Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Women More Likely To Be Killed In Bicycle Crashes Than Men

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Women More Likely To Be Killed In Bicycle Crashes Than Men

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-17, 10:26 AM
  #1  
hotbike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hotbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,751

Bikes: a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 256 Post(s)
Liked 90 Times in 75 Posts
Women More Likely To Be Killed In Bicycle Crashes Than Men

Quote:
"CHICAGO — Half of the people killed while riding their bicycles in Chicago in 2016 had four things in common, according data released by city officials Wednesday.

• They were not male — even though 70 percent of Chicago's regular bicyclists are men.

• They were younger than 30....."

Read More:

https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/2017...il-vision-zero
hotbike is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 10:32 AM
  #2  
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,336

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 510 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
With only six fatalities it's doubtful that the sex breakdown has any meaning.
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 10:59 AM
  #3  
phoebeisis
New Orleans
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,794
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Terrible to die so young
but what in the world would sex have to do with it?

Not sure what the writers of this article are suggesting-targeting females-or incompetent females?

Much more likely a statistical blip-just 6 deaths-3 and 3-can't make anything out of that-
what are the entire year entire country numbers?

Slight aside-years ago I had a job that required driving to different places(places I had never been to before)
and arriving at a specific time
I got in more wrecks(car) doing that than any other time in my life
The distraction of finding an address-and the time pressure-made me more dangerous

This might be why commercial drivers-who are normally more skilled- are more likely to kill a bike rider
of course their HUGE vehicle-with poor sight lines-makes them more dangerous to relatively hard to see riders

Yeah ride like they don't see you
because
THEY DON'T SEE YOU

Yeah big vehicles are more dangerous to bikes-especially in cities-they can't see you-no surprise
certainly they aren't targeting women-and unlikely women are less careful
Charlie
phoebeisis is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 11:22 AM
  #4  
kickstart
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
With only six fatalities it's doubtful that the sex breakdown has any meaning.
It seems there have been some changes in certain driver risk groups according to the insurance industry from a radio program I was listening to. As I remember the biggest changes were that women are now almost on par with men in risk, teens are now a lower risk close to mature drivers, and millennials are the highest risk group.
I don't see why that wouldn't translate to cycling too.
kickstart is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 11:30 AM
  #5  
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,336

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 510 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
It seems there have been some changes in certain driver risk groups according to the insurance industry from a radio program I was listening to. As I remember the biggest changes were that women are now almost on par with men in risk, teens are now a lower risk close to mature drivers, and millennials are the highest risk group.
I don't see why that wouldn't translate to cycling too.
That may well be, however the article cited used one years data of 6 deaths which was used to make a statement about the relative risk being higher for women cyclists than for men. My comment was that that is insufficient data to make any kind of defensible statistical inference.
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 11:36 AM
  #6  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,261
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,351 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
It seems there have been some changes in certain driver risk groups according to the insurance industry from a radio program I was listening to. As I remember the biggest changes were that women are now almost on par with men in risk, teens are now a lower risk close to mature drivers, and millennials are the highest risk group.
I don't see why that wouldn't translate to cycling too.
There are many motor vehicle collisions.
The data for those collisions are collected very reliably.

That's not the case for bicycle collision statistics.

Bicycling is a less common activity than driving. The person who opts to do an unusual activity might not be a typical driver (they might be a more safer driver).

Last edited by njkayaker; 03-11-17 at 11:43 AM.
njkayaker is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 11:58 AM
  #7  
kickstart
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
That may well be, however the article cited used one years data of 6 deaths which was used to make a statement about the relative risk being higher for women cyclists than for men. My comment was that that is insufficient data to make any kind of defensible statistical inference.
Originally Posted by njkayaker
There are many motor vehicle collisions.
The data for those collisions are collected very reliably.

That's not the case for bicycle collision statistics.

Bicycling is a less common activity than driving. The person who opts to do an unusual activity might not be a typical driver (they might be a more safer driver).
That may just be shoddy journalism jumping to exaggerated conclusions, but does that exclude the possibility it still reflects real and tangible changes?
It doesn't seem unreasonable that willingness to take risks would more likely be based on the person rather than the vehicle. It also doesn't seem unreasonable that as the gender gap continues to close, the similarities in behavior will continue to grow.
kickstart is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 01:06 PM
  #8  
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
With only six fatalities it's doubtful that the sex breakdown has any meaning.
Agreed that this is far too few incidents from which to draw valid statistical conclusions. But the conclusion is consistent with reports from London where women cyclists were seen to be over represented in cyclist fatalities resulting from being hooked by turning trucks. One possibility suggested was that women are more likely to remain stopped at red lights making them vulnerable to the turning truck when the light changes.
Why are female cyclists more vulnerable to London's lorries? | London Evening Standard
prathmann is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 02:24 PM
  #9  
hotbike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hotbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,751

