Only one Bike?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,621
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times
in
770 Posts
Go remove the suspension from the car you drive daily and then go drive it on some back roads and get back to me. You might be capable of answering your own question.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,621
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times
in
770 Posts
Or maybe have the best of both worlds and get a full suspension fat.
#28
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I have both, and the idea that a fat bike provides the benefits of a FS bike seems nonsensical to me. They are completely different animals.
Are there some obstacles/tech situations where a rigid fat bike has an advantage? Sure, if the challenge is mostly due to traction (snow, deep leaves, lots of loose rock) and speeds are low. Otherwise, I find an FS bike to be far more competent on rock/rooty/technical terrain. Further, the faster the speed, the less rough it needs to be for the FS bike to outshine the fat bike.
CAN you do rocky/rooty/tech trails on a fat bike? Of course. I do, and it is a blast. But for that matter you can do them on a rigid bike with 2.1" tires. And that is a blast as well (just beats the crap out of me).
Not trying to knock fatties, I recently got one (rigid Wednesday) and love it, but a large part of what I love about it is the added challenge compared to the FS (Turner 5-Spot). And the fact that it is much better suited for the $h!t conditions we have around here 5 months out of the year. (mud, snow, deep leaves) means I get more riding in.
Bottom line is that if I had to vote the FS or the Fattie of the island.... the fat bike would go.
#29
Senior Member
my pug was awesome in the snow. but if the street was plowed at all , then a rigid mtb was fine. for me there werent enough unplowed roads around for the fb.
#30
old and in the way
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Palisade, CO
Posts: 156
Bikes: Niner RLT, Niner rigid MTB, Salsa Beargrease, Rocky Mountain Element
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Even with a smaller wheel/tire, the gearing on my Beargrease is far too limiting for riding at higher (road) speeds. I put a lot of miles on my fatty including snow races and frequently ride it as a second class for cyclocross racing. I really love the bike, but for the only ride, no.
#31
Senior Member
I ride river beds. Rocks, sand, water and have tried both FS and Fat bike. The friend with the FS tried my fatty and after, he said he could not do these rides without a fat bike and I agree with him.
As I've posted before: MTBs are good for single track, fat bikes are good for no track
As I've posted before: MTBs are good for single track, fat bikes are good for no track
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,621
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times
in
770 Posts
I ride river beds. Rocks, sand, water and have tried both FS and Fat bike. The friend with the FS tried my fatty and after, he said he could not do these rides without a fat bike and I agree with him.
As I've posted before: MTBs are good for single track, fat bikes are good for no track
As I've posted before: MTBs are good for single track, fat bikes are good for no track
I'll just chalk it up to you don't know what you don't know.
#33
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
#34
Senior Member
#35
Banned.
Thread Starter
I ride river beds. Rocks, sand, water and have tried both FS and Fat bike. The friend with the FS tried my fatty and after, he said he could not do these rides without a fat bike and I agree with him.
As I've posted before: MTBs are good for single track, fat bikes are good for no track
As I've posted before: MTBs are good for single track, fat bikes are good for no track
Likes For Rajflyboy:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
No! Not even close! The only way I can think that a fatbike could be my only bike would be if I lived in a very remote location where I was bush wacking to get places.
#37
Word.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rural New England
Posts: 232
Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Orbea Oiz XCountry Bike, Specialized Roubaix, Borealis Echo Fat Bike for Winter, many others out in the barn.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 64 Post(s)
Liked 99 Times
in
51 Posts
Certainly. I've been considering it. My cycling activity has gotten down to single track mountain biking (here in rural New England), loaded/solo touring one month a year out west, and utility trips to the store, etc. I could enjoy doing all of these things on a fat bike. Trouble is, I already own 3+ bikes to cover these functions, so I'm not too tempted to sell off two of them. But yeah, I know others who have arrived at owning one bike: a fat bike and they are some of the happiest riders I know.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,621
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times
in
770 Posts
Rigid fat bike is OK to have as a single one and only bike if all you ride is buff single track. But if you ride stuff like this...that's where it sucks...
#39
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Horses for courses, I simply don't ride the terrain for a fat bike. My one bike garage would either be a ~130mm full sus or an aggressive steel hardtail.
#40
Senior Member
#41
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I’ll assume you know what “steel” and “hardtail” mean.
