So Lance was doping after all
#1
Hiracer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 460
Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, Bacchetta Strada, Diamondback MTB, Lemond Sarthe DF
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So Lance was doping after all
Beta-CHG is a hormone that is produced naturally by the body when the body has testicular cancer. It also happens to be a banned substance and one tested by the various sport organizations, including the UCI.
Several professional athletes have tested positive for Beta-CHG, professed their innocence, and later were proven to have been innocent because they were diagnosed with testicular cancer. The testing may have saved their lives because of the early detection of the cancer.
Lance was tested by the UCI several times during the period in which he had testicular cancer. He did not test positive for beta-CHG. Not even once.
He never sued the UCI for negligence. In fact, he never even castigated them for failing to find beta-CHG, a finding that would have greatly helped prevent his cancer from developing to the near fatal stage that it did.
This repeated failure to detect beta-CHG makes no sense whatsoever unless Lance was doping.
I learned this factoid from Walsh's most recent book. I went on the internet and confirmed that beta-CHG is, in fact, routinely tested to determine whether a man has testicular cancer.
This is the evidence that has changed my mind about Lance. It's just not possible that several of these tests would all have failed to catch beta-CHG, unless he was somehow diluting or cleansing his blood before the dope tests.
This guy has fooled most of the world, and got rich by cheating.
Several professional athletes have tested positive for Beta-CHG, professed their innocence, and later were proven to have been innocent because they were diagnosed with testicular cancer. The testing may have saved their lives because of the early detection of the cancer.
Lance was tested by the UCI several times during the period in which he had testicular cancer. He did not test positive for beta-CHG. Not even once.
He never sued the UCI for negligence. In fact, he never even castigated them for failing to find beta-CHG, a finding that would have greatly helped prevent his cancer from developing to the near fatal stage that it did.
This repeated failure to detect beta-CHG makes no sense whatsoever unless Lance was doping.
I learned this factoid from Walsh's most recent book. I went on the internet and confirmed that beta-CHG is, in fact, routinely tested to determine whether a man has testicular cancer.
This is the evidence that has changed my mind about Lance. It's just not possible that several of these tests would all have failed to catch beta-CHG, unless he was somehow diluting or cleansing his blood before the dope tests.
This guy has fooled most of the world, and got rich by cheating.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,162
Bikes: Litespeed Firenze / GT Avalanche
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yes, anything written in a book is the truth.
Hey, did you read about the Martian base on the moon? There is a book on that too. What about the whole civilization living inside the Earth? There a several books on that. They are actually superior beings to us you know.
You had better get off the forum. You have a lot more factoids to read up on.
Hey, did you read about the Martian base on the moon? There is a book on that too. What about the whole civilization living inside the Earth? There a several books on that. They are actually superior beings to us you know.
You had better get off the forum. You have a lot more factoids to read up on.
#7
Powered by Borscht
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 8,342
Bikes: Russian Vodka
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, anything written in a book is the truth.
Hey, did you read about the Martian base on the moon? There is a book on that too. What about the whole civilization living inside the Earth? There a several books on that. They are actually superior beings to us you know.
You had better get off the forum. You have a lot more factoids to read up on.
Hey, did you read about the Martian base on the moon? There is a book on that too. What about the whole civilization living inside the Earth? There a several books on that. They are actually superior beings to us you know.
You had better get off the forum. You have a lot more factoids to read up on.
#8
Perineal Pressurized
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Please explain this bit of logic.
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
#10
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Beta-CHG is a hormone that is produced naturally by the body when the body has testicular cancer. It also happens to be a banned substance and one tested by the various sport organizations, including the UCI.
Several professional athletes have tested positive for Beta-CHG, professed their innocence, and later were proven to have been innocent because they were diagnosed with testicular cancer. The testing may have saved their lives because of the early detection of the cancer.
Lance was tested by the UCI several times during the period in which he had testicular cancer. He did not test positive for beta-CHG. Not even once.
He never sued the UCI for negligence. In fact, he never even castigated them for failing to find beta-CHG, a finding that would have greatly helped prevent his cancer from developing to the near fatal stage that it did.
This repeated failure to detect beta-CHG makes no sense whatsoever unless Lance was doping.
I learned this factoid from Walsh's most recent book. I went on the internet and confirmed that beta-CHG is, in fact, routinely tested to determine whether a man has testicular cancer.
This is the evidence that has changed my mind about Lance. It's just not possible that several of these tests would all have failed to catch beta-CHG, unless he was somehow diluting or cleansing his blood before the dope tests.
This guy has fooled most of the world, and got rich by cheating.
Several professional athletes have tested positive for Beta-CHG, professed their innocence, and later were proven to have been innocent because they were diagnosed with testicular cancer. The testing may have saved their lives because of the early detection of the cancer.