Bikes: a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 256 Post(s)
Liked 90 Times in 75 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
Agreed that this is far too few incidents from which to draw valid statistical conclusions. But the conclusion is consistent with reports from London where women cyclists were seen to be over represented in cyclist fatalities resulting from being hooked by turning trucks. One possibility suggested was that women are more likely to remain stopped at red lights making them vulnerable to the turning truck when the light changes.
Why are female cyclists more vulnerable to London's lorries? | London Evening Standard
Yes, this and several other articles, aside from the stories about the accidents as they occur, have led me to believe that females are more vulnerable, statiscally speaking, to rear wheel of the trailer crashes.

My own Daughter, keep in mind, works for a trucking company, and has been known to drive a Kenworth on occasions... We believe it has something to do with the notion that only boys are interested in toy trucks, and that girls don't receive any recognition or encouragement , with the Educational Toy known as a toy truck (feel free to explain the difference between a toy and a scale model, and/or a die-cast model) ... Society says these things are for boys... And let's not just consider dinky models, how about the kind of toy truck that kids can ride on?
A Garden Tractor can be a quarter-scale Kenworth, and the kids will have fun while learning a few things (just be sure to disengage the rotating blades, please...)

Oh, wait, I have to upload a photo...
hotbike is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 02:25 PM
  #10  
hotbike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hotbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,751

Bikes: a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 256 Post(s)
Liked 90 Times in 75 Posts
hotbike is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 02:33 PM
  #11  
hotbike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hotbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,751

Bikes: a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 256 Post(s)
Liked 90 Times in 75 Posts
Maybe Fiberglass Side Guards should be mandatory?
Truckers' Side Guards by AviationMetalSmith, on Flickr
hotbike is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 03:41 PM
  #12  
kickstart
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by hotbike
Maybe Fiberglass Side Guards should be mandatory?
They will probably become nearly universal on vans, but they are incompatible with some forms of trucks such as tankers, dump, and container chassis.
kickstart is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 04:07 PM
  #13  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Sounds like more of an infrastructure design problem than gender related.

Overall data for cycling accident injuries and deaths are difficult to parse for trends like this, but NHTSA, NCBI and other data consistently indicate males are more likely than females to be injured and killed in cycling accidents.

I can speculate a few reasons why females might be more vulnerable to certain types of cycling injuries and deaths, but without better data it's impossible to verify. A sample hypthesis: Women's heads are comparable to men's in size and weight but they generally have less neck strength. This may leave them more vulnerable to head blows and injuries in falls. Now the challenge is to get the necessary data and study it to confirm or disprove that theory.

Another hypothesis: Chicago Divvy bike riders are mostly women who don't wear helmets. (I'm speculating based on observing casual city rental bike riders in my hometown, Fort Worth -- and my observations may be flawed or biased because of the route on which I see mostly young women riding city bikes while not wearing helmets.) Again, we'd need the data to determine whether this is true and relevant.

It's all just guesswork without data, statistically significant sampling and proper studies.
canklecat is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 04:16 PM
  #14  
AlexCyclistRoch
The Infractionator
 
AlexCyclistRoch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,201

Bikes: Classic road bikes: 1986 Cannondale, 1978 Trek

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by hotbike
Ahh...a twin-steer Foden!
AlexCyclistRoch is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 04:18 PM
  #15  
AlexCyclistRoch
The Infractionator
 
AlexCyclistRoch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,201

Bikes: Classic road bikes: 1986 Cannondale, 1978 Trek

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by hotbike
Maybe Fiberglass Side Guards should be mandatory?
Truckers' Side Guards by AviationMetalSmith, on Flickr
Those are strictly aerodynamic aids. You can still be run over by the trailer tandems, and those "side guards" have little structural integrity to them.
AlexCyclistRoch is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 04:22 PM
  #16  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Europe actually has Guard rails on their trailers, and a Disc covering the bolts on the front wheels

American truckers put sharpened chrome spikes on their front wheel lug nuts..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 04:31 PM
  #17  
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,336

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 510 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by canklecat
Sounds like more of an infrastructure design problem than gender related.

Overall data for cycling accident injuries and deaths are difficult to parse for trends like this, but NHTSA, NCBI and other data consistently indicate males are more likely than females to be injured and killed in cycling accidents.

I can speculate a few reasons why females might be more vulnerable to certain types of cycling injuries and deaths, but without better data it's impossible to verify. A sample hypthesis: Women's heads are comparable to men's in size and weight but they generally have less neck strength. This may leave them more vulnerable to head blows and injuries in falls. Now the challenge is to get the necessary data and study it to confirm or disprove that theory.

