were on it with no trouble. I also, in the last few years built a "commute" bike based off a Trek 4300 w/cantilever brakes, I run 26 by 2.125 wheels.
I am not understanding where the idea that rim brakes cannot do larger than 28 tires, as both of these exceed that size quite a bit, and I know of others running similar sizes.
Was there something I missed?
I am not understanding where the idea that rim brakes cannot do larger than 28 tires, as both of these exceed that size quite a bit, and I know of others running similar sizes.
Was there something I missed?
Last edited by leftover; 08-21-18 at 10:25 AM. Reason: sheesh typos
#131
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,519
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7662 Post(s)
Liked 3,506 Times
in
1,850 Posts
People have not all figured out how to undo the quick release on their brakes and are trying to jam a fully inflated tire between pads which are a millimeter off the rim.
#132
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#133
Senior Member
Thread Starter
BTW, I got my drivers license driving a Subaru with a standard shift. There's no problem having a standard shift bike. All bikes come standard with a manual shift. Well, other than those E-Shift bikes.
So, let's not bring the automobile into a thread discussing bikes. It's off topic.
#134
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
Go pretty much anywhere that isn't America or Canada (maybe Mexico too, never been there, can't say), and try to rent an auto tranny. I'm not waiting for it to happen, youre pretty much limited to an expensive luxury option or more likely nothing at all.
As far as drums, they are still extensively used on heavy trucks and in the rear on economy cars.
Ie, both are used where the market demands it and where they are the economical/technical choice
#135
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,519
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7662 Post(s)
Liked 3,506 Times
in
1,850 Posts
LOL, I just remembered my 2004 Civic has drum brakes in the rear ... and a 5-speed stick.
But hey ... they don't use rim brakes on helicopters, so that proves .... well ....
Disc brakes offer nothing, it is true. I have discs on the front of my Honda and on two bikes and on all four wheels of two Toyotas ... and never in my life have any of those brake discs offered me a thing. Not even on my birthday or during the winter holidays.
On another hand, the rest of my bikes have rim brakes ... not even a card on my birthday. What a bunch of selfish ingrates.
But hey ... they don't use rim brakes on helicopters, so that proves .... well ....
Disc brakes offer nothing, it is true. I have discs on the front of my Honda and on two bikes and on all four wheels of two Toyotas ... and never in my life have any of those brake discs offered me a thing. Not even on my birthday or during the winter holidays.
On another hand, the rest of my bikes have rim brakes ... not even a card on my birthday. What a bunch of selfish ingrates.
#136
Non omnino gravis
In pertinent summary:
- Disc brakes can be better than rim brakes-- but the bottom-of-the-line Shimano mechanicals offer no real advantage over a typical rim brake
- Disc brakes may indeed by "the future," but that doesn't equate to rim brake obsolescence. You can still buy 6-speed freewheels and friction shifters.
- The disc model of the Speedster weighs nearly 2lbs more, and costs ~$150 more than the rim brake version. That's a double-dealbreaker.
#138
Banned
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 707
Bikes: Specialized Diverge E5 Comp, Specialized AWOL Comp, Scott Solace 10
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
20 Posts
In pertinent summary:
- Disc brakes can be better than rim brakes-- but the bottom-of-the-line Shimano mechanicals offer no real advantage over a typical rim brake
- Disc brakes may indeed by "the future," but that doesn't equate to rim brake obsolescence. You can still buy 6-speed freewheels and friction shifters.
- The disc model of the Speedster weighs nearly 2lbs more, and costs ~$150 more than the rim brake version. That's a double-dealbreaker.
#140
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 2,900
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Basso Loto, Pinarello Stelvio, Redline Cyclocross
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
LOL, I just remembered my 2004 Civic has drum brakes in the rear ... and a 5-speed stick.
But hey ... they don't use rim brakes on helicopters, so that proves .... well ....
Disc brakes offer nothing, it is true. I have discs on the front of my Honda and on two bikes and on all four wheels of two Toyotas ... and never in my life have any of those brake discs offered me a thing. Not even on my birthday or during the winter holidays.
On another hand, the rest of my bikes have rim brakes ... not even a card on my birthday. What a bunch of selfish ingrates.
But hey ... they don't use rim brakes on helicopters, so that proves .... well ....
