Light interfering with computer
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Light interfering with computer
Hi All
I recently bought a Niterider Lumina 750 which, on the whole, I'm quite pleased with. However, I've had to move my CatEye cordless computer as the Lumina is obviously outputting some RF interference which stops the computer working if it's too close. I can now use the Lumina on low, medium or high but not flashing. I have other lights, including a dirt cheap Nestling light bought from Amazon, which don't exhibit this behaviour so I was a little disappointed.
I emailed NiteRider about this and received the following response:
'That behavior is to be expected. It all has to do with how hard the LED itself is being driven. Companies like Nestling don't drive their LEDs nearly as hard as we do which is why our lights produce their true advertised lumen ratings.'
I have a strong suspicion that this is tosh but since my background is with software rather than hardware can someone who is more knowledgeable on these things comment?
Thanks
John
I recently bought a Niterider Lumina 750 which, on the whole, I'm quite pleased with. However, I've had to move my CatEye cordless computer as the Lumina is obviously outputting some RF interference which stops the computer working if it's too close. I can now use the Lumina on low, medium or high but not flashing. I have other lights, including a dirt cheap Nestling light bought from Amazon, which don't exhibit this behaviour so I was a little disappointed.
I emailed NiteRider about this and received the following response:
'That behavior is to be expected. It all has to do with how hard the LED itself is being driven. Companies like Nestling don't drive their LEDs nearly as hard as we do which is why our lights produce their true advertised lumen ratings.'
I have a strong suspicion that this is tosh but since my background is with software rather than hardware can someone who is more knowledgeable on these things comment?
Thanks
John
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,138
Bikes: 2 many
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1266 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
169 Posts
What they say is correct. A corded computer may work. It works with my 2400 lumen light, on many different bikes, that have different kinds of computers on them.
#3
Bad example
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,066
Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 825 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
95 Posts
I have found that my dynamo-powered lights do not cause problems with wireless computers, and Cateye Padrone computers seem to be immune to flashing lights.
#4
Senior Member
It's possible the PWM brightness regulation is cause of the interferences.
A light without PWM, less electronics or a metal housing/case could reduce the interferences to you wireless computer.
A light without PWM, less electronics or a metal housing/case could reduce the interferences to you wireless computer.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18373 Post(s)
Liked 4,508 Times
in
3,351 Posts
It sounds like the company knows of the issues.
They likely need better shielding for their electronics, and eventually will be forced by complaints to update their hardware, but not necessarily recall old hardware.
I thought the FCC regulated radio interference of consumer electronics, but perhaps it is limited to licensed radio bands, and not unlicensed bands. Nonetheless, you could test to see if your device interferes with radio or TV.
Does the packaging include FCC certification... or is it a different certification?
Personally, I can't stand flashing headlights, and use them very infrequently.
Have you tried installing the light elsewhere? Moving it above or below the bars? Helmet?
They likely need better shielding for their electronics, and eventually will be forced by complaints to update their hardware, but not necessarily recall old hardware.
I thought the FCC regulated radio interference of consumer electronics, but perhaps it is limited to licensed radio bands, and not unlicensed bands. Nonetheless, you could test to see if your device interferes with radio or TV.
Does the packaging include FCC certification... or is it a different certification?
Personally, I can't stand flashing headlights, and use them very infrequently.
Have you tried installing the light elsewhere? Moving it above or below the bars? Helmet?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
I did not know my Dinotte 600L was using pulse width modulation for the lower settings until the first time I rode at night in snow.
On the 25% and 50% settings it generates a really cool strobe effect with the trails of the snowflakes alternately appearing/disappearing.
Last edited by Shimagnolo; 01-29-18 at 11:37 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,901
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,928 Times
in
1,210 Posts
Time for the tinfoil brigade to make an appearance...
Have you considered wrapping the light in aluminum foil? That might provide enough shielding to keep your computer working.
Have you considered wrapping the light in aluminum foil? That might provide enough shielding to keep your computer working.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: N. California
Posts: 158
Bikes: Trek Emonda SL6, Santa Cruz Tallboy 27.5+
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
6 Posts
Consumer expectation or design parameter fail?
