Obsessing over weight
#126
Senior Member
#127
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,452
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,448 Times
in
1,822 Posts
#131
Senior Member
#132
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
As far as I know and I'll take that as a vote of confidence . And I think I would know if the heavy single speed did that, because I once commuted for two weeks with a worn out Huffy and I think it did make me psychologically slower. Hating your own bike will do that.
#133
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,569
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1102 Post(s)
Liked 2,135 Times
in
1,440 Posts
These threads always end up after some finger pointing with statements like
"people can spend their money on anything they like - it's their money....BUT, some people have foolish notions and I need to tell them they are wasting their money"
"people can spend their money on anything they like - it's their money....BUT, some people have foolish notions and I need to tell them they are wasting their money"
#134
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,452
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,448 Times
in
1,822 Posts
There are people who agree with me ... and there are the rest of the people, who are wrong.
#135
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,569
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1102 Post(s)
Liked 2,135 Times
in
1,440 Posts
Haha. There you go. Four months on BF and you're a seasoned pro.
#138
Aluminium Crusader :-)
Another one: guys who don't use bar tape to cut weight, or don't tape the drops because they rarely use them. That might cut 20g.
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,452
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,448 Times
in
1,822 Posts
That's not to cut weight... the bare bars are more aero than the tape. Less drag. I sandpaper the words off my tire sidewalls for the same purpose. Serious cyclists seek that edge.
#142
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1096 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I say that only half in jest, because the whole point of Art with a capital A is to make one a better person in some way. And the extent to which the work causes this (it isn't in ones head, it's the purpose of the work) is what makes it Art. Otherwise it's only decoration and amusement, if not clutter and noise. That said, there are bankers who hang a Picasso above their desk just to look smart in the same way there are dentists who ride Lightweights just to look fast. But that doesn't mean either can't be put to better use and effect by people who understand and appreciate them better.
#143
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I was not aware of that point of Art and can't find it in a definition. I indicated in my prior post ",unless you think it does" that aspect you post about. No doubt lighter makes some faster.
But actually the Full Definition of art fits better than I though to obsessing about weight.
Art | Definition of Art by Merriam-Webster
But actually the Full Definition of art fits better than I though to obsessing about weight.
Art | Definition of Art by Merriam-Webster
- 1: skill acquired by experience, study, or observation <the art of making friends>
- 2a : a branch of learning: (1) : one of the humanities (2) plural : liberal artsb archaic : learning, scholarship
- 3: an occupation requiring knowledge or skill <the art of organ building>
- 4a : the conscious use of skill and creative imagination especially in the production of aesthetic objects; also : works so producedb (1) : fine arts (2) : one of the fine arts (3) : a graphic art
- 5a archaic : a skillful planb : the quality or state of being artful
- 6: decorative or illustrative elements in printed matter
#144
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Here is some of the stuff I do to my son's bike:
120g cassette
Carbon Fiber bottle cages with alloy bolts.
35g skewers
Silk tires without coating on the sidewall
Raw shell for seat - no cover, light tape, partially wrap bars, Cordz cables
120g cassette
Carbon Fiber bottle cages with alloy bolts.
35g skewers
Silk tires without coating on the sidewall
Raw shell for seat - no cover, light tape, partially wrap bars, Cordz cables
#145
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
This is good:WANKMEISTER: DOES WEIGHT MATTER? - Peloton Magazine
...
To sum it up, Gourley wants you to believe that bike weight doesn’t really matter. He proves this by taking out his calculator and plugging in some numbers, assuming identical rider weight and an identical steady grade. Air resistance, we’re told, isn’t factored in. That’s so we can have a model that is as far from reality as those triathlon outfits are from attractive.
What he “discovers” in his windless lab where everyone rides along at the same power output is that a one-pound weight advantage only gives you a 2.5 second advantage in his fantasy lab setting. And who doesn’t race in a laboratory?
...
...
To sum it up, Gourley wants you to believe that bike weight doesn’t really matter. He proves this by taking out his calculator and plugging in some numbers, assuming identical rider weight and an identical steady grade. Air resistance, we’re told, isn’t factored in. That’s so we can have a model that is as far from reality as those triathlon outfits are from attractive.
What he “discovers” in his windless lab where everyone rides along at the same power output is that a one-pound weight advantage only gives you a 2.5 second advantage in his fantasy lab setting. And who doesn’t race in a laboratory?
...
#146
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
This is good:WANKMEISTER: DOES WEIGHT MATTER? - Peloton Magazine
... a model that is as far from reality as those triathlon outfits are from attractive.
...
