Touring and Brooks saddle.
#1
Sarcastic Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 482
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Touring and Brooks saddle.
What is the best Brooks saddle to put on a Trek 520 used for commuting and different types of touring? Will do some short and long distance tours. B17, Champion, narrow, standard? Don't really know the difference between them all. Oh, the seat is about 1-2 inches above the handle bars; at least when I rode it at the LBS. This is unfamiliar territory. Thanks!
Cheers,
Urbanmonk
Cheers,
Urbanmonk
#2
X-Large Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 580
Bikes: 2004 Rivendell Atlantis, 2004 Thorn eXp, 2004 Bob Brown Cycles Custom
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Use the Search Button... that's what it is for.
Not to be impolite... you are asking MANY well-worn questions that have lots of already answered answers just waiting to delight and tickle your eyes if you'd only place your cursor over Search and press your left mouse button.
Not to be impolite... you are asking MANY well-worn questions that have lots of already answered answers just waiting to delight and tickle your eyes if you'd only place your cursor over Search and press your left mouse button.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12192 Post(s)
Liked 1,496 Times
in
1,108 Posts
Hi,
sounds like you have a pretty aggressive riding position for a touring bike. Touring bikes usually have them on the same level.
I have the bars a tiny bit higher than the seat on my Fuji. As you get more aero, people usually want a narrow saddle. The Pro is popular. Is your riding position good for you over the course of a few hours of riding?
sounds like you have a pretty aggressive riding position for a touring bike. Touring bikes usually have them on the same level.
I have the bars a tiny bit higher than the seat on my Fuji. As you get more aero, people usually want a narrow saddle. The Pro is popular. Is your riding position good for you over the course of a few hours of riding?
#4
Sarcastic Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 482
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks, late.
So the aero position is not what I'm seeking for long hauls? I want comfort most of all. I just rode the bike yesterday at my LBS. With a 21 inch frame, (I'm 5'10), and the set-up that way, the seat was about an inch maaaaybe 2 above the the bars. (Do you think the frame is too small; I have around two inches clearance in the inseam.) The LBS said they would swap bars and stem for shorter geo if needed. And they also said they would swap the original seat: Bontrager CRZ Road, for a Brooks model if I wanted. The geometry is completely differenct than that on my Cannondale cross/road; there I'm more aero. But for touring/commuting I only want comfort. Thanks.
Cheers,
Urbanmonk
So the aero position is not what I'm seeking for long hauls? I want comfort most of all. I just rode the bike yesterday at my LBS. With a 21 inch frame, (I'm 5'10), and the set-up that way, the seat was about an inch maaaaybe 2 above the the bars. (Do you think the frame is too small; I have around two inches clearance in the inseam.) The LBS said they would swap bars and stem for shorter geo if needed. And they also said they would swap the original seat: Bontrager CRZ Road, for a Brooks model if I wanted. The geometry is completely differenct than that on my Cannondale cross/road; there I'm more aero. But for touring/commuting I only want comfort. Thanks.
Cheers,
Urbanmonk
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 71
Bikes: Trek 1500 (04)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know about "best", but I had a Brooks B17 on my '79 Fuji Grand Tourer for over 20 years. It accompanied me on several long distance trips (at least one century and a two day 160 mile trip). I would still have it today if we didn't have to pick and choose what things to leave behind when we moved back from Japan.
When I bought a new road bike this year, it wasn't too long before I ordered a B17 Special. Most of my riding now is on a short commute (~2.5 miles each way, twice a week).
The B17 was and is an excellent saddle for me (6'2", 200+/-20 lbs) for both commuting and touring. Again, I cannot speak to "best". Furthermore, as always, your mileage may vary...
When I bought a new road bike this year, it wasn't too long before I ordered a B17 Special. Most of my riding now is on a short commute (~2.5 miles each way, twice a week).
The B17 was and is an excellent saddle for me (6'2", 200+/-20 lbs) for both commuting and touring. Again, I cannot speak to "best". Furthermore, as always, your mileage may vary...