Another hypothesis: Chicago Divvy bike riders are mostly women who don't wear helmets. (I'm speculating based on observing casual city rental bike riders in my hometown, Fort Worth -- and my observations may be flawed or biased because of the route on which I see mostly young women riding city bikes while not wearing helmets.) Again, we'd need the data to determine whether this is true and relevant.

It's all just guesswork without data, statistically significant sampling and proper studies.
How about this, the hypothesis is not true - the one year sample is within normal variation and actually more men than wonmen are killed. you cannot draw any conclusion from the presented data. Guesses are simply hot air blown out the butt. Any hypothesis that is not based on an accurate conclusions is not worth the electrons it takes to post it. Frankly any "speculation that "females might be more vulnerable to certain types of cycling injuries and deaths" is in this case garbage because there is no was to discern that females might be more vulnerable to certain types of cycling injuries and deaths is in any way true.
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 04:34 PM
  #18  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
How about this, the hypothesis is not true - the one year sample is within normal variation and actually more men than wonmen are killed. you cannot draw any conclusion from the presented data. Guesses are simply hot air blown out the butt. Any hypothesis that is not based on an accurate conclusions is not worth the electrons it takes to post it. Frankly any "speculation that "females might be more vulnerable to certain types of cycling injuries and deaths" is in this case garbage because there is no was to discern that females might be more vulnerable to certain types of cycling injuries and deaths is in any way true.
You restated what I already wrote. Golf clap.
canklecat is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 04:54 PM
  #19  
kickstart
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by AlexCyclistRoch
Those are strictly aerodynamic aids. You can still be run over by the trailer tandems, and those "side guards" have little structural integrity to them.
Most of the trailers I pull have them, and I can say for certain they are rigid enough to fend off a pedestrian or cyclist.
kickstart is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 04:58 PM
  #20  
kickstart
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
American truckers put sharpened chrome spikes on their front wheel lug nuts..
Those silly looking things are actually snap on plastic covers that are basically harmless, if not safer than the lugs themselves. Odds are if one is close enough to a moving truck to contact them, they probably have a lot more to worry about.
kickstart is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 05:34 PM
  #21  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times in 936 Posts
I agree that a sample size of 6 isn't enough to make a correlation that gender has anything to do with likeliness to be a bicycle fatality. Maybe if they studied all fatalities across the entire country for the past 20 years or so, but even then it's not guaranteed that gender really matters, even if more females are victims.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 10:36 PM
  #22  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,261
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,351 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
That may just be shoddy journalism jumping to exaggerated conclusions, but does that exclude the possibility it still reflects real and tangible changes?
It doesn't exclude the possibility that it doesn't reflect "real and tangible changes" either.

You don't know anything. Especially, if it's shoddy journalism.

Originally Posted by kickstart
It doesn't seem unreasonable that willingness to take risks would more likely be based on the person rather than the vehicle.
Many (maybe, even most) people consider cycling in traffic much more dangerous than driving.

People who choose to cycle are (likely) a small percentage of drivers.

That (relatively) unusual behavior might mean their behavior as drivers is unusual.

Maybe, the degree of care taken by cyclists is different than the average driver.

Originally Posted by kickstart
It also doesn't seem unreasonable that as the gender gap continues to close, the similarities in behavior will continue to grow.
Who knows! The data provided isn't sufficient to tell.

Last edited by njkayaker; 03-11-17 at 10:45 PM.
njkayaker is offline  
Old 03-11-17, 10:53 PM
  #23  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,261
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,351 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
Agreed that this is far too few incidents from which to draw valid statistical conclusions. But the conclusion is consistent with reports from London where women cyclists were seen to be over represented in cyclist fatalities resulting from being hooked by turning trucks. One possibility suggested was that women are more likely to remain stopped at red lights making them vulnerable to the turning truck when the light changes.
Why are female cyclists more vulnerable to London's lorries? | London Evening Standard
Who knows if females being run over by lorries in London has anything to do with people in Chicago. Are the females in Chicago being killed the same way?
njkayaker is offline  
Old 03-12-17, 03:04 AM
  #24  
coominya
Senior Member
 
coominya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Brisbane Aust
Posts: 1,643

Bikes: Giant ToughRoad Giant talon

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 705 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
With only six fatalities it's doubtful that the sex breakdown has any meaning.
Right you are professor. Lets wait until we have at least 100 corpses before we jump to conclusions.
coominya is offline  
Old 03-12-17, 07:00 AM
  #25  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,261
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,351 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by coominya
Right you are professor. Lets wait until we have at least 100 corpses before we jump to conclusions.


Why jump to conclusions at all?

Why ignore the other 3 riders?

Last edited by njkayaker; 03-12-17 at 10:50 AM.
njkayaker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.