Double to a Triple Conversion
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Double to a Triple Conversion
So I have an old trek 5000 2004 model equipped with 9 x 2 speeds. I saw an add in a local marketplace for an ultegra triple crankset for 100$. I would need a new BB as mine is the old octalink thing. My question is about the other upgrades needed. I thought that I would need to get a new shifter but the seller says that trek didn't make seperate double and triple shifters at that time ( which might make sense since my front shifter clicks through three positions but my limit is now set by the limit screws I think). Would I be able to make it without a new front shifter? Also I read online that generally double front derailleurs do well with triples so long as the change between the middle and outer isn't huge?
In this case I am assuming my total need would be :
- Ultegra triple crankset
- Appropriate BB
- Medium cage RD instead of the short for a bit more capacity
Is this right or do I have things all messed up? I am thinking that if this is indeed all that's needed I might just do that. The triple will be a bit more weight but a nice few extra gears. I can probably also then mount a smaller rear cassette for tighter spacing and that should compensate for some of the weight?
In this case I am assuming my total need would be :
- Ultegra triple crankset
- Appropriate BB
- Medium cage RD instead of the short for a bit more capacity
Is this right or do I have things all messed up? I am thinking that if this is indeed all that's needed I might just do that. The triple will be a bit more weight but a nice few extra gears. I can probably also then mount a smaller rear cassette for tighter spacing and that should compensate for some of the weight?
#2
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,515
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,398 Times
in
2,057 Posts
What is your existing front shifter Ultegra 6500?
#4
Really Old Senior Member
This seems to indicate you'd need a 6503 front Shifter & DER.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...XiXKw8VgHD0ZBa
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...XiXKw8VgHD0ZBa
#5
Full Member
Thread Starter
This seems to indicate you'd need a 6503 front Shifter & DER.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...XiXKw8VgHD0ZBa
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...XiXKw8VgHD0ZBa
So I just found this which confirms that indeed the 6500 front shifters are all double/ triple compatible. So I guess I don't need to change that.
Now the question becomes whether I need a new front derailleur or replacing the rear should be enough? I understand they may specify that you need a triple front derailleur but have people had ok success with the double being used for a triple?
#6
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,515
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,398 Times
in
2,057 Posts
I'd probably try it and see if it works to my satisfaction. If it didn't, then I'd pick up a 5503 or 6503 FD. I'd probably check out my local coop for a used one.
Triple fronts usually have a much bigger/lower back cage
Triple fronts usually have a much bigger/lower back cage
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Don't replace the rear derailleur until you try the current one first. The short cage may not wrap up quite enough chain to allow the smallest couple of cogs with the granny chainring but there is no reason to ever use those combinations and an inadvertent shift to them only gives a slack chain and is not damaging. If the chain is very slack in small-small get a longer cage rear derailleur but I don't think it will be that bad.
#8
Full Member
Thread Starter
So when looking at triple cranksettes, the cheapest are the octalink ones from the same age. A little more can get me hollowtech ii newer BB cranksettes. The reason this question comes up is because I'm not sure if power meter crank arms would be compatible with the octalink if I decide to get one in the future? Anyone know how readily available used power meters are that would fit on an octalink specific cranksette? If they're not I might as well get a newer standard one to future proof ?
#9
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
15 Posts
If your not stuck with Ultegra the marketplace here as a nice Shimano 105 triple setup for $150. You would get everything needed in one nice package and you could sell off your current entire package.
#10
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
15 Posts
So I just found this which confirms that indeed the 6500 front shifters are all double/ triple compatible. So I guess I don't need to change that.
Now the question becomes whether I need a new front derailleur or replacing the rear should be enough? I understand they may specify that you need a triple front derailleur but have people had ok success with the double being used for a triple?
Now the question becomes whether I need a new front derailleur or replacing the rear should be enough? I understand they may specify that you need a triple front derailleur but have people had ok success with the double being used for a triple?
Likes For danmyersmn:
#11
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,515
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,398 Times
in
2,057 Posts
Also if you look on the far left in the "compatibility" area where they show the best combinations you will not see a triple lever.
In addition you will not find a ST-6503 lever listed and that would be the part number for a triple front shifter if it existed.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2495 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
Edit: Post #11 notwithstanding, it isn't that hard to know if you have a double or triple shifter. The shifter (and bb ... and crankset) will need to be changed. That is what is really being discussed in post #10 . The FD may or may not need to be changed but it probably does. This is a textbook 'rabbit hole' scenario. This is as far as I go.
Last edited by Leisesturm; 02-14-20 at 10:39 AM.
#13
Full Member
Thread Starter
This. From the second post onwards I have been reading through all of them waiting for someone to state the above. Moreover, the reason why the o.p. needs a new BB is not simply because the new crank is a different system. A new, longer, BB spindle would be needed in any case because the extra ring needs at least 5mm or more additional space to exist. Were it my bike I would get the smallest ring supported by the BCD of the existing crankset and call it good. That, or take an earlier posters advice and ... downgrade, to a 105 triple system. Ultegra was never really intended to be a touring kind of gruppo.
Edit: Post #11 notwithstanding, it isn't that hard to know if you have a double or triple shifter. The shifter (and bb ... and crankset) will need to be changed. That is what is really being discussed in post #10 . The FD may or may not need to be changed but it probably does. This is a textbook 'rabbit hole' scenario. This is as far as I go.
Edit: Post #11 notwithstanding, it isn't that hard to know if you have a double or triple shifter. The shifter (and bb ... and crankset) will need to be changed. That is what is really being discussed in post #10 . The FD may or may not need to be changed but it probably does. This is a textbook 'rabbit hole' scenario. This is as far as I go.
Here's an eBay post for more evidence in addition to the spec sheet from above. It seems the 6503 needed is the front derailleur not the shifter :
#14
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
15 Posts
ST-6500 is double/triple compatible. If you look at the link in the operation it has 2 columns. One when using a FD-6500 (double FD) and on the right when using a FD-6503 (triple FD) with the 6510 lever.
Also if you look on the far left in the "compatibility" area where they show the best combinations you will not see a triple lever.
In addition you will not find a ST-6503 lever listed and that would be the part number for a triple front shifter if it existed.
Also if you look on the far left in the "compatibility" area where they show the best combinations you will not see a triple lever.
In addition you will not find a ST-6503 lever listed and that would be the part number for a triple front shifter if it existed.
#15
Full Member
Thread Starter
So ... Any ideas about powermeters on those octalink cranksettes / crank arms or am I better off with a newer standard model? 🤔