FS: Bridgestone RB-1, 56cm F&F
#1
Señor Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 895
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 296 Times
in
149 Posts
FS: Bridgestone RB-1, 56cm F&F
Bike is now SOLD
Offered here is a 1992 Bridgestone RB-1 frameset. The catalog .pdf can be found here. These bikes have a mythology about them, but the frame isn't my size so I'll have to take others' word on that.
One thing to note with this frame is the relatively long top tube (57.5 cm c-t-c) versus the seat tube (56 cm c-t-c). I typically expect a 56cm/56cm base frame size and then increments of +/-2 cm seat tube and 1 cm top tube. I think the RB-1 has the same sort of geometry one encounters with many Lemonds. The buyer should be aware of this.
The bike came to me from my next-door neighbor, who decided he needed a more modern bike. It was originally purchased for his son, who raced it for a season. It came to me with a mishmash of parts, some of which I've re-purposed and some I've lost track of.
Asking $SOLD + shipping, via PayPal. I'll charge cost, about $40 shipping to the lower 48, more elsewhere. Local pickup always welcome.
The bike has cosmetic issues with damaged decals, paint scratches and paint loss around the seat lug and binder (I'll explain about this last one below). However, I don't see any dents or dings and there are no rust or structural issues.
Specs
Price includes
Issues
Please ask if there's anything unclear or you'd like to see additional or better pictures.
More pics (Flickr album here):
Shown with 700x25 tires.
Offered here is a 1992 Bridgestone RB-1 frameset. The catalog .pdf can be found here. These bikes have a mythology about them, but the frame isn't my size so I'll have to take others' word on that.
One thing to note with this frame is the relatively long top tube (57.5 cm c-t-c) versus the seat tube (56 cm c-t-c). I typically expect a 56cm/56cm base frame size and then increments of +/-2 cm seat tube and 1 cm top tube. I think the RB-1 has the same sort of geometry one encounters with many Lemonds. The buyer should be aware of this.
The bike came to me from my next-door neighbor, who decided he needed a more modern bike. It was originally purchased for his son, who raced it for a season. It came to me with a mishmash of parts, some of which I've re-purposed and some I've lost track of.
Asking $SOLD + shipping, via PayPal. I'll charge cost, about $40 shipping to the lower 48, more elsewhere. Local pickup always welcome.
The bike has cosmetic issues with damaged decals, paint scratches and paint loss around the seat lug and binder (I'll explain about this last one below). However, I don't see any dents or dings and there are no rust or structural issues.
Specs
- Material: Ishiwata 022E frame and 019E fork, double-butted
- Seat tube (ctc): 56 cm
- Top tube (ctc): 57.5 cm
- Head tube: 15.0 cm
- Chain stays (ctc): 41 cm
- Dropout spacing: 132 mm
- Threading: Standard
- Seatpost size: 27.0 mm
- Dropouts and frame (via Sheldon string test) confirmed straight
Price includes
- Frame & Fork
- Headset: Shimano 600, feels a little bit rough
- Seatpost: Kalloy, 27.0 mm black (very long)
- Frame fasteners as shown
Issues
- About the paint loss at the seat lug: At some point my neighbor decided he needed a new seatpost, and somehow ended up with a 27.2 mm rather than the spec 27.0 mm. The new post was very tight, and he surmised that the frame must be damaged. He's a petroleum engineer, so he and a co-worker decided to MagnaFlux the seat lug to find the problem. This involved removing some paint. They didn't find a problem. Finally, he came to me to ask if he should (and how to) ream out the seat tube to make the post fit. I explained that seat posts come in 0.2mm increments and he had been sold the wrong size. [I wish he had talked to me first.] I decided to leave the paint as-is rather than try to touch it up - that will up to the new owner.
- The rear dropout is 132 mm rather than 130 mm as expected. I don't see any alignment issues via Sheldon's string test and the dropouts are straight. Dunno why the extra 2 mm.
Please ask if there's anything unclear or you'd like to see additional or better pictures.
More pics (Flickr album here):
Shown with 700x25 tires.
Last edited by CO_Hoya; 04-12-18 at 08:29 PM. Reason: Bike is sold
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Oh man! If it weren't for the long top tube, I'd be getting in line. GLWS!
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,694
Bikes: A few BSO's.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
27 Posts
Very tempting since the tt is just right but HT length is a bit short and I would need like 8" of seat post for proper leg extension. Is this an odd geometry or am I just uneducated about this type of fit? BTW this is THE color RB1 for my tastes.
#5
I got 99 projects
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hills of Central NH
Posts: 1,581
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Great looking frame! I bet a Shimano 5500 group would look sweet on that. From the description it sounds like it would fit someone who usually would ride a 58?
#6
Señor Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 895
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 296 Times
in
149 Posts
A few responses on this:
Yes? I can't say for sure since I didn't spend more than 5 minutes riding it before deciding I should take a pass. You can see the seat post set for me in the last pic in the Flickr album (ignore the stem height, I was screwing around with it when I took that pic). FWIW, I like a 60-ish c-t-c seat tube.
- I believe Bridgestone measured bike height as c-t-t seat tube, so this bike is a 57.5cm per their standard if you want to look at their geometry chart (pg. 47 of the catalog linked in the first post). I'm used to thinking of bike sizes in c-t-c measurements, so reported this instead.
- Elsewhere in the catolog (pg 32-33), Leonard Zinn offers a two-pager explaining the benefits of the longer top tube and slacker angles.
- I also faced your dilemma, although I prefer a 58-59cm top tube. I decided to pass the frame along because of this.
Yes? I can't say for sure since I didn't spend more than 5 minutes riding it before deciding I should take a pass. You can see the seat post set for me in the last pic in the Flickr album (ignore the stem height, I was screwing around with it when I took that pic). FWIW, I like a 60-ish c-t-c seat tube.
Last edited by CO_Hoya; 03-26-18 at 12:32 PM.
#7
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
EDIT: @CO_Hoya beat me to the punch!
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times
in
2,610 Posts
You’re killing me with this iconic frameset in my size! Have you tried the iBOB list/google group?
#12
Señor Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 895
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 296 Times
in
149 Posts
I have not.
While I receive the emails, I’ve never bothered to figure out how to post to the list. Just send an email to the iBOB address?
While I receive the emails, I’ve never bothered to figure out how to post to the list. Just send an email to the iBOB address?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times
in
2,610 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times
in
2,610 Posts
Woot!
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times
in
2,610 Posts
You’re killing me!
#19
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
How TF was this not sold immediately?
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.