Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

In defense of powder coat

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

In defense of powder coat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-19, 12:52 PM
  #51  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
Thread Starter
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,634

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4678 Post(s)
Liked 5,795 Times in 2,281 Posts
Originally Posted by TenGrainBread
I believe that telling Gugie that his posting a perfectly reasonable thread on a bicycle enthusiast site is "taking his hobby way too seriously" is a bit rude. It just struck me as needlessly negative. Maybe I'm off

Anyway back to the topic...
I think aesthetically it's a toss-up. I've seen powder that looks thin and wet like paint. I'm unconvinced there's a meaningful difference in rust prevention between the two (just about how much prep you put into it), but the point about removing the powder being very difficult is a good one.
1. Gugie's been on this forum too long to let much bother him. I don't mind a spirited discussion. If I take this hobby way too seriously, well, I resemble that remark ;-)
2. I thought that the fact that it's difficulty to remove powder coating was a feature..
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Likes For gugie:
Old 03-20-19, 01:20 PM
  #52  
sdn40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 602

Bikes: 88 Cannondale Criterium

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 291 Post(s)
Liked 147 Times in 91 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
1. Gugie's been on this forum too long to let much bother him. I don't mind a spirited discussion. If I take this hobby way too seriously, well, I resemble that remark ;-)
2. I thought that the fact that it's difficulty to remove powder coating was a feature..
Just to clarify again, my response was not directed toward you
sdn40 is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 01:26 PM
  #53  
Slightspeed
Senior Member
 
Slightspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,249

Bikes: 1964 Legnano Roma Olympiade, 1973 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Peugeot PR10, 2002 Specialized Allez, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2013 Culprit Croz Blade

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 818 Times in 421 Posts
I considered powder coat when I redid my '73 Super Course, but wasn't sure how the intricate Capella lugs would come out. I had already decided on a non-stock Toyota green paint color, that I couldn't find in powder coat. The paint had cured almost a year before last years Eroica ride. After the ride, I noticed several paint chips in places where there are usually no contact from everyday use. the fork had two chips on it, and behind the crank these was one in line with an inner chain ring bolt. I was sure I had plenty of clearance there. Next time, I'll give powder coat a closer look. I have another project, a '78 Super Course that is a decent "patina" bike, but I prefer nice and shiny. If I really like the bike, I may go for a stock color (more or less) gold.
M next project ... powder coat?

My '73 Super Course, automotive painted, with chips.




Last edited by Slightspeed; 03-20-19 at 01:42 PM.
Slightspeed is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 01:39 PM
  #54  
Hudson308 
Mr. Anachronism
 
Hudson308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Somewhere west of Tobie's
Posts: 2,087

Bikes: fillet-brazed Chicago Schwinns, and some other stuff

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 526 Post(s)
Liked 256 Times in 165 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
Sure, and I prefer flying first class and staying in luxury hotels. It's not going to stop me from flying to Hawaii coach and staying at a condo because I can't afford the 1%er vacation.

There are pros and cons to both. Surely powder coat is more durable and much more environmentallly friendly, as well as significantly less expensive. You've seen several examples of what I'd call comparable to wet paint examples, at significantly less cost. Also, most powder coaters turn around a frame in a few weeks - and I'm talking about the ones who know how to handle bike frames, not just any powder coater. All the really good wet painters that I know of have several months of backlog, and even then can't hit anywhere near a date.

If you're looking for wet paint quality, pay wet paint prices. If you've got a ratty 70's or 80's production frame, a powder coat will spruce it up nicely.

I'm not against wet paint at all. On rare occasion I have a frame that I think is worth the treatment.

I'm just a bit tired of reading the "don't powdercoat, it'll be crap, they'll hide the lug lines, fill bottle bosses, etc." crowd when I think a much more appropriate answer would be "it depends on where you send it". There are enough people on this forum that have had great experiences with certain powder coaters to recommend, hopefully local, but if you can't find a good bike powder coater locally, odds are you can't find a good wet painter locally as well, so shipping costs are a wash.
This is all EXACTLY what I would try to explain to people contemplating a frame refinish.
I've been trained and have experience using automotive paint.
Although it is the gold standard for many, wet paint is not the be-all end-all for every application. Neither is powdercoat.
__________________
"My only true wisdom is in knowing I have none" -Socrates
Hudson308 is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 01:55 PM
  #55  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
Thread Starter
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,634