I understand “aggressive” in this case to mean a longer travel (120-160mm) fork, slack head angle, and I would think tires in the 2.3-2.6 range, but maybe the poster has plus sized tires in mind.
I understand “aggressive” in this case to mean a longer travel (120-160mm) fork, slack head angle, and I would think tires in the 2.3-2.6 range, but maybe the poster has plus sized tires in mind.
#42
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yeah, long travel hardtail. smash the descents and still have the efficiency for the climbs. something like a production privee, stanton slackline etc.
#43
Senior Member
Not for me. I would have some kind of a road, cross or gravel to use on the pavement. And some kind of a MTB for off road. I’m not a hard core rider so going fast just doesn’t excite me at all. I can see a + bike or fat bike as my only off road machine. Too many bikes mean too much money.
#45
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
If I lived where there were no roads and no trails, yes I would probably own a fat bike as my only bike.
#47
BMX commuter gone roadie
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 42
Bikes: Cheap ones
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Older thread, bumping for my impressions having ridden my first fat-bike. I don't ride fast on trails. I'm a wimp. For one ride I hit frequently though, through two miles of power lines in my community, I could absolutely see this being my only bike. The fat bike gives me more confidence downhill at speed. That path is a convenient short cut that I avoided regularly until now.
I'd probably rephrase this question because one bike will never suit all your needs ideally. I'd ask, "If you had to spend good money on only one bike, would it be a fat bike?" In that case, absolutely. Relatively efficient roadies, for brewery cruises and such, can be had for cheap. The fat-bike does everything else well and you tend to get more as you spend more, relative to a road/gravel/hybrid.
Besides, if you ride for fitness and not distance or speed, the fat bike just gives you a better work-out. Ride it enough and your fitness will catch up.
I love fat bikes.
I'd probably rephrase this question because one bike will never suit all your needs ideally. I'd ask, "If you had to spend good money on only one bike, would it be a fat bike?" In that case, absolutely. Relatively efficient roadies, for brewery cruises and such, can be had for cheap. The fat-bike does everything else well and you tend to get more as you spend more, relative to a road/gravel/hybrid.
Besides, if you ride for fitness and not distance or speed, the fat bike just gives you a better work-out. Ride it enough and your fitness will catch up.
I love fat bikes.
#48
meh
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,702
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
OK, now that this crazy talk it done ... I downsize my house last year so I have more $$$ to add more bikes, including a second fatbike.
#49
Banned.
Thread Starter
Older thread, bumping for my impressions having ridden my first fat-bike. I don't ride fast on trails. I'm a wimp. For one ride I hit frequently though, through two miles of power lines in my community, I could absolutely see this being my only bike. The fat bike gives me more confidence downhill at speed. That path is a convenient short cut that I avoided regularly until now.
I'd probably rephrase this question because one bike will never suit all your needs ideally. I'd ask, "If you had to spend good money on only one bike, would it be a fat bike?" In that case, absolutely. Relatively efficient roadies, for brewery cruises and such, can be had for cheap. The fat-bike does everything else well and you tend to get more as you spend more, relative to a road/gravel/hybrid.
Besides, if you ride for fitness and not distance or speed, the fat bike just gives you a better work-out. Ride it enough and your fitness will catch up.
I love fat bikes.
I'd probably rephrase this question because one bike will never suit all your needs ideally. I'd ask, "If you had to spend good money on only one bike, would it be a fat bike?" In that case, absolutely. Relatively efficient roadies, for brewery cruises and such, can be had for cheap. The fat-bike does everything else well and you tend to get more as you spend more, relative to a road/gravel/hybrid.
Besides, if you ride for fitness and not distance or speed, the fat bike just gives you a better work-out. Ride it enough and your fitness will catch up.
I love fat bikes.
this sums it up perfectly
#50
Banned.
Thread Starter
I use my fatbike for tons of riding - typically, 1,000 to 1,500 miles of winter, gravel, fun every year ... But I can do most of that riding with my faster gravel bike (except winter single-track rides/races). I love my Pug, but if I had to thin the herd to one bike, Pug won't be the one.
OK, now that this crazy talk it done ... I downsize my house last year so I have more $$$ to add more bikes, including a second fatbike.
OK, now that this crazy talk it done ... I downsize my house last year so I have more $$$ to add more bikes, including a second fatbike.