Lance was tested by the UCI several times during the period in which he had testicular cancer. He did not test positive for beta-CHG. Not even once.
He never sued the UCI for negligence. In fact, he never even castigated them for failing to find beta-CHG, a finding that would have greatly helped prevent his cancer from developing to the near fatal stage that it did.
This repeated failure to detect beta-CHG makes no sense whatsoever unless Lance was doping.
I learned this factoid from Walsh's most recent book. I went on the internet and confirmed that beta-CHG is, in fact, routinely tested to determine whether a man has testicular cancer.
This is the evidence that has changed my mind about Lance. It's just not possible that several of these tests would all have failed to catch beta-CHG, unless he was somehow diluting or cleansing his blood before the dope tests.
This guy has fooled most of the world, and got rich by cheating.
#13
Dirt-riding heretic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 17,413
Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Beta-CHG is a hormone that is produced naturally by the body when the body has testicular cancer. It also happens to be a banned substance and one tested by the various sport organizations, including the UCI.
Several professional athletes have tested positive for Beta-CHG, professed their innocence, and later were proven to have been innocent because they were diagnosed with testicular cancer. The testing may have saved their lives because of the early detection of the cancer.
Lance was tested by the UCI several times during the period in which he had testicular cancer. He did not test positive for beta-CHG. Not even once.
He never sued the UCI for negligence. In fact, he never even castigated them for failing to find beta-CHG, a finding that would have greatly helped prevent his cancer from developing to the near fatal stage that it did.
This repeated failure to detect beta-CHG makes no sense whatsoever unless Lance was doping.
I learned this factoid from Walsh's most recent book. I went on the internet and confirmed that beta-CHG is, in fact, routinely tested to determine whether a man has testicular cancer.
This is the evidence that has changed my mind about Lance. It's just not possible that several of these tests would all have failed to catch beta-CHG, unless he was somehow diluting or cleansing his blood before the dope tests.
This guy has fooled most of the world, and got rich by cheating.
Several professional athletes have tested positive for Beta-CHG, professed their innocence, and later were proven to have been innocent because they were diagnosed with testicular cancer. The testing may have saved their lives because of the early detection of the cancer.
Lance was tested by the UCI several times during the period in which he had testicular cancer. He did not test positive for beta-CHG. Not even once.
He never sued the UCI for negligence. In fact, he never even castigated them for failing to find beta-CHG, a finding that would have greatly helped prevent his cancer from developing to the near fatal stage that it did.
This repeated failure to detect beta-CHG makes no sense whatsoever unless Lance was doping.
I learned this factoid from Walsh's most recent book. I went on the internet and confirmed that beta-CHG is, in fact, routinely tested to determine whether a man has testicular cancer.
This is the evidence that has changed my mind about Lance. It's just not possible that several of these tests would all have failed to catch beta-CHG, unless he was somehow diluting or cleansing his blood before the dope tests.
This guy has fooled most of the world, and got rich by cheating.
Normal healthy men don't have any beta-HCG in their bodies. Pregnant women do, and last I checked they're not particularly performance-enhanced.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
#14
Despite all my rage, I am
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,613
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not one of the Lance defenders, and am usually game to any story that rips into him, but that just sounds like a bunch of crap.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do you mean beta-HCG? That's a marker for a certain subtype of cancer (choriocarcinoma) and has no performance enhancing benefit at those levels. Just because it's negative doesn't mean you don't have testicular cancer.
Normal healthy men don't have any beta-HCG in their bodies.
Normal healthy men don't have any beta-HCG in their bodies.
IIRC isn't beta-hcg what's tested for in pregnancies?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 645
Bikes: giant comp2 tcr, giant xtc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do you mean beta-HCG? That's a marker for a certain subtype of cancer (choriocarcinoma) and has no performance enhancing benefit at those levels. Just because it's negative doesn't mean you don't have testicular cancer.
Normal healthy men don't have any beta-HCG in their bodies.
Normal healthy men don't have any beta-HCG in their bodies.
#18
Dirt-riding heretic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 17,413
Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Well, that would be false too. Beta-HCG does not necessarily have to be present at all in testicular cancer.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
#19
Dirt-riding heretic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 17,413
Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
And yes, beta-HCG is present in pregnancy too.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Armstrong was at 52000, 92380, and 109000 according to him(google'd for it). Won't show up in a typical urine drug test though would it? Or would it? Blood test it would.
#23
Hardcore Rider
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 22
Bikes: Trek 1600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
really who cares if he had any thing in his blood its over and done with, besides i would like to see u go through chemotherapy and go ride and finish a tour
#24
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,001
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11969 Post(s)
Liked 6,642 Times
in
3,481 Posts
Troll
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon