Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Trek or Raleigh

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-06, 04:01 PM
  #1  
New2Cycling
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
New2Cycling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mid-Atlantic State
Posts: 87

Bikes: Schwinn Range Searcher

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trek or Raleigh

My father is interested in purchasing a bike from a LBS. He's really kind of stuck between two brands, Raleigh and Trek. Since he hasn't been on a bike in years, he is interested in a hybrid bike. Based on the two brands I stated, does anyone have preferences? Any advice or input would be greatly appreciated.
N2C
New2Cycling is offline  
Old 02-19-06, 04:11 PM
  #2  
BroMax
The Other White Meat
 
BroMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reno
Posts: 605

Bikes: Raleigh Sports 3 speed, Torker T-530

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I looked at the Raleigh line and eliminated it from my list of semi-finalists, mostly because it's no longer a "real" Raleigh, imported from their factory in Nottingham. The other reason is they seem very fond of putting suspension forks on just about everything and I do not need or want a suspension fork. For all I know they could be a good value; just not for me.

Of the two, I'd favor Trek.

For myself, I've decided to take as much money as I need to put an old, well-equipped Motobecane that gathers dust in my garage--a "gift" from a student who left years ago--into good, useable condition. For the value, it's the best I can do and it will be cheaper than what I was planning to spend. I expect it will be a good start on a relationship with the local bike shop, because parts are usually sold at a higher margin that ready-to-ride bikes.
BroMax is offline  
Old 02-19-06, 06:50 PM
  #3  
catatonic
Chairman of the Bored
 
catatonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 5,825

Bikes: 2004 Raleigh Talus, 2001 Motobecane Vent Noir (Custom build for heavy riders)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I have a Raleigh mountain bike, and it's great. A bit heavy, but the component choices seem to be pretty well thought out.

I really don't care where it's made so long as it's quality. Even the great Italian companies are making some of their bikes in Taiwan now...so to me where it's made is a moot point.
catatonic is offline  
Old 02-20-06, 01:20 AM
  #4  
becnal
I'm made of earth!
 
becnal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 2,025

Bikes: KTM Macina 5 e-bike, Babboe Curve-E cargobike, Raleigh Aspen touring/off-road hybrid.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I love love love my Ralleigh hybrid. Don't care what anyone says, it IS a real Raleigh. Great bike! Especially like the Magura hydraulic brakes it comes with. Super stopping power, a snap to change the brake pads, and removing a wheel takes 2 nanoseconds.
becnal is offline  
Old 02-20-06, 05:34 AM
  #5  
bikingbets
loves rail-trails
 
bikingbets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Western PA
Posts: 154

Bikes: 2009 Kona Sutra, 2010 Kona Dew Plus, 2008 Raleigh Companion Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've never ridden a Trek, but I can give you my perspective of a Raleigh Passage 4.0 hybrid.
It's a great bike! I bought it new after getting addicted to cycling on a slow mountain bike. The Raleigh has great components and is very comfortable. However, it is rather heavy. As I got more fit and wanted to ride faster, the wider (40 mm) tires and suspension fork weren't as necessary as they once were for the comfort factor. Now my husband has the Raleigh (which he absolutely loves) and I have a used Marin Sausalito. The Raleigh is more of a "comfort bike" and the Marin is more of a "road bike."
bikingbets is offline  
Old 02-20-06, 05:46 AM
  #6  
Waldo
Zippy Engineer
 
Waldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: IN
Posts: 1,801

Bikes: Bianchi 928, Bianchi Pista Concept 2004, Surly Steamroller, 1998 Schwinn Factory Team Homegrown, 1999 Schwinn Homegrown Factory, 2000 Schwinn Panther, Niner EMD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BroMax
I looked at the Raleigh line and eliminated it from my list of semi-finalists, mostly because it's no longer a "real" Raleigh, imported from their factory in Nottingham.
The Trek hybrids are made by Giant in Taiwan or China...are they still real Treks?
Waldo is offline  
Old 02-20-06, 01:14 PM
  #7  
foxden
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Have a Raleigh Passage 5.0, had some features I prefered - trigger shifters, disc brakes, and 35mm 700C tires. It is very well made with a bit better components than the Trek 7300 that I looked at. Both are virtually the same, and all are made in China. If you want something finer, a Cannondale is US made. But as far as value, either one, along with Gary Fisher, Specialized and Giant, is a good choice.

Everyone will give you different advice, generally based upon their riding experience and level. A hybrid is a good entry bike and will be fine on the road and paved trails. It is more comfortable than a road bike, too. You could outgrow it, but that is a better route than buying some road bike that never gets ridden because it is too uncomfortable for a beginner and sits in your garage.
foxden is offline  
Old 02-21-06, 04:12 PM
  #8  
jz19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 253
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I had a Raleigh mountain bike (2003) and it was a good bike. I sold it because I wanted a steel frame but I never had a problem with it and was a better value for the money than other brands. Your dad should ride both bikes and then decide which one he like better. Both will work fine.
jz19 is offline  
Old 02-22-06, 07:42 PM
  #9  
HWS
Fuji Shill
 
HWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gilmanton Iron Works, NH
Posts: 1,230

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have an 03 Raleigh C40 and have put probably 10,000 miles on it. All I have had to do is replace the chain, tires and brake pads. I still ride it in the winter as my beater. It's as solid as a rock.
__________________
HWS is offline  
Old 04-04-06, 08:57 PM
  #10  
Cyclesome
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Pa
Posts: 4

Bikes: Trek 4500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Like your advice

I am considering the Trek 7300 or a Cannondale Adventure 400 to replace my uncomfortable Trek 4500.
How do the components of a Trek and Canndondale compare? Please advice.
Cyclesome is offline  
Old 04-08-06, 10:18 PM
  #11  
danielhaden
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
One more vote for Raliegh!!

