My 7.5 FX need wider tires
#1
Yup
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 214
Bikes: Electra Townie 7d
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My 7.5 FX need wider tires
It was supposed to come with 32's from the factory but for some reason mine came with 28's. The amount of cobblestones and bad pavement I hit on the commute make me want something a bit softer.
Does anyone know...what is the widest tire I could put on without changing out rims??
Does anyone know...what is the widest tire I could put on without changing out rims??
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 947
Bikes: 2011 Trek FX 7.3 | 2015 Trek FX 7.4 | Lotus Classique
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times
in
16 Posts
32s or 35s but, for the 35s, you may want to get a professional opinion. i know you can definitely do 32s.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
look at your bike to see a label for what rims you have. for example, my 7.2 fx has matrix 750 rims. then google search your rim for its inner width. then look at sheldon's chart to determine a conservatively safe maximum width for the replacement tire. i bet you can go up to 37 without problem.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html#width
or you use calipers and measure the inner width of the rim yourself (with tires removed).
or you can call trek customer service 1-800-373-4594
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html#width
or you use calipers and measure the inner width of the rim yourself (with tires removed).
or you can call trek customer service 1-800-373-4594
#4
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wyoming, USA
Posts: 28
Bikes: Trek FX 7.5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm running a set of Conti Contacts 37s on my stock rims - '09 FX 7.5 - no worries and love the tires. I do believe that Contis tend towards the narrow side in terms of their sizing though.
#5
Yup
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 214
Bikes: Electra Townie 7d
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just googled those, nice looking tire, thanks! Did you have to do any brake adjustments?
#6
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Brakes hit the rim, not the tires. If the tire fits the rim/frame/fork the brakes shouldn't need adjustment.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#7
Yup
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 214
Bikes: Electra Townie 7d
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#8
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wyoming, USA
Posts: 28
Bikes: Trek FX 7.5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No, they won't fit through the pads if you're adjusted properly.
Just pop the cables free from the V-arm at the noodle retainer and you're all set.
Just pop the cables free from the V-arm at the noodle retainer and you're all set.
#9
Yup
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 214
Bikes: Electra Townie 7d
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
aka Phil Jungels
I really, really like the Schwalbe Marathon Supremes. My 35's actually measure 35 on an 18mm wide (inside) rim.
They aren't cheap, but their performance makes them frugal.
They aren't cheap, but their performance makes them frugal.
#11
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wyoming, USA
Posts: 28
Bikes: Trek FX 7.5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've had the Contacts only a short time but I've run 'em pretty hard. My riding is probably 70/30 on/off-road and our streets here are pretty rough. Typical small Wyoming town! I've pushed them pretty hard on asphalt turns and they seem to corner pretty good for an all around tread. Hard pack dirt roads and gravel alleyways are no worries. Haven't been in sand or mud yet but I don't expect stellar performance in those areas
Ride is decent, nice with reduced pressure and they're fast enough to be fun when pumped up. I'm using the reflective sidewalls as I ride quite a bit at night and this provides a better target for the motorists to lock in on
Take care and pleasant trails to ya.
#13
aka Phil Jungels
One more thing... My Crosstrail has 18mm wide rims, and 45mm wide tires as OEM. No problem with them whatsoever.
Well, two more things...... I settled on 35 on the front, and a 40 on the rear, as the best mix for handling and ride. The 35 really makes the steering more precise, and the 40 really makes the ride more plush, without sacrificing handling.... I noticed no difference in ride when going from the 45s to the 40s, but a big difference in handling, with the 35 on the front, with no loss of ride quality.
Best to measure around your installed tire - in all directions - to determine how much more space you have in there.
Well, two more things...... I settled on 35 on the front, and a 40 on the rear, as the best mix for handling and ride. The 35 really makes the steering more precise, and the 40 really makes the ride more plush, without sacrificing handling.... I noticed no difference in ride when going from the 45s to the 40s, but a big difference in handling, with the 35 on the front, with no loss of ride quality.
Best to measure around your installed tire - in all directions - to determine how much more space you have in there.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: East metro-Atlanta
Posts: 88
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The "correct" tire size is related to the inner rim width, so recommending a tire size without specifying the inner rim width is sloppy at best.
My Trek 7.5 FX has wheels with an inner rim width of 16 mm. According to Sheldon Brown, "A general guideline is that the tire width should be between 1.45/2.0 x the inner rim width." (https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html).
My calculator shows 1.45 x 16 = 23.2 mm and 2.0 x 16 = 32 mm.
Your bike, your choice. An informed choice is better.
My Trek 7.5 FX has wheels with an inner rim width of 16 mm. According to Sheldon Brown, "A general guideline is that the tire width should be between 1.45/2.0 x the inner rim width." (https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html).
My calculator shows 1.45 x 16 = 23.2 mm and 2.0 x 16 = 32 mm.
Your bike, your choice. An informed choice is better.
#15
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wyoming, USA
Posts: 28
Bikes: Trek FX 7.5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One must also consider the noticeable variation in actual tire size when compared to claimed industry size ratings. Having looked at numerous tires in the 32mm - 40mm sizes now I've discovered quite a variety of actual sizes when mounted on the same size rim.
I've got a set of 37mm Contis that are shorter and narrower than a Kenda 35mm mounted on the same rim.
Seems the industry standards, or at least the manufacturer's interpretation of the same, are somewhat flexible.
I've got a set of 37mm Contis that are shorter and narrower than a Kenda 35mm mounted on the same rim.
Seems the industry standards, or at least the manufacturer's interpretation of the same, are somewhat flexible.
#16
Cyclologist
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: On 2 Wheels
Posts: 303
Bikes: Trek 4500, Trek 7.5 FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have 38's on my 7.5. It was offered with something much narrower 28 or 32, 38 was the widest in stock. I've seen 40's sold here and there, but I didnt like the tread and that seems kind of rare.
#17
Papaya King
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio (Grandview area)
Posts: 1,640
Bikes: 2009 Felt X City D, 1985 (?) Trek 400, 1995 (?) Specialized Rockhopper, 1995 Trek 850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
One must also consider the noticeable variation in actual tire size when compared to claimed industry size ratings. Having looked at numerous tires in the 32mm - 40mm sizes now I've discovered quite a variety of actual sizes when mounted on the same size rim.
I've got a set of 37mm Contis that are shorter and narrower than a Kenda 35mm mounted on the same rim.
Seems the industry standards, or at least the manufacturer's interpretation of the same, are somewhat flexible.
I've got a set of 37mm Contis that are shorter and narrower than a Kenda 35mm mounted on the same rim.
Seems the industry standards, or at least the manufacturer's interpretation of the same, are somewhat flexible.