Disc brakes offer nothing, it is true. I have discs on the front of my Honda and on two bikes and on all four wheels of two Toyotas ... and never in my life have any of those brake discs offered me a thing. Not even on my birthday or during the winter holidays.
On another hand, the rest of my bikes have rim brakes ... not even a card on my birthday. What a bunch of selfish ingrates.
#141
faster downhill
my bike has:
disc brakes, tubeless tires, thru axles, and di2 shifting-oh the horror! this must give you old heads DBDS (disc brake derangement syndrome)
disc brakes allow for more tire clearance? don't wear out rims from friction? better modulation? quieter, especially with carbon rims?
rim brakes work fine and I have them on the front of my vintage frame fixie.
get the bike you like and want to ride, even if it. has 3 wheels.
disc brakes, tubeless tires, thru axles, and di2 shifting-oh the horror! this must give you old heads DBDS (disc brake derangement syndrome)
disc brakes allow for more tire clearance? don't wear out rims from friction? better modulation? quieter, especially with carbon rims?
rim brakes work fine and I have them on the front of my vintage frame fixie.
get the bike you like and want to ride, even if it. has 3 wheels.
Likes For superpletch:
Likes For Cl904:
#143
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,926
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4817 Post(s)
Liked 3,945 Times
in
2,566 Posts
Now I do have a feature that helps clearance although that was never considered when I did it. My levers are road V-brake. Less leverage, more cable travel so they sit further off the rim. (V-brake levers to get the bigger, more comfortable hoods and drop the power for more predictable braking on mountain descents. I love e'm.)
Ben
#144
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 2,900
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Basso Loto, Pinarello Stelvio, Redline Cyclocross
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
my bike has:
disc brakes, tubeless tires, thru axles, and di2 shifting-oh the horror! this must give you old heads DBDS (disc brake derangement syndrome)
disc brakes allow for more tire clearance? don't wear out rims from friction? better modulation? quieter, especially with carbon rims?
rim brakes work fine and I have them on the front of my vintage frame fixie.
get the bike you like and want to ride, even if it. has 3 wheels.
disc brakes, tubeless tires, thru axles, and di2 shifting-oh the horror! this must give you old heads DBDS (disc brake derangement syndrome)
disc brakes allow for more tire clearance? don't wear out rims from friction? better modulation? quieter, especially with carbon rims?
rim brakes work fine and I have them on the front of my vintage frame fixie.
get the bike you like and want to ride, even if it. has 3 wheels.
You can ride anything that the business can sell you. Disk brakes do not have "better modulation" than regular rim brakes. I won't argue that your rims will last longer if you won't argue that you're going to spend a hell of a lot more time replacing the disk pads. And the light weight disks wear out pretty rapidly. Though you are correct that it saves your $5,000 carbon wheels from wearing out from braking on the rims.
You have seen that changing a "through axle" on race bikes is so slow that the team car simple gives racers a new bike and changes the wheels later. The reason that through axles are necessary is because with a rim brake the force of stopping is at the fork crown/head tube whereas with a disk brake the stopping force is all at the axle. That makes the entire fork a lever capable of breaking. I don't think that normal 8 mm axles would break but the manufacturers certainly must be getting worried to put in 10 mm axles (25% larger) with a wrap-around locking mechanism.
There are plenty of reasons to use improving technology. BB30 cranks are narrower and if the BB is properly made and you use sealed ceramic bearings they will damn near last forever. With the narrower base you can be more efficient with your pedal stroke.
On a car or truck you have POWER braking systems completely with a fluid reservoir so that you can have very deep brake pads and as they wear down the fluid levels are renewed automatically. You don't have that on a bike so any wear on the brake pad shows up as level pull. It doesn't take long for the brake to bottom out against the bar. So you replace the pad to bring everything back to normal. Plus disk brakes have a hell of a lot more aero-drag. The TT bikes ALL use rim brakes.
Using tubeless tires has been an eye-opener to me. Wider, softer tires ride so much better that the old high pressure race tires we used to use seem silly now. The race teams are using tube tires instead of tubular and they are 26-27 mm wide. They are still getting a lot of flats because they are using those super low rolling resistance cotton ply tires that you could puncture with an evil look.
The long and the sort of it is that there are advances that are made to make the product better and others that aren't advances - only changes to help sell a new and "better" product. I have a couple of CX/gravel bikes and there is no question that good V-brakes have MUCH better modulation and only fractionally less power. And they don't squeal.
