How to pace myself?
#51
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
The OP's problem is intensity.
It doesn't matter whether it is on the flats, uphill, downhill, into the wind, with the wind, solo or with a group. He is simply riding too hard.
The OP needs an objective measure of intensity, that's all. A cheap heart rate monitor will do this.
-Tim-
It doesn't matter whether it is on the flats, uphill, downhill, into the wind, with the wind, solo or with a group. He is simply riding too hard.
The OP needs an objective measure of intensity, that's all. A cheap heart rate monitor will do this.
-Tim-
Likes For TimothyH:
#52
Senior Member
Power meters are the gold standard, and best when used with a heart rate monitor, but there's a third system, which is basically just as good but often overlooked: Ratings of perceived exertion or RPE
essentially, internalize a 0-10 list like this (stolen from Joe Friel's Blog):
0 - NOTHING AT ALL
0.5 - VERY, VERY LIGHT
1 - VERY LIGHT
2 - FAIRLY LIGHT
3 - MODERATE
4 - SOMEWHAT HARD
5 - HARD
6
7 - VERY HARD
8
9
10 - VERY VERY HARD (MAXIMAL)
If the hill is a small sharp bump, try the 7-8 range, if you're on a slight downhill try 3, there're are no hard and fast rules to this, but you'd be surprised at how good you are at understanding how hard you can go. FYI, for perspective, I'd consider the zones 5-6 to be barely what you could sustain for an entire hour.
If you need convincing that you can monitor yourself decently as good as a significantly more expensive sensor setup see this and the many other scientific research papers that correlate RPE vs actual zones using heart or heart and power data in control settings: Validity, Reliability, and Application of the Session-RPE Method for Quantifying Training Loads during High Intensity Functional Training
#53
Senior Member
I use a heart rate monitor. I know what I can sustain all day and know where I need to be if I'm trying to get stronger. Seems to be working, not complicated.
#54
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Clearly, the most efficient method is to ride off a very high cliff.
Please don't try this.
Please don't try this.
#55
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Pacing yourself is so easy, that you don't even need a HR monitor or a power meter. I do it instinctively
Likes For wolfchild:
#56
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
Yes, of course ... within reason.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#57
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
This whole thing is going sideways. @Machka was 100% correct about duffing it into headwinds-- a headwind is not a hill, it cannot be defeated. There is no reward. The OP never asked about "power on a TT course" or any other tangential musings. The OP asked how to pace over longer rides for efficiency (which in this case means not wearing yourself down to the nub during a non-competitive ride) and most of the responses have come from pseudo-racers-- answering questions that haven't been asked. "Making up time?" Making up time from what, for what? This is in General, and it's not a race. No one should be talking about racing. Did people mistake that P for an R? Pacing, not racing.
And ... on a long ride, there's a lot more going on that the theoretical numbers produced by calculators. There's a whole psychological thing going on too.
I'm one of the rare people out there who doesn't mind headwinds (within reason) and one of the reasons for that is because I changed my way of tackling them.
Sure I could fight into them and swear at them and expend all my energy forcing my way through ... and be completely exhausted, frustrated and angry 4 hours later. Or I could just relax and pedal at a comfortable pace into the headwinds ... and expend my energy during those moments when I get a break to help ensure my average speed doesn't drop below the 15 km/h minimum. And 4 hours later I still feel all right and able to tackle the next 4 hours of the ride.
I made this discovery during my multitude of long rides in Manitoba where it is flat and windy.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#58
Senior Member
Actually as a recreational rider I would get very bored pacing myself. I'm out to enjoy the ride, Not cover greater distance. And part of that enjoyment sometimes means pedaling hard to go faster. Not to beat a competitor, Not trying to get somewhere faster. But for the shear fun. Other times I just relax and take in the scenery.
They only time pacing plays a role for me is climbing hills and fighting strong wind. And that's why I have 21 gears (11 practical speeds). The key is to pick one that I can sustain to get up the hill or home against the wind. I can climb steep hills and fight strong wind with just a bit more effort than fast cruising when I pick the right one. Sometimes, On a steep hill it means climbing at not much faster then a brisk walk. So be it.
They only time pacing plays a role for me is climbing hills and fighting strong wind. And that's why I have 21 gears (11 practical speeds). The key is to pick one that I can sustain to get up the hill or home against the wind. I can climb steep hills and fight strong wind with just a bit more effort than fast cruising when I pick the right one. Sometimes, On a steep hill it means climbing at not much faster then a brisk walk. So be it.
#59
Senior Member
And ... on a long ride, there's a lot more going on that the theoretical numbers produced by calculators. There's a whole psychological thing going on too.
I'm one of the rare people out there who doesn't mind headwinds (within reason) and one of the reasons for that is because I changed my way of tackling them.
I made this discovery during my multitude of long rides in Manitoba where it is flat and windy.
Also, I get it, from your other posts, you're clearly the type that does multi-hour tours all over the world and have been cycling for many, many, years. You've been under this assumption for quite awhile and no matter how much evidence, "theoretical" numbers, even if I posted my own rides showing variance in technique, you won't believe me. I know it's hard to change your viewpoint, but by all means, do some actual testing and stop relying on anecdotal evidence, so if someone asks a question like this and another person answers with a well reasoned scientific response, you don't immediately tell them, "Actually, you've got it the wrong way round for headwinds. Lots of people do.". I hate to say it, but I'm not the one who's gotten it "the wrong way round".
A better argument would be the case for low PSI 28mm tubeless tires vs high PSI 23mm clinchers. The former will alleviate road buzz thereby saving muscle energy and make cornering more confident so less speed is lost. The later would have better rolling resistance and aerodynamics but cause more fatigue and less confidence. However, the proven benefits and which one is actually faster is still not clear at this time and additional research is still being done.
Last edited by firebird854; 06-07-19 at 07:56 AM.
#60
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
Well ... since I'm the one who is actually out there riding and not just crunching numbers .... ..........
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#62
Senior Member
#63
staring at the mountains
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Castle Pines, CO
Posts: 4,560
Bikes: Obed GVR, Fairdale Goodship, Salsa Timberjack 29
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times
in
112 Posts
I use an HRM to pace because while I can feel when I'm close to threshold, it's harder to feel sub-threshold fluctuations, and it's easy to accidentally be in high Z3 for too long. Without an HRM, I can't stay in Z2 by feel alone. It's a useful tool....