Panaracer Gravelkings
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 209
Bikes: Lemond Poprad, Cervelo Soloist, Cannondale F4, RANS Velocity Squared
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times
in
45 Posts
Panaracer Gravelkings
I was looking at the Panaracer Gravelking SK or SK+, and depending on retailer are "tubeless ready, " or plain "tubeless." Anyone try the tubeless ready versions? Is it kinda like half good a two things? I am looking for a clincher, but most reviews don't touch on the dual use. I have Panaracer Pasela 700 x 32 currently.
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
#2
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,957
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times
in
527 Posts
According to the Panaracer website, all of the GK SKs are "tubeless compatible" except for the 26-622 and 28-622, which require tubes. The terms tubeless, tubeless-ready, and tubeless-compatible are synonymous.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Iowa
Posts: 682
Bikes: 2021 Salsa Fargo 1x12, 2019 Jamis Renegade Exploit 1x11. Motobacne NX Fat Tire
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 198 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times
in
170 Posts
You could argue they technically aren't tubeless until you mount them on your rims without a tube This is why "tubeless compatible" or "tubeless ready" are used to describe them as some people will still put tubes inside when mounting them.
#4
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
”Tubeless” technically means that it can be run without sealant on the proper “tubeless” rim.
Likes For Kapusta:
#5
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 209
Bikes: Lemond Poprad, Cervelo Soloist, Cannondale F4, RANS Velocity Squared
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times
in
45 Posts
Thanks. I wonder how tubeless ready tires work as a clincher? As good as a regular clincher?
#6
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
#8
Junior Member
#9
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 209
Bikes: Lemond Poprad, Cervelo Soloist, Cannondale F4, RANS Velocity Squared
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times
in
45 Posts
I was asking because my understanding of tubeless rims (apparently flawed) was that they were not interchangeable. I guess things have changed.
Anyway, thanks for the input.
Anyway, thanks for the input.
#10
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
421 Posts
From what I've read and experienced with tubeless ready rims, it can be very hard to get tires on and off. One bike in our family fleet would be pretty much impossible to fix a flat while on a ride, because our combined strength is barely enough to get the bead over the rim, even after trying all of the tricks in the book, and not wanting to injure our hands.
Personally I would only consider tubeless ready rims if I had a reason to ride tubeless, otherwise it's yet another technology to make cycling less pleasant for the average person.
Personally I would only consider tubeless ready rims if I had a reason to ride tubeless, otherwise it's yet another technology to make cycling less pleasant for the average person.