My Planet Bike Blaze two watt LED headlamp & Bontrager Node 2.1 bike computer did not play well together. The computer froze every ride with the light on. Moving them farther apart did not solve anything, different lights did.
I moved on to a Bontrager ION 700 and later obtained a Cateye Volt 1200. Individually or in combination, these plus a Design Shine 500 lumen taillight caused no problems for the Node at all.
This month I added Stages power & replaced the Node with an Elemnt Bolt. So far I've rode 399 miles with these during daylight. All with the ION 700 on hi-intensity strobe & the DS500 on either EMS flash or at a lower intensity for overcast days. My expectations are met. It all works well.
I moved on to a Bontrager ION 700 and later obtained a Cateye Volt 1200. Individually or in combination, these plus a Design Shine 500 lumen taillight caused no problems for the Node at all.
This month I added Stages power & replaced the Node with an Elemnt Bolt. So far I've rode 399 miles with these during daylight. All with the ION 700 on hi-intensity strobe & the DS500 on either EMS flash or at a lower intensity for overcast days. My expectations are met. It all works well.
Last edited by BarryVee; 01-29-18 at 11:45 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
....
I emailed NiteRider about this and received the following response:
'That behavior is to be expected. It all has to do with how hard the LED itself is being driven. Companies like Nestling don't drive their LEDs nearly as hard as we do which is why our lights produce their true advertised lumen ratings.'
I have a strong suspicion that this is tosh but since my background is with software rather than hardware can someone who is more knowledgeable on these things comment?
Thanks
John
I emailed NiteRider about this and received the following response:
'That behavior is to be expected. It all has to do with how hard the LED itself is being driven. Companies like Nestling don't drive their LEDs nearly as hard as we do which is why our lights produce their true advertised lumen ratings.'
I have a strong suspicion that this is tosh but since my background is with software rather than hardware can someone who is more knowledgeable on these things comment?
Thanks
John
The regulations in the US are relatively loose for consumer products. The EU, though, tends to be a bit more strict.
Did you have any particular questions about the interference problem?
Steve in Peoria
#13
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,516
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4350 Post(s)
Liked 3,989 Times
in
2,663 Posts
You certainly wouldn't want to flash a white light in someone's eyes so they cannot see, that doesn't work well. Red lights are fine on the human eyes especially at night and don't ruin our night vision but white light isn't.
As long as the light is working as a solid light I wouldn't worry. Certainly if you are having issues you could get a wired computer which is going to generally be more reliable everywhere anyway. Wireless is great for looks but a wired computer is great for reliability as it is not effected by anything.
As long as the light is working as a solid light I wouldn't worry. Certainly if you are having issues you could get a wired computer which is going to generally be more reliable everywhere anyway. Wireless is great for looks but a wired computer is great for reliability as it is not effected by anything.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
A lot of responses - thank you all for your thoughts.
I used to have a corded computer on this bike but it failed a little while back. It's actually getting quite hard to decent ones here and I didn't really want to get a cordless one as they are less reliable and more expensive. On the other hand I like CatEye computers, having used them for years and didn't really want to get a different make. I have a Sigma computer on my Brompton and it really annoys me. I might have a change around as I have a bike I want to sell that currently has a CatEye corded computer on it.
CliffordK: The light appears to made from metal so I was suprised that this didn't appear to offer enough shielding. I can't see any FCC certification on the packaging. Yes, I tried moving the light around. Currently the light and computer are about as far apart as I can make them without putting the light on my helmet - which I don't really want to do. I like to use a flashing light for daylight riding.
Steelbikeguy: I'm not sure that there's anything much I want to do. If I was a bit more knowledgeable I might ask how I could modify the circuit to reduce RF interference but I don't think I feel quite up to that. I'm just a bit frustrated. I have an old Lupine Tesla that exhibits the same issue. I replaced it because the battery is dying and things have moved on so far in the last few years that it's cheaper to get a new light of the same power than to replace the battery. I was rather hoping that a new light wouldn't interfere and I can't help feeling that if NiteRider designed the light better there wouldn't be a problem.
