Heredity and Pro Cycling
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Heredity and Pro Cycling
Is it possible to be a pro cyclist without superb genes from mom and dad?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
It may be possible to be a pro without the genes but not a long lived top pro. Top pros, no matter the sport, are not only superior athletes in the short term, they seem to suffer many fewer injuries. In tennis for example, Andy Murry is a top ranked tennis player but is prone in injuries keeping him off the court frequently.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
Like any sport, you’re looking at about 1/10 of 1% of the population who are even born with the athletic ability to compete. You don’t necessarily need to have inherited the genes from a parent or grandparent (for every Matthieu vdPoel or Dan Martin or Taylor Phinney with top level pro cyclists on both sides of the family, there are ten pros who have no family background in any sport at all), but if you don’t have lungs that can pull in enough air, or red blood cells that can carry enough o2, or muscles that can use that o2 and some glucose to turn pedals around, and then the hand-eye l-body coordination to steer a bike at high speeds, you’re not going to make it. Because no matter how hard the 95-percentile rider works at ALL of those things, there’s a 1-percentile rider who is working as hard or harder. And that 1-percentile rider will always have the edge.
Likes For Leinster:
#4
Banned.
Thread Starter
Like any sport, you’re looking at about 1/10 of 1% of the population who are even born with the athletic ability to compete. You don’t necessarily need to have inherited the genes from a parent or grandparent (for every Matthieu vdPoel or Dan Martin or Taylor Phinney with top level pro cyclists on both sides of the family, there are ten pros who have no family background in any sport at all), but if you don’t have lungs that can pull in enough air, or red blood cells that can carry enough o2, or muscles that can use that o2 and some glucose to turn pedals around, and then the hand-eye l-body coordination to steer a bike at high speeds, you’re not going to make it. Because no matter how hard the 95-percentile rider works at ALL of those things, there’s a 1-percentile rider who is working as hard or harder. And that 1-percentile rider will always have the edge.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,268
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 605 Post(s)
Liked 480 Times
in
260 Posts
If all sport were purely based on individual merit, then of course genetic ability would be a big factor; in some cases it is, there are some exceptional athletes succeeding out there who've worked very hard to achieve incredible things.
But it is far from the only factor, especially where politics and financial backing are important. This is very true in racing, and in cycling. What is your last name may be the difference between getting chosen for a seat, or not. It doesn't mean the person is not qualified, or didn't work as hard. But if two guys go around the F1 track at the same rate (or within a few hundredths of a second) and one brings millions of euros of funding... well, the choice is made, isn't it? Lance Stroll (F1) is a very talented driver, but certainly gets a lot of help from his billionaire father.
Add in that if your mom and dad can teach you things from a young age and put you literally years in front of your competitors as far as practice and training goes... you're not genetically superior, you've simply got the benefit of experience that others haven't had, and that might make you a better competitor. Or maybe they can put you in contact with the right coaches, sponsors, systems, teams, funding sources... again with F1, I think of Rosberg (Nico; dad Kiki), or with cycling, Roche (Nicolas; dad Stephen).
As is often the case with this sort of question, its "a bit of both", but depends very much on the structure of the sport.
But it is far from the only factor, especially where politics and financial backing are important. This is very true in racing, and in cycling. What is your last name may be the difference between getting chosen for a seat, or not. It doesn't mean the person is not qualified, or didn't work as hard. But if two guys go around the F1 track at the same rate (or within a few hundredths of a second) and one brings millions of euros of funding... well, the choice is made, isn't it? Lance Stroll (F1) is a very talented driver, but certainly gets a lot of help from his billionaire father.
Add in that if your mom and dad can teach you things from a young age and put you literally years in front of your competitors as far as practice and training goes... you're not genetically superior, you've simply got the benefit of experience that others haven't had, and that might make you a better competitor. Or maybe they can put you in contact with the right coaches, sponsors, systems, teams, funding sources... again with F1, I think of Rosberg (Nico; dad Kiki), or with cycling, Roche (Nicolas; dad Stephen).
As is often the case with this sort of question, its "a bit of both", but depends very much on the structure of the sport.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,268
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 605 Post(s)
Liked 480 Times
in
260 Posts
Yes (you don't need "superior genes from mom and dad"), but along with a genetic ability to be a professional cyclist, you also need a great deal of external help (financial and political), or an equally great deal of luck.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,751
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4389 Post(s)
Liked 3,016 Times
in
1,865 Posts
It also helps to be born, raised, and to train at 3000 m. Just ask the Colombians.
#8
Banned.
Thread Starter
#9
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,984
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4945 Post(s)
Liked 8,085 Times
in
3,825 Posts
#10
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,984
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4945 Post(s)
Liked 8,085 Times
in
3,825 Posts
Like any sport, you’re looking at about 1/10 of 1% of the population who are even born with the athletic ability to compete. You don’t necessarily need to have inherited the genes from a parent or grandparent (for every Matthieu vdPoel or Dan Martin or Taylor Phinney with top level pro cyclists on both sides of the family, there are ten pros who have no family background in any sport at all), but if you don’t have lungs that can pull in enough air, or red blood cells that can carry enough o2, or muscles that can use that o2 and some glucose to turn pedals around, and then the hand-eye l-body coordination to steer a bike at high speeds, you’re not going to make it. Because no matter how hard the 95-percentile rider works at ALL of those things, there’s a 1-percentile rider who is working as hard or harder. And that 1-percentile rider will always have the edge.
#11
Senior Member
Famous cyclists are not born of famous parents. Most come from a background that where grinding it out on a bike is for many, just grinding it out to make a life in a way that's may be better than... e.g., picking tomatoes.
#12
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Genes help, but the people with the absolute best genetics for cycling, bodybuilding, violin playing, brain surgery, tennis... may never know. What we see are the people who get exposed, are interested, work hard, get lucky, etc.
#13
Banned.
Thread Starter
#14
Senior Member
Lets say "good" genes = talent.
So the sport that has less rules needs more talent.
The sport with more rules needs less talent.
Obviously most sports require some talent I'm just using a simple way of expressing it.
For example, if it's a 100 meter Sprint, that will require a lot of talent and less strategy.
But if it's a MMA fight that's gonna require less talent and more skillset and strategy.
So where does cycling stand given my interpretation?
So the sport that has less rules needs more talent.
The sport with more rules needs less talent.
Obviously most sports require some talent I'm just using a simple way of expressing it.
For example, if it's a 100 meter Sprint, that will require a lot of talent and less strategy.
But if it's a MMA fight that's gonna require less talent and more skillset and strategy.
So where does cycling stand given my interpretation?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
https://www.amazon.ca/Sports-Gene-Ex...s%2C147&sr=8-1
This is a good book on the subject of nature vs nurture with pro athletes.
This is a good book on the subject of nature vs nurture with pro athletes.
#16
Banned.
Thread Starter
https://www.amazon.ca/Sports-Gene-Ex...s%2C147&sr=8-1
This is a good book on the subject of nature vs nurture with pro athletes.
This is a good book on the subject of nature vs nurture with pro athletes.
thanks for posting
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
If you mean get a USAC license that says pro - possible if your size specs out.
There are outstanding athletes that are not the body type. I doubt U Bolt could be a pro cyclist. His genes seem fine.
Last edited by Doge; 01-27-20 at 07:41 PM.
#18
Senior Member
at the very top level (Tour), you absolutely need genetics.
There is no effin way any average Joe who trains 5 days/wk will be able to climb anywhere close to any pro who decides to only train 2 days/wk.
There is no effin way any average Joe who trains 5 days/wk will be able to climb anywhere close to any pro who decides to only train 2 days/wk.