Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Question on minimum derailleur capacity

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Question on minimum derailleur capacity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-17, 11:30 PM
  #1  
decisivemoment
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 74

Bikes: 2007 Cannondale Synapse Alloy/105 5800/HED Ardennes+ rim

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Question on minimum derailleur capacity

I'm looking at a new 105 rear derailleur and notice the Shimano specs for the medium cage specific a minimum cassette of 11-28 and a maximum of 11-32 -- and they do specify those ranges and not just the individual sprockets. Does this mean there's too much slack chain to run a 12-25 or 11-25 and you'd have to go for a short cage for that? With the short cage topping out at 28T (or maybe 30T at a pinch), that seems a little inconvenient as I'd kind of like to be able to run 12-25 most of the time but something like an 11-32 for a vacation to a hilly area. The concept of maximum capacity makes perfect sense but is there a minimum capacity below which you cannot go if you don't want the derailleur cage to come right back up into itself?
decisivemoment is offline  
Old 11-18-17, 11:35 PM
  #2  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,663

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5766 Post(s)
Liked 2,538 Times in 1,404 Posts
IMO there's no such thing as a minimum capacity for a derailleur. After all. every cassette includes smaller spockets, so it it'll work with the rated 28t, it'll also work with the 25, or even the 12.

I suspect that minimum capacity specs. aren't intended to be a minimum as much as the smallest size at which they're necessary. So, if your cassette tops out at 26t, you don't NEED to use the medium cage, but that doesn't mean you can't use it.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 11-19-17, 05:19 AM
  #3  
Feaduin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You can run a more closely spaced cassette if you want. What the minimum means is that is the range of cassettes that the derailleur is going to shift optimally on. Going to a more closely spaced cassette will mean that the jockey wheel will not be able to maintain consistent spacing off the cassette cogs. That being said, I doubt that the difference is going to be that noticeable.
Feaduin is offline  
Old 11-20-17, 01:44 AM
  #4  
beanbag
S*v* J*sus
 
beanbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Northern California
Posts: 83

Bikes: Fuji Gran Fondo

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
The two numbers you need to look at are "Total capacity" = 37T and "maximum sprocket" = 32T.

Total capacity = (big+big combo) minus (small+small combo).

For example, if you have 50/34F and 11/32 R, then the capacity = (50+32)-(34+11)=82-45=37

This combo will just barely work, namely the big-big will be very tight and the small-small will be very loose.
If you swap the cassette to 11-25, then the small-small will be equally loose and the big-big will be a little looser than before.

Just keep in mind that you'll be keeping the same chain when swapping cassettes back and forth, so don't accidentally make your chain too short for the 11-32.
beanbag is offline  
Old 11-20-17, 04:14 AM
  #5  
raria
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
This

Originally Posted by beanbag
The two numbers you need to look at are "Total capacity" = 37T and "maximum sprocket" = 32T.

Total capacity = (big+big combo) minus (small+small combo).

For example, if you have 50/34F and 11/32 R, then the capacity = (50+32)-(34+11)=82-45=37

This combo will just barely work, namely the big-big will be very tight and the small-small will be very loose.
If you swap the cassette to 11-25, then the small-small will be equally loose and the big-big will be a little looser than before.
raria is offline  
Old 11-20-17, 08:27 AM
  #6  
Bike Gremlin
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times in 130 Posts
Originally Posted by decisivemoment
I'm looking at a new 105 rear derailleur and notice the Shimano specs for the medium cage specific a minimum cassette of 11-28 and a maximum of 11-32 -- and they do specify those ranges and not just the individual sprockets. Does this mean there's too much slack chain to run a 12-25 or 11-25 and you'd have to go for a short cage for that? With the short cage topping out at 28T (or maybe 30T at a pinch), that seems a little inconvenient as I'd kind of like to be able to run 12-25 most of the time but something like an 11-32 for a vacation to a hilly area. The concept of maximum capacity makes perfect sense but is there a minimum capacity below which you cannot go if you don't want the derailleur cage to come right back up into itself?
No, there is no minimal capacity. With enough max. capacity and optimal chain length, the RD cage will remain within it's working "sweet spot". However, getting a long cage RD where a short cage one (with smaller capacity) would serve fine does have a (really minor) flaw: you get some needless extra weigth and perhaps arguably slightly (if measurable at all) slower shifting.
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 08-23-18, 09:02 PM
  #7  
decisivemoment
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 74

Bikes: 2007 Cannondale Synapse Alloy/105 5800/HED Ardennes+ rim

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Eventually ended up setting it up with the 5800 long cage and the 11-28 cassette. Seems to work very well though it doesn't look quite right on the bike.....and I inadvertently set the chain too short for a bigger cassette so if I do add something for a mountain goat before the current chain wears out I'll just have to get a new chain early. Losing the #16 sprocket feels strange but it has been an excuse to use the 17 and practice faster cadence.
decisivemoment is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nose4it
Bicycle Mechanics
8
06-26-17 06:17 AM
RMoudatir
General Cycling Discussion
19
03-29-17 03:43 PM
aaronechang
Bicycle Mechanics
14
11-10-12 09:59 AM
Phydiox
Bicycle Mechanics
3
07-14-10 10:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.