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4678 Post(s)
Liked 5,795 Times in 2,281 Posts
Originally Posted by sdn40
Just to clarify again, my response was not directed toward you
Yes, I knew that, I took no offense to any of these posts.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 02:13 PM
  #56  
smallpox champ
Senior Member
 
smallpox champ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 154

Bikes: '84 specialized expedition, '87 specialized sirrus, '84 specialized stumpjumper sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 61 Times in 14 Posts
Here's the powder coat I got on my custom frame. I talked to the boss of my local place and scrutinized the importance of a thin coat, he also opted for sanding instead of a media blast. I purchased the powder myself from Prismatic Powders.




smallpox champ is offline  
Likes For smallpox champ:
Old 03-20-19, 02:26 PM
  #57  
bear_a_bug 
Full Member
 
bear_a_bug's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 344

Bikes: 650B'd '74 Raleigh Super Tourer and '83 Trek 620, '22 Gorilla Monsoon

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 133 Post(s)
Liked 167 Times in 69 Posts
Originally Posted by smallpox champ


That is exceptional for PC. Well done advising your coater on the thinness!

As one who has a PC-ed frame (the red Super Tourer @gugie showed at the beginning of the thread), I'll weigh in by agreeing with everyone's points.

Honestly, though, if you're gonna ride the bike and it's not a super valuable or "historic" frame, get the PC. As with all things, if you've got the money and you've got to have it, then sure, get wet paint.

But PC is completely fine for a rider that's gonna get a bit dinged up in its lifetime. You feel less bad about leaning it against something abrasive, too.
bear_a_bug is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 02:32 PM
  #58  
RobbieTunes
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times in 909 Posts
Originally Posted by Wileyone
It's harder to get guns here in the GWN. But I think 10 lashes for the Powder Coat and another 20 for the wheelset.
Might be approiate.
”Thank you sir! May I have another?”
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 02:36 PM
  #59  
RobbieTunes
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times in 909 Posts
Ceramic coating?

Heard of it, guy showed me a Tempo, really nice. What is it?
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 08:32 PM
  #60  
gear64
Senior Member
 
gear64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: STL Missouri
Posts: 473

Bikes: State Black Label All Road, Univega Gran Premio, Lotus Classique, Terranaut Metro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 62 Posts
Does the shop usually take care of removing original paint and treating any existing rust or is that typically on the bike owner?
gear64 is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 08:54 PM
  #61  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
Thread Starter
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,634

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4678 Post(s)
Liked 5,795 Times in 2,281 Posts
Originally Posted by gear64
Does the shop usually take care of removing original paint and treating any existing rust or is that typically on the bike owner?
I've used 5 different powder coaters in and around Portland. Every single one of them has/had experience powder coating bike frames. Every single one of them media blasted the frames, including any rust. BTW, none of them used walnut shells, btw. It ain't the media, necessarily, it's how you use it. I do a bit of framework, you can use an agressive file or a fine file, but it's more in the technique than the file, IMO.

Note that the frames I deal with aren't ultra-thin wall, so I have no experience powder coating them.

Lots of people read stuff, it makes sense, so it must be true. Don't believe everything you think. "One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions" - Rear Admiral Grace Hopper.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 08:59 PM
  #62  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times in 1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by sdn40
The rust under a powder coat thing bugs me. Are people saying powder coating causes rust ? Because rust can form under paint the last time I checked.
yes, rust can attack under any coating.
the interaction of a wet applied primer ( especially a self etching primer) and an epoxy sealer is more money and more protection than powdercoat.
powdercoat encapsulates more than “ sticking to the steel” .

I will I’ll note that there are different brands and qualities of powdercoat grains. I’m sure that the temp cycle can play a part too.
repechage is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 09:19 PM
  #63  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times in 933 Posts
Informative.
base2 is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 10:37 PM
  #64  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
Thread Starter
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,634

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4678 Post(s)
Liked 5,795 Times in 2,281 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
Trying to figure out how this equates to bicycles, which (one hopes) are not left outdoors in harsh conditions 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 01:38 AM
  #65  
taguy4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kansas
Posts: 171

Bikes: Peugeot PR-10, Peugeot UO-8, Boeris racing bike, AMF Roadmaster Renegade, Gitane Gypsy Sport, various Schwinn muscle bikes, Schwinn Super Sport, Panasonic DX-4000, Palo Alto Campy equipped bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage


yes, rust can attack under any coating.
the interaction of a wet applied primer ( especially a self etching primer) and an epoxy sealer is more money and more protection than powdercoat.
powdercoat encapsulates more than “ sticking to the steel” .