Incidentally, I have a Garmin Edge that doesn't seem to have any problem picking up the signal from the sender mounted much further away, which I find a bit odd.
I used to have a corded computer on this bike but it failed a little while back. It's actually getting quite hard to decent ones here and I didn't really want to get a cordless one as they are less reliable and more expensive. On the other hand I like CatEye computers, having used them for years and didn't really want to get a different make. I have a Sigma computer on my Brompton and it really annoys me. I might have a change around as I have a bike I want to sell that currently has a CatEye corded computer on it.
CliffordK: The light appears to made from metal so I was suprised that this didn't appear to offer enough shielding. I can't see any FCC certification on the packaging. Yes, I tried moving the light around. Currently the light and computer are about as far apart as I can make them without putting the light on my helmet - which I don't really want to do. I like to use a flashing light for daylight riding.
Steelbikeguy: I'm not sure that there's anything much I want to do. If I was a bit more knowledgeable I might ask how I could modify the circuit to reduce RF interference but I don't think I feel quite up to that. I'm just a bit frustrated. I have an old Lupine Tesla that exhibits the same issue. I replaced it because the battery is dying and things have moved on so far in the last few years that it's cheaper to get a new light of the same power than to replace the battery. I was rather hoping that a new light wouldn't interfere and I can't help feeling that if NiteRider designed the light better there wouldn't be a problem.
Incidentally, I have a Garmin Edge that doesn't seem to have any problem picking up the signal from the sender mounted much further away, which I find a bit odd.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,138
Bikes: 2 many
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1266 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
169 Posts
A lot of responses - thank you all for your thoughts.
I used to have a corded computer on this bike but it failed a little while back. It's actually getting quite hard to decent ones here and I didn't really want to get a cordless one as they are less reliable and more expensive. On the other hand I like CatEye computers, having used them for years and didn't really want to get a different make. I have a Sigma computer on my Brompton and it really annoys me. I might have a change around as I have a bike I want to sell that currently has a CatEye corded computer on it.
CliffordK: The light appears to made from metal so I was suprised that this didn't appear to offer enough shielding. I can't see any FCC certification on the packaging. Yes, I tried moving the light around. Currently the light and computer are about as far apart as I can make them without putting the light on my helmet - which I don't really want to do. I like to use a flashing light for daylight riding.
Steelbikeguy: I'm not sure that there's anything much I want to do. If I was a bit more knowledgeable I might ask how I could modify the circuit to reduce RF interference but I don't think I feel quite up to that. I'm just a bit frustrated. I have an old Lupine Tesla that exhibits the same issue. I replaced it because the battery is dying and things have moved on so far in the last few years that it's cheaper to get a new light of the same power than to replace the battery. I was rather hoping that a new light wouldn't interfere and I can't help feeling that if NiteRider designed the light better there wouldn't be a problem.
Incidentally, I have a Garmin Edge that doesn't seem to have any problem picking up the signal from the sender mounted much further away, which I find a bit odd.
I used to have a corded computer on this bike but it failed a little while back. It's actually getting quite hard to decent ones here and I didn't really want to get a cordless one as they are less reliable and more expensive. On the other hand I like CatEye computers, having used them for years and didn't really want to get a different make. I have a Sigma computer on my Brompton and it really annoys me. I might have a change around as I have a bike I want to sell that currently has a CatEye corded computer on it.
CliffordK: The light appears to made from metal so I was suprised that this didn't appear to offer enough shielding. I can't see any FCC certification on the packaging. Yes, I tried moving the light around. Currently the light and computer are about as far apart as I can make them without putting the light on my helmet - which I don't really want to do. I like to use a flashing light for daylight riding.