#145
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 2,900
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Basso Loto, Pinarello Stelvio, Redline Cyclocross
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I just went to see what tires I could fit on my road bike. I'm comfortable riding 28c road tires on fine gravel but Cycle Oregon is offering one of its gravel options this year where the stones are 1 to 2". It looked like I could get a 38c Pasela on the front. Fully expecting to have to deflate the tire, I went for it. Throwing the caliper release off was not quite enough. But popping the Tektro (Cane Creek? - I forget which this bike has) lever release and I had clearances to spare. Lots. And this on on pretty skinny rims, ~20 mm outside width. I suspect a 45c would go in inflated. The calipers are simply Shimano Ultergra? 105?. I picked them up used and never learned the model.
Now I do have a feature that helps clearance although that was never considered when I did it. My levers are road V-brake. Less leverage, more cable travel so they sit further off the rim. (V-brake levers to get the bigger, more comfortable hoods and drop the power for more predictable braking on mountain descents. I love e'm.)
Ben
Now I do have a feature that helps clearance although that was never considered when I did it. My levers are road V-brake. Less leverage, more cable travel so they sit further off the rim. (V-brake levers to get the bigger, more comfortable hoods and drop the power for more predictable braking on mountain descents. I love e'm.)
Ben
#147
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 2,900
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Basso Loto, Pinarello Stelvio, Redline Cyclocross
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
LOL, I just remembered my 2004 Civic has drum brakes in the rear ... and a 5-speed stick.
But hey ... they don't use rim brakes on helicopters, so that proves .... well ....
Disc brakes offer nothing, it is true. I have discs on the front of my Honda and on two bikes and on all four wheels of two Toyotas ... and never in my life have any of those brake discs offered me a thing. Not even on my birthday or during the winter holidays.
On another hand, the rest of my bikes have rim brakes ... not even a card on my birthday. What a bunch of selfish ingrates.
But hey ... they don't use rim brakes on helicopters, so that proves .... well ....
Disc brakes offer nothing, it is true. I have discs on the front of my Honda and on two bikes and on all four wheels of two Toyotas ... and never in my life have any of those brake discs offered me a thing. Not even on my birthday or during the winter holidays.
On another hand, the rest of my bikes have rim brakes ... not even a card on my birthday. What a bunch of selfish ingrates.
I suspect that you are not an engineer or what I said would have been pretty plain to you the first time I said it. And if you are an engineer please tell me where you work so I could completely avoid your designs.
#148
faster downhill
You can ride anything that the business can sell you. Disk brakes do not have "better modulation" than regular rim brakes. I won't argue that your rims will last longer if you won't argue that you're going to spend a hell of a lot more time replacing the disk pads. And the light weight disks wear out pretty rapidly. Though you are correct that it saves your $5,000 carbon wheels from wearing out from braking on the rims.
You have seen that changing a "through axle" on race bikes is so slow that the team car simple gives racers a new bike and changes the wheels later. The reason that through axles are necessary is because with a rim brake the force of stopping is at the fork crown/head tube whereas with a disk brake the stopping force is all at the axle. That makes the entire fork a lever capable of breaking. I don't think that normal 8 mm axles would break but the manufacturers certainly must be getting worried to put in 10 mm axles (25% larger) with a wrap-around locking mechanism.
There are plenty of reasons to use improving technology. BB30 cranks are narrower and if the BB is properly made and you use sealed ceramic bearings they will damn near last forever. With the narrower base you can be more efficient with your pedal stroke.
On a car or truck you have POWER braking systems completely with a fluid reservoir so that you can have very deep brake pads and as they wear down the fluid levels are renewed automatically. You don't have that on a bike so any wear on the brake pad shows up as level pull. It doesn't take long for the brake to bottom out against the bar. So you replace the pad to bring everything back to normal. Plus disk brakes have a hell of a lot more aero-drag. The TT bikes ALL use rim brakes.
Using tubeless tires has been an eye-opener to me. Wider, softer tires ride so much better that the old high pressure race tires we used to use seem silly now. The race teams are using tube tires instead of tubular and they are 26-27 mm wide. They are still getting a lot of flats because they are using those super low rolling resistance cotton ply tires that you could puncture with an evil look.