... a model that is as far from reality as those triathlon outfits are from attractive.
...
In other words, riding the same race the same way, but calculated with 3 pounds heavier, what does that do to the 1-sec power, 10 second and so on for that race? I wouldn't be surprised if it throws it off beyond the rider's ability at some point in the profile, and that would be significant.
#147
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I know this isn't the racing forum. So I also don't exactly know what "matters" means. If it means will more weight make you slower, then yes. But that may not matter at all.
I have essentially done what you ask over the years for my son - same TT course, same road races - but the rider of course varies. Anyway doing all my silly stuff he has had wins that amount to 1.6sec. I can attribute that to the silly stuff I did. For junior racing, that did matter. For non racing, again, I don't know.
I have essentially done what you ask over the years for my son - same TT course, same road races - but the rider of course varies. Anyway doing all my silly stuff he has had wins that amount to 1.6sec. I can attribute that to the silly stuff I did. For junior racing, that did matter. For non racing, again, I don't know.
#148
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,452
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,448 Times
in
1,822 Posts
What's racing got to do with it? if "racing" was the primary criterion, three-quarters of all cyclists would be excluded, and then, if we tried to set a scale of how "serious" the racers were ... And does the master wanker not read results on time trials, where 2.5 seconds might be the gap from first to third?
Speaking of "serious" ... Seriously, Doge, when are you going to get serious? Bottle cages with bolts? Make him carry the bottle in his jersey, or better still in his shorts (lower center of gravity.) "Serious" racers aren't going to let themselves be slowed by the weight of alloy cage bolts.
Speaking of "serious" ... Seriously, Doge, when are you going to get serious? Bottle cages with bolts? Make him carry the bottle in his jersey, or better still in his shorts (lower center of gravity.) "Serious" racers aren't going to let themselves be slowed by the weight of alloy cage bolts.
#149
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
What's racing got to do with it? if "racing" was the primary criterion, three-quarters of all cyclists would be excluded, and then, if we tried to set a scale of how "serious" the racers were ... And does the master wanker not read results on time trials, where 2.5 seconds might be the gap from first to third?
Speaking of "serious" ... Seriously, Doge, when are you going to get serious? Bottle cages with bolts? Make him carry the bottle in his jersey, or better still in his shorts (lower center of gravity.) "Serious" racers aren't going to let themselves be slowed by the weight of alloy cage bolts.
Speaking of "serious" ... Seriously, Doge, when are you going to get serious? Bottle cages with bolts? Make him carry the bottle in his jersey, or better still in his shorts (lower center of gravity.) "Serious" racers aren't going to let themselves be slowed by the weight of alloy cage bolts.
I've actually been thinking of re-visiting the optimal "aero" placement of bottles, since I noticed the other day that Cervelo's wind tunnel suggests between the aerobars (and not on the frame DT or ST, either of which is better than the "tri" behind the saddle). Since I don't have an aerobar, and there are a few other places to try it. Commuters and weekend warriors need to optimize things to you know.
Just to be contrary, half a million USA Triathlon members plus 477,000 one-day members, vs 750,000 bike commuters (US Census) perhaps puts the racers in the majority. If we're excluding the millions who rode "at least once" in a year, and I think it's a given that most of them don't care much about weight.
#150
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Your quote of me was a quote from the article, that I pasted. I think MW was saying 2.5 matters a lot - in a race.
For non-racing, does going faster matter? I don't know what racing has to do with it except road riders tend to use the stuff racers do. I live next to the Pacific Coast Bike trails so I saw an eliptigo today and there are always a few recumbents around, but the majority of non-racers are on racing bikes/or those you could race. If I, my son, or my ride the Townie around people act as if we are not roadies (or looking at me, but whatever).
So for non-racing - does it matter? Well only if going faster matters.
And having just serviced my car with 185K miles on it (going for 300K), some things are not about practicality - and cost more than alloy bolts. I just want to get 300K on the car and I just want sub 14# race bikes (unless they are weighing them).
For non-racing, does going faster matter? I don't know what racing has to do with it except road riders tend to use the stuff racers do. I live next to the Pacific Coast Bike trails so I saw an eliptigo today and there are always a few recumbents around, but the majority of non-racers are on racing bikes/or those you could race. If I, my son, or my ride the Townie around people act as if we are not roadies (or looking at me, but whatever).
So for non-racing - does it matter? Well only if going faster matters.
And having just serviced my car with 185K miles on it (going for 300K), some things are not about practicality - and cost more than alloy bolts. I just want to get 300K on the car and I just want sub 14# race bikes (unless they are weighing them).