Steelbikeguy: I'm not sure that there's anything much I want to do. If I was a bit more knowledgeable I might ask how I could modify the circuit to reduce RF interference but I don't think I feel quite up to that. I'm just a bit frustrated. I have an old Lupine Tesla that exhibits the same issue. I replaced it because the battery is dying and things have moved on so far in the last few years that it's cheaper to get a new light of the same power than to replace the battery. I was rather hoping that a new light wouldn't interfere and I can't help feeling that if NiteRider designed the light better there wouldn't be a problem.
Incidentally, I have a Garmin Edge that doesn't seem to have any problem picking up the signal from the sender mounted much further away, which I find a bit odd.
Corded bike computers are much more reliable than wireless.
Ii think the aluminum foil goes on your head!
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
A lot of responses - thank you all for your thoughts.
......
Steelbikeguy: I'm not sure that there's anything much I want to do. If I was a bit more knowledgeable I might ask how I could modify the circuit to reduce RF interference but I don't think I feel quite up to that. I'm just a bit frustrated. I have an old Lupine Tesla that exhibits the same issue. I replaced it because the battery is dying and things have moved on so far in the last few years that it's cheaper to get a new light of the same power than to replace the battery. I was rather hoping that a new light wouldn't interfere and I can't help feeling that if NiteRider designed the light better there wouldn't be a problem.
Incidentally, I have a Garmin Edge that doesn't seem to have any problem picking up the signal from the sender mounted much further away, which I find a bit odd.
......
Steelbikeguy: I'm not sure that there's anything much I want to do. If I was a bit more knowledgeable I might ask how I could modify the circuit to reduce RF interference but I don't think I feel quite up to that. I'm just a bit frustrated. I have an old Lupine Tesla that exhibits the same issue. I replaced it because the battery is dying and things have moved on so far in the last few years that it's cheaper to get a new light of the same power than to replace the battery. I was rather hoping that a new light wouldn't interfere and I can't help feeling that if NiteRider designed the light better there wouldn't be a problem.
Incidentally, I have a Garmin Edge that doesn't seem to have any problem picking up the signal from the sender mounted much further away, which I find a bit odd.
Adding a metallic shield or a common mode choke is fairly hit or miss, even when you know what you are doing, despite being much easier than circuit modification. The most reliable modification is usually to increase the distance between the light and its cable and the bike computer.
The best (and most obvious) solution is to replace the offending headlight with something else. It would be good to contact the manufacturer of any light under consideration, and ask them about what they do to prevent their lights from interfering with wireless computers. If they mention that they run EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) tests to measure radiated emissions, that is a good sign. If they simply run tests to see if their lights interfere with a variety of wireless computers, that would also be a good sign. If they give the same sort of nonsense answer that you got.. "all lights do this", then stay away!
Steve in Peoria
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,901
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,928 Times
in
1,210 Posts
I used to have a corded computer on this bike but it failed a little while back. It's actually getting quite hard to decent ones here and I didn't really want to get a cordless one as they are less reliable and more expensive. On the other hand I like CatEye computers, having used them for years and didn't really want to get a different make. I have a Sigma computer on my Brompton and it really annoys me. I might have a change around as I have a bike I want to sell that currently has a CatEye corded computer on it.
It's still possible to find good wired computers. I think Cateye makes at least 2-3 models. You might have to order one if your LBS doesn't carry them.
I finally gave up on a 14-15 year old wired computer last fall. I wish I had known to use dielectric grease on the contacts back then, it might still be working. With the dielectric grease, my other bike's Cateye is still working after 11 years. That's pretty reliable, in my book.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I finally gave up on a 14-15 year old wired computer last fall. I wish I had known to use dielectric grease on the contacts back then, it might still be working. With the dielectric grease, my other bike's Cateye is still working after 11 years. That's pretty reliable, in my book.
I think the one that failed was an Enduro 8. Anyhow, got another of those on my recumbent which I'm planning to sell this year so I'll probably have a swap around and put the Sigma computer on the recumbent before it goes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Solo44
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
3
11-04-13 12:31 PM
Curbendo
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
12
10-10-11 05:33 PM
Fleet59
Road Cycling
2
03-28-11 06:46 AM