The long and the sort of it is that there are advances that are made to make the product better and others that aren't advances - only changes to help sell a new and "better" product. I have a couple of CX/gravel bikes and there is no question that good V-brakes have MUCH better modulation and only fractionally less power. And they don't squeal.
You have seen that changing a "through axle" on race bikes is so slow that the team car simple gives racers a new bike and changes the wheels later. The reason that through axles are necessary is because with a rim brake the force of stopping is at the fork crown/head tube whereas with a disk brake the stopping force is all at the axle. That makes the entire fork a lever capable of breaking. I don't think that normal 8 mm axles would break but the manufacturers certainly must be getting worried to put in 10 mm axles (25% larger) with a wrap-around locking mechanism.
There are plenty of reasons to use improving technology. BB30 cranks are narrower and if the BB is properly made and you use sealed ceramic bearings they will damn near last forever. With the narrower base you can be more efficient with your pedal stroke.
On a car or truck you have POWER braking systems completely with a fluid reservoir so that you can have very deep brake pads and as they wear down the fluid levels are renewed automatically. You don't have that on a bike so any wear on the brake pad shows up as level pull. It doesn't take long for the brake to bottom out against the bar. So you replace the pad to bring everything back to normal. Plus disk brakes have a hell of a lot more aero-drag. The TT bikes ALL use rim brakes.
Using tubeless tires has been an eye-opener to me. Wider, softer tires ride so much better that the old high pressure race tires we used to use seem silly now. The race teams are using tube tires instead of tubular and they are 26-27 mm wide. They are still getting a lot of flats because they are using those super low rolling resistance cotton ply tires that you could puncture with an evil look.
The long and the sort of it is that there are advances that are made to make the product better and others that aren't advances - only changes to help sell a new and "better" product. I have a couple of CX/gravel bikes and there is no question that good V-brakes have MUCH better modulation and only fractionally less power. And they don't squeal.
wow, that was a strange screed. you are way smarter than me, obviously, but I change my disc brake pads in about 3 minutes and I've found they last about 3k miles. I'm not too concerned about the extra second it takes me to remove my thru-axle. I've never had to replace brake pads due to brake levers bottoming out, I've only ever had to replace them due to being worn out. I'm not worried about the fraction of a watt that disc brakes may consume due to aero drag? I love my tubeless tires and even run them on my road bikes. It appears you have limited experience with disc brakes. I love them, but ride what you want.
we better call the NIMH because DBDS is taking hold
Likes For superpletch:
#149
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 2,900
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Basso Loto, Pinarello Stelvio, Redline Cyclocross
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
wow, that was a strange screed. you are way smarter than me, obviously, but I change my disc brake pads in about 3 minutes and I've found they last about 3k miles. I'm not too concerned about the extra second it takes me to remove my thru-axle. I've never had to replace brake pads due to brake levers bottoming out, I've only ever had to replace them due to being worn out. I'm not worried about the fraction of a watt that disc brakes may consume due to aero drag? I love my tubeless tires and even run them on my road bikes. It appears you have limited experience with disc brakes. I love them, but ride what you want.
we better call the NIMH because DBDS is taking hold
we better call the NIMH because DBDS is taking hold
I couldn't say how you can go 3,000 miles without the lever bottoming out but then I ride a LOT of hills. At the moment I almost have 100,000 ft of climbing this years in almost 3,000 miles. I missed out on several months of riding with eye surgery, dental work and then a month of rain. So I'm way behind. I rode the disk bike maybe 200 miles and had to replace the pads. Of course that is some pretty dramatic trails with up to 24% climbs and over 30% drops. Since a CX bike doesn't have any suspension you have to charge through a lot of stuff and grab a real handful of brakes before the next turn to do it all again. Maybe a disk road bike doesn't wear as fast. I don't wear out my rims or pads on the road bikes.
#150
Cycleway town
When disc brakes fail through heat build up from heavy braking, they fail to a mode of not working. With the exception of carbon rims, rim brakes don't fail from heavy braking. When heavily loaded, going down big hills you do have to think about what is happening with discs and heat. You don't with rim brakes. I still like my discs and I'm not taking them off my bike, but they are only on there because I scored them cheap as part of a package deal.
Again, pads. And discs. Its not fair to compare the best rim brakes to small/budget/resin disc set-ups.
Also, the wet... enough said.
My bike would be hopeless on rims.
Likes For MikeyMK: