26 x 1.95 tyres vs 26 x 1.75 tyres?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
26 x 1.95 tyres vs 26 x 1.75 tyres?
first post!
The question is in the title.
Would someone notice a difference riding two different mountain bikes with these two different wheel and tyre sizes?
Thanks in advance
The question is in the title.
Would someone notice a difference riding two different mountain bikes with these two different wheel and tyre sizes?
Thanks in advance
#2
Really Old Senior Member
Maybe? Same brand & model of tire?
Try both sizes on the SAME bike and you should notice the weight reduction at a minimum.
Try both sizes on the SAME bike and you should notice the weight reduction at a minimum.
#3
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
#4
Really Old Senior Member
BTW, they are the SAME wheel size.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,678
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would have to ask the difference what kind of difference are you expecting first.
Off road dirt, gravel or on pavement? the only difference would be on the tread design you choose and that will have a direct fill on the road surface you are on also.
If you are going to ride pavement only then a non knobby style that will be better and you will notice, but take it in the gravel and dirt depending on the tread you pick you may notice it also.
Off road dirt, gravel or on pavement? the only difference would be on the tread design you choose and that will have a direct fill on the road surface you are on also.
If you are going to ride pavement only then a non knobby style that will be better and you will notice, but take it in the gravel and dirt depending on the tread you pick you may notice it also.
__________________
It may not be fancy but it gets me were I need to go.
https://www.jtgraphics.net/cyclist_bicycles.htm
It may not be fancy but it gets me were I need to go.
https://www.jtgraphics.net/cyclist_bicycles.htm
#7
S'Cruzer
typically, you run a lower pressure in a larger tire. You should be running 40-50psi in those 1.95s (50mm), unless you're really heavy (50 lbs is suitable for a 230lb rider). a light rider might only run 35 lbs. you can run maybe 10% less pressure in the front, too, depending on the balance of your bike (the more upright and rear-weighted the bike, then run more air in back, less in front).
50-60 lbs, maybe 65 lbs, is appropriate for a 1.75" (44mm), based on your weight and the bikes front-rear balance.
50-60 lbs, maybe 65 lbs, is appropriate for a 1.75" (44mm), based on your weight and the bikes front-rear balance.
#8
Banned
Would someone notice a difference
Do you remember the story of 'the Princess and the Pea' ?
https://childhoodreading.com/?p=5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Princess_and_the_Pea
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
Depends.
When I run a skinny tire on my MTB I need to run the pressure way up there to avoid snakebite flats.
For a shorter ride on a reasonably firm but knobbly surface it's no big deal, but for longer rides comfort will eventually begin to tell.
And if I have to tackle a loose surface a skinny tire just won't let me reach a useful compromise between snakebite avoidance and "buoyancy" on the loose surface.
When I run a skinny tire on my MTB I need to run the pressure way up there to avoid snakebite flats.
For a shorter ride on a reasonably firm but knobbly surface it's no big deal, but for longer rides comfort will eventually begin to tell.
And if I have to tackle a loose surface a skinny tire just won't let me reach a useful compromise between snakebite avoidance and "buoyancy" on the loose surface.
#10
Senior Member
Based on the information provided proceeding the question, my answer would me no.
#11
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got a related question and am, admittedly, unknowledgable. I currently have 26"x1.95 tires. My front wheel has a a Leeds electric motor now (getting older....). I am considering to buy a bike with 26"x1.75 tires. Will there be any problem to put this on the same rim, as long as that rim is 26"?
#12
Banned
ETRTO numbers on the sidewall both 559?
(there are several nominal 26" wheel-tire combos)
then you're good to go ..
559-47 is what I use on my trekking bike..
...
(there are several nominal 26" wheel-tire combos)
then you're good to go ..
559-47 is what I use on my trekking bike..
...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
daihard
General Cycling Discussion
63
08-21-13 05:51 PM
the watcher
Commuting
5
02-24-11 08:59 PM