I've ridden a lot of Trek. I wasn't pleased once.

Raliegh is well though out.

My preference is Dutch market Ralieghs. Those are the highest quality. Shipping cost is far out.
danielhaden is offline  
Old 04-08-06, 11:50 PM
  #12  
chicbicyclist
Senior Member
 
chicbicyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 605

Bikes: Batavus Old Dutch

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have a Raleigh made in 2000 or 2001. They are made in the USA, and I love the brand. I'm not sure where the newer Raleighs come from. I do agree that if you don't like front suspension like me, steer clear of the newer models.

Last edited by chicbicyclist; 04-08-06 at 11:56 PM.
chicbicyclist is offline  
Old 04-09-06, 07:46 AM
  #13  
bbattle
.
 
bbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,764

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times in 14 Posts
Trek Hybrids would be good, also their fitness bikes, the FX series. The FX doesn't have the front suspension of the hybrid, is a little more aggressive on the geometry and has flat bars instead of riser bars. My wife has a Trek 7100 hybrid and I'm upgrading her to the 7.5FX this spring. It's a bit faster and has better components. She rode the 7100 on dirt roads, packed trails, roads with no troubles but for rides longer than 25 miles I feel the FX will be the better ride.



Trek Hybrid 7100 $300 list




Trek 7.2FX $400 list


2005 Giant FCR4 $440


2006 Fuji Crosstown 4.0 $290


Raleigh Passage 4.0


My wife's new 7.5FX WSD


Bikes like these will have triple chainrings with a wide cassette for lots of gearing options. You can add racks and fenders and tow kids in their trailers. As you go up in price, you get better wheels, better gears but the frame is the same.

These front suspension forks seem to be really popular but my wife hasn't felt the need for one and they do add weight to the front of the bike. A lot of these bikes have a suspension seatpost but that too, seems to be unnecessary.

When you first start riding and putting decent mileage on your bike, the saddle may seem to be hurting your rump. Don't make the mistake of swapping it with something squishier; that will actually make the problem worse. You sit on your sitbones(ischial tuberosities). If they sink down into the saddle, that brings pressure to bear on your "soft parts". Not a good thing. Better to get a hard saddle that supports your sitbones. Trust me, you'll get used to it.

I recommend getting a saddle bag that fits in behind your saddle to store a spare tube, tire levers, a patch kit, maybe some useful allen wrenches. You can get some that can hold all that plus a cellphone or your wallet. A bottle cage and some extra water bottles are good to have, too. You can get a small frame pump that is strapped to your bottom tube next to the water bottle. I recommend a floor pump for home use.

Then, a nice helmet that fits. Doesn't have to be expensive but make sure it has decent ventilation and fits your noggin well. Maybe some half-fingered gloves. Sunglasses that fit snugly around your face keep the wind and bugs out of your eyes and you won't be squinting all the time.

Finally, to show the neighborhood how cool you are on your new ride, some nice spandex jerseys and shorts. These really do make the riding a lot more comfortable but if the idea of spandex shorts bothers you, get some mountain bike shorts, aka baggies. They will have the chamois to protect your rear but aren't skin tight.

It's important to test ride as many bikes in your category to find the one that fits you the best. Have the local bike shop(LBS) guys do any adjustments to the seat and handlebars to get you a decent fit and then ride. A 54cm Trek won't fit you the same as a 54cm Fuji or a 54cm Specialized so buying an unknown bike off e-Bay isn't recommended.

There are still plenty of 2005 models available in many stores and you may be able to get a good deal on one.
__________________
bbattle is offline  
Old 04-10-06, 12:21 AM
  #14  
danielhaden
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The cat's meow.

Since the bike shop is set on selling you something that requires maintenance. . .

How about something fast, fully featured, and comfortable; considerably faster and requires no maintenance?

Here it is, the cat's meow:



Fully featured gears that don't require maintenance, operate easily (Any gear, any time, never stuck), don't overlap (no complex derailer conflicts! No memorizing what doesn't work, because every gear works!), and the gears are highly competent for both hills and speed.
Weatherproof drum brake that does not wear out the rear rim and does not require maintenance
Super-bright headlights and taillight that do not require batteries (dyno hub powered with one simple switch).
Fenders that stop dirt from entering the chain= no maintenance.
An alloy touring rack with the extra sheilds to support pannier bags so that you can easily carry things
700c size wheels make tire selection far easier; however, it comes with kevlar sheilded tires for flat resistance and no maintenance

Of course, the always-ready-to-go design keeps you away from the bike mechanic, so they wouldn't be likely to recommend this. Well, that and it's not mainstream. It is sort of like a light weight 3x faster 3-speed because it has comfort, all the features, ease of use, durability and lots of speed. This makes lots of enjoyment!

Give it a test drive. It is fast, lightweight (I was so surprised that a fully featured cycle would be light weight), extremely enjoyable, and did I mention it is fast? It'll blow those Treks away! That's because it is so much easier to pedal than a hybrid cycle that you wind up going faster and having more fun.
danielhaden is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.