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12192 Post(s)
Liked 1,496 Times
in
1,108 Posts
Hi,
when you get a good touring position the muscles in your back relax because they aren't supporting your weight. I call it the Aahhh moment. If you have to use several inches of spacers or a 200cm stem to get there.....it's the wrong size. The position is much like a crouch where you are bent forward a little. That is the traditional touring position. A lot of people prefer the position of a traditional sport rider. Bar will still be at the same height (or an inch lower) but they will be an inch or two further away from the seat. Still fairly upright, but a lot zoomier. If you want to cover long distances quickly, this is an option.
when you get a good touring position the muscles in your back relax because they aren't supporting your weight. I call it the Aahhh moment. If you have to use several inches of spacers or a 200cm stem to get there.....it's the wrong size. The position is much like a crouch where you are bent forward a little. That is the traditional touring position. A lot of people prefer the position of a traditional sport rider. Bar will still be at the same height (or an inch lower) but they will be an inch or two further away from the seat. Still fairly upright, but a lot zoomier. If you want to cover long distances quickly, this is an option.
Last edited by late; 03-07-04 at 09:11 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ohio's Cycling Capital, America's North Coast.
Posts: 4,617
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
For me, it comes down to fit. The b-17 is far more comfortable than my Pro. The pro is too narrow for my gorgeous behind.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Central Upstate New York
Posts: 130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Best Brooks saddle for you? I don't believe anybody can truly answer that other than you. Best for one person is not the best for another. I have 50,000 miles on a Brooks Pro and it's the best for me. Try either a B17 or a Pro and ride ride and ride. Then answer you question if you are happy with your choice.
Wells
Wells
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cherry Hill,NJ
Posts: 1,176
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Urbanmonk
Thanks, late.
So the aero position is not what I'm seeking for long hauls? I want comfort most of all. I just rode the bike yesterday at my LBS. With a 21 inch frame, (I'm 5'10), and the set-up that way, the seat was about an inch maaaaybe 2 above the the bars. (Do you think the frame is too small; I have around two inches clearance in the inseam.)
So the aero position is not what I'm seeking for long hauls? I want comfort most of all. I just rode the bike yesterday at my LBS. With a 21 inch frame, (I'm 5'10), and the set-up that way, the seat was about an inch maaaaybe 2 above the the bars. (Do you think the frame is too small; I have around two inches clearance in the inseam.)
As you describe it this bike sounds like it is too small. Try a 23". The most important measurement is the top tube length. Compare the two sizes for best fit. The larger size will allow you to get the bars higher. At seat height using the bars that come with the bike will still allow an aerodynamic riding position while your in the drops. But mostly you'll want to ride on the hoods or flat top part of the bar. The more upright position will be more comfortable for longer rides.
#12
In Memory of One Cool Cat
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,722
Bikes: Lemond Victoire, Cannondale.Mountain Bike, two 1980s lugged steel Treks, ancient 1980-something Giant mountain bike converted into a slick tired commuter with mustache handlebars, 1960-something Raleigh Sports
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Check out Wallingford Bicycle
www.wallbike.com sells 'em all and will consult with you about your needs. They even offer a guarantee if you want to return a Brooks saddle. Who else can say that?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Urbanmonk
B17, Champion, narrow, standard?
The Champion is a fancier B17. Thicker leather. Nice copper rivets rather than copper-coated steel rivets, and possibly a thicker leather with a chamfered edge. Costs a bit more, but it'll look nicer. I like the honey color.
wallbike.com has a great Brooks return guarantee... something like 6 months to try the saddle.
Everything I see says to go easy on maintenance. Rivendell.com recommends Oberhauf leather protector over the Brooks Proofide, but the Brooks stuff probably works too. Just don't use to much of either.
#14
ruggerhugger
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Orrville OH
Posts: 1
Bikes: Roark/Lemond Zurich
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do you know the difference between an B17 Narrow and the Brooks Pro saddle? I'm researching them and can't find the difference or, are they one and the same?
#15
hello
I believe the Pro comes with thicker leather and is just a tiny bid wider than the B17 Narrow. I have both saddles.
#16
Tuggo
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 32
Bikes: Trek 2500, Burley Tandem, beater tourer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Go to the oracle - the Brooks site at https://www.brookssaddles.com/
All will be made clear. Note that the B 17 (and some other models) come in narrow, standard and womens widths, the women's one being wider than the standard.
Brian
All will be made clear. Note that the B 17 (and some other models) come in narrow, standard and womens widths, the women's one being wider than the standard.
Brian