Chain Length 11-34T -> 11-30T
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 468
Bikes: Domane SLR7 Project One
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked 173 Times
in
105 Posts
Chain Length 11-34T -> 11-30T
My Trek Domane came with an 11-34T cassette but for my local road rides around here I don't need that low of gearing so I've ordered an 11-30T for the tighter gear ratios. Rear mech is an Ultegra RD-R8000-GS med. cage.
Is there any reason I can't leave the chain length as it is when I run the 11-30T? When I ride steeper terrain I would like the option to go back to the 11-34T cassette but it would make things simpler if I could use the same chain instead of having dedicated chains for each cassette.
Thanks.
Is there any reason I can't leave the chain length as it is when I run the 11-30T? When I ride steeper terrain I would like the option to go back to the 11-34T cassette but it would make things simpler if I could use the same chain instead of having dedicated chains for each cassette.
Thanks.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Llano Estacado
Posts: 3,702
Bikes: old clunker
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 684 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 105 Times
in
83 Posts
My Trek Domane came with an 11-34T cassette but for my local road rides around here I don't need that low of gearing so I've ordered an 11-30T for the tighter gear ratios. Rear mech is an Ultegra RD-R8000-GS med. cage.
Is there any reason I can't leave the chain length as it is when I run the 11-30T? When I ride steeper terrain I would like the option to go back to the 11-34T cassette but it would make things simpler if I could use the same chain instead of having dedicated chains for each cassette.
Thanks.
Is there any reason I can't leave the chain length as it is when I run the 11-30T? When I ride steeper terrain I would like the option to go back to the 11-34T cassette but it would make things simpler if I could use the same chain instead of having dedicated chains for each cassette.
Thanks.
#4
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,004
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4343 Post(s)
Liked 2,999 Times
in
1,628 Posts
You almost certainly don't need a different chain for each cassette.
A 4t difference in the biggest cog does NOT mean you need a chain 4 links shorter.
Whether you can use your existing chain for the new 30t cassette depends on how closely they sized the chain for the 34t.
Here's how you tell - put your current chain in the big-big and see how far the idler pulley comes forward - if it's really maxed out, it'll look like this, and you'll be fine with the same chain on a 30t cassette:
If the chain is longer than that, the idler pulley will be hanging down lower and might not be able to wrap the extra length with the smaller cassette. If you want to make sure - resize the chain like this or put on a new chain sized like this for the 34t.
A 4t difference in the biggest cog does NOT mean you need a chain 4 links shorter.
Whether you can use your existing chain for the new 30t cassette depends on how closely they sized the chain for the 34t.
Here's how you tell - put your current chain in the big-big and see how far the idler pulley comes forward - if it's really maxed out, it'll look like this, and you'll be fine with the same chain on a 30t cassette:
If the chain is longer than that, the idler pulley will be hanging down lower and might not be able to wrap the extra length with the smaller cassette. If you want to make sure - resize the chain like this or put on a new chain sized like this for the 34t.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT (Formerly Los Angeles, CA)
Posts: 1,145
Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Synapse -- 2014 Cannondale Quick CX
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
54 Posts
If your existing setup is, as an example, a 42/26 and 11-34 (just made up numbers) then your existing max tooth count is 76t, and minimum is 37t. The chain must be long enough to accommodate up to 76 teeth, plus chainstay length and derailleur S-takeup length. That same chain must be short enough to not cause derailleur cage overlap in the 37t setting of 26/11.
Let's say your new setup is 42/26 and 11-30. Now the maximum you must accommodate is a 72t configuration. The minimum is unchanged.
But I'll bet dollars to doughnuts that your 11-34 cassette has a cog somewhere around 30t. Maybe it's 29, or 31, but close to 30. There's no reason to think that because you went to a smaller cassette where the maximum rear cog is the same size as your #3 cog used to be would require changing the chain size.
"Require", I say... your drivetrain performance will be no worse using the same chain length. However, running a longer than necessary chain length is not optimal. Given that you are going to a smaller cassette, you can get away now with optimizing your chain length in a way that could possibly improve drivetrain performance more than was possible with the old cassette and its longer-chain requirement. In theory you could reduce the chain by four links (two outer, two inner) and possibly improve performance slightly because there will be less slack for the derailleur to take up. The smaller cassette enables you to run a chain length that is less demanding on the derailleur's capacity.