I will I’ll note that there are different brands and qualities of powdercoat grains. I’m sure that the temp cycle can play a part too.
paint
I agree with this. The things I've had powdercoated were done without any primer, which in my opinion is asking for trouble down the road in terms of rust starting underneath the paint, etc. They do make a powder primer, but my sense is it rarely is used as the powder sticks to the metal without it and it's just one more step in the process that powdercoaters aren't willing to do. Also I've found powdercoating to be very brittle in nature and easy to chip with the right kind of impact.

I personally would never have a bike frame powdercoated, but I have a bias because I restore cars for a living so I have all the equipment and materials to do a solvent paint job properly. I paint bike frames after priming them with a corrosion inhibiting primer (like epoxy) and I clear over decals to extend their life by giving them some protection. I think this is the only way to go on a bike that has value.

I suspect the temptation to have a bike frame powdercoated is due in part by the fact that it's easier (and probably cheaper) to find someone that will powdercoat a frame than to find someone (that knows what they're doing) willing to do a proper solvent paint job with the right primer, etc.
taguy4 is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 05:19 AM
  #66  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times in 933 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
Trying to figure out how this equates to bicycles, which (one hopes) are not left outdoors in harsh conditions 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
The gist is the industry has various grades of powder, they are all tested to various defined standards, are in use in some of the worlds harshest environments, & can be durable AF, but not necessarily. The powder for BMW wheels, for example, must test at least 10 years in service without degredation before BMW will even consider it.

It was a response to the "it'll rust under" comment. Basically, I'm saying that if properly applied, no it won't & how long do you expect anything to last, anyway?

Of course poorly applied powder of a low grade will be less satisfactory than high quality, properly applied paint. But That's hardly news, rooted in bias & perpetuated by painters that feel the economic pressure of a competiting product.
base2 is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 05:59 AM
  #67  
nesteel 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,069

Bikes: See the signature....

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 191 Times in 114 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
I've used 5 different powder coaters in and around Portland. Every single one of them has/had experience powder coating bike frames. Every single one of them media blasted the frames, including any rust. BTW, none of them used walnut shells, btw. It ain't the media, necessarily, it's how you use it. I do a bit of framework, you can use an agressive file or a fine file, but it's more in the technique than the file, IMO.

Note that the frames I deal with aren't ultra-thin wall, so I have no experience powder coating them.

Lots of people read stuff, it makes sense, so it must be true. Don't believe everything you think. "One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions" - Rear Admiral Grace Hopper.
The reason none of them use walnut shells may be that the shells leave an oily residue that you'd have to cleaned off before powder. Just another step that could be avoided by use another blasting media.
__________________
My bikes: '81 Trek 957, '83 Trek 720, '85 Trek 500, '85 Trek 770, '81 Merckx, '85 Centurion Cinelli, '85 Raleigh Portage, '92 RB-2, '09 Bianchi
nesteel is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 07:13 AM
  #68  
Wileyone 
Senior Member
 
Wileyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 606 Times in 403 Posts
I have been debating whether or not to strip this one or just live with it. The frame was purchased allready powder coated. It looks terrific from 10' away but up close I find the fine detail in the lug work to be lacking. What do you guys think?
Should I redo it at a signifacant cost or just leave it? It is a pretty rare bike.

Last edited by Wileyone; 03-24-19 at 10:03 AM.
Wileyone is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 07:59 AM
  #69  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
Thread Starter
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,634

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4678 Post(s)
Liked 5,795 Times in 2,281 Posts
Originally Posted by nesteel
The reason none of them use walnut shells may be that the shells leave an oily residue that you'd have to cleaned off before powder. Just another step that could be avoided by use another blasting media.
I've asked all the powder coaters I've used what they use, and why. Mostly it's something they already use, and is cheap. One used glass, the other some industrial slag, another actual sand. Right pressure and technique, you can probably get away with a lot of stuff.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 08:02 AM
  #70  
AlmostTrick
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times in 504 Posts
Originally Posted by Wileyone
I have been debating whether or not to strip this one or just live with it. The frame was purchased allready powder coated. It looks terrific from 10' away but up close I find the fine detail in the lug work to be lacking. What do you guys think?
Should I redo it at a signifacant cost or just leave it? It is a pretty rare bike.
Leave it.

It seems quite silly to me that many here would prefer a scratched up original paint job over a decent and clean powder job.
AlmostTrick is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 08:05 AM
  #71  
ollo_ollo
Senior Member
 
ollo_ollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Soviet of Oregon or Pensacola FL
Posts: 5,342

Bikes: Still have a few left!

Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 467 Post(s)
Liked 532 Times in 267 Posts
Here are a couple more: Stella done last year by a local shop that does a lot of commercial work. Was recommended by locals, but he does a better job on tractors and 4 wheelers than bikes. He did well at not going too thick, but there was lots of surface grit. I sanded with #600, then clear coat after Cyclomondo decals using Rustoleum for a pretty good finish and appearance from a distance, but up close looks like glossy orange peel surface in some places. Still looks good after 1 season of riding. Cost was $150 because of masking to preserve chrome. Don't know what his basic price would be without masking.

Second is a fillet brazed Motobecane done in 2007 at a new shop in Olympia, Wa. Cost was $60 and used transparent red over bare metal to give a chromovelato look. Decals from Cyclomondo were just done last year and I custom picked them from earlier model Moto decals I liked better than the ugly mid 80's originals. Also needed Columbus not Reynolds tubing decals for this model and got the whole set for his standard $45. I like how both turned out. Don't have any good close ups, need to do some of both bikes. Don
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_2334.jpg (1.07 MB, 546 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_2354.jpg (781.4 KB, 544 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_2979.jpg (743.7 KB, 545 views)

Last edited by ollo_ollo; 03-21-19 at 08:26 AM. Reason: add $ cost for Stella PC
ollo_ollo is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 08:16 AM
  #72  
HarborBandS
HarborBandS
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago Western Suburbs
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 266 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 57 Posts


$100 powder coat job on $100 frame. It has exceeded my expectations in every way. RAL 3003 Ruby Red.

Look at the lug details at the brake bridge. That's a very thin piece of metal that is still quite well-defined.



Last edited by HarborBandS; 03-21-19 at 08:27 AM.
HarborBandS is offline  
Likes For HarborBandS:
Old 03-21-19, 08:21 AM
  #73  
Nessism
Banned.
 
Nessism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061

Bikes: Homebuilt steel

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times in 337 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
Thanks for posting this. I was going to comment that not all powder coat is created equal but that article details it all out better than I could.

Most general purpose shops will default to basic polyester powder because it's the cheapest. While polyester isn't bad per say moving up to a more advanced coating such as polyurethane will significantly improve corrosion durability. I learned this through observing salt spray testing performed on various coatings being performed by a company I used to work for. Polyurethane powder is more expensive and most shops will charge accordingly though. I suppose it's all dependant on what you want and how much you're willing to pay.
Nessism is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 09:36 AM
  #74  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
I powder coated my 1978 Trek TX 900; it came out nice. I'll need to dig up some pics . . .
bikemig is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 10:13 AM
  #75  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
Thread Starter
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,634

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4678 Post(s)
Liked 5,795 Times in 2,281 Posts
Originally Posted by taguy4
They do make a powder primer, but my sense is it rarely is used as the powder sticks to the metal without it and it's just one more step in the process that powdercoaters aren't willing to do. Also I've found powdercoating to be very brittle in nature and easy to chip with the right kind of impact.

I personally would never have a bike frame powdercoated, but I have a bias because I restore cars for a living so I have all the equipment and materials to do a solvent paint job properly. I paint bike frames after priming them with a corrosion inhibiting primer (like epoxy) and I clear over decals to extend their life by giving them some protection. I think this is the only way to go on a bike that has value.

I suspect the temptation to have a bike frame powdercoated is due in part by the fact that it's easier (and probably cheaper) to find someone that will powdercoat a frame than to find someone (that knows what they're doing) willing to do a proper solvent paint job with the right primer, etc.
Good point, and I think one should consider at least asking about an anti-corrosion primer and incur the extra expense.

As far as you finding PC to be very brittle and easy to chip, compared to wet paint, I've found exactly the opposite. My purpose-built gravel grinder is ridden almost exclusively on gravel roads. I can hear rocks ping on the frame from time to time, and there are zero chips in the paint, whereas my Ed Litton wet sprayed, catalyzed, clear coated frame has several chips in it from similar riding - which is why I don't take it on gravel anymore.

If I had a paint booth and was set up to do it myself, almost all of my bike frames would be wet painted as well! If you can come within 2X of the average cost of a powder coat, I'll send as much business your way that I can!

As far as "the only way to go on a bike that has value", value is in the eye of the beholder.

I'm glad that we've had a spirited discussion about powder vs wet paint. It's pointed out the pros and cons of both, and what to watch out for.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.