Now if your minimum setting changed too; lets say you went to a 10t smallest rear cog... in that case it may be necessary to remove a link to eliminate derailleur cage overlap in the small/small setting. Or if you went to a 36t rear cassette, it may be necessary to add two links if your chain was already as short as possible before going to a larger cassette.
It's also worth mentioning that if your chain has more than a thousand miles on it, cassette swap time is chain replacement time too. True, chains last a lot longer than 1000 miles if properly cared for. But a brand new cassette is less prone to early wear when it's not mated to a chain that has any degree of stretch (wear). My suggestion is this: Buy your new chain. Then resize your old one and ride around a bit to test the size. If it is too short or too long, it's better to discover this with the chain you're about to throw away than with the new one.
Let's say your new setup is 42/26 and 11-30. Now the maximum you must accommodate is a 72t configuration. The minimum is unchanged.
But I'll bet dollars to doughnuts that your 11-34 cassette has a cog somewhere around 30t. Maybe it's 29, or 31, but close to 30. There's no reason to think that because you went to a smaller cassette where the maximum rear cog is the same size as your #3 cog used to be would require changing the chain size.
"Require", I say... your drivetrain performance will be no worse using the same chain length. However, running a longer than necessary chain length is not optimal. Given that you are going to a smaller cassette, you can get away now with optimizing your chain length in a way that could possibly improve drivetrain performance more than was possible with the old cassette and its longer-chain requirement. In theory you could reduce the chain by four links (two outer, two inner) and possibly improve performance slightly because there will be less slack for the derailleur to take up. The smaller cassette enables you to run a chain length that is less demanding on the derailleur's capacity.
Now if your minimum setting changed too; lets say you went to a 10t smallest rear cog... in that case it may be necessary to remove a link to eliminate derailleur cage overlap in the small/small setting. Or if you went to a 36t rear cassette, it may be necessary to add two links if your chain was already as short as possible before going to a larger cassette.
It's also worth mentioning that if your chain has more than a thousand miles on it, cassette swap time is chain replacement time too. True, chains last a lot longer than 1000 miles if properly cared for. But a brand new cassette is less prone to early wear when it's not mated to a chain that has any degree of stretch (wear). My suggestion is this: Buy your new chain. Then resize your old one and ride around a bit to test the size. If it is too short or too long, it's better to discover this with the chain you're about to throw away than with the new one.
Last edited by daoswald; 05-31-19 at 02:14 PM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,076
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
If you're not decreasing the size of the smallest chainring or the smallest cog, you don't need to shorten the chain.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 468
Bikes: Domane SLR7 Project One
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked 173 Times
in
105 Posts
Thanks guys. The second cog on the 11-34T is a 30. So it would be the same as that only in the inner most position instead of the second. May have to wind the B screw in a bit get the proper spacing to the new smaller big cog. I'll put it on give it a try but I'm guessing it will be fine. If not, I'll shorten one of my chains as required.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
"Require", I say... your drivetrain performance will be no worse using the same chain length. However, running a longer than necessary chain length is not optimal. Given that you are going to a smaller cassette, you can get away now with optimizing your chain length in a way that could possibly improve drivetrain performance more than was possible with the old cassette and its longer-chain requirement. In theory you could reduce the chain by four links (two outer, two inner) and possibly improve performance slightly because there will be less slack for the derailleur to take up. The smaller cassette enables you to run a chain length that is less demanding on the derailleur's capacity.
#9
Really Old Senior Member
You'll be fine!
You'll have an extra link set to spread the chain wear. AND the ability to switch back to the 34T without having to lengthen it.
I doubt you'll need to touch the B screw.
Just ride it.
You'll have an extra link set to spread the chain wear. AND the ability to switch back to the 34T without having to lengthen it.
I doubt you'll need to touch the B screw.
Just ride it.
Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 05-31-19 at 08:42 PM.
#10
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
Unless the chain droops on the little-little combination, you will be fine.
#11
Really Old Senior Member
#12
Senior Member
It's a mistake to think that properly sized means the shortest possible chain length. The longest works just as well. As long as you don't exceed the RD's wrap capacity, the little/little method works perfectly. It's what campagnolo recommends.
Likes For davidad: